1. Easy (1.56 stars, 113 notes)
2. Hard (3.07 stars, 230 notes)
3. