ego_17 wrote:

change offset on easy diff too
easy
00:23:647 (2,3) - change to repeat slider like you did it before 00:16:785 (2) - fixed!
00:31:794 (6) - this note should be playeble, so circle mb? hm no, I like how it's placed currently
00:37:799 (5) - new combo fixed!
00:41:230 (9) - ^ ^
00:42:088 (1) - remove new combo ^
00:47:234 (4) - new combo ^
00:47:234 (4,5,6) - plays good but too hard - make it like this - 01:31:837 (2,3,4) - should be fine now
00:53:668 (2,3,4,5,6) - for easy try awoid more thet 3 circles in a row and for me its same as 00:14:640 (1,2,3) - but in another key so you dont need so many circles ^
00:57:956 (6) - stat from this place Fixed!
01:04:389 (2) - to many circles again and difficulty lvl incresed its ok to make harder in kiai part but not here i think replaced 2 circles by a slider
01:06:105 (6) - repeat offbeat for me make it simple slider or two half beat sliders starting on white tiks fixed differently
01:24:975 (1,2) - repeats again) I want to keep the break
01:34:410 (6) - new combo yep
01:35:268 (8) - remove last 2 repeats ^
01:42:130 (5) - ^ ^
and circles, theare is too much replaced by sliders
01:44:274 (7,8) - mb change to somthng changed
01:45:561 (1) - i point on it again) but this time its ok ) no changes
02:01:429 (1,2,3) - too hard changed
02:17:941 (2) - start it 02:17:726 (2) - and make longer fixed
02:22:375 (6) - new combo ^

hard
00:54:097 (3) - remove replaced by a slider
01:24:976 (1,2,3) - there is no need of using blue tics changed a little. I want to keep the offbeat
01:32:266 (3,4,5,6,7,8) - i see why you did this, but plasing them in stacks it not good and deleting 01:32:696 (5) - makes it more playable changed with sliders
01:34:197 (2) - del fixed!
01:36:127 (4) - one circle ^
01:43:203 (6,8) - del ^
01:47:063 (7) - ^ ^
01:55:855 (7,1,2,3) - ? its like copypasted on wrong beat) try to remap this place until 02:00:144 (4) remapped.
02:02:288 (1) - its ok that kiai overmapped a litle, but i think from now it nedds to be more calm ^
thats all for now )
mb a litle more in the future )
and try to give more attention on flow, in this map its very important : try to make notes follow simple lines, one by one(00:29:651 (4,1) - not like this, or this 00:33:082 (5,1) - 00:36:514 (5,1) - ) - remapped a little for some parts.

and for me hitsounds its just to make some beats and melody sound more clear, placing them on every second beat is kind too easy way (play this map or listen insane in editor https://osu.ppy.sh/b/23461 )
ps i need some time to respond for your mod - im a little busy on work for now

Gordon123 wrote:

[General]
all good but BPM : 70,00 No. It was 70 before, but the end was desynchronized (try by yourself)
[Normal]
00:42:088 (2) - replace slider > https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1787347 (In rhythm)

for this slider

The slider velocity alteration is too brutal for an easy diff, I think. Modified by another way.
[Hard]
good job
P.S. good luck Thank you!

Gaia wrote:

Heya~

[General]
Remove the slider sound? I think it'd sound a lot better - removed! yeah, it sounds better :3
A lot of straight sliders, would be more fun if you had more curves imo

[Easy]
00:27:506 (1,2) - looks like an awkward blanket should be fine
00:37:799 (1,2) - blanket better fixed
00:37:799 (1) - 00:40:270 - not stacked properly yep
00:41:230 (1,2) - blanket no, I like how it's placed now
00:54:954 (5) - to not overlap and blanket http://puu.sh/9ZUTO/867d71437f.jpg fixed by another way (for AiMod)
01:12:109 (7) - down instead of left so blanket? remapped.
01:24:546 (8,1) - aren't lined up now they are
01:32:266 (3) - weird whistle sound and I don't think you can use 1/4 for easy ^
01:35:268 (3) - Don't think you can reverse more than once in easy yes but kiai time. I'll see with the next modders.
01:42:130 (4) - ^ ^
01:43:417 (5,6) - not lined up now they are
01:43:846 (6,1) - try not to overlap I want to keep it Let's see what the other modders will say
01:49:850 (7) - same as above same
01:53:281 (5,1) - not stacked perfectly now they are~
01:57:569 (4,5,6) - blanket these okay but a little

