Wojjan wrote:
did you really need five votes instead of four on ekaru? I was just as strong on my jinxy read, from the point of my last post even stronger than ekaru because, you know, four votes on a day one lynch. Something could be up with that. I didn't feel like going out of my way from my vote on bmin to a bandwagon I was less sure of that was going to go through anyway
You can see it that way, but you can also see it as fence sitting. Not voting for someone when he/she's going to get lynched offers many excuses as to why you didn't vote him/her depending on the situation.
For example, if the person lynched was town, the excuse could be: "I was suspicious, but my gut told me otherwise. That's why I didn't vote."
Whereas if the person lynched was scum, the excuse could be: "Oh he/she was going to get lynched anyway, but I did point out that he/she was suspicious."
So your excuse as to why you didn't vote Ekaru seems scummy.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
But that doesn't discount JInxyjem though.
JInxy only said that he wasn't going to vote for Ekaru in the meantime since there was still time and it would mean placing Ekaru at L-1.
I understand JInxy's reason to not place Ekaru at L-1 with three days left.
Placing someone at L-1 without being 100% sure is generally dangerous.
(If Ekaru had been a town power role, mafia could have quickhammered thus making us lose an important role.
Now that we know Ekaru was scum, he could have self-hammered too - ending the discussion prematurely.)
But, JInxyjem, were you/when were you planning to actually vote for Ekaru.
You said that only reason why you didn't vote for him was because there was three days left.
Now why didn't you vote for him when we had only one day left before the deadline?