Will read/post at work.
To escape the mafia's eyes I think.Irreversible wrote:
Why should town lie to get suspicious or what? I don't get that actually, ..
For the second lie, it does not affect anything because we're using the amount of Town power roles to infer the amount of Scum power roles. (Scum PRs = Town - 2).Haneii wrote:
That isn't the only lie they can make. They can say they don't have a power role when they do.NoHitter wrote:
Like I said before, scum can only lie by adding more "claimed PRs" to the list.
You just described the game of mafia. He suggested we use the info from the claims towards traditional scumhunting and you call it ridiculous because it'll play out like a mafia game?Tanzklaue wrote:
this is just ridiculous, your reasoning of they-shoot-us-to-death-but-in-the-optimum-case-we-can-lynch-them-faster-than-they-kill-us sounds like a really bad justification for this.
*looks through thread to see which post might have given you this idea/made you feel threatened*Tanzklaue wrote:
I still think that the mass claim is super anti town, though. but by now the damage is already too big and not claiming would be like lynching yourself.
sorry for the bad wording, what I meant is that his (nohitters) exact plan only would work in the optimum case (and maybe one or two others), while in every other scenario scum just playing shooting gallery and town not having enough clues/time to find clues that lead to the mafia.Haneii wrote:
You just described the game of mafia. He suggested we use the info from the claims towards traditional scumhunting and you call it ridiculous because it'll play out like a mafia game?Tanzklaue wrote:
this is just ridiculous, your reasoning of they-shoot-us-to-death-but-in-the-optimum-case-we-can-lynch-them-faster-than-they-kill-us sounds like a really bad justification for this.
Haneii wrote:
*looks through thread to see which post might have given you this idea/made you feel threatened*Tanzklaue wrote:
I still think that the mass claim is super anti town, though. but by now the damage is already too big and not claiming would be like lynching yourself.
*comes up empty*
Okay.
basically this. the massclaim advanced too far, scum already got advantages. our only hope is to deal with the situation we got into now, and hope we somehow can get something out of it for town. a full massclaim is more salvageable than a 3/4 massclaim.fartownik wrote:
I agree with RB and JInx here. If we stop claiming right now it will only cause confusion and more WIFOM in the next days, basically harming town even more. NH already explained a lot here and I will trust him for this one. I don't see a reason (a pro-town one) for the remaining people not to claim in this very moment.
I still find it odd that you went first went with "I'm going to claim because if I don't I'll get lynched" instead of "I agree with Fartownik, Jinx, and RB - it's too late and we should all claim"Tanzklaue wrote:
Haneii wrote:
Tanzklaue wrote:
I still think that the mass claim is super anti town, though. but by now the damage is already too big and not claiming would be like lynching yourself.
*looks through thread to see which post might have given you this idea/made you feel threatened*
*comes up empty*
Okay.
fartownik wrote:
I agree with RB and JInx here. If we stop claiming right now it will only cause confusion and more WIFOM in the next days, basically harming town even more. NH already explained a lot here and I will trust him for this one. I don't see a reason (a pro-town one) for the remaining people not to claim in this very moment.
basically this. the massclaim advanced too far, scum already got advantages. our only hope is to deal with the situation we got into now, and hope we somehow can get something out of it for town. a full massclaim is more salvageable than a 3/4 massclaim.
They do, i'm just not counting them as the town starting PRs.Rantai wrote:
Wait, Masons don't count as a PR?
Learnt something new today.
They are, but in the case that we only have 3 people claiming PRs the Masons should claim (I'm assuming they'd be the 2 out of the 3 people who claimed PR). They should also let us know if they have another PR along with being Masons.Rantai wrote:
Wait, Masons don't count as a PR?
Learnt something new today.
Sakura wrote:
They do, i'm just not counting them as the town starting PRs.Rantai wrote:
Wait, Masons don't count as a PR?
Learnt something new today.
Yes, i was planning on extending it when replacement arrives anyway.NoHitter wrote:
Mod: Can we request an extension when replacement arrives?
he was too busy posting in unfunny troll map threads and congratulating mappers for their ranked maps. no way could he write a simple "I am a PR/not a PR" here in the thread.Raging Bull wrote:
It would help if he posted before replacement
2, if they didn't scew the numbers. which i highly doubt, because scewing numbers in that kind of situation isn't smart.Raging Bull wrote:
I guess scum chose 1 power ifi read right
I understood it more like BRBP confirmed being Mason, but I can be wrong.Tanzklaue wrote:
at least BRBP said that he has an additional PR (I believe? sorry if I misread that).
masons can also have additional PRs. so if rantai has an additional PR, then scum chose 2 advantages. probably 2 PRs, since daychat with 2 people isn't too useful (I don't know since I have no experience :/), and recruiting the traitor isn't a good enough trade for an additional PR in my opinion (since a goon doesn't have that many perks more than a traitor anyway).
so I would assume that we have a set up of 1-2 PR mafias with one traitor amongst us.