[Hard]
Slow song like this, CS4 (maybe even less) sounds better to me will be too easy for a Hard diff D: but okay
00:15:497 (2,3) - line up straight fixed
00:16:784 (1,2) - ^ ^
00:20:214 (2,3) - both a little bit to the left yep!
00:39:514 (3,5) - not straight ^
00:41:980 (2) - not very sure about the 8th here. it should be fine
01:23:152 (4) - ^ ^
01:35:267 (2) - stack on 01:33:552 (1) - ? why ?
01:51:135 (1,3) - line up straight yep
02:10:863 (2,3) - blanket fine
02:20:299 (6,7,8,9) - not perfect square moved
02:22:375 (1,2) - not lined up straight ^

Nice and relaxing ^^ Great song~
GL from now on!! Thank you!!

FlobuFlobs wrote:

Easy

1. 00:18:071 (3) - this curve is a bit too sharp fixed with a blanket
2. 00:28:364 (2) - blanket here? remapped a little.
3. 00:39:944 (3) - spacing should be constant remapped all because of this stupid AiMod
4. 00:45:519 (5,1) - bad Blanket I don't see the problem with this blanket
5. 00:47:663 - add note not on the easy diff
6. 01:07:820 (7) - move the end a bit lower to avoid stack with 01:06:104 (5) - yep
7. 01:31:837 (2,3,4,5) - this is extremly hard to read changed
8. 01:57:569 (4,5) - bad blanket why ?
9. 02:07:862 (4) - copy this and flip and and snap it, looks way better yep!

Hard

1. 00:31:365 (2) - fix spacing ok
2. 00:30:508 (1,2,3) - isnt correctly lined up can't see
3. 00:34:367 (1,2,3) - incease spacing by 0,1x or 0,2x to avoid stack? fixed
4. 00:35:225 (3) - blank ? hm no
5. 00:35:225 (3,4,5) - incease spacing by 0,1x or 0,2x to avoid stack? no stacking here...?
6. 00:53:238 (1) - Fix spacing fixed
7. 01:13:824 (3) - move more to the right for a better looking spacing ok
8. 01:20:685 (3,4,5) - ^the same with left yeah
9. 01:23:152 (4,5) - space or blanke them, it looks like 1/4 unstacked
10. 01:27:977 (5) - move a bit lower for better spacing yeah!

• pretty good man,this diff is very suit to play for beginners.

1. Don't use too many circles in your map,create some sliders instead of them.If you always look the ranked maps,you ll see slider is very important object. Lost my pieces is a good example.The map ll be emptiness without sliders.00:15:497 (2,3) - you can use the slider instead of there two circles.etc...
2. 00:26:219 (2) - you can change it into a slider.
3. 00:29:221 (3,4,1,2,3,4,5) -
4. There are just a little bit examples,you can find more and fix in your diff.

pandorawindy wrote:

At your request,i come here mod your map for M4M;
First things first,I am a guy who can give you some suggestions to improve your overall quality.I don't concern the maps' rankability.
[Easy]

• pretty good man,this diff is very suit to play for beginners. Thanks

[Hard]

1. Don't use too many circles in your map,create some sliders instead of them.If you always look the ranked maps,you ll see slider is very important object. Lost my pieces is a good example.The map ll be emptiness without sliders.00:15:497 (2,3) - you can use the slider instead of there two circles.etc...
2. 00:26:219 (2) - you can change it into a slider.
3. 00:29:221 (3,4,1,2,3,4,5) -
4. There are just a little bit examples,you can find more and fix in your diff.

