maybe slightly increase spacing between 00:22:442 (2,3), so 1/2 rhythm could be more distinguishable? the entire pattern looks like the same rhythm while it's actually not the same rhythm
01:46:817 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13)
considering this huge drop in intensity, i'd recommend decreasing spacing by a lot for this one
and while i get your intention to emphasize 1/4 synth, i don't think that it deserves that much emphasis
what drop in intensity, it's literally the highest pitched synth lol
03:00:123 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - tbf this part feels a bit weak and it doesn't stand out that much comparing it to everything else on this piano solo
personally i think it could receive a buff, 03:00:798 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - this stream specially to make it stand out from the rest of the streams since this one is a pretty noticeable peak because of those cymbals and stuff on the background going upwards
03:00:123 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - builds tension towards 03:01:338 (1,2,3) - which results in a big jump towards 03:01:743 (1,2,3) -, even if this wasn't the case what you suggest literally changes nothing but the way its executed
i could make the spacing super low and contrast the 5bursts that way, i could stack 5 bursts on top of one another like HW's axion, i could do a back to back 1/1, if im ballsy enough i could even do a repeating 3/4, i can do a triple, i can make the stream you mentioned stacked, i can make the 1/4 sliders have a fullscreen gap into a large spaced stream or stack it again and it would all be just as valid contextually as your suggestion if the pattern is executed well.
its subjective, i could go on all day