Can you offer reasons for why you wouldn't like it? Do you think the pp system is inaccurate, or perhaps the current score system is more accurate? If so, why?
forum
Add pp as a scoring system in standard mode
posted
Total Posts
318
I wouldn't mind this if both systems were side by side. As in, you could select
Top 50s by Score
or
Top 50s by Performance
the same way you select which gamemode you want to see top 50s in, at least on the web interface for beatmaps. In-game could just work with the dropdown like selecting country and friend ranks does.
I think being able to set a top 50 through your score opens the game up to be a lot more competitive to weaker players (Players who can HD+HR, for example, rather than DT), so it shouldn't be removed completely. If you removed top 50s by score, only the very best players would ever get a top 50s on the popular maps, so in the end, for a lot of maps, it would look very similar to the normal ranking system.
I think including both score systems would be a larger benifit. Maybe Top 50s by Performance could be the default, but I think maybe that would be too big a transition all at once. Including both seems like a better solution.
It would look pretty good on profiles too, imo:
[User] achieved Performance rank #42 on [Map] (osu!)
and
[User] achieved Score rank #14 on [Map] (osu!)
Top 50s by Score
or
Top 50s by Performance
the same way you select which gamemode you want to see top 50s in, at least on the web interface for beatmaps. In-game could just work with the dropdown like selecting country and friend ranks does.
I think being able to set a top 50 through your score opens the game up to be a lot more competitive to weaker players (Players who can HD+HR, for example, rather than DT), so it shouldn't be removed completely. If you removed top 50s by score, only the very best players would ever get a top 50s on the popular maps, so in the end, for a lot of maps, it would look very similar to the normal ranking system.
I think including both score systems would be a larger benifit. Maybe Top 50s by Performance could be the default, but I think maybe that would be too big a transition all at once. Including both seems like a better solution.
It would look pretty good on profiles too, imo:
[User] achieved Performance rank #42 on [Map] (osu!)
and
[User] achieved Score rank #14 on [Map] (osu!)
I don't understand why people are against this idea. It's just a matter of disliking change I guess, being attached to legacy methods.
Cause there are no rational reasons other than the technical problems, for this not to be implemented. If pp is the most accurate measurement of skill right now, why would you only want global/country player rankings to use it, but not map rankings? Map rankings should display an order based on skill obviously, and the most accurate measurement of that is pp right now.
Too bad I don't have stars.
Also this is a little off topic, but don't you think country rankings should use the same weighting method to calculate an overall country pp based on it's player's pps, the same way our pp is calculated based on our best performances? You know the [performance above*0.95] weighting. Cause right now it's almost exclusively based on active player number.
Cause there are no rational reasons other than the technical problems, for this not to be implemented. If pp is the most accurate measurement of skill right now, why would you only want global/country player rankings to use it, but not map rankings? Map rankings should display an order based on skill obviously, and the most accurate measurement of that is pp right now.
Too bad I don't have stars.
Also this is a little off topic, but don't you think country rankings should use the same weighting method to calculate an overall country pp based on it's player's pps, the same way our pp is calculated based on our best performances? You know the [performance above*0.95] weighting. Cause right now it's almost exclusively based on active player number.
I agree with this. While I do like the idea of having scoring system based on pp, another con to this not yet mentioned is that there are thousands upon thousands of scores right now (based on, well, score) that people would be pretty mad about if they spent so much time trying to get and suddenly weren't top 50 anymore. Having both systems works best IMO, it keeps the old score system for those who prefer it more as well as a new and generally more accurate one.Period wrote:
I wouldn't mind this if both systems were side by side. As in, you could select
Top 50s by Score
or
Top 50s by Performance
the same way you select which gamemode you want to see top 50s in, at least on the web interface for beatmaps. In-game could just work with the dropdown like selecting country and friend ranks does.
I think being able to set a top 50 through your score opens the game up to be a lot more competitive to weaker players (Players who can HD+HR, for example, rather than DT), so it shouldn't be removed completely. If you removed top 50s by score, only the very best players would ever get a top 50s on the popular maps, so in the end, for a lot of maps, it would look very similar to the normal ranking system.
I think including both score systems would be a larger benifit. Maybe Top 50s by Performance could be the default, but I think maybe that would be too big a transition all at once. Including both seems like a better solution.
It would look pretty good on profiles too, imo:
[User] achieved Performance rank #42 on [Map] (osu!)
and
[User] achieved Score rank #14 on [Map] (osu!)
Sounds good. Change is progress.
I'll put it really harshly and plainly: I don't care if you spent 6 years trying to FL the unforgiving marathon if someone else double times it. Your score is clearly in my eyes the most well attempted when using flashlight but it's still just pointless now that someone has a DT score. If you want to win by effort then you should doubletime the map with flashlight and prove that you're not only better but willing to try harder.
Another example because flashlight gets bad press. I don't care if you spent 8000 retries trying to halftime fc fourdimensions, you aren't even close to someone who gets a 1000 combo and your score shouldn't even be considered a thing compared to them.
One last example because halftime is another taboo mod. I don't care if you spent 60 hours playing and fcing image material with 98% acc and hd when someone else has a 95% hr fc. Your hd score ISN'T as good no matter what your actual score says.
Hopefully you are in the minority and this does happen.Ziggo wrote:
That'd be awful. I hope this will never happen.
I don't see why weaker players should even stand a chance, they're weaker, if they don't improve they will stay weak and die out of the ranking. Think of it like osu! natural selection, the weak die and the strong live on.Period wrote:
I wouldn't mind this if both systems were side by side. As in, you could select
Top 50s by Score
or
Top 50s by Performance
the same way you select which gamemode you want to see top 50s in, at least on the web interface for beatmaps. In-game could just work with the dropdown like selecting country and friend ranks does.
I think being able to set a top 50 through your score opens the game up to be a lot more competitive to weaker players (Players who can HD+HR, for example, rather than DT), so it shouldn't be removed completely. If you removed top 50s by score, only the very best players would ever get a top 50s on the popular maps, so in the end, for a lot of maps, it would look very similar to the normal ranking system.
I think including both score systems would be a larger benifit. Maybe Top 50s by Performance could be the default, but I think maybe that would be too big a transition all at once. Including both seems like a better solution.
It would look pretty good on profiles too, imo:
[User] achieved Performance rank #42 on [Map] (osu!)
and
[User] achieved Score rank #14 on [Map] (osu!)
This argument really just keeps coming back as the biggest slap in the face to things I want to happen honestly. I recall making a thread about nerfing halftime because it's just so strong on hard maps but it got shot down for the reason that people spent a lot of time trying to get their scores and so I had to find an alternative; now the same argument is back again here. If a score is weaker then I don't really care how long you spent getting it, the score is weaker and shouldn't matter in a competitive game. Effort shouldn't be rewarded, performance should be rewarded and that seems to be the direction the ranking system wanted to go with the introduction of pp, ppv2 and tp.Maxis wrote:
I agree with this. While I do like the idea of having scoring system based on pp, another con to this not yet mentioned is that there are thousands upon thousands of scores right now (based on, well, score) that people would be pretty mad about if they spent so much time trying to get and suddenly weren't top 50 anymore. Having both systems works best IMO, it keeps the old score system for those who prefer it more as well as a new and generally more accurate one.
I'll put it really harshly and plainly: I don't care if you spent 6 years trying to FL the unforgiving marathon if someone else double times it. Your score is clearly in my eyes the most well attempted when using flashlight but it's still just pointless now that someone has a DT score. If you want to win by effort then you should doubletime the map with flashlight and prove that you're not only better but willing to try harder.
Another example because flashlight gets bad press. I don't care if you spent 8000 retries trying to halftime fc fourdimensions, you aren't even close to someone who gets a 1000 combo and your score shouldn't even be considered a thing compared to them.
One last example because halftime is another taboo mod. I don't care if you spent 60 hours playing and fcing image material with 98% acc and hd when someone else has a 95% hr fc. Your hd score ISN'T as good no matter what your actual score says.
the pp in standard may not have changed much (if at all) but the other modes are still a mess. this is a good idea, but i think we better wait untill those are fixed first.
Topic Starter
And generally rhythm games become more difficult when they get faster. I don't really see your point, and I even mentioned that players will not only be able to prove their speed, but also their accuracy in my third point in the OP. I should also mention that most people would say pp represents accuracy better; would you like a 94% Hidden score to beat a nomod SS?
I don't understand why you see this as a bad thing. osu! isn't a game intended to hold your hand and make things easier; if it were, we wouldn't see beatmaps like FREEDOM DiVE and Rainbow Dash Likes Girls getting ranked. If the map is really so popular that most of the top 50 players on the game have tried their best on it, I think it's reasonable to expect that they fill the leaderboards. They are, after all, the best.Period wrote:
I think being able to set a top 50 through your score opens the game up to be a lot more competitive to weaker players (Players who can HD+HR, for example, rather than DT), so it shouldn't be removed completely. If you removed top 50s by score, only the very best players would ever get a top 50s on the popular maps, so in the end, for a lot of maps, it would look very similar to the normal ranking system.
I won't lie, I don't disagree. It's obvious the score system right now is very flawed, e.g. like you said HD is nothing compared to HR, DT is some tough stuff whereas FL is just spam retry until you memorize, and overall the system's a mess. PP right now is a much better system by far and when it comes to actually comparing scores and plays, the amount of pp given is a much better way to go. I worry more about how the rest of the community would react to this kind of change, for example a person who got #1 on a song with HDFL topping HDHR and DT scores by spamming it for hours won't suddenly like to hear they moved to #638 or... something. I dunno, but point is, there's people who spend hours trying to get top scores, not to get #638.jesus1412 wrote:
This argument really just keeps coming back as the biggest slap in the face to things I want to happen honestly. I recall making a thread about nerfing halftime because it's just so strong on hard maps but it got shot down for the reason that people spent a lot of time trying to get their scores and so I had to find an alternative; now the same argument is back again here. If a score is weaker then I don't really care how long you spent getting it, the score is weaker and shouldn't matter in a competitive game. Effort shouldn't be rewarded, performance should be rewarded and that seems to be the direction the ranking system wanted to go with the introduction of pp, ppv2 and tp.
I'll put it really harshly and plainly: I don't care if you spent 6 years trying to FL the unforgiving marathon if someone else double times it. Your score is clearly in my eyes the most well attempted when using flashlight but it's still just pointless now that someone has a DT score. If you want to win by effort then you should doubletime the map with flashlight and prove that you're not only better but willing to try harder.
Another example because flashlight gets bad press. I don't care if you spent 8000 retries trying to halftime fc fourdimensions, you aren't even close to someone who gets a 1000 combo and your score shouldn't even be considered a thing compared to them.
One last example because halftime is another taboo mod. I don't care if you spent 60 hours playing and fcing image material with 98% acc and hd when someone else has a 95% hr fc. Your hd score ISN'T as good no matter what your actual score says.
I think of this from an outsider's perspective, I myself agree that performance > effort and that's why I support pp as a scoring system. If anything, the problem is just avoiding making people mad, since nobody likes change.
I've thought about what you said and that made me think of a more of a compromise of an idea: if this pp scoring system gets implemented, then when it goes live, all top 50s and replays based on the old scoring system are archived somewhere else, like on the site, ingame in a separate tab (like Global Ranking: old or something), or just somewhere where you can still see it, but you can't submit score anymore to that system. In other words, if someone comes around and SS's Big Black with HD, rrtyui will still be #1 on the old scoring system because it won't submit there (though they might of course, be #1 in pp).
Either way this kind of system may not be quite ready to be implemented, as the pp system is still improving especially on gamemodes other than standard, but I would like to see this replace our scoring system at some time in the future.
Topic Starter
Updated the title to specifically call for the scoring system to change in standard mode only, at least for now.
Have some stars, I'd like to see this implemented as the main scoring metric. It would finally allow us to supercede our old best ranks on a map with better mods
Plus I think that it would be easier to find impressive replays.
My only problem with this is that it might be hard to implement.
Plus I think that it would be easier to find impressive replays.
My only problem with this is that it might be hard to implement.
I talk for myself here and its just my opinion on it.
I don't want to be tied to the pp system that much to be honest. I think mainly because this would allow you to miss more often with less consequences (but at a higher difficulty, yes I know). For example:
I play 'x' song with no mod, get FC with 1000x combo. , and get no pp from it.
I play 'x' song with DT, get 600x combo, with 3 misses, and get 5 pp from it.
In my eyes, this would be annoying. As it would diminish a full combo, by making a non full combo potentially be much higher in rank. (I understand the difficulty would be a lot higher with dt), Its just the fact that a score wouldn't need to be as "perfect" as it needs to be now.
In addition to that, top 50 rank means nothing to be honest. Your real ranking is already measured by the pp system. The top 50 rank is more of a honoring feeling rather than a skill measurer to begin with in my opinion . (You can look at any easy difficulty top 50 to realize this)
And, again, to me , I like that not everything is tied to the pp system. Besides it is more straight forward with scores, because in the end, no one will argue that someone is first on a song if they have the highest score, whether someone could argue that the pp system is inaccurate in some instances (which I am not saying it is, however I don't think its 100% perfect and that would be seemly impossible to accomplish) , and say that 'x' song isn't that hard or blabla with 'this' or 'that' mod.
That is why I don't particularly like the idea.
Notice how I emphasize that this is My opinion , you are all free to think the exact opposite about it for all anyone cares.
Edit: And we will probably turn to the double scoring as mentioned earlier. See it here t/218559
I don't want to be tied to the pp system that much to be honest. I think mainly because this would allow you to miss more often with less consequences (but at a higher difficulty, yes I know). For example:
I play 'x' song with no mod, get FC with 1000x combo. , and get no pp from it.
I play 'x' song with DT, get 600x combo, with 3 misses, and get 5 pp from it.
In my eyes, this would be annoying. As it would diminish a full combo, by making a non full combo potentially be much higher in rank. (I understand the difficulty would be a lot higher with dt), Its just the fact that a score wouldn't need to be as "perfect" as it needs to be now.
In addition to that, top 50 rank means nothing to be honest. Your real ranking is already measured by the pp system. The top 50 rank is more of a honoring feeling rather than a skill measurer to begin with in my opinion . (You can look at any easy difficulty top 50 to realize this)
And, again, to me , I like that not everything is tied to the pp system. Besides it is more straight forward with scores, because in the end, no one will argue that someone is first on a song if they have the highest score, whether someone could argue that the pp system is inaccurate in some instances (which I am not saying it is, however I don't think its 100% perfect and that would be seemly impossible to accomplish) , and say that 'x' song isn't that hard or blabla with 'this' or 'that' mod.
That is why I don't particularly like the idea.
Notice how I emphasize that this is My opinion , you are all free to think the exact opposite about it for all anyone cares.
Edit: And we will probably turn to the double scoring as mentioned earlier. See it here t/218559
Those two are actually very big concerns in my opinion. Whenever the algorithm would be updated there would also get even more scores into the top50 which do not have a replay.Kyou-kun wrote:
2. If pp were ever to update its calculations, it could affect (possibly significantly) the placement of scores on the leaderboards. However, as far as I know, no significant changes have been made to either tp or pp in a long time, so I don't think this would be too much of an issue.
3. Any scores which were set in the past which didn't beat their highest score with the current system, but would have with the proposed system, obviously wouldn't be counted. This could cause a lot of issues with players asking that some of their scores be placed into the leaderboard because of the fact that the only reason they currently are not is because they were set before the system was changed.
I feel like keeping score as a stable base measure is not such a bad thing. Especially with the possibility of mod-specific highscores (no more losing pp by beating your score with mods but worse accuracy) and optionally sorting the top50 pp-wise I don't see any reason why this wouldn't suffice.
Topic Starter
How often is the algorithm updated in a way which would affect beatmap leaderboards significantly? While it's a problem, I don't see it to be a significant enough one to warrant the use of such an inaccurate system.
Topic Starter
If a 1000 combo nomod is worth less pp than a 600 combo DT, it means that DT is probably a better score, thus it should rank higher. Why should a score have to be "perfect"? I guarantee that on any map where a 600 combo DT would beat a 1000 combo nomod, the player who did the 600 combo DT could probably also do the 1000 combo nomod, and much more easily at that.xasuma wrote:
I talk for myself here and its just my opinion on it.
I don't want to be tied to the pp system that much to be honest. I think mainly because this would allow you to miss more often with less consequences (but at a higher difficulty, yes I know). For example:
I play 'x' song with no mod, get FC with 1000x combo. , and get no pp from it.
I play 'x' song with DT, get 600x combo, with 3 misses, and get 5 pp from it.
In my eyes, this would be annoying. As it would diminish a full combo, by making a non full combo potentially be much higher in rank. (I understand the difficulty would be a lot higher with dt), Its just the fact that a score wouldn't need to be as "perfect" as it needs to be now.
Why should you be "honored" if your scores suck? Not to be harsh, but it doesn't seem reasonable. You think nobody argues about first places with the current score system? That's just dead wrong. Almost nobody considers a FL or HDHR to be the "true" #1 when it's ahead of a DT FC. People already argue that the score system is far more inaccurate than the pp system ever was.xasuma wrote:
In addition to that, top 50 rank means nothing to be honest. Your real ranking is already measured by the pp system. The top 50 rank is more of a honoring feeling rather than a skill measurer to begin with in my opinion . (You can look at any easy difficulty top 50 to realize this)
And, again, to me , I like that not everything is tied to the pp system. Besides it is more straight forward with scores, because in the end, no one will argue that someone is first on a song if they have the highest score, whether someone could argue that the pp system is inaccurate in some instances (which I am not saying it is, however I don't think its 100% perfect and that would be seemly impossible to accomplish) , and say that 'x' song isn't that hard or blabla with 'this' or 'that' mod.
I think a lot of mid tier players would lose motivation if something like this was introduced. I don't really like the idea at all.
Kyou kun, I don't particularly want to argue about this. I was just elaborating on why I didn't like the idea.
From what I see though is that if this were implemented, some people would in fact feel uneasy.
I'll keep reading to see where this heads.
From what I see though is that if this were implemented, some people would in fact feel uneasy.
I'll keep reading to see where this heads.
Topic Starter
Why would you lose motivation because of a more accurate ranking system? As a "mid-tier" player myself, I would be more motivated to see my scores get high ranks, since I know they actually mean something.Bauxe wrote:
I think a lot of mid tier players would lose motivation if something like this was introduced. I don't really like the idea at all.
By mid-tier, I'm not talking top few thousand. I mean the range from maybe 5k to 50k. Getting a top 50 score will seem impossible to them.Kyou-kun wrote:
Why would you lose motivation because of a more accurate ranking system? As a "mid-tier" player myself, I would be more motivated to see my scores get high ranks, since I know they actually mean something.Bauxe wrote:
I think a lot of mid tier players would lose motivation if something like this was introduced. I don't really like the idea at all.
Topic Starter
Why should it feel possible? Further, on what maps are 5k-50k ranked players getting top 50 scores frequently with the current system? I don't know of any myself.
Why should anyone hold ranks they clearly don't deserve? This ain't charity. They can aim for country ranks.
The main reason is that I think the current scoring system is more fun. Some examples: There are more ways to get a good rank besides going super fast or having godlike accuracy. Also you don't need to restart a map every time you get some 100s at the start if you want to get into the rankings.Kyou-kun wrote:
Can you offer reasons for why you wouldn't like it? Do you think the pp system is inaccurate, or perhaps the current score system is more accurate? If so, why?
The second point is, that changes in the pp-system would change the scoring system every time. This would result in even less changes to the system. Also, I believe a consistent scoring system is better in general.
You make it sound like the same 50 people should have rank 1 to 50 on every map...Drezi wrote:
Why should anyone hold ranks they clearly don't deserve? This ain't charity. They can aim for country ranks.
Topic Starter
If they set the 50 best scores on the map, then yes, they should. That's sort of the point of an accurate, skill-based ranking system.Bauxe wrote:
You make it sound like the same 50 people should have rank 1 to 50 on every map...
Why should there be more ways to get a good rank besides going super fast or having godlike accuracy? Those are the skills that deserve high ranks, and currently, they often get low ones instead. As for the 100s at the start not mattering as much: Do you really think that makes sense? That a lower accuracy score with the same mods and combo often beats a higher accuracy score because of that?Ziggo wrote:
The main reason is that I think the current scoring system is more fun. Some examples: There are more ways to get a good rank besides going super fast or having godlike accuracy. Also you don't need to restart a map every time you get some 100s at the start if you want to get into the rankings.
Yes, I mentioned this. Why would a consistent but flawed scoring system be better than an evolving but accurate one?Ziggo wrote:
The second point is, that changes in the pp-system would change the scoring system every time. This would result in even less changes to the system. Also, I believe a consistent scoring system is better in general.
this sounds unfair to flashlight
though i do hate flashlight
though i do hate flashlight
Well, if every top50 player achieved the best they are capable of on every map, why should others take their place? It's not like top players care about hards and below anyway as far as I know.Bauxe wrote:
You make it sound like the same 50 people should have rank 1 to 50 on every map...
