1. Easy (1,39 stars, 102 notes)
2. Normal (1,72 stars, 136 notes)
3. Shining (2,91 stars, 222 notes)

1. Some objects go outside of the playing field, not the editor field, but a slider tail or side might sneak outside a bit. In my opinion, that annoys the balls out of me, I like to see all objects stay within the square but I don't know how you could fix this other than making CS smaller (for Easy). Just letting you know my thoughts.

This pattern?

ReFaller wrote:

NM from my queue.
[Easy]
Your base sv in compare to your used large spacing gives a feeling that all objects are playing with a small jumps. If you increase circle size to 2 it will make playing everything a bit smoother.
[Normal]
You might be tempted to change CS to 3 in same purpose as Easy.
[Hard]
00:16:641 (3,4,5) - current rhythm order causes that i'm barely playing 00:17:534 (6,7) with a successful. I consider switching 00:16:641 (3,4,5) as presented in pictures below:

This is your current rhythm.

This is rhythm after changes.

I didn't move placements, so don't suggest jumps from second picture.
00:28:069 (3,4,5) - Issue repeats here too, so you don't need pictures for it since you what to do from above one.

-Jordan- wrote:

Mod from my queue

Feel free to not kudosu this mod, I couldn't find much wrong, sorry don't worry owo

Normal

01:08:605 (4,5,6) - This pattern is mapped just like the part before it but gains in intensity. I think for this you should add some variety to better match the change in music. i can't add notes on blue ticks its unrankable :/

01:23:689 - The BPM of this timing point is incorrect? To follow the previous pattern the slider should have ended on a red tick, and when comparing the music to the song before it, it should have decreased in BPM which leads me to believe the BPM is actually ~58. i'm going to ask to some people before fix it to be sure (tbh its sound good on blue tick too lul)

Shining

00:02:891 (1,2,3,4) - I understand you wanting to stack these like this but it seems unnecessary for this difficulty really. I think you should increase the stack leniency to 4 as stacks like this aren't too commonly seen in 3* maps, unless you have reason to keep it. tbh i really like this stacking i don't want to change it

00:54:677 (4,5,6) - I think there are a lot more dominant sounds for you to map here rather than still following the fading lyrics.

01:16:462 (3) - Same with the 1/3 vocals here. i prefer keep this here i like the way to emphasis the vocals with a 1/3 slider renverse

01:22:891 (1,2,3,4) - 'If' you do change the stacking, this is still stacked because of the change in bpm so you should stack these too to match the intro. like i said before

01:24:786 (1) - End the spinner on the red timing point? Since here you end it at the start of the trill it makes more sense to end it on beat with the music. i don't see a problem its sound good :/

Maxylan wrote:

NM From my queue ~

Shining

[General, aka applies to all difficulties]
You should consider doubling the BPM of the song from 84 to 168. Mapping in 84 BPM while it is possible is very limiting as in apparent in the difficulties, and also the song supports 168 BPM if you listen closely.
00:05:391 (4,5,6) - If you listen closely with 25% speed it sounds to me the offset is maybe 4ms~ off? Consider changing it up so accuracy is easier on the player. i don't think so 84 bpm it's fine because the music is slow (i listen very closely and i don't see a problem :/)
You do follow some flow, but your mapping style is very linear. Meaning you only occasionally use sharp angles and mostly draw straight lines between your objects. You can improve it a ton more by adding different spacing, sharper angles, more circular flow, unique object placements. When it comes to aesthetics, I think the entire map is unrankable, but I could, of course, be wrong, that's for the BN's to decide. i spoke with some BNs and they told me it's rankable so there are no problems with it
[Shining]
FYI: Will only point out big mistakes that you can think and improve over, and mistakes that are repeated alot will also only be covered once. This is because I think you're better off remapping the entire Shining difficulty.

00:05:034 (3) - "Start a slider on a strong sound and end it on a sound of equal or relatively less strength" - pishifat.
Never end a slider on a stronger sound than it starts on. It's a mistake punishable by death (jk ~)
00:12:891 (1) - From this point on there's alot of mixing with mapping vocals and instruments. Most of it is done in a good way (apart from the various previously mentioned topics like flow, aesthetics, etc.) but this 00:16:462 (2,3) is a bad offender because it starts mapping the background while the singer is holding it sets the expectation to the player that the rest will also follow the instruments, and not the vocals. because instruments are important at this moment i need to emphasis them
00:16:820 (4,5,4,5) - Ah it frustrates me too see a map that's so linear, these are just two examples but there are a ton of places where you can emphasise sound by adding SOMETHING! Just anything please! Spacing would be the go-to for most mappers in these cases. I follow just the music and when there are some parts who need to be spaced out, i do it.
00:46:462 (6) - Never end a slider on a strong sound! Like I just mentioned, but I also wanted to mention how confusing I thought it was with all the red-anchor sliders in such a slow map, mixed in with curved sliders. Curved and Red-anchor slider does different things when it comes to emphasizing sound because generally speaking, red-anchor sliders are quicker and chaotic and curved are more smooth and follows flow better.
00:54:677 (4,5,6) - End this symmetrical and linear style of mapping that died out in 2013 - 2014 D= but it's looks not so bad xDD