I don't think I'm overusing circles and I don't want to use more sliders because they make the beatmap too easy and I want to use them to emphasize the rythm.
However, I replaced some circles by sliders in the whole song, where I think some sliders should be placed.
I also am a fan of the soft music,so i love your song,i trust you can make your map better.

Jaltzu wrote:

GENERAL
I'm pretty sure you can change 69,95 BPM to 70. Noo I cant, try by yourself and listen the last 15 seconds of the song with 25%speed.

EASY

00:20:216 (4,5) - Don't stack notes in easy diff. Low BPM and good visibility. It should be fine if it's rankable.
00:47:234 (6,7) - Continue the slider till 00:48:306 and delete the circle. fixed
01:49:850 (5) - This multislider doesn't fit in the music in this position. fixed
02:01:000 (6) - New combo of course
02:03:574 (8) - Do not stack this circle under the slider tail. okay
02:13:009 (3,4,5) - Replace with: http://puu.sh/agOkM/fe2c201b02.jpg yeah
02:18:155 - http://puu.sh/agOum/5c825fcef8.png no

HARD

00:54:525 (1,2,3,4,5) - I think this part doesn't fit the music well. It's not bad at all when played, but I would still map this the same 'calm' way as everything else till this point in the map. Fixed by removing some elements.
Nothing else to point out. Love this.

Really lovely map. Good luck for getting it ranked. Thank you~

Jaltzu wrote:

GENERAL
I'm pretty sure you can change 69,95 BPM to 70.
it really becomes offbeat - i tried it

NORMAL

00:50:236 (6) - Continue this slider till 00:51:094. Delete circle 00:51:094 (7)
but i did it same about 2-3 times before (cos it sound same to me) and changing only this place? no/ and i think 00:51:094 (7) - must be playable so - circle here, or slider, not slider end.
01:35:267 - You could add something like: http://puu.sh/agOPI/d74f02e468.png
i intentionally avoided 1/4 sliders (just 2-3 here) they too short and overlap eachover - so no changes (it sound good and really fits, but i follow to another melody, not this ringbells - only in the end once..)
01:42:129 - ↑↑
01:48:991 -↑↑
01:55:853 -↑↑
02:11:293 (5) - NC
02:13:866 (1) - Delete NC
02:14:724 (2) - NC
02:15:152 (1) - Delete NC i want mark those sliders more...
02:23:164 (1) - ↑↑
im truing to follow melody not down beats here, but i splitted some long combos

mb we fix this star raiting issue later...

Really lovely map. Good luck for getting it ranked.

1. You haven't Break time, so not need 'Letterbox during breaks' check.
2. Not need 'Widescreen Support'. you not use SB.
   

1. 00:14:640 (1,2) - try blanket?
2. 00:48:949 (1) - spacing is so far. try 1.00 around spacing. beginner player confuse!
3. 01:35:267 (3) - maybe this slider confuse beginner player. (hard) 1/2 reverse slider more better imo.
4. 02:13:008 (3,2) - overlaps is looks bad. try change better.
5. this diff some stack notes. bit hardly play.

1. 00:39:943 (4) - add clap. i think fit.
2. 01:38:269 (5) - add whistle slider head?
3. 01:55:424 (6) - ^
4. 02:16:010 (2) - why use red point? (slider).
   

1. OD8 is too big. i prefer 7.
2. 01:34:410 (1) - remove NC. nothing mean imo.
3. 02:23:164 (2) - add whistle. because strong piano sound.

P o M u T a wrote:

hi

[General]

1. You haven't Break time, so not need 'Letterbox during breaks' check. Uh, okay, even if I don't think it will really change something
2. Not need 'Widescreen Support'. you not use SB. Already not checked.

