I don't mean to flame, it's just that so many speedranks and so many unranks coming from the same person raised this issue in the first place.

dkun wrote:

Hello guys.

t/93158
So uh, a 9 day speedrank and yet another derank.

2008 here we come again - E-I 'spreads' and not even nearly fully mapped .mp3s, huzzah /o/

I pointed out the massive amount of unused MP3 on page 2. I'm just posting here because I'm mad

BATs need to look at speed ranks with EXTRA care, not extra confidence that the map is good. Shure, people who have many beatmaps ranked are usually good at making maps, but that doesn't mean that their maps will meet a quality level in a small amount of time. Check to see if mods were actually listened to, and check for problems with the map.

I still don't want to see 2 diff map spam, especially when there isn't a taiko >:O

^There are also mappers without (m-)any ranked maps that have a high quality standard but aren't getting any attention at all, that's the sad part :/

it amused me, to be honest. It's like, we make these huge walls of text on how to make things better, have a sensed, productive and constructive discussion and pointed out some stuff that shouldn't happen again.

And it doesn't freaking change anything in the end. If anything, it got worse. If I didn't know better, I'd say it was speedranked on purpose to make us rage, but assumptions like these suck, so I won't.

And once again, to thelewa, yes, we can quote names, because like dkun stated, very few people are guilty of speedranking mediocre maps, and we're mentioning the one offender par excellence. After all, and I'm going to be very honest here, when I interpret a good 50% of the posts here, I get something along the lines of "Dammit Andrea, stop your BS". I'm not condemning it, I'm just saying, that's what happens.

We've established that speedranking is bad when the map doesn't deserve it. As in, it's "rankable", but it isn't "good". I've made a few posts about that already. The sheer majority of speedranked maps are maps that don't stand out by their quality - they stand out by popular song choice. We've established that these maps shouldn't be ranked, and yet, this happened. Again.
You've got to understand that people are about sick of it now. Wouldn't it be more rewarding for the mapper who put a lot of effort into his map, looked actively for mods, and listened to/applied them to get their map ranked fast, rather than the mapper who makes some 2-diff mapset with plain mapping, with very few/lousy mods too often disregarded, and ranks it in a couple of days through relations with the XAT? Come on now. The star priority is supposed to put the best maps in the limelight, so that these maps get looked at by the XAT and eventually get ranked first, because they deserve it, so how come this is happening?

I doubt we're taken seriously.

There is a mindset in the BAT team that gives them a ticket out of "having to do anything", including changing their attitude/methods for whatever reason. Sure we have the ranking criteria, but that only applies after a map is selected for possible ranking. The BAT team is very corruptible when it comes to these things because it seems like there is a lack of... order. An example:

Player: Hey BAT, why are you so inactive/lazy/hasty when it comes to ranking/modding maps? That's your job!
BAT: I'm not paid to be a BAT, so it's not a job. /conversation

When we confront peppy on the issue, we get a more solid (yet still troublesome) rebuttal. "I am working on something that will fix this issue" or "Because it was designed like this, it works better than if we implemented your idea". With the BAT team having a sturdy wall of "logic" infront of them, the only way we can change things in the ranking process is to change the ranking criteria, which is done by posting word walls like this. There are a few BAT members that read these wordwalls, and they are also the ones unranking maps, proposing changes to ranking criteria to BATs, and listening to players. Sakura comes to mind when I think of this.

tl;dr: We need more Sakura.

just grab the head of the problem, at rip it off. we all know who is this certain BAT, who shall not be named but sounds a little bit like sangria, is the main abuser of the system. expell him from the BAT, so he can learn his lesson, and most importantly, can't abuse his power any further. in fact, every XAT who is constantly involved in such questionable ranks (not only speedwise, but qualitywise) and only seems to mod for a certain group of mappers should get a time out. everybody knows roughly who these people are, and everybody knows they only abuse their power and sit on their colored names. they don't do much, if anything, for the community, they don't do the things they should do, so why should they keep their place?

probably around 50% of the XAT would be cut off if peppy grabs his balls and does something, but they didn't do much to begin with, so they are replaceable. in general, the standards for getting a position in the MAT and more importantly BAT-team should be a lot higher than they are at the moment. I mean, come on, you don't even need to speak half decent english to be a MAT or BAT.

sadly, nothing will happen, because everything is perfectly fine in peppies eyes, or not worse enough to do something against it.

Tanzklaue wrote:

just grab the head of the problem, at rip it off. we all know who is this certain BAT, who shall not be named but sounds a little bit like sangria, is the main abuser of the system. expell him from the BAT, so he can learn his lesson, and most importantly, can't abuse his power any further. in fact, every XAT who is constantly involved in such questionable ranks (not only speedwise, but qualitywise) and only seems to mod for a certain group of mappers should get a time out. everybody knows roughly who these people are, and everybody knows they only abuse their power and sit on their colored names. they don't do much, if anything, for the community, they don't do the things they should do, so why should they keep their place?

probably around 50% of the XAT would be cut off if peppy grabs his balls and does something, but they didn't do much to begin with, so they are replaceable. in general, the standards for getting a position in the MAT and more importantly BAT-team should be a lot higher than they are at the moment. I mean, come on, you don't even need to speak half decent english to be a MAT or BAT.

sadly, nothing will happen, because everything is perfectly fine in peppies eyes, or not worse enough to do something against it.

This post is full of false assumptions. I suggest you guys don't try to talk about something you know nothing about.

Tanzklaue wrote:

*Stuff*
sadly, nothing will happen, because everything is perfectly fine in peppies eyes, or not worse enough to do something against it.

On another note, peppy is now plural.

CXu wrote:

Tanzklaue wrote:

*Stuff*
sadly, nothing will happen, because everything is perfectly fine in peppies eyes, or not worse enough to do something against it.

On another note, peppy is now plural.

lol sorry can't resist to post, laugh so hard

Tanzklaue wrote:

expell him from the BAT, so he can learn his lesson, and most importantly, can't abuse his power any further.

This would do nothing since he can ask for mods and get them almost instantly, ask for bubbles and get them almost instantly, ect. The same thing has happened to others in the past.

Can we actually get a post from Andrea in here? I'd love to see his opinion in the subject.

Blue Dragon wrote:

Can we actually get a post from Andrea in here? I'd love to see his opinion in the subject.

It's one of two pieces to the puzzle that we are missing. The other piece is peppy's current opinion on this matter.

This PM chatlog is posted with permission of Andrea


Now please let's stop pointing fingers and let's start working towards a solution.

^ I'm not against Andrea, but this is really surprising.

Okay, this is now better.

Now I'd like to see why these specific people (mostly BATs and MATs, that say that don't accept requests) do that. I mean... Not trying to provoke anything here, but why would someone mod a map without even asked to while people are struggling to get their maps ranked while they are ignored?

This is strange. Why would people (especially XATs) rush towards andrea's maps and mod them? I could see some players rushing towards popular mappers in hope for a mod4mod/advice or something, but XATs? I am confused

Sakura wrote:

Now please let's stop pointing fingers and let's start working towards a solution.

We did a while ago already, but people keep being ignorant. Also I suppose this should be discussed internally, since it's basically a MAT/BAT problem.

Shiro wrote:

This post is full of false assumptions. I suggest you guys don't try to talk about something you know nothing about.

it's not nice to blame everybody here for something I wrote. I posted this, not the rest of the people who discuss this, thus it is my opinion, and only mine, so please, don't say that others didn't behave correctly.
to the "false assumptions": what should I do if not assume these things? the whole thing is as transparent as a brick wall, so I can't really do many other things but assuming. I am sorry that the post was quite outrageous, and it really wasn't thoughtful enough for this thread, and the purposes of this thread. still, I think something should happen, because if Andrea didn't lie, then other XATs should get a big reminder that there not only BATs and MATs and popular mappers in this game, but many others who really need and appreciate help from the XATs. the critic still is the same: the XATs have to change their mind and stop only modding maps from only a small amount of people, and focus on the community as a whole.

and @CXu: yes, all of the peppies in this world have to acknowledge the problem that speedranking of unfinished or bad maps is. :< I'm sorry for failing at english while criticizing that XATs should be able to speak english q.q

Sakura wrote:

Now please let's stop pointing fingers and let's start working towards a solution.

Hey we found solution - XAT's needs to change their modding policies and mod not only popular / others XATs maps, but mod basing on star priority.
My opinion: If XAT's <mainly bats> do their work bad, they need to change or get demoted, really they are not only people in the world which can be BAT's.
Ofc. flame war begin.
Edit: We're discussing here, and I wonder if some of that bats which we mean, are reading this.

Sakura wrote:

This PM chatlog is posted with permission of Andrea

21:59:35: <Sakura> however there's something i want to ask you
21:59:52: <Sakura> have you ever put yourself in the shoes of the other mappers?
22:00:39: <Sakura> as in, ask people for mods and mods on your maps, MATs and BATs not coming to your calls, spending months on trying to get it ranked, while in the meantime a BAT gets 5-6 or even 7 maps ranked?
22:01:26: <Andrea> yeah I did... that isn't nice at all I suppose...
22:01:40: <Andrea> I had a 9 months pending map too so I know
22:02:03: <Sakura> now even worst case scenario, imagine that your map has a lot of SP and is on first page, and has been bubbled and on first page for a month or 2
22:02:16: <Sakura> then, that BAT's map gets in first page and gets immediately ranked afterwards
22:02:31: <Andrea> I'd rage badly, of course
22:02:45: <Sakura> well tell you, that's how the whole community feels right now with your maps
22:02:55: <Sakura> but the thing is, that isn't your fault
22:03:05: <Sakura> you just make the map in hopes to get it ranked like everyone else
22:03:33: <Sakura> the thing is that the BATs and MATs themselves go towards your map as soon as it gets there, regardless of the other maps
22:04:55: <Andrea> yeah that's the thing
22:05:04: <Andrea> most of the times I don't even ask for mod
22:05:12: <Andrea> but MATs or BATs comes there and mod it

Now please let's stop pointing fingers and let's start working towards a solution.

Solutions have been pointed out on the thread as it is.

If you're actually arrogant enough to believe this log, then I fear for you.

Tanzklaue wrote:

Shiro wrote:

This post is full of false assumptions. I suggest you guys don't try to talk about something you know nothing about.

it's not nice to blame everybody here for something I wrote. I posted this, not the rest of the people who discuss this, thus it is my opinion, and only mine, so please, don't say that others didn't behave correctly.

Exactly. You're assuming the whole BAT/MAT is fine with all these speedranks->unranks, which is far from being true. The only ones who are fine with them are the ones who are involved.

dkun wrote:

If you're actually arrogant enough to believe this log, then I fear for you.

Sorry but I looked at http://osu.ppy.sh/s/55626 when I check the first page of pending randomly without being requested. This is your freedom to believe or not. If you don't believe facts there'll be nothing we can do.

If you ask for reason that I go there, that is SP.

wmfchris wrote:

dkun wrote:

If you're actually arrogant enough to believe this log, then I fear for you.

Sorry but I looked at http://osu.ppy.sh/s/55626 when I check the first page of pending randomly without being requested. This is your freedom to believe or not. If you don't believe facts there'll be nothing we can do.

If you ask for reason that I go there, that is SP.

I hope you understand my point in posting this image.

I think one should be very cautious when checking SP. After all, like we said before, a guy with 50 kd can boost his map to +50 without it ever been modded once. I'm not saying that being able to star your map is a bad thing, but in my opinion XAT should work like this: count how many mods the map got so far, how many of said mods were applied, and to what extent. Then, look at the map itself, and make out if it is "rankable", or if it's "good". If it's just "rankable", move on to another map, or at least don't bubble/rank it outright. If it's "good", then do your best for the map to be ranked as quickly as possible, following the modding process, of course.

I've always taken for granted that XAT are here to help mappers, and thus are willing to help them, no matter how hard, tedious, or complicated the task is. Am I mistaken when I think that? Are there XAT that don't want to help mappers out there? If so, then they should probably try, methinks.

If someone has 50 SP to waste that means they have done a lot of good modding themselves. It doesn't substitute for real mods, but it is worth a check by a BAT to see how far it is getting along. Also, this shouldn't be a reason to stop using the SP system entirely. BATs should use the SP system but to save time they should wait for there to be a large amount of mods or multiple kd givers before they give their own opinion.

Well, maybe differentiate star priority and priority from mods?
Like, the total priority is the same, but it shows somewhere how many are stars and how many are mods:
(23 stars, 5 mods) or (3 stars, 9 mods) <-- write that somewhere so it's atleast visible, and doesn't require us to count stars.

Feature request it?

You can calculate the number of mods by yourself, and I already brought the idea of displaying the number of mods (that is, posts that were given kd) next to the star priority more than 3 weeks ago.

^I even contributed a green star for this Feature Request D;

Limit the maximum Stars giveable by the same user to the same map.
It'll be better if the mapper itself will start spending more for other maps than his, And about 3-4 Star per map should be good, I really hate seeing Star walls, with almost ALL of them gaved by the same people.

I have much to say but I am lazy, so just let me just state my conclusion.

Fellow mappers, do you want a totally fair ranking system in which all mappers are treated the same with no privilege due to experience or seniority whatsoever, or do you want a somewhat unfair ranking system in which your efforts or good records are rewarded with more privileges?

Tell you what, I prefer the latter.

But if you throw in the variable "are you acquainted with key personnel in the ranking system"?

Tell you what, I am disappointed but I had to choose the first one.

Now you think, oh surely there must be something in between these two extremes while addressing that variable?

Tell you what, if you've got a solution, it's got to be something totally revolutionary.

^ Stop talking like that. D:

Mr Color wrote:

If it's just "rankable", move on to another map, or at least don't bubble/rank it outright. If it's "good", then do your best for the map to be ranked as quickly as possible, following the modding process, of course.

Err, you mean... when it's only "rankable", help the mapper get things right, right? It's no good if we ignore a map just like that. Either way, I think every map should be treated the same... as in, we should always try our best.

Mr Color wrote:

I've always taken for granted that XAT are here to help mappers, and thus are willing to help them, no matter how hard, tedious, or complicated the task is. Am I mistaken when I think that? Are there XAT that don't want to help mappers out there? If so, then they should probably try, methinks.

I'm sure most, if not all, XATs are willing to help. The mappers are the ones who don't want to be helped sometimes ("it's my style leave it alone I don't want to change it"), and that stops the ranking process too.
This is regarding the actual modding process, of course.

CXu wrote:

Well, maybe differentiate star priority and priority from mods?
Like, the total priority is the same, but it shows somewhere how many are stars and how many are mods:
(23 stars, 5 mods) or (3 stars, 9 mods) <-- write that somewhere so it's atleast visible, and doesn't require us to count stars.

The one problem I've always seen with this feature proposal though, is that mod posts by most newbie/regular users are... not very helpful, and it's always up to the XAT to get things right.
If only we could differentiate "very good mod posts" from "regular mod posts", that'd make this work... but then again, that makes things too complicated, I think.

HakuNoKaemi wrote:

Limit the maximum Stars giveable by the same user to the same map.
It'll be better if the mapper itself will start spending more for other maps than his, And about 3-4 Star per map should be good, I really hate seeing Star walls, with almost ALL of them gaved by the same people.

I'm sure this won't happen... the whole point of kudosu stars is that you can do anything you want with them, whether it is for your own maps or other people's. After all, you earned them fair and square. It's a right you've earned to put 500+ stars on a single map if you want, after all, you spend 500 kudosu.

Anyway, no, I didn't read the whole thread, I'm just putting that out there. Regarding speedranks, even though I haven't modded in some time, I do give priority to old bubbles before anything, since it's just painful that some maps have been waiting for so long while others get in and out fast. It's just that I haven't had time to mod recently.
I don't think I can be blamed for speedranking anyway, as my last ranked map was some months ago, and the map before that was in January of this year. I know nobody's blaming me, just wanted to put that out there.

tl;dr for this thread: Many BATs are ignoring the SP system and paying a lot of attention to certain mappers, without concern for the SP system. This causes pre-mature maps to be ranked more often and more maps become unranked because of the problems. Another issue with ignoring the SP system is that quality maps unfairly remain in the pending section.

There are many different ways to fix the issue, but no matter what system goes in place, it won't do anything because the same BATs will ignore the system the same way as they ignore the current system. The BATs who are "speedranking" need a change in behavior, and the only person who is able to force a change (peppy) has almost ignored the problem entirely, refusing to do anything about it.

Gens wrote:

Err, you mean... when it's only "rankable", help the mapper get things right, right? It's no good if we ignore a map just like that. Either way, I think every map should be treated the same... as in, we should always try our best.

Well, yeah, my sentence kind of sucked. I was implying for when a XAT wants to bubble/rank, I should have put more emphasis on "at least don't bubble/rank it outright."
Every map deserves the same kind of attention, but not all of them deserve to be ranked in equal time. Like I said, good over rankable and whatnot.

