Iono. Same thing as I think about blindly voting.Echo wrote:
What did you guys think about nardi's post though?

Iono. Same thing as I think about blindly voting.Echo wrote:
What did you guys think about nardi's post though?
Dear experiments,
Since it's the first day, I decided we'll have a little bit of liberty with timing and start the day in the wee hours. Don't get yourself all hot and bothered about 3AM.
Secondly, I will update the vote standings.
Thirdly, as I am an easily confused person, do not mark in bold when you're clearly not voting, puh-LEESE.
Lurk without voting わなんでやねん、バカ?
Regards
Pasonia
P.S. Execution method this game? I guess I'll just step in front of you and shoot you with my pistol. I need an excuse to do some ultraviolent shit rofl.
「わ」って何だ?「は」ってじゃない、バカ?Pasonia wrote:
Thirdly, as I am an easily confused person, do not mark in bold when you're clearly not voting, puh-LEESE.
Lurk without voting わなんでやねん、バカ?
Lurking in itself is an average tell, but remember nardi was lynched as a wolf last game (and I'm pretty sure he is/was). Reusing a phrase that garnered suspicion, even though it may not have been the ultimate cause of his lynch, is not something a villager would do.adam2046 wrote:
I don't see "admitted to lurking" as a very good point.
Uhhh... because it obviously makes you look suspicious? This isn't the kind of game to randomly joke around in.nardi11011 wrote:
Why can't I joke around without people wanting to kill me? Anyway, I'm not a wolf this time. Also, what's wrong with admitting to lurking" (especially if I'm not actually lurking, but sleeping)?
When you lurk you're soaking up information without contributing anything. As a villager we need as much information as possible to find the wolves. Hence lurking is somewhat of a wolf tell.nardi11011 wrote:
Why can't I joke around without people wanting to kill me? Anyway, I'm not a wolf this time. Also, what's wrong with admitting to lurking" (especially if I'm not actually lurking, but sleeping)?
What do you mean by that? No one even mentioned Todesengal before you made that post.nardi11011 wrote:
I don't know who to vote so I'll just jump on the bandwagon and...
Lurk without votingTodesengal
IRC wrote:
14:52 < Echo> think it through
14:52 < Echo> imagine
14:52 < Echo> you said something on the first day
14:52 < Echo> which resulted in you getting lynched
14:53 < Echo> which you onnly just backed out of by fakeclaiming
14:53 < Echo> would you seriously say the exact same thing in the next game if you were human?
Vote standings have been updated W(°0°)W
I may be able to see it as suspicious if I think about it hard enough, but probably not for the same reason as you. I'm aware that lurking in general, and not posting too much, is often a tell for wolves (I think you said that earlier), but calling Nardi out on that reason may be a bit of a stretch I think.Echo wrote:
So no one other than me sees that line as suspicious :/IRC wrote:
14:52 < Echo> think it through
14:52 < Echo> imagine
14:52 < Echo> you said something on the first day
14:52 < Echo> which resulted in you getting lynched
14:53 < Echo> which you onnly just backed out of by fakeclaiming
14:53 < Echo> would you seriously say the exact same thing in the next game if you were human?
Well, the difference would be:0_o wrote:
Wow, honestly, out of ALL of the roles to claim, you claim the only one who can't be protected at night...
I think my vote is settled now. If ASH isn't a wolf, he will likely die tonight, so whether he is lynched or not really won't make a difference. If he is a wolf, then obviously lynching him would be a good thing. So really, the worst thing that could happen is that we lynch someone who was going to die anyway. It's a neutral-win situation.
At least that's how my mind works. My vote for ASH stands.
You missed Echo unvoting me and voting m980.Pasonia wrote:
It says: VOTE STANDINGS HAVE BEEN UPDATED AGAIN. GAME ENDS IN 23 HOURS.
Yes, theoretically speaking, the Guardian Angel CAN keep protecting himself from being killed. Trouble is, the wolves are more likely not to know if it was the GA guarding himself or him being guarded by another person. Also, the Guardian Angel will sometimes have his cover blown, so if shit happens don't say I didn't warn ya.Rolled wrote:
I just want to clarify a few things. Somebody please correct me if I'm wrong.
The guardian angel can protect themselves, right? And if they are protected and the wolves try to kill them, the wolves will not get a kill that night, being a wasted night for the wolves? And as long as the wolves attempt to night-kill the guardian angel every night, the GA can just continue to protect themselves the whole time? (I doubt this will happen, rhetorical question)
Example: ASH protects himself on night 1, wolves attempt to kill him. Total fatalities of day 1 = 1 lynch vote, 0 night kills.
Since ASH had a successful protection on night 1, he can then protect himself on night 2 as well?