Just to let you know, DakeDekaane, the mafia could have 2 PR, daychat, and the traitor. The traitor would always be there (ie:mafia doesn't have to choose/ask for one) unless the mafia chose to recruit him/her into a Goon:DakeDekaane wrote:
tho they may have daychat as it'd be useful as they could discuss in our back right now, but given the situation it's more likely to they could have 2 PR and Traitor is more likely to be in the crowd,
Sakura wrote:
This game will be using the "Stacking the Deck" setup, there will be 3 scum, one of them is a Traitor and they don't know who it is, yet, Mafia may choose up to 3 of the following powers that they want
Are we counting Rantai in PR list? Rantai do you have another role besides Mason?NoHitter wrote:
Not PR
NoHitter
JInxyjem
Hika
DakeDekaane
Irreversible
Haneii
Tanzklaue
rEdo
PR
Raging Bull
Rantai
fartownik
BRBP
If you're mafia and lie and then someone else claims to have the same role you're caught (or at least quite soon).Tanzklaue wrote:
how useful would be a fullclaim from the PRs?
rEdo wrote:
keep in mind that the scum themselves could be suggesting this in order to receive information, and that whole "let's claim who has them PRs" thing could be just a bait for us to bite. I wouldn't share such information with everybody else while we've got threats in.
The rest feel null to me at the moment.rEdo wrote:
not to mention that this whole claiming thing could be mafia's conspiration
Hmm it's up to you. If we mislynch that will leave us with 4 - 3 - 4. (3 scum - 4 unconfirmed town). Those are great odds for a vig.Raging Bull wrote:
Should I even shoot in the beginning? Assuming they have JOAT only, that means there are 2 scum + 1 traitor.
Both, when Ninja submits kill it's like they targeted no one, so watcher wont see anyone targetting their target, or tracker wont see the ninja targetting anyone.NoHitter wrote:
Mod: By "tracked" do you mean "watched"? i.e. Seen by a Watcher?
you didn't even ask me for reasons, yaaaaayfartownik wrote:
My reads:
Irreversible: Totally null. Especially that random vote on NoHitter, he also used to post more in the previous games.
i was sitting in school, and I was boredNoHitter wrote:
@Irreversible
Why did you vote me?
Ask NH.DakeDekaane wrote:
@BRBP: can we know the reasons of your vote on NH?
No idea why he's voting for me.BRBP wrote:
Ask NH.DakeDekaane wrote:
@BRBP: can we know the reasons of your vote on NH?
Oh well... looking at this right now is actually weird. He proposed this and also claimed right in the same post.BRBP wrote:
@NH Just wondering since you asked Irre why he voted for you, but didn't ask me.
@Dake I voted because I don't like the "two style" nor that he basically stated "We're playing like this whether you like it or not. *Okay I go first, not a pr*" immediately after the game started.
etc.
that's what i'm here for <3BRBP wrote:
I cry every time you post.
I've said a few things, as I said before, it's a bit hard for me to get something solid in D1 most of the time, and maybe by asking the why of the votes I think we can read better each one of us. I can understand why someone would vote NH, but I prefer reading it from their words.Irreversible wrote:
dake: instead of telling us smth about you you always ask 'why did you vote him, why did you vote that'.. are you worried about nohitter's live? :c
Haneii wrote:
We only have a day left?
Vote Hika
You're acting apathetic. When you post you rarely, if ever, have anything to contribute or at least something to give me an idea about what you're thinking/your opinion. It's anti-town and could hurt us even more if you're left to continue like this.
Didn't notice that you did until Dake pointed it out.BRBP wrote:
@NH Just wondering since you asked Irre why he voted for you, but didn't ask me.
Because that's what Two always does xDBRBP wrote:
@Dake I voted because I don't like the "two style" nor that he basically stated "We're playing like this whether you like it or not. *Okay I go first, not a pr*" immediately after the game started.
Though I'm curious farto, how was that a "slip"?fartownik wrote:
I still wouldn't go for him though, at least not yet. It might've been just a slip, or maybe he was too sure his tactic will end up successful.
I'm fine with that, but you should consider changing your target depending on the flip today.Raging Bull wrote:
Everyone fine if I shoot rEdo? If he flips scum, it's possible Haneii can be scum too. Seems like she defended him a bit.