Kay, so if BRBP is a PR too then it gives us 3 PR for town, which means Mafia took 1 option from the list (unless someone from Town lied for some reason). Time for my claim I guess.
Claim: Watcher
Claim: Watcher
rEdo wrote:
keep in mind that the scum themselves could be suggesting this in order to receive information, and that whole "let's claim who has them PRs" thing could be just a bait for us to bite. I wouldn't share such information with everybody else while we've got threats in.
The rest feel null to me at the moment.rEdo wrote:
not to mention that this whole claiming thing could be mafia's conspiration
Hmm it's up to you. If we mislynch that will leave us with 4 - 3 - 4. (3 scum - 4 unconfirmed town). Those are great odds for a vig.Raging Bull wrote:
Should I even shoot in the beginning? Assuming they have JOAT only, that means there are 2 scum + 1 traitor.
Both, when Ninja submits kill it's like they targeted no one, so watcher wont see anyone targetting their target, or tracker wont see the ninja targetting anyone.NoHitter wrote:
Mod: By "tracked" do you mean "watched"? i.e. Seen by a Watcher?
you didn't even ask me for reasons, yaaaaayfartownik wrote:
My reads:
Irreversible: Totally null. Especially that random vote on NoHitter, he also used to post more in the previous games.
i was sitting in school, and I was boredNoHitter wrote:
@Irreversible
Why did you vote me?
Ask NH.DakeDekaane wrote:
@BRBP: can we know the reasons of your vote on NH?
No idea why he's voting for me.BRBP wrote:
Ask NH.DakeDekaane wrote:
@BRBP: can we know the reasons of your vote on NH?
Oh well... looking at this right now is actually weird. He proposed this and also claimed right in the same post.BRBP wrote:
@NH Just wondering since you asked Irre why he voted for you, but didn't ask me.
@Dake I voted because I don't like the "two style" nor that he basically stated "We're playing like this whether you like it or not. *Okay I go first, not a pr*" immediately after the game started.
etc.
that's what i'm here for <3BRBP wrote:
I cry every time you post.
I've said a few things, as I said before, it's a bit hard for me to get something solid in D1 most of the time, and maybe by asking the why of the votes I think we can read better each one of us. I can understand why someone would vote NH, but I prefer reading it from their words.Irreversible wrote:
dake: instead of telling us smth about you you always ask 'why did you vote him, why did you vote that'.. are you worried about nohitter's live? :c
Haneii wrote:
We only have a day left?
Vote Hika
You're acting apathetic. When you post you rarely, if ever, have anything to contribute or at least something to give me an idea about what you're thinking/your opinion. It's anti-town and could hurt us even more if you're left to continue like this.
Didn't notice that you did until Dake pointed it out.BRBP wrote:
@NH Just wondering since you asked Irre why he voted for you, but didn't ask me.
Because that's what Two always does xDBRBP wrote:
@Dake I voted because I don't like the "two style" nor that he basically stated "We're playing like this whether you like it or not. *Okay I go first, not a pr*" immediately after the game started.
Though I'm curious farto, how was that a "slip"?fartownik wrote:
I still wouldn't go for him though, at least not yet. It might've been just a slip, or maybe he was too sure his tactic will end up successful.
I'm fine with that, but you should consider changing your target depending on the flip today.Raging Bull wrote:
Everyone fine if I shoot rEdo? If he flips scum, it's possible Haneii can be scum too. Seems like she defended him a bit.