Topic Starter
Flashlight already gives bonus pp, and not an insignificant amount.VioletMaid wrote:
this sounds unfair to flashlight
though i do hate flashlight
Even the simplest (new) scoring method that might be added is still going to be better than the current one.
I mean...... I also do think that current pp system is not exactly perfect and might change(which sucks, since your pp might drop randomly) in future.
However, does that mean current best scoring system makes more sense ans should be left unchanged?
A score system that doesnt even care the first 10 100s and that does care last one 100?
Score system that takes 120pp right away from you just because you decided to HD on a previously-DT-best scored-map?
hello?
be a person who knows how to think about how it can be better than before, not a crybaby who says NO all the time.
There is no such ing as perfect, but there is a thing called "better"
I mean...... I also do think that current pp system is not exactly perfect and might change(which sucks, since your pp might drop randomly) in future.
However, does that mean current best scoring system makes more sense ans should be left unchanged?
A score system that doesnt even care the first 10 100s and that does care last one 100?
Score system that takes 120pp right away from you just because you decided to HD on a previously-DT-best scored-map?
hello?
be a person who knows how to think about how it can be better than before, not a crybaby who says NO all the time.
There is no such ing as perfect, but there is a thing called "better"
It'd be interesting. Getting all 300's to the end of the song, you have only 4-5 notes left, You are placed 10th on the map, then completely f up the final stream. You'll end up dropping from 10th to 500th. If we take this route with the scoring system, this is exactly what's going to happen. Scores won't be just scaling up, they will be increasing / decreasing as you play through the song.
An issue that I think would have problems is the lower diffs where there is literally only 1pp or a few extra points in Aim/Acc/Spd difference between each mod. That means anyone who can spin would only have to run two mods (DT HR) and they'd have a first even on medium length spinners.
At this point, having an option to sort by PP earned would be better than having the scoreboard adjust since it wouldn't be the top PP players in first. The current system also has this problem, but I see it being even worse with the new system since mods no longer would give a set value, and would probably make the multipliers within only a few decimal places of each other because of how close they are in performance.
It depends on how it is calculated as I'm no mathematician to be able to even comprehend how it might be calculated, but the difference between mods on easy songs, and mods on hard songs is extremely big. We have to make sure all ranges of difficulties can be calculated properly.
Just some things I thought of while reading through this thread for a few days. I'm not against this, nor am I supporting it. I'm just going to stay neutral in this whole thing.
PP is out of my reach with this new system since it doesn't work to my style of playing so I've honestly just given up on it. I've never really been competitive anyways, no do I care really about improving my speed skills. I'd rather improve at something I have fun doing (Flashlight and 100%ing slow songs no one has before.)
Is this a good idea? Yes, very much so. However, I still think there are lots of problems that need to be taken care before we can safely transfer over to it. Many of which have already been listed. Right now I think it is way too early still to be pushing this feature as hard as this thread seems to be wanting to. The system isn't even closed to being finished with the other modes, Seems like there is still some balancing issues to deal with, etc. If there is going to be such a big change as switching over to a different method of scoring, everything has to be completed and ready to go, doing bits and pieces at a time would make it a disaster, especially with how delicate the system is with reasons you (kyou) and tom have mentioned.
An issue that I think would have problems is the lower diffs where there is literally only 1pp or a few extra points in Aim/Acc/Spd difference between each mod. That means anyone who can spin would only have to run two mods (DT HR) and they'd have a first even on medium length spinners.
At this point, having an option to sort by PP earned would be better than having the scoreboard adjust since it wouldn't be the top PP players in first. The current system also has this problem, but I see it being even worse with the new system since mods no longer would give a set value, and would probably make the multipliers within only a few decimal places of each other because of how close they are in performance.
It depends on how it is calculated as I'm no mathematician to be able to even comprehend how it might be calculated, but the difference between mods on easy songs, and mods on hard songs is extremely big. We have to make sure all ranges of difficulties can be calculated properly.
Just some things I thought of while reading through this thread for a few days. I'm not against this, nor am I supporting it. I'm just going to stay neutral in this whole thing.
PP is out of my reach with this new system since it doesn't work to my style of playing so I've honestly just given up on it. I've never really been competitive anyways, no do I care really about improving my speed skills. I'd rather improve at something I have fun doing (Flashlight and 100%ing slow songs no one has before.)
Is this a good idea? Yes, very much so. However, I still think there are lots of problems that need to be taken care before we can safely transfer over to it. Many of which have already been listed. Right now I think it is way too early still to be pushing this feature as hard as this thread seems to be wanting to. The system isn't even closed to being finished with the other modes, Seems like there is still some balancing issues to deal with, etc. If there is going to be such a big change as switching over to a different method of scoring, everything has to be completed and ready to go, doing bits and pieces at a time would make it a disaster, especially with how delicate the system is with reasons you (kyou) and tom have mentioned.
Well, guess we have different views about skill then. I think ranks like top HD or FL scores are well desevered.Kyou-kun wrote:
Why should there be more ways to get a good rank besides going super fast or having godlike accuracy? Those are the skills that deserve high ranks, and currently, they often get low ones instead.
Yes, I do. Because you can easily retry over 100s at the start, so they should be way less important than 100s later on.Kyou-kun wrote:
As for the 100s at the start not mattering as much: Do you really think that makes sense? That a lower accuracy score with the same mods and combo often beats a higher accuracy score because of that?
pp is far too inaccurate for anything like this.
it only considers max combo and acc, which are not sufficent for any case of score calculation.
there is no pattern recognization or anything that could determine the skill of a player accurately.
I think you are getting to hyped up over a system which is not operational.
Before per hitobject data can be provided,
it is simply nonsense to base scores on it.
maybe this should be implemented, but in the far future after pp is fully functional and gives accurate scoring.
then we can talk about this.
ps:FL is much harder than DT. DT is just high speed spamming. (excluding sayo's plays)
it only considers max combo and acc, which are not sufficent for any case of score calculation.
there is no pattern recognization or anything that could determine the skill of a player accurately.
I think you are getting to hyped up over a system which is not operational.
Before per hitobject data can be provided,
it is simply nonsense to base scores on it.
maybe this should be implemented, but in the far future after pp is fully functional and gives accurate scoring.
then we can talk about this.
ps:FL is much harder than DT. DT is just high speed spamming. (excluding sayo's plays)
Not sure if serious.dennischan wrote:
ps:FL is much harder than DT. DT is just high speed spamming. (excluding sayo's plays)
I really hope this will be the case for osu!mania in the future. For now, using DT is useless because it's extremely hard to beat a no-mod score when there is a score limit and DT does not boost score.
DT scores are harder to achieve and should be on top of the rankings and also boost performance.
DT scores are harder to achieve and should be on top of the rankings and also boost performance.
If you're not going super fast or producing scores with godlike accuracy/aim your score isn't good (relatively) and hence should not be rewarded with a spot in the leader boards.Ziggo wrote:
The main reason is that I think the current scoring system is more fun. Some examples: There are more ways to get a good rank besides going super fast or having godlike accuracy. Also you don't need to restart a map every time you get some 100s at the start if you want to get into the rankings.Kyou-kun wrote:
Can you offer reasons for why you wouldn't like it? Do you think the pp system is inaccurate, or perhaps the current score system is more accurate? If so, why?
The second point is, that changes in the pp-system would change the scoring system every time. This would result in even less changes to the system. Also, I believe a consistent scoring system is better in general.
Topic Starter
It sounds to me like you don't understand how pp works. It does consider every hit object in the map, and calculates the beatmap's difficulty based on the average and maximum strain of your aim, speed, and accuracy. Sometimes this can cause inaccurate calculations, but those are pretty much always only inaccurate for the overall ranking system, and don't really affect individual leaderboards. Yes, Koigokoro is overrated in terms of pp, but each individual score on the map can be placed very accurately. In fact, I think pp works better as a scoring system than as a ranking system.dennischan wrote:
pp is far too inaccurate for anything like this.
it only considers max combo and acc, which are not sufficent for any case of score calculation.
there is no pattern recognization or anything that could determine the skill of a player accurately.
I think you are getting to hyped up over a system which is not operational.
Before per hitobject data can be provided,
it is simply nonsense to base scores on it.
maybe this should be implemented, but in the far future after pp is fully functional and gives accurate scoring.
then we can talk about this.
ps:FL is much harder than DT. DT is just high speed spamming. (excluding sayo's plays)
As for saying "DT is just high speed spamming", that's your inner rank 30,000 speaking.
What about getting 95% FC with Flashlight is more skillful than 90% FC (or even less than FC) with DT on FREEDOM DiVE? Do you really think those two scores are even comparable? One is doable by a few players if they put enough time into the game; the other is impossible for any player at the current time, no matter how much time they put into the game. pp already considers how much DT increases difficulty by recalculating, so DT gives larger bonuses to difficult maps (as it should), where Flashlight's bonus is static (as it should be).Ziggo wrote:
Well, guess we have different views about skill then. I think ranks like top HD or FL scores are well desevered.
So because those 100s are easier to fix, you think it shouldn't matter as much? What's the reasoning behind that? All the hit circles have the same judgment, and ignoring variations in speed, it's equally easy to get a 100 on all of them.Ziggo wrote:
Yes, I do. Because you can easily retry over 100s at the start, so they should be way less important than 100s later on.Kyou-kun wrote:
As for the 100s at the start not mattering as much: Do you really think that makes sense? That a lower accuracy score with the same mods and combo often beats a higher accuracy score because of that?
I wouldn't mind being able to sort plays by pp gains, but I don't want performance points to become the main scoring system. We already have enough people spamming DT on everything and this would just encourage that kind of play style further rather than teaching people to become accurate. If you can get a high accuracy with DT on a difficult song then you deserve to hold the top 50 on that map. I don't think it's fair to completely throw the other mods out the window. Ether go for pure pp gains or try to achieve high scores on maps, do you really need both at the same time?
In short, I don't really care if a score is deemed more impressive or not by the pp system. These biases will always exist, and removing score will just make this into an even bigger problem. Not to mention ruining all the current scores and making everything into a big mess. I think everything works fine how it is now. Being able to sort scores by pp is a much better idea in my opinion (and there are already a few topics that suggest that).
I agree that the current system is far from perfect, but I don't think the pp system is meant to be the main scoring system.
In short, I don't really care if a score is deemed more impressive or not by the pp system. These biases will always exist, and removing score will just make this into an even bigger problem. Not to mention ruining all the current scores and making everything into a big mess. I think everything works fine how it is now. Being able to sort scores by pp is a much better idea in my opinion (and there are already a few topics that suggest that).