• [Normal]

1. 01:13:962 - 01:14:141 - 01:14:677 - need normal-whistle
2. 01:05:748 (5) - curved maybe
3. 01:11:641 - map this drum
4. 01:12:355 - 01:12:712 - here too

niruko wrote:

o/

• [Normal]

1. 01:13:962 - 01:14:141 - 01:14:677 - need normal-whistle
2. 01:05:748 (5) - curved maybe
3. 01:11:641 - map this drum je ne peux pas car apres ça sonne weird et je ne peux pas rétrécir le slider ce serait unrankable :/
4. 01:12:355 - 01:12:712 - here too ^

BAKKALO wrote:

Hey je suis là car tu as faire une request sur mon Modding Queue x) Yep :p

[Shining]
Elle est un peu répétitive :\ Mais bon pour l'instant ça va, les paternes qui se répètent ne se voient pas trop ^^ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
00:16:820 (4,5) - Je trouve ce paterne bizarre visuellement, perso j'aurai fait comme ça ( http://puu.sh/xabeJ/3e09ac20e5.jpg ) libre à toi de changer si tu en as l'envie
00:25:391 (3,4,5) - Le 3 et le 4 sont trop rapprocher, j'ai sélectionné le 4-5 et j'ai placé sur x:19 y:242 c'est bien comme c'est j'pense xd
01:17:891 (6,7) - Bouge un peu le 7 pourquoi? il est bien où il est :/

Désolé si c'est un petit mod mais il n'y a pas vraiment de défaut donc je ne sais pas trop quoi dire x) Bonne chance pour la rank ! Merci!

joker- wrote:

hi hi
i looked over your mapsets but they dont have much issues in my view
so i suggest very subjective mod then i will leave whether you give me kds or not

General

1. should remove "ゼロトケイ" & "zerotokei" since they are duplicate with title and romanised title this is the name of the album
2. 00:01:463 - 00:12:534 - why you dont add any hitdound on this section? for instances, you would take on hitsound(i.e. Addiction:N Finish) per switching NC and so on tried something xd

Normal

1. 00:06:105 (4) - you would be better to remove this circle since i listen like a tiny sound can be ignored on calmest part on this song. i suggest you replace 1/2 slider on 00:05:748 - or take same rhythm on Easy
2. 00:22:712 - i wanna catch this sound instead of 00:22:355 - . because you added custom hitsound that is imitate sound on normal clap and you dont add any hitsound 00:22:355 - 's sound. then it can be expressed more suitable for this song in my thought. but if you agree with my opinion, you have to fix same rhythm pattern on the whole... probably should ignore mine lel but 00:22:355 - is more strong than 00:22:712 - i wanted to emphasis this sound 00:22:712 - by adding a hitsound here 00:22:891
3. 01:08:605 (4,5) - you are missing strong drum on 01:08:784 - ? so i recommend you try to catch up this sound and shouldnt be clickable on 01:09:141 - . about the rhythm, you can find better one without saying anything. i can't change it because if i add a 1/3 slider it's should be unrankable or if i add some circle it's should be difficult for the players because circles on white, blue and red ticks are impossible to play for newbies :/

Shining

1. 00:01:998 (2) - why dont you replace 1/1 slider instead? the same reasons above 00:04:855 (2,3,4) - same here it's sound good imo
2. 00:06:105 (7) - same mentions as hard
3. 01:01:284 (7) - can you move upward it to be smooth flow from a previous slider since it doenst look nice for aesthetics in your neat map. accordingly, you can express emphasized strong vocal on beginning NC but in case you did it, the distance is too much imo. thus you would be better to adjust them each other.
4. 01:08:605 (1,2,3,4,5) - players are kinda awkward for difference of distances like this smooth flow. to prevent it, i suggest you make edge flow on 01:08:962 (3,4) - . i don't understand :/

should be all!
very impressive song and clean mapset Thanks!
hope really rank it! Good Luck!

1. I believe the current timing is slightly inaccurate. This should be better with:
   
   
   Try getting someone else's opinion on that.
   
   (current timing)

1. 00:21:462 (1) - Considering the logic you are following with 00:15:570 (7,1) - , 00:26:998 (7,1) - , and etc. you should have a small jump here as well.
2. 01:09:141 (4,5) - Be careful with the spacing here. Even if you are using 2.00x just like with 01:08:605 (1,2,3,4) - , since you increased the SV, the spacing between those notes increased as well.
3. 01:15:034 (7) - This is not 1/3 here. If you listen carefully, you will notice that the reverse should be snapped on the 1/8 tick and the slider should end on the blue tick.
4. 01:16:462 (3) - Unfortunately, here again, it is not 1/3 (and not 1/8). The vocals start on 01:16:820 - and there is a drum beat on 01:16:998 - .

Kurai wrote:

[Timing]

1. I believe the current timing is slightly inaccurate. This should be better with:
   
   
   Try getting someone else's opinion on that. Okay!
   
   (current timing)

[Shining]

1. 00:21:462 (1) - Considering the logic you are following with 00:15:570 (7,1) - , 00:26:998 (7,1) - , and etc. you should have a small jump here as well.
2. 01:09:141 (4,5) - Be careful with the spacing here. Even if you are using 2.00x just like with 01:08:605 (1,2,3,4) - , since you increased the SV, the spacing between those notes increased as well.
3. 01:15:034 (7) - This is not 1/3 here. If you listen carefully, you will notice that the reverse should be snapped on the 1/8 tick and the slider should end on the blue tick.
4. 01:16:462 (3) - Unfortunately, here again, it is not 1/3 (and not 1/8). The vocals start on 01:16:820 - and there is a drum beat on 01:16:998 - .

josh1024 wrote:

From the queue:

Uh, looks good to me, sorry.

Easy
00:51:462 (7) hitsound? there is no important sound here :/

Kyuukai wrote:

hihi
Normal
01:01:998 (2) - Tu peux delete ça pour rendre le truc moins dense
01:04:855 (2) - ^
01:13:427 (2) - ^

Shining
00:12:891 (1) - Je trouve ça bizarre que tu mettes un slider en 1/1 pour follow les vocals or que tu mappe principalement le xylophone en fond, peut être que 00:15:748 (1,2) - ceci pourrait mieux passer ?
00:19:320 (2,3) - C'est pas intuitif, le 2 suit le piano mais tu mappe le xylophone juste avant, en plus de ça tu skip un son important ici 00:20:034 - avec ton 3 ah :/
00:24:320 (1) - premier truc xd
01:24:769 - Peut être qu'une note suivi du spinner serait mieux, mais ça c'est un avis personnel xd non thanks j'aime bien comme ça xd

Monstrata wrote:

Hitsounding

00:14:677 - 00:17:534 - Places like this could use a drum-whistle for the hihat.

Shining

00:04:320 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - Keep the intro a bit less dense. Use more 1/4 repeat sliders and less consecutive circles. That way when the instruments join in at 00:07:177 - it gives the map a more noticeable step up in pacing that fits the song. I put 2 more 1/4 repeat sliders, i hope it's fine lul
00:51:105 (2,3) - Kinda nitpicky but move it up a bit so 2>3 fits the curve of 3 a bit better? Like so:

~

01:15:034 (7) - I think this also deserves a spacing increase.
01:23:708 (3,4) - While this is okay, you might want to consider changing this to a 1/2 slider instead cuz it is kinda hard to acc bpm changes. I usually use sliders cuz of the slider-head leniency. You could also add a circle on 01:24:769 - and have the spinner begin 1/8 of a beat later.

Normal

00:43:605 (4,1) - Make the curve fit a bit better here too?
01:24:769 (1) - Consider adding a circle and beginning the spinner like on the blue tick

Easy

00:21:462 (5) - Beginning here, you start NC"ing every two measures instead of every measure, so please fix them all.

[]

Call me back when you're ready! (Don't forget to give my map a quick check when you have time, i'd appreciate it ^^) No problem!~

Battle wrote:

[easy]
00:40:034 (3,4) - tbh these kinda look ugly so could you change the shape of these or change how close they are cuz wow they're really close to each other lol
01:21:284 (1) - tbh you could put a whistle for the end, i think it fits well I fixed a normal-finish on the big white tick like the others diffs, i think it's fine
[top]
00:02:891 (1,2,3,4) - i would think a little bit of movement, but not like, a lot, would make this flow a bit smoother cuz it's somewhat easy to stumble on the note presses ingame since the stacks are a bit confusing with the approach circles

kinda applies to other situations similar to it, stuff like 00:52:177 (5,6,1) - is fine tho

normal is fine too

CucumberCuc wrote:

Hi

[Easy]
00:02:891 (2,3) for other objects on diff you not to do so far, maybe do slightly are close? i think it's fixed~

[Normal]
00:57:891 (6,1) it's far, do are close it's Distance Snap

[Shining]
00:04:855 (2,3,4,5) slightly different range it's fine imo
00:08:605 (6,7,8,9) ^ ^
00:13:605 (2,3,4) ^ ^
00:24:320 (1,2,3) ^ ^
00:51:284 (3,4,5) ^ ^
01:12:891 (1,2,3) do the same distance? 01:13:605 - here vocals are more strong than 01:12:891 - this is why i make a jump

Time Capsule wrote:

me myself feel the placement on the water drop sampleset applied to fast and give less impact than it should
00:17:177 - for example, it could be stronger by just move it 1 beat after which it 00:17:891 -
ye I pointing it until 00:35:748 -

no kds
(will throw proper mod later if necessary)

Pachiru wrote:

Bravo Shogun, tu rank pas mal de choses en ce moment, c'est cool
GG!

Imakuri wrote:

speedranking :vvvvvvvvvvvvv
gg kan mm

-NanoRIPE- wrote:

Nice
gratz!!

AzureDoctor wrote:

Grats on speedrank, lol