[Easy]

1. 00:14:640 (1,2) - try blanket? okay, a large one
2. 00:48:949 (1) - spacing is so far. try 1.00 around spacing. beginner player confuse! Yeah! Didn't noticed that.
3. 01:35:267 (3) - maybe this slider confuse beginner player. (hard) 1/2 reverse slider more better imo. It's kiai time, and it's not soo hard I think.
4. 02:13:008 (3,2) - overlaps is looks bad. try change better. changed
5. this diff some stack notes. bit hardly play. I think it's okay, but I'll see with the next mods.

[ego_17's Normal]

1. 00:39:943 (4) - add clap. i think fit.
2. 01:38:269 (5) - add whistle slider head?
3. 01:55:424 (6) - ^
4. 02:16:010 (2) - why use red point? (slider).

[Hard]

1. OD8 is too big. i prefer 7. yeah why not
2. 01:34:410 (1) - remove NC. nothing mean imo. okay.
3. 02:23:164 (2) - add whistle. because strong piano sound. Nope. I like the current sound.

sorry. short mod.
good luck

handsome wrote:

m4m~

combo 1 and 2 are too alike modified a little

[HARD]
interesting, but its very linear and compressed. try to make full use of the playing field. i do acknowledge the challenges encountered due to the low bpm though. try to do more blanketing and curved sliders. also, keep ds constant, its much neater.

00:15:497 (2) - ds? for one pixel? yeaaaah, if you want, here's your pixel. xD
00:34:796 (2,3) - can be blanketed yep
00:52:380 (4) - NC here, remove NC after hm yeah why not
01:05:246 (7) - pretty ugly overlap, try to have the sliders perpendicular to the flow nope, I tried but AiMod disagrees.
01:08:248 (5) - too close yeah
01:11:465 (4) - incorporating 1/4 sliders into a stream is very confusing to the fingers. try having 5 and 6 stacking below the slider. no, I think it should be fine like this - and it's a Hard diff
01:23:152 (4,5) - too close no.
01:26:690 (4) - ^ centered
01:33:552 (1,3) - stack? yeah of course!
02:07:861 (3) - blanket yeah a little.
02:10:863 (2,3) - can be blanketed better, here's a guide (i havent changed it) with a REAL guide it's better. x_x"

SPOILER

[img]02:10:863%20(2,3)%20-[/img]

[NORMAL]

00:23:646 (1,2,3) - this portion is staggered weirdly, fix it
00:25:790 (5) - either blanket or let it flow regualrly
00:27:506 (1) - blanket

umm i'm falling asleep, its too slow for me, i tried though, :p

P o M u T a wrote:

hi

i rechecked hitsounds as promised to Neil

[ego_17's Normal]

1. 00:39:943 (4) - add clap. i think fit. added
2. 01:38:269 (5) - add whistle slider head? added
3. 01:55:424 (6) - ^ added
   
   and, added another hitsounds at kiai
   
4. 02:16:010 (2) - why use red point? (slider). listen to the song - there is some sort of bells ringing
   
   thanks !

/////////

handsome wrote:

m4m~

[NORMAL]

00:23:646 (1,2,3) - this portion is staggered weirdly, fix it intentionaly - they placed at curved line and so flow more natural, at oval form/
00:25:790 (5) - either blanket or let it flow regualrly i dont like blankets - that it changes ?
00:27:506 (1) - blanket ^

umm i'm falling asleep, its too slow for me, i tried though, :p

Blue Dragon wrote:

TO THE MOON YES GET THIS RANKED

theramdans wrote:

Hello!
random mod-overall not bad for first map but i found some issues here lol
You can make the bpm exact 70.00

Ovoui wrote:

slt


[ego_17's Normal]

00:22:359 (3) - Something like that works better imo

SPOILER

i want second slider go up to fit with next combo
01:44:703 (5) - move it to x=272;y=64 ? moved down
01:45:131 (6) - this is not symetric to 01:43:845 (4) - visible only in redactor
02:16:010 (2) - a curve slider is better imo i like it this way )

Hollow Wings wrote:

from Scorpiour's Modding Queue

ego_17's Normal

1. 01:35:696 (1,2) - blanket maybe sure
2. 01:49:420 (1,2) - ^, well, not a big deal thou i leave it like this
3. fine

theramdans wrote:

further modding

Sorry for rly long delay
Ive been busy and tired all this week so that I kept forgetting this

Here goes!

