-Neipezi wrote:

hello hentai owo

Video Information

• - Framerte : 60.0 fps
  - Video Bitrate : 1000 kbit/s
  - File Size : 10.6 MB
  - Length : 1:29
  - Blu-Ray Files (1080p) Encoded
  
  Go to the Download (Dropbox)

quality is not very good Thanks for the better quality video!

[Easy]
- you hear a clap sound on slider ticks. you can add the "soft-slidertick 2". I prefer not to use slidertick hitsounds.
00:15:402 (3) - clap add? I don't think so. It doesn't match my hitsound pattern.
01:07:059 (1,2,3) - when the "hai hai hai" in the lyrics, would you add the whistle? (included in other notes) hard to use whistle there without messing with the sampleset and other stuff because I'm also using other custom hitsounds on those notes, and I'd have to create more custom sets in order to do that. I don't think it's so important to use whistle there.

[Normal]
00:16:846 (3) - would you like to add whistle of soft hit sound is not custom? There's no drums on head or end of the slider, so I don't use hitsound on it.

[Hard]
00:25:027 (7) - NC add?
00:32:247 (5) - ^
Added some new combos.


please wait sleep, we will work again
Edit : perfect map, setting.. must register as soon as possible rankings

LixRei wrote:

Came from mod queue... (hi again)
Damn; map's too perfect. Not much to do here; just pointing out some little misses.

[Normal]

1. 01:22:461 (1,2) - Overlaps don't seem that well... That also applies to 01:25:027 (1,2) Overlap is fine imo.
2. And I think you need to decide if stacking notes with 1/2 or 1/1 beat of separation... Sorry if I'm unclear here. I know what you mean, but I made sure it was pretty obvious, as I only used 1/1 stacks for the ends of phrases where there are the claps and vocal "hai hai".

[Hard]

1. 00:53:102 (2,4) - Stack those two. Will look better. ok

[Insane]

1. 01:03:209 (1,2,3,4) - Putting those short sliders here... are you sure? If you are, at least reduce a little the distance of separation (I personally prefer to turn those in streams). Reduced spacing.
2. 01:26:311 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - I think this pattern can be better if you shape it as a hexagon. No, I prefer to have increasing spacing.

That's all...
I owe you some proper mod (or you're just too good for me?).
Good luck! (this deserves to be ranked ASAP).

Gray Veyron wrote:

Hey, From my queue!

firetruck, so many diffs, I'll mod the first three diff instead.
Here's my die-hard mod ;__;

[> General <]

1. - Why should you add bladedance when you've used another one for a space(blade dance)? It's counted on the title. Some sources list it without space and some with, so I want users to be able to find it either way. I included tags blade dance because some users may search for the full title of the anime "seirei tsuki no blade dance" in quotation marks, so this is to help them find it.
2. - Remove anime from tags? It'll be counted on the genre later. I know there are other maps are doing it, but i think it's much pressure when adding it there. Is it unrankable to do this? I think I want to keep it because some users don't know how to search properly by genre and will just put "anime" as search query, so I want them to be able to find the map that way.

[> Easy <]

1. 00:02:247 (3,2) - Almost an overlap, I know you want to do it for blanket or some reason, imo, it doesn't fit well here. I don't think overlap is problem here. It fits fine to me.
2. 00:04:813 (3,1) - I think the flow broke a bit here, since the slider's position is away-off and nothing front of it, just behind it. I'll just say; Curve on the straight slider for blanket reasons. No, I think this flows well and gives stronger emphasis to (1).
3. 00:06:739 (2,3) - Too straightic, make a Wave or a Claw formation here. uhh.. what? I think straight sliders play fine here?
4. 00:18:289 (1,2,3) - Make a Cycle formation here. ? I think it's fine as it is now.
5. 00:22:781 (4,5,1) - Instead of stacking on Easy diffs, make a triangle formation here. I think stack is not a problem for 1/1 here because I only use it in those parts of the phrase near the end with the claps and vocal "hai hai" and I think it matches the song well.
6. 00:25:348 (4,5,1) - ^ ^
7. 00:29:199 (2,3) - Try reposition this slider a little and direct to the slider (3)'s head. It's fine.
8. 00:33:049 (4,5,1) - Same as 00:22:781 (4,5,1) - Same.
9. 00:35:616 (4,5,1) - ^ ^
10. 00:49:749 (3) - Remove the Finish here, the beat is not likely strong enough here. Where? If you mean 00:50:375 then I think those finishes fit well since there is cymbal in the music.
11. 00:50:375 (3) - I don't think you need a reverse here, reduce and add a 1/1 slider next to this slider. It doesn't really make a difference to me.. But is there any reason why 2/1 + 1/1 would be better? I think the current rhythm is fine too, and simpler to play.
12. 01:00:001 (2,3,4,1) - Same as 00:22:781 (4,5,1) -, How about a diamond formation here. Same
13. 01:10:910 (2,3) - Same as 00:06:739 (2,3) - ?
14. 01:18:610 (2,3) - ^ ^
15. - Nothing to say here. Great~

[> Normal <]

