Nonexistent people do not talk in a game you don't exist. kthxbai.
「わ」って何だ?「は」ってじゃない、バカ?Pasonia wrote:
Thirdly, as I am an easily confused person, do not mark in bold when you're clearly not voting, puh-LEESE.
Lurk without voting わなんでやねん、バカ?
Lurking in itself is an average tell, but remember nardi was lynched as a wolf last game (and I'm pretty sure he is/was). Reusing a phrase that garnered suspicion, even though it may not have been the ultimate cause of his lynch, is not something a villager would do.adam2046 wrote:
I don't see "admitted to lurking" as a very good point.
Uhhh... because it obviously makes you look suspicious? This isn't the kind of game to randomly joke around in.nardi11011 wrote:
Why can't I joke around without people wanting to kill me? Anyway, I'm not a wolf this time. Also, what's wrong with admitting to lurking" (especially if I'm not actually lurking, but sleeping)?
When you lurk you're soaking up information without contributing anything. As a villager we need as much information as possible to find the wolves. Hence lurking is somewhat of a wolf tell.nardi11011 wrote:
Why can't I joke around without people wanting to kill me? Anyway, I'm not a wolf this time. Also, what's wrong with admitting to lurking" (especially if I'm not actually lurking, but sleeping)?
What do you mean by that? No one even mentioned Todesengal before you made that post.nardi11011 wrote:
I don't know who to vote so I'll just jump on the bandwagon and...
Lurk without votingTodesengal
IRC wrote:
14:52 < Echo> think it through
14:52 < Echo> imagine
14:52 < Echo> you said something on the first day
14:52 < Echo> which resulted in you getting lynched
14:53 < Echo> which you onnly just backed out of by fakeclaiming
14:53 < Echo> would you seriously say the exact same thing in the next game if you were human?
Vote standings have been updated W(°0°)W
I may be able to see it as suspicious if I think about it hard enough, but probably not for the same reason as you. I'm aware that lurking in general, and not posting too much, is often a tell for wolves (I think you said that earlier), but calling Nardi out on that reason may be a bit of a stretch I think.Echo wrote:
So no one other than me sees that line as suspicious :/IRC wrote:
14:52 < Echo> think it through
14:52 < Echo> imagine
14:52 < Echo> you said something on the first day
14:52 < Echo> which resulted in you getting lynched
14:53 < Echo> which you onnly just backed out of by fakeclaiming
14:53 < Echo> would you seriously say the exact same thing in the next game if you were human?
Well, the difference would be:0_o wrote:
Wow, honestly, out of ALL of the roles to claim, you claim the only one who can't be protected at night...
I think my vote is settled now. If ASH isn't a wolf, he will likely die tonight, so whether he is lynched or not really won't make a difference. If he is a wolf, then obviously lynching him would be a good thing. So really, the worst thing that could happen is that we lynch someone who was going to die anyway. It's a neutral-win situation.
At least that's how my mind works. My vote for ASH stands.
You missed Echo unvoting me and voting m980.Pasonia wrote:
It says: VOTE STANDINGS HAVE BEEN UPDATED AGAIN. GAME ENDS IN 23 HOURS.