I agree that the current system is far from perfect, but I don't think the pp system is meant to be the main scoring system.
Topic Starter
Speed and aim are often better than accuracy. Accuracy is often better than speed and aim. pp calculates this and decides which score involved the most skill. I don't see how it's encouraging players to be less accurate. thelewa is known for having great accuracy, where his other skills aren't really comparable, and he's rank #5 overall by the pp system. How would this be possible if pp encouraged speed and aim but not accuracy?
The fact is that speed and aim are vastly underrated with the current system, whereas pp is balanced.
The fact is that speed and aim are vastly underrated with the current system, whereas pp is balanced.
DT best mod
make it give all the pp
and 1.13x thx
tu much hd hr pushing dt plays off the scoreboard when not as impressiv
better alternative to pp scoring
make it give all the pp
and 1.13x thx
tu much hd hr pushing dt plays off the scoreboard when not as impressiv
better alternative to pp scoring
I like this idea enough to match your stars.
Hope this gets included simply because it pissed me off how I turned an FC-5 into an FC but still lost about 10pp once because my accuracy was slightly lower.
Hope this gets included simply because it pissed me off how I turned an FC-5 into an FC but still lost about 10pp once because my accuracy was slightly lower.
Can someone explain to me why the overall pp-based ranking is accepted and considered accurate by the majority of players but at the same time, the score-based map rankings are still considered to be the appropriate way of sorting performances on each map?
How can someone think that global rankings and map rankings should use a different method? How does that even make sense?
How come the overall rankings do not use score, if it's supposedly more "honorific" and "accurate" than pp on each individual map?
Is there something obvious I overlooked which makes the situation more complicated that I made it seem?
How can someone think that global rankings and map rankings should use a different method? How does that even make sense?
How come the overall rankings do not use score, if it's supposedly more "honorific" and "accurate" than pp on each individual map?
Is there something obvious I overlooked which makes the situation more complicated that I made it seem?
That is not the point. I think that will be implemented regardless soon-ish (I linked it in an earlier page). So you don't have to lose pp for a 'better' score anymore. But that is not what the discussion is about here. :pCalignoBot wrote:
I like this idea enough to match your stars.
Hope this gets included simply because it pissed me off how I turned an FC-5 into an FC but still lost about 10pp once because my accuracy was slightly lower.
Im gonna remain neutral for the rest of this thread I think :B
Because Score is, in effect, a "perfect" way to compare scores and more precise [maps can get up to 1.5bil score, pp doesnt really go above 500. less room for error on the scoreboard this way.] since otherwise there will be like 5 sets of the same amount of pp on the scoreboard for your average full dthd/hdhr scoreboard.Fudgyking wrote:
Can someone explain to me why the overall pp-based ranking is accepted and considered accurate by the majority of players but at the same time, the score-based map rankings are still considered to be the appropriate way of sorting performances on each map?
How can someone think that global rankings and map rankings should use a different method? How does that even make sense?
How come the overall rankings do not use score, if it's supposedly more "honorific" and "accurate" than pp on each individual map?
Is there something obvious I overlooked which makes the situation more complicated that I made it seem?
Also there's no obfuscation. People will know exactly how they got on the scoreboards because the way score is calculated is perfectly common knowledge and makes for absolute accuracy and is better for comparison purposes.
And it's always been that way.
Topic Starter
But it's not perfect. It's flawed. You also don't seem to have read the third post in this thread.
On an insane map, 1x100 makes a difference with pp, so it's as precise as it needs to be.
On an insane map, 1x100 makes a difference with pp, so it's as precise as it needs to be.
Kyou-kun wrote:
But it's not perfect. It's flawed. You also don't seem to have read the third post in this thread.
On an insane map, 1x100 makes a difference with pp, so it's as precise as it needs to be.
lets take into account you cant.. and will never see your PP on the play in game while playing... for many reasons such as it just feeling crappy mechanically, i.e the first 10% of the map or so you wont see any pay off for hitting those circles at all, and it's not every single note that will increase this 'in game pp score' so the gameplay feels disconnected from scoring, especially considering most plays arent going to be worth much pp anyway compared to the players "best" plays so it will just be demoralizing in game. And because the way PP is calculated.. and because unranked maps do exist.. etc..
That aside, if we keep the way the game works right now and have score used in game [which we will], just not for anything but measuring your individual circle clicks, you're playing the map and there's this arbitrary number on the top right called "Score" while on the left the scoreboard just has combo and PP. That kind of disconnect doesn't really promote competition but just obfuscates it. Why even show your play underneath the scoreboard in-game if it's just going to show your score/combo compared to their pp/combo, how would you even climb onto the scoreboard whilst playing since PP isnt even calculated til the end?
And on easy-normals its going to be rather silly to just see something like "38 pp" repeated 50 times on 2 different maps that might have a very different max combo like 300 vs 1000 but they were worth the same PP and everyone SS'd it so whose to say what's different about playing them?
If anything, just get rid of HD HR getting a decimal advantage over DT in score multiplier, and get rid of Half Time scores showing up entirely, and scoreboards are perfect the way they are imo. There are even less reasons why Peppy would disagree with that proposal but even so there's still a 0% chance of it happening because he hates touching the scoreboards.
On a final note, Peppy severed the association between PP and actual rank on maps with ppv2 came out, i dont think he'd link them again.
p.s wouldnt mind being able to see scores by PP rank with a filter like friends/country etc as a supporter though. As Global its just too much.
Who looks at their score while playing?? It's just a meaningless large number.Bassist Vinyl wrote:
lets take into account you cant.. and will never see your PP on the play in game while playing... for many reasons such as it just feeling crappy mechanically, i.e the first 10% of the map or so you wont see any pay off for hitting those circles at all, and it's not every single note that will increase this 'in game pp score' so the gameplay feels disconnected from scoring, especially considering most plays arent going to be worth much pp anyway compared to the players "best" plays so it will just be demoralizing in game.
Topic Starter
Where do I start...
2. Unranked maps don't affect this at all.
3. Why does it matter if every note gives a pp or not? You don't pay attention to your score the whole play, I'm sure. The only time your score matters is at the end, which is why what I proposed in point "1" of this post seems reasonable.
5. A method to calculate pp dynamically, mid-play can be created.
1. There are plenty of ways that pp could be shown in-game while playing. I think the most reasonable way to implement this would be to have a "descending" score method; that is, you start with the max pp possible for the map, and it goes down as you make mistakes. I already proposed this for accuracy a long time ago in this forum, but it never got anywhere.Bassist Vinyl wrote:
lets take into account you cant.. and will never see your PP on the play in game while playing... for many reasons such as it just feeling crappy mechanically, i.e the first 10% of the map or so you wont see any pay off for hitting those circles at all, and it's not every single note that will increase this 'in game pp score' so the gameplay feels disconnected from scoring, especially considering most plays arent going to be worth much pp anyway compared to the players "best" plays so it will just be demoralizing in game. And because the way PP is calculated.. and because unranked maps do exist.. etc..
2. Unranked maps don't affect this at all.
3. Why does it matter if every note gives a pp or not? You don't pay attention to your score the whole play, I'm sure. The only time your score matters is at the end, which is why what I proposed in point "1" of this post seems reasonable.
4. Why would the number at the top right have to continue to exist in the game? In my opinion, it just adds clutter. Even if score were to remain the scoring method, it would still be reasonable if that number were removed.Bassist Vinyl wrote:
That aside, if we keep the way the game works right now and have score used in game [which we will], just not for anything but measuring your individual circle clicks, you're playing the map and there's this arbitrary number on the top right called "Score" while on the left the scoreboard just has combo and PP. That kind of disconnect doesn't really promote competition but just obfuscates it. Why even show your play underneath the scoreboard in-game if it's just going to show your score/combo compared to their pp/combo, how would you even climb onto the scoreboard whilst playing since PP isnt even calculated til the end?
5. A method to calculate pp dynamically, mid-play can be created.
5. I don't get what you mean by the "different max combo like 300 vs 1000", as a combo difference that drastic would clearly result in a difference in pp. I already told you that the highest score will get the higher rank in situations where pp is equal.Bassist Vinyl wrote:
And on easy-normals its going to be rather silly to just see something like "38 pp" repeated 50 times on 2 different maps that might have a very different max combo like 300 vs 1000 but they were worth the same PP and everyone SS'd it so whose to say what's different about playing them?
6. Even with DT being worth a little bit more, it's still imbalanced in my opinion. You don't even need close to a full combo on some maps to get really high pp on them with DT because of how the pp system recalculates map difficulty based on mods. DT doesn't affect slow maps as much as it does fast ones, so a flat bonus could never work well for a scoring system.Bassist Vinyl wrote:
If anything, just get rid of HD HR getting a decimal advantage over DT in score multiplier, and get rid of Half Time scores showing up entirely, and scoreboards are perfect the way they are imo.
7. He severed the association between pp and score rank in specific, because he recognized how little score matters when considering actual skill. If the leaderboards did represent actual skill, I don't think there would be any problem with connecting them to the ranking system.]Bassist Vinyl wrote:
On a final note, Peppy severed the association between PP and actual rank on maps with ppv2 came out, i dont think he'd link them again.
well except it wouldnt unless they had the exact same star rating.Kyou-kun wrote:
5. I don't get what you mean by the "different max combo like 300 vs 1000", as a combo difference that drastic would clearly result in a difference in pp. I already told you that the highest score will get the higher rank in situations where pp is equal.
Topic Starter
So you're talking about different maps? I still don't get your point. Why would it matter if there were multiple different maps where several scores are worth 38 pp?
and what about calculating pp dynamically while playing? you're rarely ever going to be coming close to your best performances so it's just going to be demoralizing unlike Score. It just doesn't seem like it will play well and will rarely be useful while playing. Maybe for replays.
diff. max combos gave diff. score which gave a better idea of the map, showing only pp says nothing about the map really.Kyou-kun wrote:
So you're talking about different maps? I still don't get your point. Why would it matter if there were multiple different maps where several scores are worth 38 pp?
Well, max combo could be easily displayed in addition to map length, number of hit circles, sliders, etc. Actually it should be either way, cause I don't like having to check global rankings (or in editor) to see it.
Ziggo wrote:
That'd be awful. I hope this will never happen.
All those FL scores dissapearing out of the Ranking. I think a lot of tears would fall.Drezi wrote:
I don't understand why people are against this idea. It's just a matter of disliking change I guess, being attached to legacy methods.
