Blood on the EDGE (TV Size)

basen is second bn for this set

also please check osu dms 🙏

yeah its me

(and yes i am also aware i was asked to look at this for timing by daycore like 500 years ago and never did because i died, the timing isn't really a big deal but i'd rather have this addressed than it not be)

considering that

https://osu.ppy.sh/beatmapsets/986865#osu/2064453
https://osu.ppy.sh/beatmapsets/979087#osu/2052148

exist for years with extremely simplified timing ignoring absolutely all of the drifts, i'd say it's whatever, but up to you guys, it still plays well

also uhhh didn't you say that you want to help mrekk with adjusting some stuff on sd mango admin channel? is there any reason why you didn't do that? :D

i mean it's been two weeks since these messages 😭

yea im not gonna act like im not responsible for this so i apologize for that

also uhhh didn't you say that you want to help mrekk with adjusting some stuff on sd mango admin channel? is there any reason why you didn't do that? :D

iirc you didn't ping me and mrekk didn't approach me for anything regarding this, so i didn't follow through on it

as for the prior ranked sets not having timing, i mean. that's not really an excuse to have bad timing on this though

i think it plays well regardless, depends if this is necessary. i can see how 00:22:053 (1) could arise concern though

ok so

the timing you currently have actually is more complex than it should be in the middle due to there being conflicting offsets for different parts, which is what gave me the impression of this needing more timing -- if anything it actually needs a bit less lol

755,267.857142857143,4,2,1,60,1,0
17897,269.058295964126,4,2,2,50,1,0
19511,265.486725663717,4,2,2,50,1,8
20041,267.857142857143,4,2,2,50,1,0
22183,267.857142857143,4,2,1,70,1,0
26200,263.157894736842,4,2,2,50,1,8
26463,263.157894736842,4,2,2,50,1,0
26726,280.373831775701,4,2,2,50,1,8
27006,267.857142857143,4,2,2,50,1,8
27541,267.857142857143,4,2,2,50,1,0
30755,267.857142857143,4,2,1,70,1,0
75487,250,4,2,1,60,1,8
75737,286.054827175209,4,2,2,70,1,0
76023,267.857142857143,4,2,2,70,1,8
76826,267.857142857143,4,2,2,70,1,0
77897,267.857142857143,4,2,1,80,1,1

this is what i got, basically just accounts for 3 notable drifts but the rest of the song is more or less okay

done thanks fiery

i ahve sent him the osz

y

BRO u jumpscared tf out of me on the notif bar

Glad I could help, brother.

kiais are optional and can be set however mappers want

cannot disagree
btw, it seems to be very inconsistent to have differences in kiais

dumas

ok

g

im always down for more finishes

ye

also as a sidenote, are these diffs actually intended to be entirely 60% volume? the only non 60% sections are those which have been changed accidentally with the mentioned copied timing, if they are, then the red lines should be put at 60% vol too

i told mrekk to tell gders to check volumes so ostensibly yes but idc im making them normal

ye

yes

i

01:30:761 - i.e. some diffs end differently so mute the spinner end

fix hs volumes too

also mute final slider/spinner ends

done

oki

ye done

tyy

fixed with timing update

Can you clarify what you mean by unfitting? Maybe I'm misunderstanding you, but samples "fitting" the music in my interpretation is completely irrelevant to hitsounding. It's been common practice for a long time for people to use the exact same snare sample no matter which song they're mapping, which I think is also antithetical to the idea of matching the song with hitsound samples, yet I've never seen such a comment on those maps. I also don't understand how it's possible to confuse the sample for a tom not only by its sound but also by where in the song it's used.

its poor sound selection, hitsounds are used to support the music by giving feedback to players so please make better use of it by selecting less boisterous samples

ive told mrekk this and i tend to agree with the initial mod. dont think the snare sounds like a tom but i do think it sounds a bit too deep for this song. the custom2 snare sample u use fits much better imo

heavily agree on this

just use what you already have for soft-hitclap63: remove normal-hitclap and ctrl+c ctrl+v for soft-hitclap63 (don't forget to rename it into normal-hitclap)

Changed both samples so that there is still contrast between them. Awaiting update

@Daycore this defeats the purpose of having multiple samplesets in the first place

done

also nightcore resets should be on the correct places

lmk if anything is off

also i think that 00:22:120 - is just quantized too late by a 1/4 lol, i think its ok to map it as if it were on the red tick

if you'll need help with applying this, let me know in dms

thanks daycore

yes

okey done

i