Gero wrote:

Gratz :3

Andrea wrote:

Congrats Baka Natsu :3

Time to blame you instead of me \^^/

Zero__wind wrote:

congratz and blame Natsu 2014~

and just wondering
if this is the first "rakned crn map"

Xinely wrote:

Can't Defeat Natsu 2014

congratz <3

rEdo wrote:

[Skystar's Extra]
02:59:027 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1) - Sorry, but what the fuck is this. This definitely is overmapped, even for Skystar. I prefered these 1/3s how they were before ;_;


Good job, though!

1. 02:59:027 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1) - Like rEdo mentioned already, after having many people testing this we came to a conclusion that this part is extremely overmapped and not necessary into the map, 1/3 would just fit perfectly here instead of using 1/6, which is overkill for the majority of the players.
2. 03:24:055 (1,1,1,1,1,1,2,3,4,5,1) - Having so many kiai fountains in such a short amount of time (5 fountains in only 3 seconds) is unrankable. Even though that, since the fountains are so close each other, you can't even see all of them but just a long unique fountain, which doesn't even give the effect wanted by the mapper. The best solution for emphasize this part could be to make some storyboarded flashes and a simple kiai instead.

Darksonic wrote:

gg

99,293,179027,6,0,L|6:280,2,79.9999975585938
73,204,179370,2,0,L|166:217,2,79.9999975585938
12,140,179712,1,0,0:0:0:0:
41,56,179827,1,0,0:0:0:0:
117,12,179941,1,0,0:0:0:0:
203,25,180055,1,0,0:0:0:0:
264,88,180170,1,0,0:0:0:0:
260,175,180284,1,0,0:0:0:0:

Fast wrote:

Darksonic wrote:

gg

Fast wrote:

Darksonic wrote:

gg

Oracle wrote:

Also note that in CRN's Extra,
02:59:027 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) - these should probably be 1/3 snap like other diffs...

nold_1702 wrote:

性液又闖禍了
Skystar brings a big trouble again.


edit:

Oracle wrote:

Also note that in CRN's Extra,
02:59:027 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) - these should probably be 1/3 snap like other diffs...

I disagree with this.1/4 here fits TOO.
Listening this part in 25% and you would find 1/3 here is OFF

1. 00:11:198 (5,6) - This is kinda inaudible, it doesn't affect much since you already understand the rhythm from the previous section, but for the best, I'd say having it on atleast 25% would be better.
2. 03:01:084 (1,2,3,4) - Overmapping triples or 1/4 sliders is one thing, but these 4 notes don't actually follow anything, Consider changing them.
3. 03:08:284 (7,8,9,10) - The flow on this is really problematic and usually results in missing 9, You could possible put 8 higher and a bit more to the right and move 9 to be lower than 10 and to the right of it so there is fast snapping between 7,8 and then a nice curved flow between 8,9,10, Here is an unpolished example of it.
4. 03:23:712 (1) - The tail touches the HP Bar even in my skin that uses an extremely thin one, This isn't a massive issue since it's a tail and not a head, but it still seems a bit sloppy.

nold_1702 wrote:

性液又闖禍了
Skystar brings a big trouble again.


edit:

Oracle wrote:

Also note that in CRN's Extra,
02:59:027 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) - these should probably be 1/3 snap like other diffs...

I disagree with this.1/4 here fits TOO.
Listening this part in 25% and you would find 1/3 here is OFF

mingmichael wrote:

e..etto.. my diff wasn't updated properly ;w; the rank version is my old muzu diff and the newest muzu (after tksalt modded it) is on here

btw i have told about this to natsu too

17VA wrote:

beautiful kiai sliders

TKSalt wrote:

so weird problem ;_;

also,
you must move the "Mega Man 2" from source to tags.
the Airman ga Taosenai is not an arrangement song.
this is an original song being aware of Mega Man 2.

nold_1702 wrote:

性液又闖禍了
Skystar brings a big trouble again.

TKSalt wrote:

so weird problem ;_;

also,
you must move the "Mega Man 2" from source to tags.
the Airman ga Taosenai is not an arrangement song.
this is an original song being aware of Mega Man 2.

