Requested Taiko Mod:
00:12:515(2) - k because you use it in the parts before too.
00:13:182(4) - k ^
00:13682(x) - d without it feels a little bit empty.
00:26:515(3) - k fits better
00:26:848(1) - d would be not bad, because of the "ru"
00:27:182(1) - k would be good because of the [u]"ji"[/b]
00:27:848(1) - d
00:28:182(1) - k I think you know why
00:28:848(3) - k ^
00:29:515(5) - D
00:37:182(4) - k?
00:47:182(x) - d?
00:49:515(5) - K because of "e"
00:50:182(7) - K ^
00:55:515(2,3) - kkd?
01:02:182(2) - k?
01:02:848(1) - K because "i"
01:03:182(3) - K because "mi"
01:06:182(2) - k?
01:16:015(x) - oh, d would be great.
01:25:515(7) - K because "i"
01:28:015(3) - K
Wow, this map is nice. Especially this part: 01:22:848
Good luck~
00:12:515(2) - k because you use it in the parts before too.
00:13:182(4) - k ^
00:13682(x) - d without it feels a little bit empty.
00:26:515(3) - k fits better
00:26:848(1) - d would be not bad, because of the "ru"
00:27:182(1) - k would be good because of the [u]"ji"[/b]
00:27:848(1) - d
00:28:182(1) - k I think you know why
00:28:848(3) - k ^
00:29:515(5) - D
00:37:182(4) - k?
00:47:182(x) - d?
00:49:515(5) - K because of "e"
00:50:182(7) - K ^
00:55:515(2,3) - kkd?
01:02:182(2) - k?
01:02:848(1) - K because "i"
01:03:182(3) - K because "mi"
01:06:182(2) - k?
01:16:015(x) - oh, d would be great.
01:25:515(7) - K because "i"
01:28:015(3) - K
Wow, this map is nice. Especially this part: 01:22:848
Good luck~