Gens wrote:

I'm sure most, if not all, XATs are willing to help. The mappers are the ones who don't want to be helped sometimes ("it's my style leave it alone I don't want to change it"), and that stops the ranking process too.

I've addressed this kind of behavior before in the thread, but I might as well repeat my opinion on the matter: if people don't want the help, don't help them. And leave the map unattended and it will unevitably hit the graveyard eventually. Bad behaviors when it comes to maps is unacceptable. Thankfully, this is rare, at least to my knowledge.

Gens wrote:

HakuNoKaemi wrote:

Limit the maximum Stars giveable by the same user to the same map.
It'll be better if the mapper itself will start spending more for other maps than his, And about 3-4 Star per map should be good, I really hate seeing Star walls, with almost ALL of them gaved by the same people.

I'm sure this won't happen... the whole point of kudosu stars is that you can do anything you want with them, whether it is for your own maps or other people's. After all, you earned them fair and square. It's a right you've earned to put 500+ stars on a single map if you want, after all, you spend 500 kudosu.

After the remotion of "Free Stars"( the stars that could have been gaved just by posting ), Kudosu Stars became important.
And if the mapper itself can call himself "modder", he should at least reward good maps, not just shoot all the kudosu stars for his maps.
The same for other modders, a map that was modded by two persons can be "prioritized" more than a good maps that has been modded by many peoples just for this stupid flaw.

I'm sure most, if not all, XATs are willing to help. The mappers are the ones who don't want to be helped sometimes ("it's my style leave it alone I don't want to change it"), and that stops the ranking process too.
This is regarding the actual modding process, of course.

It's just bad to point things which only problem is being new. And that's what most mappers will refuse to even listen. It's bad pointing and insisting in things that only you think are bad, really, and that's another thing mappers will refuse.

Mithost wrote:

tl;dr for this thread: Many BATs are ignoring the SP system and paying a lot of attention to certain mappers, without concern for the SP system.

Out of curiosity. Can you name them please? Or atleast give us a number.

I'm not exactly shure what BATs are the main offenders, but I know that a large amount of BATs are not to blame. Plus I don't think 10+ BATs are going to be speedranking.

The best solution I can think of is to mod by SP, like I already do myself.

Checking bubbled maps from the 1st page only is the best choice probably BATs could do, while MATs should focus on bubbling maps with at least +20 of priority.

Anyway, regarding my maps, if they got ranked in a short time, it's because they got lot of mods in a really short time and because they always been on top priority on the first page of bubbles, that's why other BATs always came there to check them, even when I didn't asked them.

So yeah, stop poiting fingers out to me and hate, because it's not my fault here.

I always try to help all the mappers here with my best, and my 898 ranked maps as a BAT shows that clearly.

That said, these are my thoughts. Hope you won't flame again, I'm trying to find a solution to this as well.

Gens wrote:

I'm sure most, if not all, XATs are willing to help. The mappers are the ones who don't want to be helped sometimes ("it's my style leave it alone I don't want to change it"), and that stops the ranking process too.

I tried and I'm still trying to get my first ranked map, but what I supposed to do when I get a mod with this sentence?
"That's all ~ Map still need more work ~" I got this from a MAT, when I asked for a mod. The mod is quite short so I don't even know why this sentence is in the end. I answered to everything and changed everything, oh and I didn't understand one thing but that certain MAT is just ignored it.

In short: What peoples supposed to do, when they got this kind of mods after they asked for it? I'm trying to flow with the current ranking system, but to be honest I'm already tired to ask a MAT to mod my map and be ignored and I think many mappers feel the same out there.

EDIT: since I didn't see the last page

Andrea wrote:

So yeah, stop poiting fingers out to me and hate, because it's not my fault here.

The one who made mistakes is the one who ranked them. Your maps are good, that is nice, but why "someone" ignore issues when he/she rank it?
This thing is easily predictable with a secondary check from someone else too. Just as this pointed out many more before.

Andrea wrote:

The best solution I can think of is to mod by SP, like I already do myself.

Checking bubbled maps from the 1st page only is the best choice probably BATs could do, while MATs should focus on bubbling maps with at least +20 of priority.

More or less this, but do check how many mods the map has gotten and not just how high the sp is.

Andrea wrote:

I always try to help all the mappers here with my best, and my 898 ranked maps as a BAT shows that clearly.

I don't think people are doubting this tbh.

Andrea wrote:

Anyway, regarding my maps, if they got ranked in a short time, it's because they got lot of mods in a really short time and because they always been on top priority on the first page of bubbles, that's why other BATs always came there to check them, even when I didn't asked them.

So yeah, stop poiting fingers out to me and hate, because it's not my fault here.

if so many of them have been getting unranked lately, there is a problem. I'd suggest getting mods at a slower rate (that means stop mod4mod, I think that's something XATs shouldn't be doing), and don't shoot any star towards your own maps so that they get high priority slower? If you're willing to do these sacrifices, I'm sure the better part of us will trust you in that you are trying to help.

And if you want people to stop flaming you then stop making unnecessary remarks here and there because people will call you out and they'll be in their own damn right to do so.

But that's literally punishing Andrea for something that isn't necessarily his fault.

Kurokami wrote:

I tried and I'm still trying to get my first ranked map, but what I supposed to do when I get a mod with this sentence?
"That's all ~ Map still need more work ~" I got this from a MAT, when I asked for a mod. The mod is quite short so I don't even know why this sentence is in the end. I answered to everything and changed everything, oh and I didn't understand one thing but that certain MAT is just ignored it.

In short: What peoples supposed to do, when they got this kind of mods after they asked for it? I'm trying to flow with the current ranking system, but to be honest I'm already tired to ask a MAT to mod my map and be ignored and I think many mappers feel the same out there.

This means your map has so many things to be improved. It's hard to get what makes your map to be same quality as ranked map in these day.
If you can pass this wall, you will be able to get bubble in your further maps so easily.

For the solution here : try to improve your map by yourself is the best way when you encounter with this kind of modding.

He's still the source of the problem, regardless of if he's guilty or not. We can't just tell XATs "please stop being so hasty with Andrea's maps" can we? Sounds a bit of a weird thing to say IMO

I really don't see it as a punishment myself. We regular users usually have a lot more trouble gathering mods than XATs because they're voraciously sought after for their mods (and eventual bubbles and whatnot). Is really waiting longer, which leads eventually to a better ranked map in the end, that much of a pain?

Kurokami wrote:

Gens wrote:

I'm sure most, if not all, XATs are willing to help. The mappers are the ones who don't want to be helped sometimes ("it's my style leave it alone I don't want to change it"), and that stops the ranking process too.

I tried and I'm still trying to get my first ranked map, but what I supposed to do when I get a mod with this sentence?
"That's all ~ Map still need more work ~" I got this from a MAT, when I asked for a mod. The mod is quite short so I don't even know why this sentence is in the end. I answered to everything and changed everything, oh and I didn't understand one thing but that certain MAT is just ignored it.

That... makes me want to punch something. If it were me I wouldn't have stopped there; whenever I see a bad map, it's not good enough for me to say "needs more mod", hell, I'll be the one to mod it more until the end. I'm willing to write huge walls of text, so you can learn what's wrong and how to fix it, in a detailed manner. After all, I didn't get on the BAT just to do cheap mods.
I see not everyone in the staff has the same mentality as me, though... I'm not pointing fingers, I'm just saying. I mean, sometimes it's okay to leave it up to other modders, but if the map's been modded plenty already and there isn't much change, I see no other option than to break the beatmap down in bits.

Well, in any case... that's the reason I mod more rarely now; it takes much more time to write all of this. orz.

Frostmourne wrote:

Kurokami wrote:

I tried and I'm still trying to get my first ranked map, but what I supposed to do when I get a mod with this sentence?
"That's all ~ Map still need more work ~" I got this from a MAT, when I asked for a mod. The mod is quite short so I don't even know why this sentence is in the end. I answered to everything and changed everything, oh and I didn't understand one thing but that certain MAT is just ignored it.

In short: What peoples supposed to do, when they got this kind of mods after they asked for it? I'm trying to flow with the current ranking system, but to be honest I'm already tired to ask a MAT to mod my map and be ignored and I think many mappers feel the same out there.

This means your map has so many things to be improved. It's hard to get what makes your map to be same quality as ranked map in these day.
If you can pass this wall, you will be able to get bubble in your further maps so easily.

For the solution here : try to improve your map by yourself is the best way when you encounter with this kind of modding.

He wasn't reffering to that (I think). He knows what that sentence means.. I guess he's saying that it's senseless to say "map still need more work" when the MAT only pointed out a couple of things. If the map needs more work, the MAT that modded his map should have written more stuff to help him in improving his map (if he says it needs more work and help..), but he didn't. If the mod is short, why did the MAT pointed out so few things? It doesn't make sense.
I think MATs "aim" is helping mappers to improve their maps by modding them.. not just bubbling good maps around. It's exactly what Gens said. A MAT/BAT should be willing to write huge wall of text if it is necessary to help the mapper to improve his map and to help him in the ranking process.

i just had a fleeting thought - if andrea has ranked more than 900 maps and has speedranked say 20 or 30 maps, he still hasn't speedranked a statistically significant portion of his total ranking count -- meaning that all this babble about speedranking is pretty much a storm in a teacup.

i might borrow some db time in the next few days and work out a query to determine who in the BAT is responsible for the statistically highest proportion of speedranks vs normal ranks.

i think you'd find the main offenders quite surprising!

Kei wrote:

He wasn't reffering to that (I think). He knows what that sentence means.. I guess he's saying that it's senseless to say "map still need more work" when the MAT only pointed out a couple of things. If the map needs more work, the MAT that modded his map should have written more stuff to help him in improving his map (if he says it needs more work and help..), but he didn't. If the mod is short, why did the MAT pointed out so few things? It doesn't make sense.

This is what I wanted to say with that.

Frostmurne wrote:

For the solution here : try to improve your map by yourself is the best way when you encounter with this kind of modding.

I'm not a pro mapper to do this after 12 page with mods. Maybe for you it is possible, but not for me. I need advice, I need things to be pointed out. Which will be very useful in my future mapping.

Gens wrote:

That... makes me want to punch something. If it were me I wouldn't have stopped there; whenever I see a bad map, it's not good enough for me to say "needs more mod", hell, I'll be the one to mod it more until the end. I'm willing to write huge walls of text, so you can learn what's wrong and how to fix it, in a detailed manner. After all, I didn't get on the BAT just to do cheap mods.

I wanted to see this when I asked a MAT to mod my map but the mod is just pointed out a few staff. Which means, at least to me, my map isn't that bad. When I got this, my map is already got 10 pages of mods and it is already much better than the first sh*t version. So my map was improved so much thanks to the modders, and I hoped the same from MAT too, but .... I got almost nothing.

Anyways, I don't want to point fingers, I just want to see a better mod from a XAT member.

@Ephemeral
The problem with the speedranks if the map gets de-rank after it. This isn't depends on the mapper. So even if it looks like it, the quilty isn't Andrea. This is already pointed out a few times, but...

Kurokami wrote:

Frostmourne wrote:

For the solution here : try to improve your map by yourself is the best way when you encounter with this kind of modding.

I'm not a pro mapper to do this after 12 page with mods. Maybe for you it is possible, but not for me. I need advice, I need things to be pointed out. Which will be very useful in my future mapping.

nah, i'm sorry for that Kurokami. I honestly say that for the first map is really really extremely hard to get star mark icon before bubble. I faced the stuff like this from Suzully and wmfchris 8 months ago in My map so. t/65919/start=30
But have to say that my case, Suzully and wmfchris explained clearly that why my map was bad.

Please don't give up.. That is all i want you to do

First rank always the threshold for a new mapper. Do not give up, i can say nearly all mappers had faced to that. Some guys crossed that, more failed. Hopes you won't be one the those failed :>

Frostmourne wrote:

nah, i'm sorry for that Kurokami. I honestly say that for the first map is really really extremely hard to get star mark icon before bubble. I faced the stuff like this from Suzully and wmfchris 8 months ago in My map so. t/65919/start=30
But have to say that my case, Suzully and wmfchris explained clearly that why my map was bad.

Please don't give up.. That is all i want you to do

Scorpiour wrote:

First rank always the threshold for a new mapper. Do not give up, i can say nearly all mappers had faced to that. Some guys crossed that, more failed. Hopes you won't be one the those failed :>

I know its hard to get the first map ranked and I always knew, but I tried. osu! is lack this song so I mapped it. I recently asked TVO to mod it and he said it is looking good to him even tho its hard to map. I don't want to trow more stars to it, since I'm using them to someone else's map which is deserve it. I'm not the same as the guy who thrown many stars for his own map and after that he ignored almost all mod.
I'm unable to do more about this mapset so I leave it as it is. Ordinary modders are already unable to anything with it after all. I will just resurrect it, nothing more.
I mapped my "second" map and asked Andrea for a testplay. He said its looking good to him and this (even if its a lie), coming from my favorite mapper is enough to my to continue as a mapper. So I will never give up, but mods like those makes me rage.

Anyways, I think enough of this off-topic conversation. This topic is not about me or my maps, its about speedranks and the issues with it.

PS: @Frostmurne
That song is one of my favorite. :3

Ephemeral wrote:

i might borrow some db time in the next few days and work out a query to determine who in the BAT is responsible for the statistically highest proportion of speedranks vs normal ranks.

i think you'd find the main offenders quite surprising!

I don't think pointing fingers to the BAT that speedranked maps the most really is the way to go. Actually, I'm pretty sure many BATs if not all of them have speedranked maps before. I'd rather check if said maps are fun to play, because some speedranks can be deserved. I think we all point fingers at Andrea because we're like "This guy has speedranked his maps for several years now and is still doing it, except they're getting unranked, which is a problem". You'd need to check through every single speedranked map, not just Andrea's. I believe it's just a matter of being more careful when modding, bubbling and whatnot in the XAT. Because we regular users are very unforgiving and are very likely to rage at every little mistake these guys make.

Andrea's post makes sense. If XATs modded only the first page of SP, there would be no less perfectly good maps that have to wait so long for ranking. As the high SP maps start to get more rare due to them all being ranked, less SP will be needed for mappers to hit the front page, where they can get the XAT attention their map needs.

Ephemeral wrote:

i think you'd find the main offenders quite surprising!

I'm a take a guess and say,

1) Larto, Mash, jar, DC
2) ztrot
3) James
4) DJPop

Ephemeral wrote:

if andrea has ranked more than 900 maps and has speedranked say 20 or 30 maps

I think the issue is the maps of his that have been speedranked, not the maps that he has speedranked (if any), the number you pointed out is the ammount of maps that Andrea has ranked, not the ammount of ranked maps that he has, also i'm pretty sure about more than half of his maps have been "speedranked", then again, as said before, this is an issue with the BATs that rank them, not with Andrea.

It's not exactly on topic but I found this while looking around the ranking criteria...

The mapset must have a well-designed spread of difficulties, containing at least an Easy or a Normal difficulty (based on how the map feels): this is so that players of all levels of experience are able to enjoy maps of the songs they love. It's really hard to define how a specific spread could work in a specific song beforehand, but here's a list of things to consider: the difficulties in the mapset must be in a consecutive order and/or with a reasonable gap between them; there should be at least one difficulty around ~2.5/3 star difficulty level; if your mapset has two difficulties, one of them cannot be insane (this basically means that it's highly recommended to have 3 difficulties unless the song itself doesn't allow much variety); if your mapset has three difficulties, one of them should be about ~2.5/3 star difficulty level, and the second should not be Insane; if your map has four or more difficulties, at least two should be something other than Insane.

I don't want to pick on andrea or anything, I know many other mappers have broken this too.

Insane =/= hard?

ouranhshc wrote:

Ephemeral wrote:

i think you'd find the main offenders quite surprising!

I'm a take a guess and say,

1) Larto, Mash, jar, DC
2) ztrot
3) James
4) DJPop

Are you having a Steffi Graf?

ouranhshc wrote:

Ephemeral wrote:

i think you'd find the main offenders quite surprising!

I'm a take a guess and say,

1) Larto, Mash, jar, DC

Main offenders of great mapping, yeah.

itt ouran is a black natteke

This is off-topic. Stop now.

Marcin and Mithost: many people use "Hard" as a replacement for Insanes nowadays, and no one gives a shit about it.

true story.
2-diffs short/tv-size maps are SO half assed.

HakuNoKaemi wrote:

true story.
2-diffs short/tv-size maps are SO half assed.

I wanted to say this in a way that didn't target anyone. I feel kinda cheated for some reason when a song I like has only 2 difficulties to play, especially when it happens to be a cut version, or it's just not mapped after the 2 minute mark. I'm working on my first serious "I'm going to get this ranked" map and although I was tempted to cut the song at 2 mins, I know that I would feel a lot better getting it ranked with it being the full 3 and a half minutes included, especially when that's the best part of the song. Having only 2 difficulties also makes it hard to progress with as a new player. Trying to do a normal>insane jump without a hard is very... threatening (not sure if I got the right word there...)

