mapped by BPChingu
submitted
last updated
Hype Train9 / 5
Nomination Status0 / 2
New Discussion
Please sign in to post or reply
Discussions
Sort by

00:07:803 00:11:358 - you could add notes for the drums here

feels a tad light atm especially compared to the section that starts on 00:21:692, which is an equally tense section to this

permalink

sure

permalink
Marked as resolved by BPChingu

00:09:025 (10,11) - you can swap it to k d if you want a better guitare follow, tho, current pattern as d k flow pretty well with patterns around. Really up to your preference

permalink

both make sense to me, k d wins by an edge

permalink
Marked as resolved by BPChingu

00:20:358 - map kick drum?

i'd also suggest starting the sv increase from 00:19:692 since the buildup starts from there

permalink

sure

permalink
Marked as resolved by BPChingu

00:35:303 - i feel the 1/8 note should be on 00:35:303 rather than on 00:35:414?

the guitar does a 1/8 triplet on 00:35:247, and i don't really hear a strong sound on 00:35:414

permalink

sure

permalink
Marked as resolved by BPChingu

00:39:914 (19) - could nc here to split the section

permalink

sure

permalink
Marked as resolved by BPChingu

00:57:025 (23) - flow wise & taking guitare into account, I like this pattern better with this one as d. But current one is good if your aim is to keep this pattern offhand

permalink

not going too much into offhands

permalink
Marked as resolved by BPChingu

01:11:247 (24) - considering finisher here 01:11:469 (26) - ; you can give more emphasis onto the finisher by changing 01:11:247 (24) - as a d.

permalink

sure

permalink
Marked as resolved by BPChingu

01:11:469 (27,18) - You can add finishers here if you want to ^-^ (they do sound in the song, but I would say it's up to personal preference to put them in the map or leave them out as is :p)

permalink

sure, applied it to entire set

permalink
Marked as resolved by BPChingu

01:13:469 (14) - ncing here would make this kinda similar to what u do at 00:59:247 (1) - if u think that would be nice

permalink

sure, also did in 03:03:692

permalink
Marked as resolved by BPChingu

01:21:136 01:21:247 - i'd swap these so that 01:21:136 is a k like 01:20:914 for the snare

permalink

sure

permalink
Marked as resolved by BPChingu

01:22:469 01:23:136 01:23:803 - map these hi-hats so we have doublets?

sure they're not snares like 01:26:025, but right now 01:26:025 to 01:27:469 is far denser than 01:22:136 to 01:26:025 at the moment, even though the tensity is the same throughout this bit

it'd be better if the density was more level imo

permalink

sure

permalink
Marked as resolved by BPChingu

01:28:358 - 01:29:247 - with the 1/8 ; if you want to make the reading easier, you can start the crescendo SV at 0.85 or 0.90.

permalink

sure

permalink
Marked as resolved by BPChingu

01:29:247 to 01:41:692 - the guitar does this xxxx rhythm throughout, yet such rhythms aren't used here even though you use them in 00:21:692 to 00:34:803

for example, it would make sense if you added notes on 01:29:803 01:31:581, move 01:33:692 to 01:33:581, etc. to follow this guitar. the note density would still be much lower than the kiais

permalink

sure

permalink
Marked as resolved by BPChingu

01:59:803 02:00:025 02:01:469 02:02:914 - map the guitar?

right now it plays like a verse section, and there's a massive contrast with the density at the beginning of the kiai compared with 02:04:803 to the end of the kiai, even though the entire kiai is equally tense throughout

permalink

sure

permalink
Marked as resolved by BPChingu

02:05:025 - what u do here makes sense but in practice the way tag works ingame means both players could play perfect and still notelock :( i suggest removing the nc at 02:06:581 (1) - but keeping the one at 02:08:358 (1) - . basically, more than 1 nc in a single stream is always dangerous

permalink

sure

permalink
Marked as resolved by BPChingu

02:08:692 (5,7) - you can ctrl+g this pattern if you want more accuracy onto the guitare and more emphasis onto this k 02:09:136 (9) - . flow wise also feels better.

permalink

sure

permalink
Marked as resolved by BPChingu

02:58:136 (26) - missing finisher or intentionally skipped? it's surely not as strong as others one in this part, but similar to this one 01:11:469 (26) -

permalink

intentional-ish. ill change it

permalink
Marked as resolved by BPChingu
/