[Normal]~
OD > AR is aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
OD -1, AR +1
this settings not linked and redactor allows chose different AR-OD - so i can do that i want (low ap - it was 2 until bakari asked for 3 - and high juging for accurasy)

00:21:501 (2) - NC should be here instead
00:22:359 (3) - ctrl + j for variety? no - "i want second slider go up to fit with next combo"
00:28:363 (2) - NC should be here instead
00:35:225 (3) - NC should be here instead (you should already get the idea) i get it, but i dont want so many one combo sliders, and i want follow points
00:41:230 (1,2) - you can blanket this not this time
01:06:104 (4) - ctrl +j and reposition i like current flow
01:19:828 (2) - curve more for me 1 and 2 is alike - thats what i want
01:35:696 (1,2) - curve more + blanket ok,but already done
01:41:272 (3) - mid point [174,219], tail point [239,246] i try to leave it unchanged , mb rethink later
01:43:845 (4,6) - curve more i remapped a lite
01:46:847 (3,4) - blanket no (wait for it)
01:49:420 (1,2,3) - curve more + blanket i tryed to make 01:50:707 (3,5) - alike, so it like this now...
01:53:280 (2,3) - blanket OK!
02:13:008 (5,2,1) curve more + blanket i didnt like blankets - they break flow on easy\normal difs for me..
02:16:010 (2) - why suddenly sharp turn slider point? lol, use curve cos sounds i maped with it ( ring bells) didnt sount alike - different sliders
02:23:164 (1) - no NC and use circle instead, there is nothing after this tick intentional , its my reference to game (blue-yellow rabbit) and long slider for long last note

Nozhomi wrote:

Hi Neil~ as requested...or not ?

- General :

1. Désactive Widescreen Support vu que tu n'as pas de SB.

- Hard :

1. Tu as un problème de spacing. Du début jusqu'au kiai, je te vois passer de 0.89x à 1.2x. Garde un spacing constant, soit 1.10x ou 1.20x vu que tu les utilise le plus. Recheck tout ! Un remapping est prévu à ce niveau.
2. AR7 peut être ? AR6.5 est convenable imo.
3. 00:17:641 (3,4) - BLanket améliorable. Tu chipotes D: Amélioré un petit peu.
4. 00:25:790 (1) - Descend le un peu pour plus être dans le flow de 00:24:932 (4) - . obviously
5. 00:27:505 (1) - Problème de distance spacing que j'ai noté au dessus. Sur la liste des improvements à venir.
6. 00:31:365 (2,3) - Blanket pls. J'ai fait que j'ai pu... Sur un si petit slider.
7. 00:53:667 (3,4,5) - Je trouve pas ça super esthétique...je pense que tu peux le retravailler un peu pour rendre ça plus joli, même si tu dois y placer un léger jump entre les 3. les distances seront retravaillées, mais j'aime bien comment c'est comme ça.
8. 00:56:240 (1,2) - Améliore moi ce flow pls... Il est très bien mon flow.
9. 01:08:248 (5,1,2,3,4,5) - Le changement de DS est vachement brutale et innatendu, alors que tout était tranquille jusque là. Franchement réduit le DS drastiquement, 2.00x grand max. Ceci est un jump. Je modifierai plus tard ci nécessaire. C'est tout de même une hard diff.
10. 01:10:822 (1,2,3,4,5) - Toute cette partie tu change le SV, mais on voit que le DS est pas le même. Retravaille ça. C'est prévu.
11. 01:12:966 (2,3) - Bad blanket improved
12. 01:14:681 (1,2,3) - Fait en sorte qu'ils soient aligné. Je remapperai ça avec les distances
13. 01:16:397 (1,2,3) - Nazi stack. A la base c'était un troll pour les HD players. Mais, fixed.
14. 01:18:112 (1,2,3,1) - Pas beau ce triangle. Il est très beau mon triangle...?
15. 01:19:399 (1,2) - Fait en sorte qu'ils soient aligné. Fait. Bah, du coup, ça fix le triangle avec le stacking.
16. 01:23:259 - NC ici plutôt non ? Et le suivant à 01:26:690 - . Bien vu.
17. 01:33:123 (5) - Place plutôt ta fin de slider à 255:209 pour une meilleur esthétique. Euh, bah, ouais, si tu veux.
18. 01:46:203 (5) - Ici tu as un DS de 1.14x alors que pour le même écartement tu as du 1.00x ici 01:42:129 (1,2,3,4,5) - . Fait un choix et soit constant. Comme je te l'ai dit, le DS a trop changé au fil des mods, je vais remapper ça.
19. 01:51:135 (1,2,3) - Centre moi ça. Ça ne change rien.
20. 01:51:350 (2,4,5,6) - Pourquoi ne pas faire un square avec ces 4 la ? Trop difficile à faire, sachant qu'un des trois côtés est un triplet.
21. 01:54:138 (3,4,5,6) - Centre moi ça aussi plus joli quand même. Ramené au centre... Bien que ça ne change pas grand chose...
22. 02:05:717 (1,2,3,4) - Pas très beau ça. Et l'overlap est pas toptop. Je reverrai ça avec le distance remapping. Les hitsounds collent pas.