Personally, I love this Idea, since I think HT and FL ist just lame. Killer Song is probably the best example for this.
If you can't accept the fact that pp is accurate, at least compared to score system, you are dumb. I can confidently say that.
Seems like
(score of) 10 100s on very begining of the map >>> 1 100 on the last note
makes sense for you. There is no word that I can properly describe you but I'm pretty much confident that you don't make sense at all
the scoreboard "looks" like they performed different because this score system has a huge flaw, making the first 10 100s virtually useless and the last 100 really matter much. If you think this score system is perfect for comparison, you got a problem there.
Even myself could think of how you can change this score system into pp-related, and friendly to users. I'm pretty sure Tom or peppy already has similar or better idea of "how pp can be directly converted to score". Please don't say we'll have tons of "#1 - 149pp" thinks on our scoreboard. they are going to be scaled to big number for sure when it comes to score. Although there might be lots of same score since there actually are many 100~99% accs with same mod and same number of 100-50-x in top #50 records, this is how it is supposed to be (and there is another thing called spinner)
I see literally no valid reason on why pp(or at least that reflects pp) score shouldn't be implemented in this entire post. Why? current scores? Cause it always has been? Yeah, of course the slavery and kingdom cuz it always has been for people in history? lmao.
Also the old scores can be converted pretty easily for sure if they decide to replace current retarded score system into pp related one. (only troublesome stuff I see is spinner)
How is having a same rank or point a problem when they performed the same?Bassist Vinyl wrote:
Because Score is, in effect, a "perfect" way to compare scores and more precise [maps can get up to 1.5bil score, pp doesnt really go above 500. less room for error on the scoreboard this way.] since otherwise there will be like 5 sets of the same amount of pp on the scoreboard for your average full dthd/hdhr scoreboard.Fudgyking wrote:
Can someone explain to me why the overall pp-based ranking is accepted and considered accurate by the majority of players but at the same time, the score-based map rankings are still considered to be the appropriate way of sorting performances on each map?
How can someone think that global rankings and map rankings should use a different method? How does that even make sense?
How come the overall rankings do not use score, if it's supposedly more "honorific" and "accurate" than pp on each individual map?
Is there something obvious I overlooked which makes the situation more complicated that I made it seem?
Also there's no obfuscation. People will know exactly how they got on the scoreboards because the way score is calculated is perfectly common knowledge and makes for absolute accuracy and is better for comparison purposes.
And it's always been that way.
Seems like
(score of) 10 100s on very begining of the map >>> 1 100 on the last note
makes sense for you. There is no word that I can properly describe you but I'm pretty much confident that you don't make sense at all
the scoreboard "looks" like they performed different because this score system has a huge flaw, making the first 10 100s virtually useless and the last 100 really matter much. If you think this score system is perfect for comparison, you got a problem there.
Even myself could think of how you can change this score system into pp-related, and friendly to users. I'm pretty sure Tom or peppy already has similar or better idea of "how pp can be directly converted to score". Please don't say we'll have tons of "#1 - 149pp" thinks on our scoreboard. they are going to be scaled to big number for sure when it comes to score. Although there might be lots of same score since there actually are many 100~99% accs with same mod and same number of 100-50-x in top #50 records, this is how it is supposed to be (and there is another thing called spinner)
I see literally no valid reason on why pp(or at least that reflects pp) score shouldn't be implemented in this entire post. Why? current scores? Cause it always has been? Yeah, of course the slavery and kingdom cuz it always has been for people in history? lmao.
Also the old scores can be converted pretty easily for sure if they decide to replace current retarded score system into pp related one. (only troublesome stuff I see is spinner)
Where did I indicate that I was responding to anything in this thread outside the overall idea of it?xasuma wrote:
That is not the point. I think that will be implemented regardless soon-ish (I linked it in an earlier page). So you don't have to lose pp for a 'better' score anymore. But that is not what the discussion is about here. :pCalignoBot wrote:
I like this idea enough to match your stars.
Hope this gets included simply because it pissed me off how I turned an FC-5 into an FC but still lost about 10pp once because my accuracy was slightly lower.
Im gonna remain neutral for the rest of this thread I think :B
So something like this?
Posting on behalf of Kyou-kun:
"That's what I think would be best, but I don't think the replays save the spinner bonus, so there'd have to be some other way to show the score instead, perhaps only for plays where some other player is tied."
"That's what I think would be best, but I don't think the replays save the spinner bonus, so there'd have to be some other way to show the score instead, perhaps only for plays where some other player is tied."
If this were implemented HD mod would probably cease to be used for a lot of people. As of now hd is used in conjuction with other mods to give a score boost , however the pp gain from it is close to none (might even be none idk).
This could be argued with HR as well, although not as much as hd. Same for FL. And it would in a way monopolize DT (being the only mod that truly boosts your pp gain by a lot).
Having said that, the balance between accuracy, aim and speed would be broken. Favoring speed over the other two.
Screw staying neutral in this thread
This could be argued with HR as well, although not as much as hd. Same for FL. And it would in a way monopolize DT (being the only mod that truly boosts your pp gain by a lot).
Having said that, the balance between accuracy, aim and speed would be broken. Favoring speed over the other two.
Screw staying neutral in this thread
So you're saying the current global player ranking system is broken? Well, both HD and HR are very rewarding if you can play them with comparable acc, maybe the acc slope is a bit too steep but that is a different issue to debate, not one connected to this idea.xasuma wrote:
Having said that, the balance between accuracy, aim and speed would be broken. Favoring speed over the other two.
HD HR isn't even in the same plane of existence as DT in terms of PP. xasuma is absolutely right.Drezi wrote:
So you're saying the current global player ranking system is broken? Well, both HD and HR are very rewarding if you can play them with comparable acc, maybe the acc slope is a bit too steep but that is a different issue to debate, not one connected to this idea.xasuma wrote:
Having said that, the balance between accuracy, aim and speed would be broken. Favoring speed over the other two.
the HD HR play has higher acc and yet is not even able to come to within half of the PP gain on the other play.
Anyone able to get at least a half combo on a song with DT is going to completely overshadow all HD HR full combos. I don't personally have a problem with the game basically becoming a DT only playground, but some [many] will.
In fact, I'd go so far as to say you'll be FORCIBLY YANKING rank 1's and spot on top 50 scoreboards away from players on like 90%+ of maps.
What it boils down to, does jesus deserve rank 1 on cataclysm for that DT FC? Absolutely. Do people who mash their way through tv size maps with DT and happen to get a decent combo deserve to completely replace people with HD HR 99%+ fcs? I'd say not...
No, you are actually wrong. I have tested them. HD doesn't bother me , therefore I can achieve a lot of scores with the same accuracy as no mod. And the pp gain is none. OK maybe 0.xx but that could be something else for all we know .Drezi wrote:
So you're saying the current global player ranking system is broken? Well, both HD and HR are very rewarding if you can play them with comparable acc, maybe the acc slope is a bit too steep but that is a different issue to debate, not one connected to this idea.xasuma wrote:
Having said that, the balance between accuracy, aim and speed would be broken. Favoring speed over the other two.
And the pp gain of hr exists yes, but that is a steep curve to keep your acc. And even when you do, it's nothing compared to DT.
HD gives a bonus to your aim (and a tiny bit to acc), so jumpy maps should provide a noticable pp gain if you HD them with similar acc. Worse acc will be very harsh on your pp though, that's why you can lose pp if you HD with sligthly more 100s. Still I don't see how this is tied to this suggestion, this is a pp related problem, which noone said is perfect, only that since it's the main (and currently most accurate) ranking system, it should be used for maps aswell.
It's obvious that the current 1.06 multiplier of HD vs 1.12 of DT does not even come close to representing the real difference in difficulty, even if pp favors DT too much it's still a lot closer.
It's obvious that the current 1.06 multiplier of HD vs 1.12 of DT does not even come close to representing the real difference in difficulty, even if pp favors DT too much it's still a lot closer.
Proof please.Drezi wrote:
HD gives a bonus to your aim (and a tiny bit to acc), so jumpy maps should provide a noticable pp gain if you HD them with similar acc.
And it is related, because a pp based score board will lead to pp searching people, which will eventually lead them into dt and our of the other mods.
And I do play a lot of dt myself, I'm not saying this because I hate on the mod at all. It just would not be fair to many HD, FL, HR plays.
:B
Posting on Kyou-kun's behalf:
"If Hidden only gave a 0.01% bonus or something to that extent, as you so claim, then why would -Hakase-'s 98.54% (301 pp) Hidden score on this be worth more pp than mugio3's 100% nomod (287 pp) score? The reason is because it gives a percentage bonus based on the aim difficulty of the map, and that map happens to have a high aim difficulty. On a map with a low aim difficulty, the bonus will be very small and insignificant, and since you probably aren't playing those kinds of maps, you likely never noticed."
"If Hidden only gave a 0.01% bonus or something to that extent, as you so claim, then why would -Hakase-'s 98.54% (301 pp) Hidden score on this be worth more pp than mugio3's 100% nomod (287 pp) score? The reason is because it gives a percentage bonus based on the aim difficulty of the map, and that map happens to have a high aim difficulty. On a map with a low aim difficulty, the bonus will be very small and insignificant, and since you probably aren't playing those kinds of maps, you likely never noticed."
You are absolutely right. But that is the exact reason why I said HD will cease to be used by a lot of people. It would only be significant enough for people to bother on very difficult maps. What about the other 90% of not very difficult aim maps?.pielak wrote:
Posting on Kyou-kun's behalf:
"If Hidden only gave a 0.01% bonus or something to that extent, as you so claim, then why would -Hakase-'s 98.54% (301 pp) Hidden score on this be worth more pp than mugio3's 100% nomod (287 pp) score? The reason is because it gives a percentage bonus based on the aim difficulty of the map, and that map happens to have a high aim difficulty. On a map with a low aim difficulty, the bonus will be very small and insignificant, and since you probably aren't playing those kinds of maps, you likely never noticed."
If it only affects a fraction of all beat maps, then it can't be as accurate as you claim it to be. Besides, If I can't notice it, then why would anyone below my rank ever notice it?
What this really is, is an ideal ranking for really high rank players on really hard maps. Good luck measuring pp accurately on 2-3 star maps.
pp internally has a fractional part, so ordering by pp really wouldn't be an issue.
There is still the one issue of overwriting a score with another one that gives less pp, but that would be mostly eliminated by per-mod highscores. The cases where you beat your score but lose pp would almost completely cease to exist, so I believe that at this point having a stable scoring system outweights the benefits of using pp for determining which scores to keep. Your opinion obviously will vary but keep in mind, that most players in this game are casuals who - as it seems to me - prefer their ranks to not randomly change.
