hi
all sugestion
[Easy, Normal, Hard]
really good map
[Insane]
01:10:195 (1) - 2 grid down because the only 01:10:195 (4,1) is spread (compared with 00:09:859 (1,2) , 00:26:452 (7,8) and 00:51:591 (1,2) )
00:29:804 (3,4,5,6,1) - Why don't you characterize them as like star? ( as if under the picture , and it might be a good idea to exchange (5) for (6)...
)
00:40:027 (9,1) - like under the picture?
01:06:843 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - Why don't you characterize them as like under picture ? (exhange (2) for (3) and moved (4) )
01:09:692 (3) - Why don't you move as if under the picture? i think 01:09:692 (3,4) is more spread is better
)
really nice map~
give you star~
all sugestion

[Easy, Normal, Hard]
really good map

[Insane]
01:10:195 (1) - 2 grid down because the only 01:10:195 (4,1) is spread (compared with 00:09:859 (1,2) , 00:26:452 (7,8) and 00:51:591 (1,2) )
00:29:804 (3,4,5,6,1) - Why don't you characterize them as like star? ( as if under the picture , and it might be a good idea to exchange (5) for (6)...

00:40:027 (9,1) - like under the picture?
01:06:843 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - Why don't you characterize them as like under picture ? (exhange (2) for (3) and moved (4) )
01:09:692 (3) - Why don't you move as if under the picture? i think 01:09:692 (3,4) is more spread is better

really nice map~
give you star~
