00:14:212 (2,1) - same thing; even more so considering 00:17:101 (3,1) - and 00:19:767 (3,1) - arent stacked
the strong sound is on 00:10:212 (2) - , not from (2) -> (3), I map it that way to give contrast for the strong sound which is the reverse slider
the second one is just a variety of patterning, the movement overall should be enough there since those sections are pretty calm
I think I got mashiro's point on 00:10:212 (2,3). 3 has a drum tune, so making a movement end on this is reasonable. The more stronger sonund on 00:10:212 (2) and 00:11:101 (1) , that's also right.
I suggest making 00:10:212 (2,3) as a C-shape so that 00:10:656 ~ 00:10:878 would be a walk movement.
btw 00:14:212 (2,1) is totally fine.
yes it is reasonable and you guys are not wrong, but its just that the way of me representing those high pitch instrument on 00:10:212 + 00:10:434 + 00:10:656 (can't tell the name of the instrument) with back and forth slider and giving no emphasis to the drum so that the contrast would be clear for the instrument
if I give emphasis to the drum with a movement then this whole section 00:10:212 (2,3,1) - is all just a nonstop movement which will lose the contrast that I want
I also did the same thing to 00:07:323 (2,3,4) - where as you can see the drum on 00:08:212 - got no emphasis movement too
sorry if my explanation is confusing but I hope it makes sense