Spoiler alert: A little bit of rebalancing in pp might be coming soon.
You didn't refute any of my points, though. Yes, score is inaccurate, but there is no reason to replace it. If you can sort both by score and by pp both sides win.Kyou-kun wrote:
How often is the algorithm updated in a way which would affect beatmap leaderboards significantly? While it's a problem, I don't see it to be a significant enough one to warrant the use of such an inaccurate system.
There is still the one issue of overwriting a score with another one that gives less pp, but that would be mostly eliminated by per-mod highscores. The cases where you beat your score but lose pp would almost completely cease to exist, so I believe that at this point having a stable scoring system outweights the benefits of using pp for determining which scores to keep. Your opinion obviously will vary but keep in mind, that most players in this game are casuals who - as it seems to me - prefer their ranks to not randomly change.
Spoiler alert: A little bit of rebalancing in pp might be coming soon.
Bauxe wrote:
You make it sound like the same 50 people should have rank 1 to 50 on every map...
:^)Kyou-kun wrote:
There's people who actually don't think this way. These are usually Flashlight players, or proponents of Flashlight mod weighting remaining the same. It's really quite surprising to me that some people don't think that players with more skill deserve better ranks.BRBP wrote:
They're less skilled, they don't deserve to be in the ranking list.
-Kyou
Tbh it's not all that uncommon and feels pretty bad losing PP because I improve a 'sliderbreak near the end' score with worse accuracy, or I overwrite a better acc score with a worse one, only because I had more 100s at the beginning of the last one, and got all 300s at the end.Tom94 wrote:
The cases where you beat your score but lose pp would almost completely cease to exist
I don't think they mind their per-map ranks much, when global rank - which I think is more important, especially for non top-tier players - changes anyway if there are changes made to PP.Tom94 wrote:
Your opinion obviously will vary but keep in mind, that most players in this game are casuals who - as it seems to me - prefer their ranks to not randomly change.
Posting on Kyou-kun's behalf:
Can you give an example of a score which is worth less than it should be with the current system? In particular, give me an example of one using the Hidden mod, if you can.xasuma wrote:
You are absolutely right. But that is the exact reason why I said HD will cease to be used by a lot of people. It would only be significant enough for people to bother on very difficult maps. What about the other 90% of not very difficult aim maps?.
If it only affects a fraction of all beat maps, then it can't be as accurate as you claim it to be. Besides, If I can't notice it, then why would anyone below my rank ever notice it?
What this really is, is an ideal ranking for really high rank players on really hard maps. Good luck measuring pp accurately on 2-3 star maps.
qftDrezi wrote:
Tbh it's not all that uncommon and feels pretty bad losing PP because I improve a 'sliderbreak near the end' score with worse accuracy, or I overwrite a better acc score with a worse one, only because I had more 100s at the beginning of the last one, and got all 300s at the endTom94 wrote:
The cases where you beat your score but lose pp would almost completely cease to exist
Because your points are mainly opinions which you and I disagree on.Tom94 wrote:
You didn't refute any of my points, though
Don't understand this post at all.BRBP wrote:
^
I'm not saying scores are worth less than they should.
All I'm saying that in comparison, dt is far more rewarding pp wise, than any of the other mods, for most songs, in most circumstances, considering most of the skills most players have.
And the example was HD. Most players won't bother in most situations to HD FL or even HR some songs .
Fine, yes, technically this is correct that top 50 might be more accurate in dt able maps. But most people won't appreciate it I don't think.
Whatever, with this much of split in opinions regarding this, there is no way they will replace scores for pp.
At most they will add it and have them side by side, and have two different top 50. Which is fine.
I'm not saying scores are worth less than they should.
All I'm saying that in comparison, dt is far more rewarding pp wise, than any of the other mods, for most songs, in most circumstances, considering most of the skills most players have.
And the example was HD. Most players won't bother in most situations to HD FL or even HR some songs .
Fine, yes, technically this is correct that top 50 might be more accurate in dt able maps. But most people won't appreciate it I don't think.
Whatever, with this much of split in opinions regarding this, there is no way they will replace scores for pp.
At most they will add it and have them side by side, and have two different top 50. Which is fine.
Adding them side by side should be fine, cause then people will realize on their own how skewed and unrealistic score-leaderboards are compared to PP ones, so it'll be possible to phase out score ones completely without much of an uproar.
I mean sure HDHR overall might be underappreciated due to close to perfect acc being valued so high, but it should be obvious that when we're comparing these mods on the SAME map, DT is a lot harder than the other mods, so obviously it's gonna be reflected in PP.
going from nomod -> DT is the same level of difficulty increase as going from HT -> nomod, and noone seems to think that HT plays with mods are undervalued compared to nomod plays.
I mean sure HDHR overall might be underappreciated due to close to perfect acc being valued so high, but it should be obvious that when we're comparing these mods on the SAME map, DT is a lot harder than the other mods, so obviously it's gonna be reflected in PP.
going from nomod -> DT is the same level of difficulty increase as going from HT -> nomod, and noone seems to think that HT plays with mods are undervalued compared to nomod plays.
Drezi wrote:
going from nomod -> DT is the same level of difficulty increase as going from HT -> nomod, and noone seems to think that HT plays with mods are undervalued compared to nomod plays.
Od.
i have the same feeling as Lanturn on this idea...i think in general having a "skill-Leaderboard" is totally fine and many people would like that idea since its more "accurate" in its sense of giving "hard Scores" their attention...but you can't make such a major change without getting a HUGEE amount of hatred from the community...so the seperate leaderboard for PP is the "best" thing that can be done
The only people who would get hurt from this are shitty FL players who only care about getting #1's and can't even SS normal/easy difficulties with DTHRFL.
I have no #1's currently but if this happens I will get a bunch of #1's thanks to bad accuracy FL players getting out of the way. (https://osu.ppy.sh/b/91593&m=0 here is an example. They didn't even use HR)
And this would not hurt mid-level players, if they don't want to be mid-level players they should stop caring about spinning on normal diffs or whatever and try to improve their skill so they can do actually impressive scores.
I don't like how speed is the most important skill right now so I hope pp splits into three parts like tp in the future, this might solve the problems people have with DT.
I have no #1's currently but if this happens I will get a bunch of #1's thanks to bad accuracy FL players getting out of the way. (https://osu.ppy.sh/b/91593&m=0 here is an example. They didn't even use HR)
And this would not hurt mid-level players, if they don't want to be mid-level players they should stop caring about spinning on normal diffs or whatever and try to improve their skill so they can do actually impressive scores.
I don't like how speed is the most important skill right now so I hope pp splits into three parts like tp in the future, this might solve the problems people have with DT.
I mentioned that they didn't use HR because I personally can't play FLHD at all, There are some SS DTHD and better accuracy DTHR scores on the map so I think they could do better if they really did memorize the map. But using a score from 2 years ago isn't totally fair I guess he did nothing wrong if we judge by ppv1.[ Tao ] wrote:
It's a bad example: FL players don't use HR because it made the map harder to memorize (FL needs advanced reflexes and memorization, especially for maps who have more than 300 combos, and HR made it even more harder) and not necessarily because they have bad acuracy. I didn't tried the map though, but if it was that easy, you would see some full mods scores.
And advanced FL players can DTHRFL Easy/Normal maps, quite easily.
I also think the score system is not perfect but as Kingkevin30 said I think it would be better to have seperate leaderboards, it's too late now for a major change like this. But good idea though.
About the advanced FL players, What about this guy? https://osu.ppy.sh/u/1308621 He would lose lots of #1's due to accuracy if map rankings changed. I admit I don't have the patience to do the scores he does but it annoys me when I see his silver S ranks surrounded by SS scores.
FL still gives aim bonus and if map rankings split into three (I don't think this will ever happen) FL scores would still have good aim.
wow. this guy. you're so wrong. it hurts me to read on. every post just hurts me more.xasuma wrote:
Proof please.Drezi wrote:
HD gives a bonus to your aim (and a tiny bit to acc), so jumpy maps should provide a noticable pp gain if you HD them with similar acc.
And it is related, because a pp based score board will lead to pp searching people, which will eventually lead them into dt and our of the other mods.
And I do play a lot of dt myself, I'm not saying this because I hate on the mod at all. It just would not be fair to many HD, FL, HR plays.
:B
And why would that be, Mr. Jesus ?jesus1412 wrote:
wow. this guy. you're so wrong. it hurts me to read on. every post just hurts me more.
You can't just say, "wow so wrong, I can't believe this guy" in an argument. That's not a valid argument.
I didn't even read past this post, but I think you forgot that DT affects accuracy and aim as well as speed. As far as I can tell, HR predominantly affects accuracy.xasuma wrote:
If this were implemented HD mod would probably cease to be used for a lot of people. As of now hd is used in conjuction with other mods to give a score boost , however the pp gain from it is close to none (might even be none idk).
This could be argued with HR as well, although not as much as hd. Same for FL. And it would in a way monopolize DT (being the only mod that truly boosts your pp gain by a lot).
Having said that, the balance between accuracy, aim and speed would be broken. Favoring speed over the other two.
Screw staying neutral in this thread
So... I don't understand the point you're trying to make here?
Well it is primarily speed over the other two. Everyone should agree on that..
Other than that, I think my post was clear enough for anyone to understand. Maybe reading all posts might help before you pick a random post and wonder why is not clear to you.
Other than that, I think my post was clear enough for anyone to understand. Maybe reading all posts might help before you pick a random post and wonder why is not clear to you.
Actually although map difficulty is calculated by looking at the whole map, the method of map difficulty calculation is rather simple and cannot be a fair basis for score calculation.
1. There is no pattern recognization.
The pp calculating method simply takes note of the difference between notes and treats it as the so called strain on a map.
Sadly, in the process there is only a simple weighing of the strain and simple addition.
Therfore, DT wiuld be overvalued in the sense that it simply makes easy patterns faster. Hard patterns would be at a disadvantage on this point.
This is why skystar maps and chloe maps are of relatively low rating since their difficulty lies in reading difficulty, not in so called aim.
2. Fast single taps are underrated.
There is no way for our simple pp calculator to distinguish between single taps and streams. Therfore fast single taps are underrated.
3. High SV is underrated.
pp calculations do not take sliders in account. Thus maps which are difficult because of sliders are underrated.
such as Talent Shredder, Strange Program
4. HD and FL are not suitably considered in the program
This ties with what I have said about no pattern recognization. The main difficulty of HD and FL is that they make the map harder to read.
It is not reasonable to put an arbritary multiplier on a map. After pattern recognization is finished, the diifculty of HD and FL can be gauged in a better way.
In this state of pp calculation, using pp as score will be unfair.
I dont deny that pp calculation can be in time, a fair substitue for the score system, but currently it is still a work in process.
I urge people in this thread to see that pp is currently not a suitable system for weighing any scores.
But I am not remotely concerned about this being implemented since it is impossible for our osu community to agree on this issue.
I know that this message might be ignored by people in this thread who only care about DTing Hards, but I hope that you people can check out my points before mindlessly dismissing it.
1. There is no pattern recognization.
The pp calculating method simply takes note of the difference between notes and treats it as the so called strain on a map.
Sadly, in the process there is only a simple weighing of the strain and simple addition.
Therfore, DT wiuld be overvalued in the sense that it simply makes easy patterns faster. Hard patterns would be at a disadvantage on this point.
This is why skystar maps and chloe maps are of relatively low rating since their difficulty lies in reading difficulty, not in so called aim.
2. Fast single taps are underrated.
There is no way for our simple pp calculator to distinguish between single taps and streams. Therfore fast single taps are underrated.
3. High SV is underrated.
pp calculations do not take sliders in account. Thus maps which are difficult because of sliders are underrated.
such as Talent Shredder, Strange Program
4. HD and FL are not suitably considered in the program
This ties with what I have said about no pattern recognization. The main difficulty of HD and FL is that they make the map harder to read.
It is not reasonable to put an arbritary multiplier on a map. After pattern recognization is finished, the diifculty of HD and FL can be gauged in a better way.
In this state of pp calculation, using pp as score will be unfair.
I dont deny that pp calculation can be in time, a fair substitue for the score system, but currently it is still a work in process.
I urge people in this thread to see that pp is currently not a suitable system for weighing any scores.
But I am not remotely concerned about this being implemented since it is impossible for our osu community to agree on this issue.
I know that this message might be ignored by people in this thread who only care about DTing Hards, but I hope that you people can check out my points before mindlessly dismissing it.
If you do not understand how increasing both the BPM and OD of a map affects aim and accuracy respectively, then you shouldn't be talking about it like you do.xasuma wrote:
Well it is primarily speed over the other two.
Oh I understand. No need to school me on map difficulty.CalignoBot wrote:
If you do not understand how increasing both the BPM and OD of a map affects aim and accuracy respectively, then you shouldn't be talking about it like you do.xasuma wrote:
Well it is primarily speed over the other two.
And instead of attacking me, be objective and work on solving the issue.
If you really need to set me straight send me a pm. These little 1v1 arguments aren't helping the thread. And again, if you would have read everything, you would have noticed most people who were posting here thought having them side by side would be a reasonable idea.
Read the last post on last page, much more informative than this little argument..
If you're talking about DT being monopolized, then my entire point is that it's not an issue because DT is significantly harder than HR to get good scores with. If you're talking about something else, then state it again.xasuma wrote:
CalignoBot wrote:
Oh I understand. No need to school me on map difficulty.
And instead of attacking me, be objective and work on solving the issue.
If you really need to set me straight send me a pm. These little 1v1 arguments aren't helping the thread. And again, if you would have read everything, you would have noticed most people who were posting here thought having them side by side would be a reasonable idea.
Read the last post on last page, much more informative than this little argument..
To whoever said HD doesn't help with pp, that's complete nonsense. HD can give a ton of pp. A lot of my top plays were worth almost nothing before I put HD on (for example, this map).
I still don't think pp should replace score. I am for the idea of replacing global scores with ones that are worth more performance points (I hate it when I set a record that's worth more pp but it doesn't get counted because my score isn't as high). I just don't feel like every mod is weighted fairly in every instance. In fact, I feel that it's impossible for the system to be so perfect that it isn't possible to set a more impressive score worth less pp. Score is a flawed system too, but it's the best system we have.
The problem with the later notes being weighted heavier (getting 100s near the end of the song hurts your score more) can be easily fixed by slightly altering the way score is calculated (though it would have to be possible to change old scores too or this would be pointless).
I don't know about other people here, but I don't want to see 85% DT scores in the top 50 on maps. I don't care how hard it is to play a song with DT.. you can just mash your way through most maps. HR takes a lot more skill than people give it credit for, and it is currently weighted far too little in my opinion. I don't even want to get into FL.. that's a whole different story in itself. I am totally against abandoning the old score system. The idea is just ridiculous.
The "standards" for score have been set a long while back, and completely messing them up now (not to mention the leader boards) is unfair to everyone.
Also, Kyou-kun calls him/herself a "mid-tier" player at rank 180..? Are you so incredibly egotistical that you fail to see that you're biased towards this idea because of how high your rank is? I don't mean that as a personal attack, but you are in the top 0.1% of everyone that plays this game.
I still don't think pp should replace score. I am for the idea of replacing global scores with ones that are worth more performance points (I hate it when I set a record that's worth more pp but it doesn't get counted because my score isn't as high). I just don't feel like every mod is weighted fairly in every instance. In fact, I feel that it's impossible for the system to be so perfect that it isn't possible to set a more impressive score worth less pp. Score is a flawed system too, but it's the best system we have.
The problem with the later notes being weighted heavier (getting 100s near the end of the song hurts your score more) can be easily fixed by slightly altering the way score is calculated (though it would have to be possible to change old scores too or this would be pointless).
I don't know about other people here, but I don't want to see 85% DT scores in the top 50 on maps. I don't care how hard it is to play a song with DT.. you can just mash your way through most maps. HR takes a lot more skill than people give it credit for, and it is currently weighted far too little in my opinion. I don't even want to get into FL.. that's a whole different story in itself. I am totally against abandoning the old score system. The idea is just ridiculous.
The "standards" for score have been set a long while back, and completely messing them up now (not to mention the leader boards) is unfair to everyone.
Also, Kyou-kun calls him/herself a "mid-tier" player at rank 180..? Are you so incredibly egotistical that you fail to see that you're biased towards this idea because of how high your rank is? I don't mean that as a personal attack, but you are in the top 0.1% of everyone that plays this game.
And how exactly does the current score system do a better job at evaluating these aspects?dennischan wrote:
1. There is no pattern recognization.
2. Fast single taps are underrated.
3. High SV is underrated.
You go on about this and that being underrated, which is a problem when comparing scores between different maps, for which pp is already being used so I don't see your point... When comparing scores on the same damn map it doesn't matter if the map is underrated in absolute value compared to other maps at all, every score on that given map is treated the same way, and their relative order is prefectly fine and more representative than score, how is that not obvious.
FL1,12 HD1,06 -.-dennischan wrote:
4. HD and FL are not suitably considered in the program
It is not reasonable to put an arbritary multiplier on a map.
Did you even read the whole damn post? I meant that at this moment it is not suitable to replace score with pp, and I'm for both of them coexisting. What I meant was that since pp is not a good calculation of actual difficulty between maps, it should not be used as a scoring system since nobody knows how much HIDDEN FAULTS there is in the pp system. For one, the pp system only considers a score's max combo and accuracy when weighing scores, and that makes the pp system not suitable for weighing scores since it works with too limited information.Drezi wrote:
And how exactly does the current score system do a better job at evaluating these aspects?dennischan wrote:
1. There is no pattern recognization.
2. Fast single taps are underrated.
3. High SV is underrated.
You go on about this and that being underrated, which is a problem when comparing scores between different maps, for which pp is already being used so I don't see your point... When comparing scores on the same damn map it doesn't matter if the map is underrated in absolute value compared to other maps at all, every score on that given map is treated the same way, and their relative order is prefectly fine and more representative than score, how is that not obvious.FL1,12 HD1,06 -.-dennischan wrote:
4. HD and FL are not suitably considered in the program
It is not reasonable to put an arbritary multiplier on a map.
Also did you not know that DT is considered a map changing mod and thus the pp calculator treats the DT-ed map as a new map? This is why what I said do matter, in fact, since DT just boosts up the speed of the map, and does not make the complexity of the map increase. Without pattern recognization, it is inevitable that the DT-ed map would be treated as a very hard map which in reality its not so hard as it seems, since the pattern keeps being simple.
Kaeru wrote:
To whoever said HD doesn't help with pp, that's complete nonsense. HD can give a ton of pp. A lot of my top plays were worth almost nothing before I put HD on (for example, this map).
I still don't think pp should replace score. I am for the idea of replacing global scores with ones that are worth more performance points (I hate it when I set a record that's worth more pp but it doesn't get counted because my score isn't as high). I just don't feel like every mod is weighted fairly in every instance. In fact, I feel that it's impossible for the system to be so perfect that it isn't possible to set a more impressive score worth less pp. Score is a flawed system too, but it's the best system we have.
The problem with the later notes being weighted heavier (getting 100s near the end of the song hurts your score more) can be easily fixed by slightly altering the way score is calculated (though it would have to be possible to change old scores too or this would be pointless).
I don't know about other people here, but I don't want to see 85% DT scores in the top 50 on maps. I don't care how hard it is to play a song with DT.. you can just mash your way through most maps. HR takes a lot more skill than people give it credit for, and it is currently weighted far too little in my opinion. I don't even want to get into FL.. that's a whole different story in itself. I am totally against abandoning the old score system. The idea is just ridiculous.
The "standards" for score have been set a long while back, and completely messing them up now (not to mention the leader boards) is unfair to everyone.
Also, Kyou-kun calls him/herself a "mid-tier" player at rank 180..? Are you so incredibly egotistical that you fail to see that you're biased towards this idea because of how high your rank is? I don't mean that as a personal attack, but you are in the top 0.1% of everyone that plays this game.
I agree~ I like FL more than DT
also best argument ever
(The "standards" for score have been set a long while back, and completely messing them up now (not to mention the leader boards) is unfair to everyone. )
It's already being used as a means of comparing people's performances which are based on different maps.dennischan wrote:
What I meant was that since pp is not a good calculation of actual difficulty between maps
I don't even... That's what the score system does.. First of all it considers your combo, if it's not near full your score is pretty much irrelevant automatically, and then it considers accuracy, but your accuracy towards the end matters 100x more than the rest, so plenty times a worse acc score ranks higher than a higher acc one with the same mods and combo.. PP is based on these stats too, but considers a lot more factors making it a lot more representative, how can you even argue against this??dennischan wrote:
For one, the pp system only considers a score's max combo and accuracy when weighing scores, and that makes the pp system not suitable for weighing scores since it works with too limited information.