Do you have some kind of randomizing C++ program to decide that for you too?Pasonia wrote:
Yes, theoretically speaking, the Guardian Angel CAN keep protecting himself from being killed. Trouble is, the wolves are more likely not to know if it was the GA guarding himself or him being guarded by another person. Also, the Guardian Angel will sometimes have his cover blown, so if shit happens don't say I didn't warn ya.Rolled wrote:
I just want to clarify a few things. Somebody please correct me if I'm wrong.
The guardian angel can protect themselves, right? And if they are protected and the wolves try to kill them, the wolves will not get a kill that night, being a wasted night for the wolves? And as long as the wolves attempt to night-kill the guardian angel every night, the GA can just continue to protect themselves the whole time? (I doubt this will happen, rhetorical question)
Example: ASH protects himself on night 1, wolves attempt to kill him. Total fatalities of day 1 = 1 lynch vote, 0 night kills.
Since ASH had a successful protection on night 1, he can then protect himself on night 2 as well?
This post sounded a little odd to me. "Why vote?" If no one at all voted for a lynch on day one, then the wolves would get a free kill that night. Unless you are a wolf, in which case it wouldn't matter what you did during the day. That was a stupid thing to say, and it has raised my suspicions.Olinad wrote:
I'll never understand why we are supposed to vote during the first day -.-' Anyway, good game to anyone
Speaking of foul, he's only posted once too... HMMTodesengal wrote:
ehhhh....it's a toss-up to me whether m980 or garlic is the more suspicious. At least garlic said something that garnered suspicion...
I hate critical thinking why do I keep doing this
also foul this jacuzzi is nice why don't you join me
I'm not saying smart people are wolves. I am saying that you are smart enough to know that you're still gonna end up dead tonight if you change your behavior to being aggressive.Echo wrote:
Just because someone is smart, it doesn't mean they're wolf. How do you justify lynching smart people?
I don't understand your PS - what does my role in a previous game have to do with my role in this one?You've been acting different in WWG2. That makes me believe that if you are a wolf in this game, it's pretty likely that you are a civillian in WWG2.
I can explain my behavioural change - I've been reading the mafiascum wiki (yes I'm that bored), I've been following the other games, and I've generally been right with my deductions so far. It's made me more confident, which is probably why you're seeing me as more aggressive. If you look through all my posts, every accusation is backed up with evidence.Well, I think you're exaggerating with some of your evidence. For example the evidence you based your vote against nardi on. It was a pretty obvious joke, I wouldn't lynch someone because of a joke. Or voting for m980 just because he hasn't posted yet. In my opinion, voting for someone who already has said something important is better than voting for someone who hasn't said anything yet. Maybe m980 doesn't know what to say, maybe this is m980's first Werewolf game.
I count 16.Derekku Chan wrote:
I think we have 16 hours left if I counted right. Or is it 14?
Vote standings updated!
Votes need to be cast in bold. ;xTodesengal wrote:
Hm...until m980 comes defend his ass, I'm going to cast my vote for m980. Either he's indisposed or he's panicking, but very suspicious nonetheless.
Though I still have my eye on you garlic.
Vote standings have been updated! Enjoy the banana w(°O°)w
Well, lynching with no proof of anything is useless and can lead to the death of a Vanilla or even an Aux... so there's more possibility to have 2 vanillas being killed during day 1. That's why I said that... Anyway, I vote for Derekku Chan, but only because I have no idea on who to vote and the discussion made up to now doesn't really help me .-.Derekku Chan wrote:
This post sounded a little odd to me. "Why vote?" If no one at all voted for a lynch on day one, then the wolves would get a free kill that night. Unless you are a wolf, in which case it wouldn't matter what you did during the day. That was a stupid thing to say, and it has raised my suspicions.Olinad wrote:
I'll never understand why we are supposed to vote during the first day -.-' Anyway, good game to anyone
Vote: Olinad
Also, as Rolled has said, silence is bad in this game. People need to contribute more and give their opinions so we have something to go on.
Previously? Aren't those guts still minePasonia wrote:
After a while, the bullets stopped flying around, the ruckus stopped, and all that remains at center stage is a bloody mess of blood and innards that was previously supergarlic's.
This game are starting out slow. This game need to pick up pace so it can hold my interest.
Also in all seriousness... Echo was civilian in game 1. Echo was civilian (according to ASH) in game 2. I can't shake the feeling that Echo is wolf in this one. Even though these roles are "random", he is speaking a bit differently. Then again, nobody has role claimed yet for him to defend and strategize.
Vote supergarlic for reasons listed above. Switching votes from someone who is a valid vote, to someone who shouldn't be voted for at all makes me wonder what the hell is going through your mind.The only two posts made by foulcoon. Unless he spoke to somebody outside of the thread, I dunno. RIP brother.
Don't post, you're dead. (The bright side: at least you can't get killed in Pasonia's next WWG now!)supergarlic wrote:
hi foul