1. 00:02:888 (1,2) - This overlap looks beutiful to you, but to me, Not very much. Make a Wave formation or blanket. It's fine.
2. 00:04:172 (3,4,5,1) - Making a diamond formation looks fitting here, It's a little symmetry, but just give it a try > http://puu.sh/b7k13/be4c9b34fd.png Stack is better for emphasizing the vocals imo.
3. 00:06:418 (3) - Curve this slider downgrid? or make the formation like you did already here 00:08:985 (3,4) - Current shape/positioning flows better.
4. 00:17:327 (4,5,6,1) - Same as 00:04:172 (3,4,5,1) - Same.
5. 00:18:931 (2,3) - Reposition the slider (3) front of the slider (2)'s tail. Makes no difference to me.
6. 00:25:349 (5,6,3) - Stack everything in, Or is it impossible? It's not possible, and (5) is already not visible by the time (3) renders, so it doesn't matter.
7. 00:33:690 (1,2) - Make a symmetry here? No..?
8. 00:37:862 (4,2) - Overlap, or on purpose? It looks alright.
9. 00:40:749 (4) - Same reason as the previous diff, Are you letting the finish hitsound follow the vocal? well, the vocal is a little weak with the beat here, It might not fit on the song track at all. Same.
10. 00:45:241 (4,5,1) - Same as 00:33:690 (1,2) - No, current pattern flows better.
11. 01:00:482 (3) - Curve like 00:59:359 (1) - ? a bit of symmetry if so. No.
12. 01:17:327 (1,2) - Same as 00:33:690 (1,2) - No.
13. 01:25:027 (1,2) - Same as 00:02:888 (1,2) - Same.
14. - Another great diff, nop nop!

[> Hard <]

1. - AiMod is such a soab on the spacings you have >_>
2. 00:00:642 (2,5) - Stack slider tail on head. sure
3. 00:03:530 (3,4,5) - Make a Squared Cycle formation here, just curve the slider (4) downright grid. A little nice flow it would be. I like the current flow (the intention is to feel dance-like)
4. 00:05:134 (8,1,2) - Maybe AiMod is right, this spacing looks a bit confusing, since you're using 1.4x or 1.5x spacing between circle (8) and slider (1). Try fixing that, There are more of them on other parts of the song track, find it yourself, I'm avoiding big mods. Not sure what you want me to do here, I think it plays fine too, but do you have a suggestion?
5. 00:09:947 (6,7) - Make a triangle formation here, since you never did this on other tracks. Stack is better for emphasis.
6. 00:16:364 (2,3,4) - Balance the triangle here, it looks weird when the spacing is fine but the pattern is not. Made an equilateral triangle.
7. 00:25:027 (1,2,3) - Try this pattern a bit, It might look okay when a little jump is there > http://puu.sh/b7lOL/d778b07a0c.png I prefer the current smoother flow, and not make such a huge jump to the next (1).
8. 00:30:482 (8,9,1,2) - Make symmetry here? Curve or uncurve, it's still well-flowed. No. It goes against my slider shape pattern (straight sliders on those strong claps at the end of the phrase, curve sliders for those parts with more motion in the music.
9. 00:35:295 (1,1) - Same as 00:00:642 (2,5) - ok
10. 00:43:637 (4,1) - Overlap, or on purpose? Why is it necessary to avoid overlap?
11. 00:53:584 (4,1) - Same as 00:30:482 (8,9,1,2) - Not sure what you mean for this.. But I don't think symmetry is needed here.
12. 00:59:359 (1,2,3) - Balance this Cycle formation. ok
13. 01:03:771 (7) - I still think this reversed slider doesn't fit the song track here, reduce, and add 1/2 slider or two stacked circles. I think current rhythm fits better than those you suggested.
14. 01:14:760 (1,5) - Why not stack the slider (5)'s head on the slider (1)'s tail? It would be a triangle formation, and avoiding the overlap with 01:15:081 (2,3) - Stacked with (2,3) instead, because it flows smoother.
15. 01:22:461 (1,2) - Same reason, Make a Claw or Wave formation here. I don't know what that means.
16. - Pretty much challenging, but i'm not amazing with the spacing(Jumps aren't included) you have there. gg

Good quality of the mapset ~ \(^o^/)

yf_bmp wrote:

Req from KwaN & yf's Modding Queue

Notice:

• 
  

1. Red: Be unrankable
2. Blue: Be important
3. Black: Suggestions

[Dance]

1. I think adjusting cs to at least 4.7 is better, coz your style in this map doesn't fit cs5 imo. ok
2. 00:00:322 (1,2,3) - try make the spacing equal, or in a bit more difference it's fine since (1,2) has smooth motion while (2,3) is opposing, giving the illusion that spacing is similar.
3. 00:02:888 (1,2,3) - ^ ^
4. 00:01:605 (5,6,7,8,1) - try make them as a five-pointed star? The pattern now looks messy I think it flows too rigid that way, and makes it difficult for me to keep the next pattern on screen.
5. 00:04:172 (5,6,7,8,1) - ^ ^
6. 00:07:059 (1,3) - these two looks too close, should increase the spacing. and same as 00:07:701 (3,2) - ok
7. 00:08:022 (1) - try finish on the head No, it's excessive imo.
8. 00:09:947 (2) - try to add finish to follow the music ok
9. 00:13:156 (1) - finish on the head no
10. 00:15:081 (1) - finish on the head ok
11. 00:15:723 (1) - it's better to remove whistle here, since it will sounds odd with finish It sounds fine.
12. 00:25:990 (1) - ^ ^
13. 00:37:701 (2) - this 1/4 slider doesn't fit the music at all imo, and unnecessary overmapped. I recommend just use a note here. ok
14. 00:52:140 (6,9) - a little mess. try separate them I think it's fine.
    