Priti wrote:

There are a few small issues in CRN's diff, none are really critical but considering them might help. Lets see

1. 00:11:198 (5,6) - This is kinda inaudible, it doesn't affect much since you already understand the rhythm from the previous section, but for the best, I'd say having it on atleast 25% would be better. It's already 25% ._., also is audible enought and the current way fit the music nicely
2. 03:01:084 (1,2,3,4) - Overmapping triples or 1/4 sliders is one thing, but these 4 notes don't actually follow anything, Consider changing them. Is the guitar solo, they fit the song
3. 03:08:284 (7,8,9,10) - The flow on this is really problematic and usually results in missing 9, You could possible put 8 higher and a bit more to the right and move 9 to be lower than 10 and to the right of it so there is fast snapping between 7,8 and then a nice curved flow between 8,9,10, this play perfectly fine, I'm a bad player and Ihavenot problem reading/playing this part
4. 03:23:712 (1) - The tail touches the HP Bar even in my skin that uses an extremely thin one, This isn't a massive issue since it's a tail and not a head, but it still seems a bit sloppy. Is just the tail and I think no body will have problems with it

B-52 wrote:

01:00:398 - Preview point, ”倒せ” (taose) es un sintagma completo.

DakeDekaane wrote:

Taking advantage of the unqualifying, a comment in Easy diff:
02:50:798 - 03:12:741 - It'd be way better to map on the guitar than on the synthesizer, it's more catchy for newbies imo. I think P A N and I agree with the current way is more intuitive to play for new players

Nyquill wrote:

Also, offset +4. Can some one just set it online T-T, there a lot of diffs, with a lot sv changes, and I'm baka and I don't want to break anything, setting it online will be nice

CXu wrote:

Unqualify* Gotta get them terms right.

SapphireGhost wrote:

CXu wrote:

Unqualify* Gotta get them terms right.

If we're going to be picky about terms I think we should use "disqualify" for the grammatical edge.

Anyway, I talked with Skystar about the sliders after they were ranked as well and I'll test the new pattern once I'm home and try to help. Sorry this wasn't caught earlier.

Natsu wrote:

Yuko + Natsu =

SapphireGhost wrote:

disqualify

was obviously

TKSalt wrote:

confirmed newest taiko diffs.

• One thing I can suggest to you is you either do a little movement in of the sliders as to show the real length of slider (1). It may quite break the great appearance of these sliders but we're doing this for the sake of having a good flow in the gameplay in terms of readability.

Faust wrote:

Here's a referral: http://vgmdb.net/album/35782

"MasKaleido - エアーマンが倒せない <SOUND HOLIC Ver.> (feat.花たん)"

Basically, "Can't Beat Air Man <SOUND HOLIC Ver.> (feat.Hanatan)"

Faust wrote:

Yes of course, it's acceptable to have it romanized.

MasKaleido isn't part of the unit "SOUND HOLIC", and Hanatan belongs to "Halozy".

Noting that this album solely consists of artiste arrangements (featuring separate vocalists), the Artist ought to be the arranger.

Natsu wrote:

Faust wrote:

Yes of course, it's acceptable to have it romanized.

MasKaleido isn't part of the unit "SOUND HOLIC", and Hanatan belongs to "Halozy".

Noting that this album solely consists of artiste arrangements (featuring separate vocalists), the Artist ought to be the arranger.

I'm not sure, but in my opinion the current metadata is more accurate, why?:

1- In the oficial page http://www.rockmanholic.com/discography.html the title is エアーマンが倒せない (SOUND HOLIC Ver.) adding Feat.Hanatan will break the original tittle of the song.

2- The better option for the artist is Hanatan, since is more known than the arrange, which can be easily in tags, like is now, also you can notice how the vocal spot have a more important position in the metadata info in the CD:



Well that's why I think the current Artist and Title should be the correct, also according to peppy post that I linked before https://osu.ppy.sh/forum/p/2744316 , but again this is my opinion I'm not 100% sure

peppy wrote:

Most artists group themselves under the circle name, unless they are very well known. If they are well known enough, it's feasible to use their artist name instead of circle name.

Amamiya Yuko wrote:

that's what i had already tried, as it just didn't fit at all
it's not like the next 1/3 part that feels kind of different like, "speed down"
it's a part which tells "speed up", that's why i did it like that

P A N wrote:

I think it's fine now since Mickey can SS on 02:59:027 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6) easily,
here is a replay http://puu.sh/7IG3m.osr

1. watching the replay it looks really easy to play, since I think the current one is playable enough too, more opinions are welcome plz!
   
2. after watching Nitro play it, is easy to do for double tap players, but not for single tap players so idk
   
3. I pass it in first play http://puu.sh/7IHTp.osr
4.