This map has been deleted on the request of its creator. It is no longer available.
Well, the difference would be:0_o wrote:
Wow, honestly, out of ALL of the roles to claim, you claim the only one who can't be protected at night...
I think my vote is settled now. If ASH isn't a wolf, he will likely die tonight, so whether he is lynched or not really won't make a difference. If he is a wolf, then obviously lynching him would be a good thing. So really, the worst thing that could happen is that we lynch someone who was going to die anyway. It's a neutral-win situation.
At least that's how my mind works. My vote for ASH stands.
You missed Echo unvoting me and voting m980.Pasonia wrote:
It says: VOTE STANDINGS HAVE BEEN UPDATED AGAIN. GAME ENDS IN 23 HOURS.
Yes, theoretically speaking, the Guardian Angel CAN keep protecting himself from being killed. Trouble is, the wolves are more likely not to know if it was the GA guarding himself or him being guarded by another person. Also, the Guardian Angel will sometimes have his cover blown, so if shit happens don't say I didn't warn ya.Rolled wrote:
I just want to clarify a few things. Somebody please correct me if I'm wrong.
The guardian angel can protect themselves, right? And if they are protected and the wolves try to kill them, the wolves will not get a kill that night, being a wasted night for the wolves? And as long as the wolves attempt to night-kill the guardian angel every night, the GA can just continue to protect themselves the whole time? (I doubt this will happen, rhetorical question)
Example: ASH protects himself on night 1, wolves attempt to kill him. Total fatalities of day 1 = 1 lynch vote, 0 night kills.
Since ASH had a successful protection on night 1, he can then protect himself on night 2 as well?
Do you have some kind of randomizing C++ program to decide that for you too?Pasonia wrote:
Yes, theoretically speaking, the Guardian Angel CAN keep protecting himself from being killed. Trouble is, the wolves are more likely not to know if it was the GA guarding himself or him being guarded by another person. Also, the Guardian Angel will sometimes have his cover blown, so if shit happens don't say I didn't warn ya.Rolled wrote:
I just want to clarify a few things. Somebody please correct me if I'm wrong.
The guardian angel can protect themselves, right? And if they are protected and the wolves try to kill them, the wolves will not get a kill that night, being a wasted night for the wolves? And as long as the wolves attempt to night-kill the guardian angel every night, the GA can just continue to protect themselves the whole time? (I doubt this will happen, rhetorical question)
Example: ASH protects himself on night 1, wolves attempt to kill him. Total fatalities of day 1 = 1 lynch vote, 0 night kills.
Since ASH had a successful protection on night 1, he can then protect himself on night 2 as well?
This post sounded a little odd to me. "Why vote?" If no one at all voted for a lynch on day one, then the wolves would get a free kill that night. Unless you are a wolf, in which case it wouldn't matter what you did during the day. That was a stupid thing to say, and it has raised my suspicions.Olinad wrote:
I'll never understand why we are supposed to vote during the first day -.-' Anyway, good game to anyone
Speaking of foul, he's only posted once too... HMMTodesengal wrote:
ehhhh....it's a toss-up to me whether m980 or garlic is the more suspicious. At least garlic said something that garnered suspicion...
I hate critical thinking why do I keep doing this
also foul this jacuzzi is nice why don't you join me
I'm not saying smart people are wolves. I am saying that you are smart enough to know that you're still gonna end up dead tonight if you change your behavior to being aggressive.Echo wrote:
Just because someone is smart, it doesn't mean they're wolf. How do you justify lynching smart people?
I don't understand your PS - what does my role in a previous game have to do with my role in this one?You've been acting different in WWG2. That makes me believe that if you are a wolf in this game, it's pretty likely that you are a civillian in WWG2.
I can explain my behavioural change - I've been reading the mafiascum wiki (yes I'm that bored), I've been following the other games, and I've generally been right with my deductions so far. It's made me more confident, which is probably why you're seeing me as more aggressive. If you look through all my posts, every accusation is backed up with evidence.Well, I think you're exaggerating with some of your evidence. For example the evidence you based your vote against nardi on. It was a pretty obvious joke, I wouldn't lynch someone because of a joke. Or voting for m980 just because he hasn't posted yet. In my opinion, voting for someone who already has said something important is better than voting for someone who hasn't said anything yet. Maybe m980 doesn't know what to say, maybe this is m980's first Werewolf game.
I count 16.Derekku Chan wrote:
I think we have 16 hours left if I counted right. Or is it 14?
Vote standings updated!
Votes need to be cast in bold. ;xTodesengal wrote:
Hm...until m980 comes defend his ass, I'm going to cast my vote for m980. Either he's indisposed or he's panicking, but very suspicious nonetheless.
Though I still have my eye on you garlic.
Vote standings have been updated! Enjoy the banana w(°O°)w
Well, lynching with no proof of anything is useless and can lead to the death of a Vanilla or even an Aux... so there's more possibility to have 2 vanillas being killed during day 1. That's why I said that... Anyway, I vote for Derekku Chan, but only because I have no idea on who to vote and the discussion made up to now doesn't really help me .-.Derekku Chan wrote:
This post sounded a little odd to me. "Why vote?" If no one at all voted for a lynch on day one, then the wolves would get a free kill that night. Unless you are a wolf, in which case it wouldn't matter what you did during the day. That was a stupid thing to say, and it has raised my suspicions.Olinad wrote:
I'll never understand why we are supposed to vote during the first day -.-' Anyway, good game to anyone
Vote: Olinad
Also, as Rolled has said, silence is bad in this game. People need to contribute more and give their opinions so we have something to go on.
Previously? Aren't those guts still minePasonia wrote:
After a while, the bullets stopped flying around, the ruckus stopped, and all that remains at center stage is a bloody mess of blood and innards that was previously supergarlic's.
This game are starting out slow. This game need to pick up pace so it can hold my interest.
Also in all seriousness... Echo was civilian in game 1. Echo was civilian (according to ASH) in game 2. I can't shake the feeling that Echo is wolf in this one. Even though these roles are "random", he is speaking a bit differently. Then again, nobody has role claimed yet for him to defend and strategize.
Vote supergarlic for reasons listed above. Switching votes from someone who is a valid vote, to someone who shouldn't be voted for at all makes me wonder what the hell is going through your mind.The only two posts made by foulcoon. Unless he spoke to somebody outside of the thread, I dunno. RIP brother.
Don't post, you're dead. (The bright side: at least you can't get killed in Pasonia's next WWG now!)supergarlic wrote:
hi foul
I guess people are just busy this weekend. They must not care much about this game.Rolled wrote:
I'm a little wary about the lack of decent replies since foulcoon's death. Almost as if Tode, derekku, adam.. were expecting it a little.
I did not remember the whole bandwagon business from the second game, and simply found nardi's post confusing. That's why I asked him why he randomly mentioned Todesengal, not because I found his post suspicious.Echo wrote:
I vote Loginer since 1) he doesn't really care about the game, 2) he hasn't really made any useful posts, and 3) the only thing he's done in his post is to copy MY accusation against nardi, after most people had expressed doubts about it.
That post was made 20 minutes after I posted. If you thought I was copying your accusation, why did you disregard my post until now?Echo wrote:
So no one other than me sees that line as suspicious :/
He starts off the game by saying he has an aux role. I was suspicious, but didn't think much of it.Agent Spin Here wrote:
I have an aux role, but it'd be pretty silly to reveal what it is in the first post. So I won't.
ASH was awful quick to role claim because people were getting suspicious of him. The bolded line is pretty much self-explanatory. He's just trying to trick people.Agent Spin Here wrote:
Haha, I have a vote.
Anyway, because people think I'm suspicious, I'll say something that'll probably make me even more suspicious to other people.
I'm guardian angel.
And you should trust me, because if I'm killed you won't have anyone to save you from the wolves. :3
Rolled wrote:
Enjoy your nightkill ASH
You wouldn't have to worry about a night kill if you're a wolf.Agent Spin Here wrote:
Sounds like fun.
Yeah, by being a wolf.Agent Spin Here wrote:
I plan to protect myself tonight.
Yes, you are.Agent Spin Here wrote:
I'm really stupid.
Yes, sure. Pointing your finger would be giving us a lot more than what you're currently giving, which is nothing. Come on, phantom vote on day 1?loginer wrote:
I could start pointing my finger at everyone if it would make people happy, though.
ouch...I was just using you as a reference ;(m980 wrote:
@tode : You haven't made any useful posts yourself.
Lovely, I have a bandwagon on my tails now. The least you could do is tell me why I'm suspicious in your opinion. :/m980 wrote:
And I'll join the bandwagon
Vote Loginer
Did you miss my post? :<m980 wrote:
The guardian angel wouldn't reveal his/her position so early in the game, but since no one disagrees with ASH (unless I'm missing something BIG).
True, but it's still a stupid thing to do.m980 wrote:
But perhaps there is a reason for this? There could very well be NO guardian angel.
Or he's just lying and either:m980 wrote:
We will have to wait until tomorrow to find out whether ASH is really guardian angel or not (Since he gave away that he won't be able to protect himself, the werewolves will probably go for him)
not gonna deny that was some cheesy acting. I was actually doing that in hopes that foul would be all "I love you tode for mourning my death" but it didn't work ;__;Larto wrote:
I vote for Todesengal
Why? I just have no real reason to vote for thepianist or Loginer. They don't seems super suspicious to me, just hella quiet.
Tode has acted a bit too surprised after foul's death. I don't know what to think of it, but it really looked like bad acting. (Just like vyt the prick acted "i dunno who the wolves cud be lol" at the beginning of WWG1 Jfijsdcoijlodjnikdjswikdjswofjnedkifcjsw)
So yeah, Tode is suspicious. And not doing much good imho.
ilu anyway todass <3
I is here. Sorry bout being offline from the comps due to finals.Rolled wrote:
I am very confused.
I really wish thepianist would show up.
There is a reason why Foulcoon was killed. I believe it's because he held an aux role. However they found out, I can tell you that Foulcoon was a psychic.Rolled wrote:
I'm a little wary about the lack of decent replies since foulcoon's death. Almost as if Tode, derekku, adam.. were expecting it a little.
And how would you know that?Todesengal wrote:
But why would they do that? Usually the wolves kill whoever's the biggest threat, and I would think that would be someone who actually thinks and has a chance of correctly guessing the wolves' identities. Yes, foul does have the capacity to do that, but he hasn't been talking at all, whereas Echo (for instance) has been active and has a history of accurate guesses. Wouldn't it make more sense to kill someone like him?
That tells me a lot </sarcasm> ;PDerekku Chan wrote:
1) Is the G.A.
or
2) Is a wolf
We already know everyone is either villager or aux or wolf >.>This means he's eithersomeone wrote:
[text]
- villager because [some reason] OR
- aux because [some reason] OR
- wolf because [some reason]