- ego_17's Normal :

1. Pls CS3, this slong is slow and don't deserve a CS4 for a normal diff. Also AR4 / OD4, because it's better than OD didn't exeed AR value.
2. I don't really get your logic for NC. Why not put them when music restart like 00:18:070 - or 00:21:501 - ?
3. 00:23:646 (1,2,3,4) - Improve alignment.
4. 00:31:365 (2) - Move it at 312:56 for better flow.
5. 00:37:799 (1) - Move it a little forward to improve flow with 00:36:512 (4) - .
6. 00:59:242 (3,5) - Improve a little this blanket.
7. 01:02:673 (1,2,3) - Center this pattern. Looks better.
8. 01:38:269 (5,2) - Use same shape for them for a better look no ?
9. 01:43:416 (3,4,5) - Center it by align 01:42:987 (2,4) - on the x axis.
10. 01:49:420 (1,3) - Use same shape (or do it for 01:50:707 (3,5) - ) and blanket 01:49:420 (1,2) - no ?
11. 02:03:573 (1) - Rotate it by -20° and replace it to improve flow.

- Easy :

1. CS2 ou 2.5. CS3 ne colle pas avec une Easy de ce BPM. Et peut être OD2 je sais pas. BPM low -> CS important. Et OD=AR ça me va bien perso.
2. Revois certains de tes NC qui sont trop long pour une easy imo.
3. J'ai pas pu vérifier le spacing parce que l'AiMod bug mais j'espère qu'il est constant. AiMod bug ? wut?
   AiMod ne détecte aucun problème sur mes diffs, j'ai fait en sorte que tout colle.
4. 00:14:640 (1,2) - Perfect blanket si tu le bouge à 352:236. Moved
5. 00:16:785 (2,3) - Overlap. Il est où l'overlap?
6. 00:34:797 (2,3) - Tu peux améliorer le blanket. improved again
7. 01:12:967 (1) - Curve le un poil plus. Ok !
8. 01:16:398 (6,1) - C'est pas l'enchainement le plus logique que j'ai vu. Le flow est naze aussi. Allez, hop, un blanket et c'est réglé.
9. 01:35:267 (3) - Je pense que tu verrais éviter les longs reverse sliders comme ça pour une Easy. Surtout que tu ne l'utilise pas à tout les moments ou la musique est comme ça (par exemple 01:38:699 (3,4) - ). Repense-y. Hm, j'y repenserai si quelqu'un d'autre me fait la remarque, en attendant c'est bon.
10. 01:47:277 (2,4) - Léger overlap. Non, là t'abuses, ça ne va tuer personne.
11. 01:47:705 (3,4) - Blanket pas beau. Il est beau mon blanket

Y a pas mal de boulot. Mais bon tu vas y arriver hein ? GL you two. Merci ^^
Mukyu~

Nozhomi wrote:

Hi Neil~ as requested...or not ?