Yeah, what else would DT be considered when it changes the map to something which could have been mapped nomod on an other song of the same BPM?dennischan wrote:
Also did you not know that DT is considered a map changing mod and thus the pp calculator treats the DT-ed map as a new map? This is why what I said do matter, in fact, since DT just boosts up the speed of the map, and does not make the complexity of the map increase. Without pattern recognization, it is inevitable that the DT-ed map would be treated as a very hard map which in reality its not so hard as it seems, since the pattern keeps being simple
Slapping on a 1,12 multiplier for DT does not judge it better, than objectively using the same algorythm to evaluate the modified map. Yeah patterns are not recognized, that's why pp still needs work as a global ranking but this DOES NOT affect the comparision of scores on the same map at all, if anything PP is a lot better as a per-map ranking system, than a global one yet due to this very fact.
But I think someone already pointed this out, so maybe you should read the thread so things wouldn't have to be explained twice, and you wouldn't keep bringing up arguments which have been refuted plain and simple.
I'm perfectly fine with people having different opinions, if you have reasonable arguments that can't be rendered invalid by merely pointing out objective facts.. That gets pretty tedious.
Fair points indeed. I'll agree that we should wait until the big issues (that are mentioned) are fixed before this is implemented for sure.dennischan wrote:
Actually although map difficulty is calculated by looking at the whole map, the method of map difficulty calculation is rather simple and cannot be a fair basis for score calculation.
1. There is no pattern recognization.
The pp calculating method simply takes note of the difference between notes and treats it as the so called strain on a map.
Sadly, in the process there is only a simple weighing of the strain and simple addition.
Therfore, DT wiuld be overvalued in the sense that it simply makes easy patterns faster. Hard patterns would be at a disadvantage on this point.
This is why skystar maps and chloe maps are of relatively low rating since their difficulty lies in reading difficulty, not in so called aim.
2. Fast single taps are underrated.
There is no way for our simple pp calculator to distinguish between single taps and streams. Therfore fast single taps are underrated.
3. High SV is underrated.
pp calculations do not take sliders in account. Thus maps which are difficult because of sliders are underrated.
such as Talent Shredder, Strange Program
4. HD and FL are not suitably considered in the program
This ties with what I have said about no pattern recognization. The main difficulty of HD and FL is that they make the map harder to read.
It is not reasonable to put an arbritary multiplier on a map. After pattern recognization is finished, the diifculty of HD and FL can be gauged in a better way.
In this state of pp calculation, using pp as score will be unfair.
I dont deny that pp calculation can be in time, a fair substitue for the score system, but currently it is still a work in process.
I urge people in this thread to see that pp is currently not a suitable system for weighing any scores.
But I am not remotely concerned about this being implemented since it is impossible for our osu community to agree on this issue.
I know that this message might be ignored by people in this thread who only care about DTing Hards, but I hope that you people can check out my points before mindlessly dismissing it.
Your understanding of the bonus from hidden is beyond flawed. If HD gave more than it currently did it would be more rewarding relative to it's difficulty than DT. Maybe 20 pp isn't much in the big picture but for a single score that's A LOT of pp.xasuma wrote:
And why would that be, Mr. Jesus ?jesus1412 wrote:
wow. this guy. you're so wrong. it hurts me to read on. every post just hurts me more.
You can't just say, "wow so wrong, I can't believe this guy" in an argument. That's not a valid argument.
I do indeed like to read dennischan's posts they're well formed and researched. I honestly can't find many flaws in his arguments other than "the scoring system does that one aspect even worse".
He is right about the PP system's flaws, but he is not right about this having any effect on it being applied as a per-map ranking system instead of score, which does a lot worse job at evaluating different mods and performances. These flaws should have only affected it being applied as a global ranking system that compares performances between different maps, but that has already happened anyway.jesus1412 wrote:
I do indeed like to read dennischan's posts they're well formed and researched. I honestly can't find many flaws in his arguments other than "the scoring system does that one aspect even worse".
Even if let's say with a dance number was so severly underrated that a HR FC SS would be worth only 100 PP, it wouldn't mean any harm to per map rankings, since everyone's performances would be undervalued, and still the best performance would be first (with that 100 pp), etc.
I agree with this.Ziggo wrote:
That'd be awful. I hope this will never happen.
Yeah thissimplyparanoid wrote:
I agree with this.Ziggo wrote:
That'd be awful. I hope this will never happen.
You might as well just remove HD and FL from the game completely if you wanted to base the scoring on pp (and everyone knows good pp scores are always DT)
I wish there was a way to add sort of negative stars
^I feel like this is a much, much better idea.Tom94 wrote:
I feel like keeping score as a stable base measure is not such a bad thing. Especially with the possibility of mod-specific highscores (no more losing pp by beating your score with mods but worse accuracy) and optionally sorting the top50 pp-wise I don't see any reason why this wouldn't suffice.
While the ranking system may be flawed and a poor indicator of skill it's much better than what we had before (for instance ppv1). The flaws aren't a huge vice that prevent it from being used the way it is- in fact most players are happy with the system. Anyone who complains about it either just really want to see more progress on the system or just weren't around for the earlier ranking systems. I rarely to never hear top players complain about the system right now. And aside from that, this thread isn't really the right place to discuss the accuracy of pp. While it may aid arguments about whether or not a scoring system like this should be implemented it doesn't really belong here.
My personal opinion on this is that I really think it should be implemented. Tom himself said there are a few things that would need to be addressed (such as pp recalculations and stored replays) but aside from that I think that it is a very sound idea and I can't see many disadvantages to it. Not only that but Tom seems to already have some of his own ideas about implementing it that sound effective.
Anyways this request has my full support and I hope that it does eventually get implemented. It would even warrant you to be more competitive, which I always find as a good thing.
Have all my stars
My personal opinion on this is that I really think it should be implemented. Tom himself said there are a few things that would need to be addressed (such as pp recalculations and stored replays) but aside from that I think that it is a very sound idea and I can't see many disadvantages to it. Not only that but Tom seems to already have some of his own ideas about implementing it that sound effective.
Anyways this request has my full support and I hope that it does eventually get implemented. It would even warrant you to be more competitive, which I always find as a good thing.
Have all my stars
It is a disservice to advocate for the separation of scoring and pp. They should be very interrelated. In particular, a higher score should always mean more pp. The current implementation is silly. There are many forum posts asking why people lost pp after improving their score. Most of the time the response is to chastise them for not searching before asking such a common question.
Many of these people will be players just starting to be invested enough in osu! to pay attention to ranking. According to Peppy, one of the major goals of the pp overhaul was to encourage progression, but the current system runs counter to that. After you set a decent score on a map, it is in your interest to actually not play that map again until you have improved significantly. Otherwise, you risk disappointment after a few missteps on on otherwise excellent play (for you) leave you a few thousand ranks below your starting point. This does not encourage to keep people playing osu! and fixing it should be made more of a priority.
Many of these people will be players just starting to be invested enough in osu! to pay attention to ranking. According to Peppy, one of the major goals of the pp overhaul was to encourage progression, but the current system runs counter to that. After you set a decent score on a map, it is in your interest to actually not play that map again until you have improved significantly. Otherwise, you risk disappointment after a few missteps on on otherwise excellent play (for you) leave you a few thousand ranks below your starting point. This does not encourage to keep people playing osu! and fixing it should be made more of a priority.
Making pp the scoring system would fix everything you posted and your idea that a higher score should always mean higher pp is the worst thing I have ever read and shouldn't be read by anyone else.nocipher wrote:
It is a disservice to advocate for the separation of scoring and pp. They should be very interrelated. In particular, a higher score should always mean more pp. The current implementation is silly. There are many forum posts asking why people lost pp after improving their score. Most of the time the response is to chastise them for not searching before asking such a common question.
Many of these people will be players just starting to be invested enough in osu! to pay attention to ranking. According to Peppy, one of the major goals of the pp overhaul was to encourage progression, but the current system runs counter to that. After you set a decent score on a map, it is in your interest to actually not play that map again until you have improved significantly. Otherwise, you risk disappointment after a few missteps on on otherwise excellent play (for you) leave you a few thousand ranks below your starting point. This does not encourage to keep people playing osu! and fixing it should be made more of a priority.
Basically both of you have the same opinion : current score system sucks, thus score system needs to be changed (so that highest score/ best score means higher pp) but you are just trying to be offensivejesus1412 wrote:
Making pp the scoring system would fix everything you posted and your idea that a higher score should always mean higher pp is the worst thing I have ever read and shouldn't be read by anyone else.nocipher wrote:
Goodwork.
better think before posting
This would render scores practically meaningless and that's bad for something that is the focus of a leaderboard. You would have scores in complete random order. It would be such a mess that you might as well just not display score at all, but that would mean there would be no meaningful way to calculate performance while playing.
I don't want this to happen.
I don't want this to happen.
Posting on behalf of Kyou-kun:
"pp is considered by many to be a good representation of performance, and thus not random. Because of this, I don't think you should claim it is random or would place scores in random order, at least not without evidence to support your claim. The formulas for how pp works are displayed for all to see on the osu! wiki. No random factors are present in any of those formulas, for any mode, which is strong evidence that your claim is incorrect.
As for there being no meaningful way to calculate performance while playing: I already addressed this in the thread."
"pp is considered by many to be a good representation of performance, and thus not random. Because of this, I don't think you should claim it is random or would place scores in random order, at least not without evidence to support your claim. The formulas for how pp works are displayed for all to see on the osu! wiki. No random factors are present in any of those formulas, for any mode, which is strong evidence that your claim is incorrect.
As for there being no meaningful way to calculate performance while playing: I already addressed this in the thread."
It's essentially sorting the scores by accuracy with a secondary weight of combo. This will practically reverse the importance of score. Score will cease to be relevant and so that 7 figure number that racks up when you hit things wont mean anything. If you get a few misses (well actually even a few more 100s will do), might as well retry because your pp gain will be next to nothing. Your modded play with misses will be worth as much pp as No mod scores or even less. Don't even try to go for leaderboard unless you can high accuracy with a given mod or use DT, which tends to be overrated.
Double time scores can make tons of mistakes and still get higher pp than SS with mods. SS ranks will be booted off leaderboards for B rank DT scores.
Also I'm not sure how you're going to calculate pp as you play in real time. Leaderboards are in game as well. PP would have to replace score as an ingame scoring system.
Double time scores can make tons of mistakes and still get higher pp than SS with mods. SS ranks will be booted off leaderboards for B rank DT scores.
Also I'm not sure how you're going to calculate pp as you play in real time. Leaderboards are in game as well. PP would have to replace score as an ingame scoring system.