    not much to mod except some small issues.
    
    map's quality is ok for rank
    
    kiai is good, but didn't you think the pattern in other parts is a little ordinary? or just say like.. not very splendid.
    just like 00:05:455 (1,2,3,4) - such pattern. it is only used by 1/2 slider to spam the rhythm. And this map have too many such patterns. So how about trying more patterns? The map will be more fun. I know this. My original intention of the map was just for experimenting with mapping style. I will probably remove this diff before ranking.

[Insane]

1. 00:13:156 (1,3) - uhm.. I suggest separating them It's fine.
2. 01:10:749 (1,3,4) - ^ ^
3. 00:38:824 (1,3) - make a blanket ok
4. 01:26:311 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - make them to a shape? the spacing now looks a little messy No, I like it this way to have increasing spacing between each pair of notes.
   
   I think this diff is more splendid than Dance diff. You did a good job on this diff I think so too.

[Very Hard]

1. 00:21:979 (5,7,8) - these objects are a little close imo. I think it's fine.
2. 01:06:739 (6,1) - ^ ^
3. 01:05:134 (1,2,3,4) - make them as a shape I prefer this way to have small spacing between (2,3), jump between (3,4).

[Hard]

• I think this diff is a little harder. For the diff spread, I recommend to decrease the standard spacing between the objects. I prefer to keep the standard spacing because it flows properly this way, but reduced some jumps.

[Normal]

1. 00:02:247 (4,5,1) - too many overlaps may confuse new players I think it's quite simple to read.
2. 01:24:386 (4,5,1) - ^ ^

[Easy]

1. 01:05:134 (2) - remove clap I think it fits.
2. 01:14:760 (4) - NC Fixed.
   
   nothing to say

Be attention to your diff spread between Normal and Hard. It is not reasonable now. I will continue working to reduce that gap.
Good luck

spring wrote:

From soga's queue. LOL
I'm a modding beginner now ,so my mod may not useful.

easy

1. 01:12:193 (1) - extend the end to 01:13:156 ,I felt a little strange with the empty beat while I was playing .LOL(Perhaps not following the vocal is a reason ) I think it's fine.

normal

• 
  All good.OVO

hard

1. 01:00:001 (3) - Ctrl +G ok
2. 01:06:418 (3,4) - I think that making them parallel would looks good ok
3. 01:22:461 (1) - How about shaping it like http://puu.sh/brKAl/979a28793d.png Current shape flows better.

very hard

1. 00:05:134 (5) - consider to curve this slider no

insane

1. 01:03:530 (3,4) - exchange these two sliders' position No, I think it flows better as it is.

dancing

1. 00:02:567 (2) - Puting a note might be better than a slider I prefer slider.
2. 00:05:134 (2) - ^ ^
3. 00:20:856 (1) - Ctrl +G might be better OVO it is not.

over here,good luck to you

iMage-- wrote:

yo cloud~ yo
thank you this >w<

General

1. add Combo color! right!

Easy

• 
  Good.

Normal

1. 00:02:247 (4,5,1) - to be unified with 00:04:813 (4,5,1) so I think to change 00:02:247 (4,5) placement is better. x:164, y:340? I don't agree. Those two parts are different, in that the second one is more accented on (1) in the music, so I separated it to make the note on (1) stronger.
   if you change here, i recommend to change 00:02:888 (1) angle too.
   
   SPOILER

   
2. 01:24:386 (4,5,1) - same. Same

Hard

1. remove widescreen support ok

Very Hard

1. remove widescreen support ok
2. 01:03:851 (6) - add NC. because different length with 01:03:209 (5). hmm.. okay

Insane

1. HP6.7→HP6~6.3. because this diff has little new combo. so i think HP6.7 is too high. Fixed.
2. 01:26:311 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - maybe you can show more beautiful. I think the current pattern does not look bad. I don't want to make a regular shape, because I want spacing to increase between each pair of notes.

Blade Dance

1. 01:26:471 (2,3,4,1) - so cool lol thanks
   only it lol

Great mapset!
Good Luck~~

LordRaika wrote:

Request Mod from my Modding Queue

osuu~
here is my mod as request :

[Dance]

• 
  Hitsound is good ^^ nothing missing...
  jst smthg a bit that concern me...