- ego_17's Normal :
Pls CS3, this slong is slow and don't deserve a CS4 for a normal diff. it was 3 before, changing it again is step backwards, and it helps to make different star raiting thith easy
Also AR4 / OD4, because it's better than OD didn't exeed AR value. why they must be equal ? thats the matter?
I don't really get your logic for NC. Why not put them when music restart like 00:18:070 - or 00:21:501 - ? i have my own logic mb ?)
00:23:646 (1,2,3,4) - Improve alignment. i intentionaly made it like this//
00:31:365 (2) - Move it at 312:56 for better flow. moved a litle
00:37:799 (1) - Move it a little forward to improve flow with 00:36:512 (4) - . dont see problem here
00:59:242 (3,5) - Improve a little this blanket. they dont blanketing ) moved a litlle
01:02:673 (1,2,3) - Center this pattern. Looks better. okay
01:38:269 (5,2) - Use same shape for them for a better look no ? you cant see them both when playing - so im ok with them
01:43:416 (3,4,5) - Center it by align 01:42:987 (2,4) - on the x axis. its more smooth like i did
01:49:420 (1,3) - Use same shape (or do it for 01:50:707 (3,5) - ) and blanket 01:49:420 (1,2) - no ? i like this place like i did - you cant blanket whole map )
02:03:573 (1) - Rotate it by -20° and replace it to improve flow.improved

• 
  
  - 00:40:372 (4) - Si tu veux suivre le flow, il est plus au dessus, + Le nouveau combo est sur le prochain slider
  - 00:50:237 (2) - x148 / y180 ?
  - 00:55:812 (1) - J'aurais mis le nouveau combo ici
  - 01:35:267 (3,4) - J'ai peur qu'un nouveau joueur se plante ici, même si ça va très bien avec la musique. J'aurais mis un slider en zigzaguant (un peu comme ça
  SPOILER

  
  tu devrais essayer et voir si ça te plait)
  - 01:41:701 (3) - Tu ne veux rien mettre ici ? o: GENRE mon super slider
  - 01:43:417 (4) - Décale le de 2px à droite
  - 01:45:560 (1) - Je ne sais pas pourquoi un reverse, ça sonne bizarre, un grand slider plutôt ?
  - 01:51:136 (2,3,4) - Les trois à 316y fait plus joli je trouve
  - 01:55:853 (1) - Il fait quoi lui en mode combo color alone ? D:
  - 01:57:569 (2) - Même remarque concernant le reverse d'avant
  - 02:03:574 (3,3) - Des sliders suivraient mieux la musique, à toi de voir si ça fait trop après
  - 02:22:375 (1) - L'inverse d'au dessus, 2 circles !

• 
  
  Okay, so you have exactly the same AR than the Easy diff, and for a Normal, it's damn low !
  - 00:29:221 (3) - x400 ?
  - 00:55:811 (1,3) - combo here fit most with the music
  - 01:23:045 (2) - You should try a 1/4 slider here and start on the blue tick
  - 01:57:569 (3) - Something like that is better I think
  example

  
  - 02:13:866 (1,2) - Something wrong in the new combo here
  - 02:15:152 (1,2) - like before, mirorred would look better, rounded slider followed by squared slider seems strange
  - 02:22:375 (1,1) - Hmm... two circles ? Or remove one combo ?
  In many slider there's a small inconsistency in the flow, not something very bad, just some circle to move a bit.
  Anyway good job on it !

