Adding that, Prodding Lilac, going to take a pee.
Essentially, I was pretending to be DxS in that second sentence.Lilac wrote:
Wow, that was so convincing. Cause saying what I did at night and continuously yelling I am Town makes me scum.
This. He already said he motivated me and I can confirm this, so if LS also confirms then he's definitely town.Wojjan wrote:
wellllll DxS claims motivator and when LS gets in here we'll hear the jist of it
Oh, okay. Good point!Wojjan wrote:
Well motivator isn't per se town, 0_o can account for that. It does however confirm his role and giving him targets to motivate or else he gets caught in the act will also keep scum motivator busy
Wojjan wrote:
I don't even see why you would see "no kill" and assume that instead of "sucessful doc protect" it's "maf was all afk and got autoprotected"
I'm basing this on a claim that mafia has lost their interest for this game.
is this the claim if so vote syncSync wrote:
lol'd
is mafia completely inactive or some shit
I just didn't wanna kill the discussion by hammering. If I had hammered, one could just as easily say that I wanted to stifle discussion since he was pretty much dead anyway.Rantai wrote:
18 players. I'd say 4 possibly 5 but that's pushing it.
Also; Vote: 0_oEcho, justifying possible town lynch (under the guise of 'safe'), fishing for hammer confirmation. To a lesser degree a vote on Mashley in rvs (distancing anyone?).0_o wrote:
Yeah, even if he is telling the truth there's nothing about the role that really clears him. Worse case scenario we mislynch a scummy town doublevoter, which as far as aux roles go, is one of the safer ones to lose.
Any objections to a hammer?
didn't even know he was in the gameRantai wrote:
No opinion on Facey at all?
Yeah, like I said earlier I know it's hypocritical, but I still think it holds.foulcoon wrote:
didn't even know he was in the gameRantai wrote:
No opinion on Facey at all?
lurk2themax and vote for another "lurker"
faceman got jokes