1. 01:27:273 (1) - this slider art is okay... BUT , dont u think u can make it MORE symmetric >>> http://puu.sh/bu7mP.jpg No, it looks better the current way.
   Also, the 2.0x is a bit too fast imo, if someone ever have trouble or mention this again... its best that u change it to 1.75x or lower ^^ I think it's fine since I build into it.
2. for jump its good , but some of them are not really consistent, i dont knw if u are intentionally do that or not... but...
   for example : It doesn't matter.
   00:30:001 (7) - to next, the distance is 2.0x
   00:30:321 (8) - to next, 2.49x
   00:30:482 (1) - to next , 2.42x
   00:30:642 (2) - 2.31x
   00:30:803 (3) - 2.41x
   00:31:444 (2) - 2.72x
   as u can see some of them , the differences is way too far XD its a bit uncomfortable...
   but if u aim for symmetric , u can ignore it a bit , but jst an advice that u might want to check the distance ^^/
   the rest is cool

[Insane]

1. u can move this 00:12:193 (7) - to x:412 , y: 48
   then 00:12:514 (8) - to x:324 , y: 144
   and 00:12:835 (9) - to x:412 , y : 240
   while they still have the same distance and make a good pattern.... ( if u do the above , u might want to 00:13:156 (1) - CTRL+G this and readjust some distance ^^ ) I prefer the current placement.
   u can do this to the other same pattern as well...
2. 00:37:541 (5) - why this one have the different slider shape with 00:37:862 (6,7) - within the same combo...
   make it the same? Curved slider fits better there to keep smooth flow.
3. 01:04:172 (9) - make this a curvy slider??? No??? Why?
4. 01:15:883 (1) - again, different shape with the rest >>> 01:16:364 (3,4) -
   like u usually did 01:13:797 (7,8,9) - same shape on same combo pattern No
5. 01:13:797 (7,8,9) - also this three can be position better to make a blanket of where the start of 01:13:156 (4) -
   it will make a better round shape of 3 curvy slider... like this >>> http://puu.sh/buv5q.jpg No, that messes up the flow.

[Very Hard]

1. 00:26:632 (3) - u forgot bout this one? that can be a better bow...
   move the last anchor to X:132 , y:272 No
2. 01:13:156 (4) - why not move this to where 01:12:674 - this slider ends position? like this two >>> 01:12:193 (1,3) - Breaks distance, and hard to hit.
3. 01:14:760 - jst a suggestion that u change this pattern ^^
   since u already use this a lot and trust me ... many people will think that u jst copy paste this pattern XD It is copy/pasted.

[Hard]

1. 00:40:749 (6) - move this a bit high , to make 00:40:428 (5,6,7) - having same distance jump, 1.58x or else ok
2. 00:42:674 - from here, i expect u repeat this 00:42:033 (3,4) - slider and slider, as it fits the song better ^^ I disagree.
   slider also easier to be executed thou
3. 01:11:231 (1) - make this horizontal like this >>> 01:11:872 (3) - Why?

[Normal]

1. suggest that u end this slider 00:11:231 (2) - here 00:11:872 - and move 00:11:872 (3) - this here 00:12:033 -
   like u did here >>> 00:08:985 (3,4) - I think it's okay to have some variety in rhythm.
2. 00:35:295 (4) - pls make this symmetric as this >>> 00:34:332 (2) - ^^ No, it breaks flow.
3. 01:25:027 (1) - move this away , dont stack it triplet here XD I think it's fine.

[Easy]

1. 00:52:300 (2) - pls make this shape the same as this one >> 00:53:584 (4) - as they have the same sound ^^
   u jst have to flip it and its cool No.
2. 01:22:140 - add 1 note here will not increase the dif too much, try X:320 , y:248 It's unnecessary.

Thats all ^^
GL for ranked~

Manuxz Sixx wrote:

Hi o/ Sorry for the delay :s

Mod from: Manuxz's CTB & Standard Modding Queue OuO

Easy

00:04:172 (2) - Improves blanket. ok...
00:29:840 (3) - I find this problematic so better try: Ctrl+H and move x:96 ; y:24 No.
00:30:803 (4) - If you follow the advice above, then this also applies: Move x:48 ; y:237 -
00:04:813 (3) - You could make a blanket there. Prefer no blanket.
00:22:781 (4,5) - I do not think stacking is the best choice for a difficulty Easy consider changing this pattern and in the other parts of the map. It's fine.
01:06:418 (3) - Ctrl+J and located in the same place. No.
01:16:685 (3) - ^ ^

Normal

00:13:156 (1) - Ctrl+H and Rotate 20° y move at x:445 ; y:227 No.
00:19:412 (3) - This slider should start in 00:19:573 - No.
00:25:990 (1) - You could make a blanket there with 00:26:632 (2) - Prefer current placement.
00:29:680 (3) - As in 00:19:412 (3) No.
00:35:295 (4) - The design of the slider could be same that 00:34:332 (2) - No.
01:22:140 (5,1) - It's hard to read recommend relocate. No, it's fine.