Disgallion wrote:

Heyaa, i'm a Disgallion.

General

Only one thing, and maybe the one that could cancel the ranking : The gap between Normal and Easy isn't big enough (I won't talk about Hard since NW told me that it will be remade) Hm ça devrait aller anyway.
Easy

• 
  
  - 00:40:372 (4) - Si tu veux suivre le flow, il est plus au dessus, + Le nouveau combo est sur le prochain slider definitely agreed.
  - 00:50:237 (2) - x148 / y180 ? nope car problème de distance entre le (2) et le (3) après. Je modifie différemment.
  - 00:55:812 (1) - J'aurais mis le nouveau combo ici agreed
  - 01:35:267 (3,4) - J'ai peur qu'un nouveau joueur se plante ici, même si ça va très bien avec la musique. J'aurais mis un slider en zigzaguant (un peu comme ça
  SPOILER

  
  tu devrais essayer et voir si ça te plait)
  Ce slider zigzag est absolument unrankable sur une easy diff. C'est le kiai time, je me fais plaisir.
  - 01:41:701 (3) - Tu ne veux rien mettre ici ? o: GENRE mon super slider unrankable comme dit ci-dessus
  - 01:43:417 (4) - Décale le de 2px à droite Il est pas sur une ligne droite mais dans un flow.
  - 01:45:560 (1) - Je ne sais pas pourquoi un reverse, ça sonne bizarre, un grand slider plutôt ? On appelle ça un offbeat :') (cc Ovoui)
  - 01:51:136 (2,3,4) - Les trois à 316y fait plus joli je trouve ça fait trop droit il est dans un flow
  - 01:55:853 (1) - Il fait quoi lui en mode combo color alone ? D: wtf effectivement xD
  - 01:57:569 (2) - Même remarque concernant le reverse d'avant CECI EST UN OFFBEAT XD
  - 02:03:574 (3,3) - Des sliders suivraient mieux la musique, à toi de voir si ça fait trop après hm, à voir peut-être plus tard!
  - 02:22:375 (1) - L'inverse d'au dessus, 2 circles ! on m'a déjà conseillé le contraire. Mais c'est vrai que je préfère comme ça.

Sinon c'est une bonne Easy, tout ce que je dis au dessus ne sont que des propositions et des avis !

Disgallion wrote:

Heyaa, i'm a Disgallion.

General

Only one thing, and maybe the one that could cancel the ranking : The gap between Normal and Easy isn't big enough (I won't talk about Hard since NW told me that it will be remade)

Normal

• 
  
  Okay, so you have exactly the same AR than the Easy diff, and for a Normal, it's damn low !
  bpm is low so ap is low too) i raized overaldiff so it harder to get 300 with same AP... raising AP didnt add star raiting, so no changes
  - 00:29:221 (3) - x400 ? it woud be on same line with 00:29:221 (3,4) , but changes DS - dont want to move whole section
  - 00:55:811 (1,3) - combo here fit most with the music you mean new combo ? i have enought 1-2 combos, dont want another one)
  - 01:23:045 (2) - You should try a 1/4 slider here and start on the blue tick this sound isnt on blue tick and didnt fit to normal
  - 01:57:569 (3) - Something like that is better I think i want to leave it unchanged
  - 02:13:866 (1,2) - Something wrong in the new combo here becose i wanted 02:15:152 (1,2) look more independent or separated
  - 02:15:152 (1,2) - like before, mirorred would look better, rounded slider followed by squared slider seems strange

  cos sounds i maped with it ( ring bells) didnt sound alike

  02:15:152 (1) - 2 bells, 02:16:010 (2) - 3 bells
  - 02:22:375 (1,1) - Hmm... two circles ? Or remove one combo ? bpm changed suddenly and its easier to hit sliders - they as long as notes for me and to colours its refference to game
  In many slider there's a small inconsistency in the flow, not something very bad, just some circle to move a bit.
  Anyway good job on it !