This is a thread about speedranking, not 2 diff mapsets. 2 diff mapsets are a choice and are rankable, and in most cases rarely used. Should open a new topic about it if you want to discuss it though.

it's like we're saying nothing at all
nothing at all
nothing at all

lolcubes wrote:

This is a thread about speedranking, not 2 diff mapsets. 2 diff mapsets are a choice and are rankable, and in most cases rarely used. Should open a new topic about it if you want to discuss it though.

2 diffs created by well-known mappers which knows them speed ranked, that's how it works.
FUCK YOU NEW PAGE
Alright to clear things out: I have about 19k maps in library, and created simply program which counts number of maps with with number of diffs <will expand functionality tomorrow>

As you can see mapsets with 2 diffs is 1/2 of mapsets with 4 diffs, statment provided by lolcubes is wrong.

so amost half of the ranked have <4 diffs. ( and 15% of times isn't anyway "rare"... maybe uncommon? )
I can usually understand long maps being formed by 3-4 diffs. I can't understand short versions having 3-4 diffs.

Last Andrea ranked was an half-assed 2-diffs mapset. So having an higher limit( 2 for maps longer than 3 min, 3 for maps shorter than 3 min, 4 for map shorter than 1m and 30s, maybe) could be a good idea to slow up the ranking of half-assed mapsets

HakuNoKaemi wrote:

So having an higher limit( 2 for maps longer than 3 min, 3 for maps shorter than 3 min, 4 for map shorter than 1m and 30s, maybe) could be a good idea to slow up the ranking of half-assed mapsets

THIS.

Marcin wrote:

HakuNoKaemi wrote:

So having an higher limit( 2 for maps longer than 3 min, 3 for maps shorter than 3 min, 4 for map shorter than 1m and 30s, maybe) could be a good idea to slow up the ranking of half-assed mapsets

THIS.

No.
Half-assed maps will always be half-assed, no matter how many diffs they have.

HakuNoKaemi wrote:

So having an higher limit( 2 for maps longer than 3 min, 3 for maps shorter than 3 min, 4 for map shorter than 1m and 30s, maybe) could be a good idea to slow up the ranking of half-assed mapsets

If the song is not good for 4 diff then this rule will be broken. In theory this sound good, but when its actually counts this will be useless. This will always depends on the song itself.

Every song is good to map 2 diffs. 2+2 ? (2 osu! + 2 Taiko) for example

HakuNoKaemi wrote:

Every song is good to map 2 diffs. 2+2 ? (2 osu! + 2 Taiko) for example

2 diff is okay. (easy/normal+hard) speaking of standard diffs. But force the mapper to make 2 other when its clear they will not fit there is just stupid.

Or you mean 4 diff with 2 standard and 2 taiko here?

HakuNoKaemi wrote:

So having an higher limit( 2 for maps longer than 3 min, 3 for maps shorter than 3 min, 4 for map shorter than 1m and 30s, maybe) could be a good idea to slow up the ranking of half-assed mapsets

2 standard and 2 taiko, still 4 diff, still you can't lament the fact that map can't be mapped in more ways.

This thread isn't about difficulty spread or halfassed maps. It's about halfassed speedranks that get unranked because they shouldn't have gotten ranked in the first place

Well, while this could be a good mod to the rules, it'll add other reasons to not permit halfassed speedrank.

Marcin wrote:

I have about 19k maps in library
...
As you can see mapsets with 2 diffs is 1/2 of mapsets with 4 diffs, statment provided by lolcubes is wrong.

19k is nothing. Also, there are tons of approval maps which have 1 or 2 diffs. Quite some really old maps have 2 diffs. So your numbers aren't exactly accurate.

lolcubes wrote:

This is a thread about speedranking, not 2 diff mapsets. 2 diff mapsets are a choice and are rankable, and in most cases rarely used. Should open a new topic about it if you want to discuss it though.

Can we stay on topic?

If you guys are so worried about said map(s) getting speedranked and then de-ranked because of issues why not mod them yourself?
Not trying to be rude but it's a better solution then complaining about it, putting your input in will lessen the chance of it happening.
What do you do? Go look at recently bubbled maps that have recent submission days. Find something wrong, point it out. If there is nothing wrong then you have no control over it being ranked or not. (Unless you are the BAT ranking it.)

marcin's data is almost perfectly distributed.. i wouldn't throw away his results based on a 7k sample size either - that is statistically sound stuff.

//offtopic
Not sure if sarcasm, or not.
//ontopic
I can download more maps and recheck D:
//offtopic again
Ephermal if you are able to: can you provide me json api which will send me ranking process <submitted, 1# bubble, <optionally 2# bubble> ranked, deranked, and again ranked, especially DATE of when they were done> based on GET map ID ? It'll allow me to make better statistics which will show: The longest ranking process, the shorter, and the average of time needed to rank map / get bubble per users.

i can't extend API like that for you, but if i manage to steal some database time i can have that queried myself without needing an API.

MMzz wrote:

If you guys are so worried about said map(s) getting speedranked and then de-ranked because of issues why not mod them yourself?
Not trying to be rude but it's a better solution then complaining about it, putting your input in will lessen the chance of it happening.
What do you do? Go look at recently bubbled maps that have recent submission days. Find something wrong, point it out. If there is nothing wrong then you have no control over it being ranked or not. (Unless you are the BAT ranking it.)

I think the problem we found with speedranking is that they are ranked too fast for us to find all of the problems. Once I stop having the busiest week of my life I'll get back into modding (already modded 1 map recently muahaha)

I agree with speedranking maps, if is map quality very high.

NEEECROOO

speedranking is bad, mmmkk?

Mithost wrote:

speedranking is bad, mmmkk?