Hard

00:15:402 (3) - Ctrl+G? ok...
00:57:113 (2) - Move at x:308 ok

That's all TuT Sorry to be of little help .... GD with the map >.<

-Nya- wrote:

Hey! From Nya's Anime Modding Queue
Sorry for the delay
Well, here’s my mod:

Easy:
Just change the OD to a two? No?00:28:557 (1) – Rather place this slider here: X:352 Y:136. It’s not really a problem; I just think it will support the flow better. It makes no difference.00:29:199 (2,3) – Rather blanket here. Like this: No, that flows awkwardly.
I just don’t really think you should overlap in an Easy diff.
If you don’t want to blanket, maybe just make the overlap a bit neater. Like this: Current overlap looks cleaner.00:35:616 (4,5) – Move these two hitcircles a bit to the left: X:84 Y:300. No, that makes it not aligned.00:42:674 (3) – Move this slider here: X:292 Y:307. No, that just breaks blanket.01:13:156 – Maybe add a hitcircle here Unnecessary.01:18:289 - ^ ^01:20:856 - ^ ^This is the only issues I found in this diff.

Normal:
00:03:530 (2) – Move this slider a tiny bit to the left to perfect the placement: X:8 Y:80 No..? I don't see how that is better.00:08:022 (1,3) – Make these two sliders similar. If it is similar, sorry. They do not need to be the same. Current shape flows better.00:10:589 (1) – Move this slider downward a bit: X:144 Y:332 so that it’s in-line with this slider: 00:09:466 (4) – No.00:12:193 (4) – Move this circle here: X:216 Y:72 Moved to align.00:13:156 (1,2) – Rather blanket? No.00:20:856 (1,2) – Make these two sliders the same (Copy and Paste) No.00:23:423 (1,2) - ^ ^00:31:124 (1,2) - ^ ^01:18:931 (4) – Move this slider to this spot: X:292 Y:164 No.01:27:273 (5) – Move this circle here: X:332 Y:336 No.

Hard:
00:15:723 (1,2) – Blanket here. No.00:19:412 (3,5) – Make these two sliders similar No.00:20:856 (1,2,3) – Change these sliders’ placement a bit so it looks neater. Something like this: How does that look neater? and that doesn't flow as well as the current placement.00:25:027 (1) – Move this slider’s tail here: X:168 Y:236 It makes distance to (2) too big.00:28:236 (8,1) – Improve the blanket Made blanket.01:04:813 – Maybe add a hitcircle here and place it on this slider’s head: 01:05:134 (1) – No.01:10:749 (5) – Rather do this? No.01:23:102 (2) – Rather this? No.
Just copy and paste this slider: 01:22:461 (1) – and then Ctrl+H.01:24:707 (6) – I don’t like the placement of this hitcircle. Place it here maybe: X:208 Y:8 No.01:25:669 (2) – Maybe this rather? No.
Follow the same directions like the previous one.

Overall, nice mapset.
Take my star!
Good Luck!

Oyatsu wrote:

Hello, from my queue.
[General]
Be ok, nothing to say

[Insane]

1. 00:02:888 (1) - I really feel it is stacked, and the pattern isn't nice for me. I prefer if it was: No, the current flow is a lot better.
2. 00:06:899 (6) - There is drum, if you created a jump here. I guess it will be so great. JUst with my feeling, drum is sensible with jump. If you agree, I sugguest moving to 285/242, so it will be stacked with 00:05:936 (2,3). The flow is better, i hope. That's too big imo. Stack is nicer.
3. 00:11:551 (4) - Opposite it, the pattern is more blanket and nicer. No, I prefer current pattern to feel more dance-like.
4. 00:13:156 (1,3) - The stack here isn't nice anyways, pattern is also no good. If you want like this, I prefer if it arounded 00:13:156 (1). The pattern is better, nicer with the way of seeing. No.
5. 00:22:461 (7) - Move to 240/141, it is more blanket for me. No, that ruins the blanket.
6. 00:32:728 (6) - Move to 293/215, ^ Your coordinates are wrong, but I improved the blanket.
7. If you fix above ^, plz move 00:34:172 (2) - to 293/216, so it can stack perfectly
8. 00:37:541 (5) - Like I said, jump at drum-sound is really great, let you try, you will see them nicer (like your notes - 00:40:108 (5,6,7) - ). Yeah, I sugguest changing into 2 circles. First one, you can put at 194/296. Second one, u can put at 352/285 ( it will be stacked perfectly with the tail of 00:36:257 (1) - ) No. I like the current pattern better.
9. 00:51:177 - There is voice here but 00:51:498 - here isn't. I sugguest moving slider 00:51:338 (5) - to 00:51:177. So rhythm is better for now. Ofc plz change the new pattern for nicer. It won't overmap with the current way I prefer to follow just instrument/drum here. It is consistent with other parts of the map.
10. 01:05:616 (6) - Strong instrument, NC maybe? No...
11. 01:07:059 (1,3) - With current mapping-school, I think 2 opposite sliders are a nice pattern, I sugguest 01:07:701 (3) - oppsite it and around 01:07:059 (1) - if you want, then ooposite 01:08:022 (4) - No, my current pattern fits my interpretation of the song better.
12. 01:08:343 (5) - NC, it should be logic with 01:10:749 (1) - No.
13. 01:10:749 (1,3) - I really don't like semi-stack here. Move 01:11:231 (3) - to more right, is at 483/288 No.
14. 01:22:140 (9) - It is around with 01:21:819 (8) - ? I really feel it isn't curve enough if it was really your plan. Let move moddile point or left-down. Try 70/269. No, the blanket is perfect as it is.
15. 01:25:027 (1) - Move tail point to 474/285, it is more blanket right now. No, I already made perfect blanket.

