00:11:469 (1) - could move this nc back one note, player changes on barlines are nice as long as they're not at the end of a pattern
same thing in many places like 00:22:136 (1) - , but not like 00:29:247 (1) - that's fine because the barline note is part of a 1/2 pattern
but the gap between muzu is a lot. i'd move that note to 00:13:692 and make kat,
even 00:13:469 (8) this one note was from kantan.
the following next 00:14:136 (9,10) exist as triple in muzu but on futsuu, it mapped.
result it makes : k_k__d_d (futsuu) / kkk__ddd (muzu)
move 02:25:469 (10) - to 02:25:247 for consistency with above
move 02:25:692 (11) - to 02:25:581 for consistency with above
move 01:02:803 (5) - to 01:03:247 and finisher
move 01:03:469 (7) - to 01:03:581 for snare
move 02:53:025 (6) - to 02:53:469 and finisher
move 02:53:692 (8) - to 02:53:803 for snare
01:03:247 (6) - it's the only diff with a finisher here. pattern wise, others diff don't really support it while this one does. Kantan and Futsuu can support it, but pretty meh or should change the pattern to support it better
maybe remove the finisher to be consistent?
01:03:581 (7) - this sudden 3/4 right after a finisher could take by surprise many beginner. If you decide to remove the note, i'd highly suggest to move this note 01:03:914 - here 01:03:469 -
01:58:581 - 02:11:692 - This part is quite dense and pretty long. Even if it's within the guideline ranking criteria, i'd highly suggest to give a proper rest around the middle of this kiai to keep using such dense patterns. I'd say removing this note 02:04:136 (19) - work pretty well.
02:46:581 (10) - that one as k fit better with the flow of 02:45:247 (5,6,7,8,9) - kdkkd here. However, changing it might be weird with 02:47:469 (11) - . So really up to your preference