YEAH YEAH, it's bad and no-one cares.

Mithost wrote:

MMzz wrote:

If you guys are so worried about said map(s) getting speedranked and then de-ranked because of issues why not mod them yourself?
Not trying to be rude but it's a better solution then complaining about it, putting your input in will lessen the chance of it happening.
What do you do? Go look at recently bubbled maps that have recent submission days. Find something wrong, point it out. If there is nothing wrong then you have no control over it being ranked or not. (Unless you are the BAT ranking it.)

I think the problem we found with speedranking is that they are ranked too fast for us to find all of the problems. Once I stop having the busiest week of my life I'll get back into modding (already modded 1 map recently muahaha)

Basically this. The sentiment has already been echoed by several people in the thread, so missing that was kind of silly.

Also, we can totally have control if we whine at the staff enough, teehee.

t/101986&start=0

Okay. I understand that the mapset itself is fine, but getting a speedrank in under 48 hours with only two maps for personal reasons? Since when has the beatmap ranking page been a place to display your personal life? I simply don't understand why it was ranked so quickly. And please don't call me a "heartless hater" for bringing this up. I'm just worried that other mappers might get discouraged by this.

That's just sad.

Lance wrote:

http://osu.ppy.sh/forum/t/101986&start=0

Okay. I understand that the map itself is fine, but getting a speedrank in under 48 hours with only two DIFFS for personal reasons? Since when has the beatmap ranking page been a place to display your personal life? I simply don't understand why it was ranked so quickly. And please don't call me a "heartless hater" for bringing this up. I'm just worried that other mappers might get discouraged by this.

fix'd something for you.

And yeah its pretty disappointing, as Sakura said there was a higher SP map but wasn't touched, and yet this map of someone going emo over some girl gets ranked that fast, and it only has 2 diffs (talk about being lazy). I cannot give a damn if you're going through something emotional but please, you have a position on the team so please keep it professional, not that no one cares about what's going on with you but mind you this is a game.

This is just pretty much unfair for mappers waiting in a very long line.

Seph wrote:

DIFFS

I consider each "diff" as you refer to it as a map in a map set. I think each individual difficulty can be called a map since... well that makes sense. But to each their own.

ps- I just realized I didn't call it a mapset in the original post. Fixed >_>

Not this shit again.

On topic:

Do you have any proof that the "emotional intention" of the mapset was what brought it's "speedrank" up?, fwiw the BAT could have gone "oh cool an Andrea map, let's mod it!" which as i said, i still think the higher SP map should have been modded first, but that's something I would do. If you really want to point fingers, then you better load them with proof that there was bias or anything involved otherwise your arguments hold no water.

The mapset was fine, there were no errors, it was ranked fast? so what, continue on with your life, discussing a map just because it was ranked fast is wasting time you could be spending... i dont know modding someone else's map so you can get it's Sp higher so it gets looked at faster? Use your time in something productive rather than waste it here discussing something that needs no discussion.

Unfair? Maybe, but then again, how much have the other mappers promoted their maps? how high is their SP? are they at least visible on the first or second page of pending?.

If you have time to complain about someone's map getting ranked faster than yours, you have time to mod other people's maps to increase your own map's SP so it gets looked at faster, the difference? on the first one no one wins, on the second one, everyone wins.

So much ^this.

again and again. . .

Don't see why a few people are getting all anal about this map. So it was ranked within 48hrs, so what? If the map had mistakes, little to no mods, and/or was unranked then that's a valid reason to be concerned about. But looking over the thread, there a good number of mods and the map looks good enough to deserve a rank. Having 2 diffs is enough for a rank and they are all by Andrea himself plus this song is a fairly slow song. Look at the relaxing Ranking Charts; 5 maps have 2 diffs only and they are sufficient enough to be on a themed chart.

People are just finding the little things to pick on Andrea now, just get over it and focus on getting your own maps rank which I need to get on >.<

Sakura wrote:

Off-Topic

A diff as most people call it is a map (or beatmap), a collection of multiple difficulties (beatmaps) is a mapset (Beatmap set).

On topic:

Do you have any proof that the "emotional intention" of the mapset was what brought it's "speedrank" up?, fwiw the BAT could have gone "oh cool an Andrea map, let's mod it!" which as i said, i still think the higher SP map should have been modded first, but that's something I would do. If you really want to point fingers, then you better load them with proof that there was bias or anything involved otherwise your arguments hold no water.

The mapset was fine, there were no errors, it was ranked fast? so what, continue on with your life, discussing a map just because it was ranked fast is wasting time you could be spending... i dont know modding someone else's map so you can get it's Sp higher so it gets looked at faster? Use your time in something productive rather than waste it here discussing something that needs no discussion.

Unfair? Maybe, but then again, how much have the other mappers promoted their maps? how high is their SP? are they at least visible on the first or second page of pending?.

If you have time to complain about someone's map getting ranked faster than yours, you have time to mod other people's maps to increase your own map's SP so it gets looked at faster, the difference? on the first one no one wins, on the second one, everyone wins.

Then tell him not to bring personal things in the game and keep it professional? I don't find that hard to do.
And no haha, don't give me that reason, even if he didn't make this map out of his emotinal distress this still happens. And quite frankly I am suprised to see two diffs from him, not even kidding. And just so you know no map is flawless, why do you even think they get modded?

Lol its funny, no one's being biased really. It just so happens that most of speedranked maps comes from him. And you just said it yourself, mod other people's maps to increase your own map's SP, can I ask what happened?

Edit: No one's picking on Andrea, Weez. Why, is it our fault that almost all of every speedranked maps come from him? And remember, prevention is better than cure.

Man, my first map was ranked in about 11 months, and I'm not complaining about speedranks or something related.

Don't you like it? Surrender then.