[Very Hard]

1. 00:11:872 (5,6) - The stack of slider with 00:11:231 (3) - are really bad for me. I still have a way in order not to stack but still keep rhythm. Try change from straight slider into curved slider? No, it's fine.
2. 00:37:701 (5) - Move to 410/110 is nicer for me. No, I like the current pattern.
3. 00:23:102 (8) - Tail is at 269/225, it will be // with 00:21:979 (5). NIcer pattern. I don't want it to be parallel.
4. 00:47:487 (4) - This jump is quite far, althought this is "Very Hard" diff but 1.8 for me is quite high. I think 1.6 is enough Reduced spacing.
5. 01:27:273 (5) - NC maybe due to strong beat. No.

[Hard]

1. Really, this diff is still "quite" difficult with the diff is called "Hard". This is like "Quite Hard" instead of "Hard" for now. Distance is so large, it is only easier than "Very Hard" be "Slider speed and Note Size". Everything for me is the same: Hard and Very Hard. Reduced spacing.
2. 01:23:102 (2) - I prefer to opposite with 01:22:461 (1) - I like this the way it is.
3. If you fixed above, 01:24:386 (5) - move to 59/125, so it will stack perfectly with the head of 01:22:461 (1) - -
4. 00:52:300 (3) - The slider pattern isn't nice for the placement. I sugguest using the straight slider and opposite with 00:52:781 (1) - . I like the current placement.
5. 01:03:209 (5) - NC, rhythm is changed. Not necessary. I'm following musical phrasing.
6. 01:26:792 - There is STRONG drum here, really bad if you ignored it. PLz add circle. That beat is weak.

[Normal]

1. 00:02:888 (1,2) - Stack in Normal, so BAD. Newbie can't see it at the first time when they play them. They aren't like noob player. I sugguest moving other placement pls Sorry, I really don't think it's bad. I like the flow of this placement, so I prefer to keep it.
2. 00:36:257 (1,2,3) - This rhythm is abit wrong for me, I can hear a whistle in instrument at 00:36:578 - and there is a quite strong drum at 00:37:380 and 00:37:701 - So I sugguest for new better rhythm. That rhythm is too complicated for Normal.
3. 00:38:824 (1,2,3) - ^ ^
4. 01:21:498 (4,5,1,2) - Like I said at the first mod stuff, when I was newbie, I really thought it is 1/2 instead of 1/1 :3 -
5. 01:25:027 (1,2) - ^ ^

[Easy]

1. 00:16:685 (2) - Move to 42/119 and move 00:17:006 (3) - to 85/195. So, the flow is better for now. Sorry, I don't think that makes it better.
2. Other is good for me

Umi wrote:

Hey cloud you'll be my first mod as BAT (who care?)

General

1. Video offset : 140, you can cleary see at the begining that it's a bit off with the music ok

Easy

1. 00:09:947 - i'd add a finish with volum 40% instead, to emphasise the cymbal ok
2. 00:14:439 (2) - ^ on end ok
3. 00:15:723 (1) - i'd rather see a normal finish on start fit way better. fine
4. 00:19:573 (3) - it need definitly a clap drum here. just put addition drum and then switch whistle with clap. ok
5. 00:20:535 (4) - it shouldn't be a clap here ? soft-hitwhistle2 is the same sound as custom soft-hitclap (same as default normal-hitnormal)
6. 00:25:990 (1) - same as 00:15:723 (1) - ok
7. 00:29:840 (3,4) - on tail of (3) and (4) should be clap not whistle Same as other part.
8. 00:36:257 (1) - how about shorten this slider by 1/1 and then add a note 00:37:220 - so u don't miss the clap 00:36:899 - I don't think it's necessary to cover that clap. I prefer to keep the long slider to match with the half-time feel in the music.
9. 00:38:824 (1) - same as above Same.
10. 00:40:749 - this finish is too noisy imo, and a green line volum 40% ok
11. 01:07:059 (1,1) - these two long sliders doesn't fit the song to me, i'd recude them by 1/1. okay..
12. 01:14:760 (4) - ^ ok
13. 01:27:273 (5) - Addition normal + finish only fit so much better (fix it in others diff as well) ok

Normal

1. 00:02:888 (1,2) - this overlap is quite confused and ugly :< how about this ? also if you agree then adjust also those at then end. Sorry, I'd like to keep it the way it is. I think it flows nice; and isn't really confusing, since the slider head and track are clearly visible.
   
   SPOILER

   
2. 00:08:022 (1) - missed a finish (volum 40%) Added finish, but I think 40% is too quiet.
3. 00:09:947 (5) - ^ Fixed.
4. 00:13:156 - ^ ok
   00:15:081 - again '-' fixed
5. 00:20:215 (4) - drum clap ok
6. 00:30:482 (4) - there is a clap here, u added it 00:28:236 (6) - so why not here They're different sounds. soft-hitwhistle2 (snare drum) fits better here.
7. 00:30:482 (4,5) - to avoid skipping the drum 00:30:321 - i suggest u this rythm and pattern, see and tell mle what u think. If u decide to fix it, don't forget to add a drum clap 00:30:321 - Tried it, but I prefer my current rhythm because I want to put more emphasis on the snare hits, and slider end doesn't work well for that imo.
   
