00:50:591 (2) - i get there's still a sound on the white tick so mapping this isn't entirely unprecedented ig, but kinda feel like this would work a lot better if you removed this
01:15:345 (3,4,1) - is this triple meant to be equidistant (or at least similar to 01:17:094 (2,3,4) - this) cuz it is hella lopsided in spacing towards the sliderend rn
01:20:860 (1,2) - 02:18:977 (1,2) - 02:51:802 (1,2,3) - yea
might be a few others i missed
02:01:354 (1) - 02:23:416 (1) - 02:37:407 (1) - 02:46:690 (1) - same
03:54:829 (5,1) - could make this curve less sharp, kind of a drastic change compared to 03:54:627 (2,3,4,5) - the smoother curve you had going here