00:50:824 (3,4,5,6,1) - Flow/emphasis here feels way too similar to what you did at 00:49:995 (5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6) -
Would contrast the movement a bit more by doing something like this instead:
00:59:940 (2,3,4,5) - vs 01:00:935 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - Would change rotation for the second set of jumps to differentiate these groupings a bit better.
01:02:758 (3) - Would move this closer to 01:02:426 (2) - something like x:260 y:163 to give better emphasis to 01:02:923 (4) - with higher spacing.
01:03:421 (7,1) - Spacing on (1) should be much smaller compared to 01:03:255 (6,7) -
Would place (1) in between 01:03:255 (6,7) - like:
yep, also i ctrl+h'd 01:02:923 (4,5,6) because i think it feels better as 01:02:758 (3) was moved to where it is on your screenshot
01:10:051 (1,1) - Would change patterning a bit for these, giving 01:10:051 (1) - a wider angle instead like:
01:14:526 (2,3) - I play this. I get dopamine.
01:17:178 (2,3) - I play this. I get melotonin. Give me dopamine.
Jokes aside 01:17:178 (2,3) - is quite underwhelming to play considering how strong the vocals are. Mainly due to how linear the movement is going downwards from 01:16:846 (1). When compare to 01:14:194 (1,2,3), strong movement changes happen here which result in greater emphasis on the vocals. Anyway you could give 01:16:846 (1,2,3) - a bit more emphasis?
01:20:824 (1,2,3) - Movement feels very forced and doesn't play well at all compared to previous patterns in the chorus.
02:40:382 (1,2,3,4,5) - 02:41:708 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1) - I get that the guitar starts playing for these, but spacing goes up way too quickly and it does not fit the intensity of this section.
Would nerf these considerably and make the spacing buildup more reasonable.
02:54:968 (3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,1) - Spacing here is so underwhelming, it doesn't contrast at all with previous section.
Would buff overall spacing for this section to better reflect the intensity this part of the song a bit better.