   SPOILER

   
   
8. 00:34:332 (2,4) - it would be better if you have the same shape here :3 as u did 00:36:899 (2,4) - I don't think so. I want to keep 00:34:332 (2) as curved slider for round flow, and the use of straight sliders in the next phrase are for contrast, since the music changes distinctly.
   
   SPOILER

   

Hard

1. First of all your spacing is way too random, this is just my opinion but to me an hard is supposed to have a consistent DS with from time to time some jumps, i highly recommend to add one, 1,4x could be cool. Done.
2. 00:05:455 (1,2) - how about blanket them? Not sure if it's the same after i changed the spacing, but kind of blanketed.
3. 00:07:380 (6,7) - i would have used the same shape here, look neater imo ok
   
   SPOILER

   
4. 00:08:022 - listen carefully, there is a cymbal sound, add a finish to emphasise it ok
5. 00:13:156 - ^ ok
6. 00:20:215 (6) - drum clap on head, as you did it there 00:30:321 (7) - That's different.. but ok
7. 00:30:803 (9) - it should be a clap. See Easy mod reply for explanation.
8. 00:33:370 (8) - you missed a finish on head. added.
9. 00:51:177 - you're mostly following the voice, in the whole difficulty,but here you skip it. Maybe add a note (because i almost click during the play) It fits the music better this way, and it's consistent with how i mapped other parts of the song.
10. 00:51:338 (5,1) - forgive me but i'm a blanket lover ok
    
    SPOILER

    

Very Hard

1. well if u ask me this is an insane, but since u already have one, i guess it's good. This was originally Insane, but I reduced the settings, renamed to Very Hard and added the new Insane
2. from 00:00:322 - to 00:04:011 - this is actually harder than the begining of insane, isn't it strange for u ? i suggest u to add somes sliders, so it will simplify this part Added some sliders.
3. 00:08:022 - missing a finish (with volum 40%) added, but i think 60% is fine.
4. 00:13:156 (1) - ^ ok
5. 00:20:215 (8) - drum clap ok
6. 00:29:680 (5,6) - i would turn (5) into 1/1 slider so it follow the voice properly then add note 00:30:161 - I prefer to follow drum, and current rhythm matches drums well.
   
   SPOILER

   
7. 01:08:503 (6) - This 1/1 slider feel weird cuz u're totally ingoring the vocal 01:08:664 - try this rythm ^
   
   SPOILER

   
8. 01:13:637 (6) - /01:15:883 (5) - /01:18:771 (6) - same reflexion as above. ^

Insane

1. 00:08:022 (1) - finish 40% Added finish.
2. 00:09:626 (7,8,9) - the shape of this pattern can be improve, 2 examples. Current shape flows smoother for me.
   
   SPOILER

   
   or
   
3. 00:13:156 (1) - same as 00:08:022 (1) - ok
4. 00:15:723 (1,5) - personnal taste here, this kind of slider's shape doesn't flow good to me, the mouvement of mouse feel forced. i'd rather see a simple curve instead I think it's fine. It will be played like a curve anyway, but I just want the beginning part of the slider to be sharper than the ending part.
5. 00:29:680 (4) - turn into 2 notes ? No? I like the current rhythm.
6. 00:45:241 (1,2) - ctrl+g, try it, flow better imo Nice.
7. 00:51:177 - check what i said on hard diff Same.
8. 00:59:359 (1) - ctrl+g, increase flow toward 00:59:680 (2) - ok
9. 01:03:209 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - such a high DS it suprised me, also pretty hard to catch :< maybe reduce it Reduced spacing.
10. 01:13:797 (7,8,9) - check 00:09:626 (7,8,9) - Same.
11. other than this nothing else great diff. Thanks

Dance

1. reduce CS to 4,5 for a better balance ok
2. Fix HS with previous suggestion ok
3. 00:15:883 (2) -how about delete this note, so it give a little break before enter in the first stanza. hmm... okay
4. 00:19:412 (6,7,8) - fllow is really awkward, you could delete reverse on (6) then add a note 00:19:723 - stacked with (7,8) No, I think this flow is actually quite fun to play.
5. 00:21:819 (4) - this note is too far away and give a bad flow, i suggest u to move it x:204,y236 Moved. I hope it is better now.
6. 00:51:658 (1,2,3) - This triplet doesn't fit the song at all unlike the next one which follow the voice. consider delete (2) I think this fits. It follows instrument.
7. 01:14:439 (3) - this slider should be turned in the other way to flow toward 01:14:760 (1) - ? i guess u can skip at least one stack :p Fixed the flow (also kept stack :3)
   
   SPOILER

   
8. 01:27:273 (1) - hum sincerely u should avoid this x2,00 SV, people will just raged at your diff by missing the last slider. 1,50 is good enough. Difficult to maintain the shape... but okay, changed.
9. Good diff, just a bit repetitive.

PS : I started the mod few days ago, so i might point things that u already fixed with previous mods.

Really good set. I'd like to see more opinions concerning the hard difficulty before pushing this forward

xxdeathx wrote:

Osu needs more kneesocks!~

[General]

1. I'm pretty sure that Ni-Sokkususu refers to the voice actors of all the girls in the anime, so you should add at least the voice actors' names to the tags.
   From MAL: "Blade Dance (精霊剣舞祭＜ブレイドダンス＞)" by Ni-Sokkususu (Claire Rouge (CV: Ibuki Kido), Rinslet Laurenfrost (CV: Kana Yuuki), Ellis Fahrengart (CV: Shizuka Ishigami), Fianna Ray Ordesia (CV: Saori Oonishi), Terminus Est (CV: Ai Kakuma))
   I don't usually like adding character names unless their voice actors are actually singing, like in this case, so you could add the character names too. I will add just the voice actress names. I think it's not important to include character names since users are likely to just look up the anime title if they are looking for the anime.
2. Why does your soft-hitwhistle2 sound like a clap? because i want a snare sound and hand clap sound in the same custom set
3. Preview point starting at kiai should be better ._. nah, I actually like the current preview point better because it shows more different parts of the song in a short time.

[Easy]
Nothing specific, but you have no 2/1 beat breaks from 00:14:439 to 01:04:493, which means the player has to focus on 1/1 the whole time without rest. Although you have several long sliders, it's still better to have parts when the player gets to let go of the key. Good observation. Removed some circles.

[Normal]

1. 01:21:498 (4,1,2) - this slider ends overlap may be a bit much Sorry, I'd like to keep it the way it is. I think it flows nice, and the slider head and track are clearly visible.

Everything else looks great

[Hard]

1. 00:36:739 - It's best not to ignore such a strong vocal, especially since this one lasts a long time Changed the rhythm a bit.
2. Hmm the sliders in this section could be arranged a little nicer or more creatively Which section?
3. 01:11:551 (2,3) - can be parallel ok
4. 01:13:156 (4,5) - can blanket each other ok
5. 01:19:894 (1,2,3,4) - try making a geometric pattern with these 4, like Nah, I like the more flowy "random" arrangement.
   
   SPOILER

   

[Very Hard]
I would not call this a "very hard." Some parts are mapped like an insane, like the jumps at 01:00:001 (3,4,5,1) - and 01:05:134 (1,2,3,4) - and the part at the end is flat out harder than the insane, especially for someone like me who has trouble single tapping high BPM circles for more than a few at a time. I've tested that part a couple times and die every time. I'd much rather have you insert some sliders at the end to ease up the pressure of all those circles. This is intended as a light insane (relative to the other one), but I didn't want to call it "light insane". This was originally the "Insane", but I changed it since I added a harder one. Added some sliders to the end part.

1. 00:06:899 (6) - (and all points onward like 00:09:466 (6) ) the middle tick 00:07:059 you're ignoring has both a musical note and vocal, it's best not to ignore it. Right now that tick feels a little empty. My rhythmic focus is on drums rather than vocals.
2. 00:51:177 - This can be mapped too. Same as above.
3. 00:52:621 (6) - How about move it somewhere other than the slider end for more interesting play? No, I think slider end stack is better here, to make the jump feel stronger.
   
   SPOILER

   
4. 00:53:904 (6) - ^ ^
   
   SPOILER

   

[Insane]
Very fun, I'm sure with some effort I could FC it when it gets ranked.

1. 00:21:979 (6) - It feels weird to ignore the background music in an insane—I'd map the 1/2 ticks too. I think it's important to have some 1/1 sliders to make the rhythm more fun that just straight 1/2s. In this case, the 1/1 slider fits well here because it is emphasizing a held syncopated note.
2. 00:51:177 - Why not map this too? Focus on drums, not vocal at this part, and I think it feels weird to tap that part out.
3. 01:01:284 (4,5) - Looks a little nicer if you rotate (5) by about 8 degrees so it's exactly perpendicular to 01:01:926 (1) - and have 01:01:284 (4) - match (5) I actually don't want it perpendicular to (1). It's just a thing.. I don't know how to explain.
   
   SPOILER

   
4. 01:03:209 (1,2,3,4) - 1/4 sliders are a lot easier to read if they don't go back and forth >.< Hmm... that just doesn't play quite right to me. Changed the pattern a bit to make it more readable (and fun).
   
   SPOILER

   

[Dance]
Looks like Irreversible's mapping style with the small circles and curvy sliders xD

1. 00:39:626 (3,4) - Maybe put the circle first so you can have slider start on 00:39:787 which is both vocals and white tick. No, the current rhythm works better for me. It just feels right.
2. 00:40:428 (3,4) - Somewhat inconsistent that this is 1/1 while 00:39:947 (4,1) - shortly before it is spaced almost as big but is 1/2. Players might want to hit it early. I'd fill in the gap at 00:40:589 with another circle or move 00:40:749 (4) - further away. Changed (3) to a 1/2 slider instead.
3. 01:03:690 (4,1) - I think this jump is a little hard to make, being 1/4 and everything. You should be able to put it closer without affecting the star rating. Moved closer.

Eh this is already starred so it looks like you're pretty close to a rank, which I look forward to. Good luck!