00:18:820 (5,6) - I personally think that this pattern would be better with 00:18:820 (5) being copy pasted and Ctrl + G / Ctrl + H, to make symmetry, and being easier to read. * 00:12:200 (5,6)
00:26:682 to 00:53:165 ( First chorus ) - Look. 00:32:475 (10) is indeed an important sound, but... 00:43:234 (4) is simple shaped. And... 00:49:855 (4,5,6) this being straight sliders don't feel like intense patterns, they feel simplistic. Maybe personal opinion but would be really cool if the first half of the chorus had simpler slider shapes ( not totally simple curves, paterns like 00:41:579 (7) ) and the second half being more distorced / have more direction chances, such as you did at 00:42:406 (10).
00:27:924 (5,6,7,8,9,10,11) - Way too long time without any NC. Put one at 00:27:924 (5) or 00:28:337 (8). It happens more times during the chorus and other random parts so keep an eye on there patterns
00:28:337 (8) - the sound here are stronger then 00:27:924 (5,6,7) - imo, making it active will feel better then passive
00:30:820 (3) - Seems out of place this slider shape there, because it breaks the linear flow. https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/15486247/d5e9 By stacking both like this, the flow and the visuals will be more enjoyable
00:34:131 (7) and 00:43:648 (5) seems way too simple when you look at similar sliders at the chorus such as 00:41:579 (7) , 00:42:406 (10) and every other one. Make 00:34:131 (7) have an red anchor and 00:43:648 (5) being a straight slider and it'll be fine
00:50:131 (5) - strong sound there. so probably reverse 00:49:855 (4) - 00:50:268 second reverse here OR something like https://imgur.com/a/6BldJYZ
01:04:475 (1) - Individually this slider would not be a problem, but the entire section have none sliders. So to keep the theme, remove this slider or put more sliders at the beggining ( maybe 2 or 3 but it just seems out of place )
01:06:958 (1,2) - ctrl + g and nc 01:07:234 (3) - instead at these patterns. gives the last note more impact
01:13:441 (1,1,2,3,1,1,2,3,1,1,2,3,1,2,3,4,5,6) - friend would love those. me instead: D: noo squuuuaaaares
01:39:372 (6) - i get the feeling thats mapped everywhere. it is consistant yes but since theres a strong kick there and you've mapped beat at various spots id consider mapping it. ESPECIALLY because its on a white tick
01:37:717 (7) - same also extend to 01:38:441 and mute sliderend
01:58:958 (4,5,6,1) - The sudden decrease in spacing may be too abrupt. The sounds do tone down but it doesn't support such drastic difference. Consider slowly decreasing the spacing instead.
02:10:544 (4,5,6,7) - To emphasis 02:10:958 (7) I would make it further apart from the triple and not stack them.
02:31:234 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - This flows bad. The three triples all sound like the same type, but the transition from 02:31:234 (1,2,3) to 02:31:648 (1,2,3) is too different from 02:31:648 (1,2,3) to 02:32:062 (1,2,3). I would make the triples linear, meaning that there's an imaginary line that goes through the center of all the triples
02:41:993 (1,2,3,4) - Scale by 1,05 on selection centre, so it'll be a little bit easier to read. This kind of pattern did not happen before in the map [ perfectly overlapped jumps ] https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/15486349/bded
03:45:303 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5) - This entire slider square pattern seems like an outsider compared to the rest of the map. Having notes so close to each other with minimal spacing change is also not fun to play for 10 seconds of essentially the same pattern. Space them out more and include some spacing emphasis.
03:51:924 (1,2,3,4,5) - Look at 03:53:579 (1,2,3,4,5) and every other pattern there. They have the perfect blanket, and here this kind of blanket doesn't happen. I suggest 03:52:200 (2,4,6) being a perfect stack just to make a theme
04:34:958 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) - This pattern goes on for too long in my opinion. I would either change the first half or the latter half to other jump patterns to further emphasis buildup.
04:44:889 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6) - These patterns are usually used to emphasize 1-2 type sounds, but these sounds are more 1,2,3 - 1,2,3, which make this awkward.
04:46:525 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - i don't like this pattern. First, I would put the NC so that it was 123-123-123, because they are repeated in three. Second - make something more interesting, instead of stacks of three in the form of a triangle, looks boring.
I like how this pattern is atm. It differs from 04:44:870 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6) - which is good since it's a very slight tone difference but it's still works with the very monotone part of the song. I'll think about the new combo though.
04:52:337 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - I could not find a solution for this pattern but 04:52:613 (3,4) feels weird. Maybe redo the double triangle pattern by Ctrl + C and rotating by 30º the04:52:337 (1,2,3) triangle? https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/15486381/82f9
05:01:855 (4,5,6) - I would space these differently; being between 05:01:579 (2,3) don't emphasize the 1,2,3 sounds.
05:26:682 (4,5,6,7) - These stacks don't emphasize the sound on 05:27:096 (7). Instead, 05:49:855 (4,5,6,7) - these patterns emphasize better. I would change any stacks like the one here to mimic 05:49:855 (4,5,6,7).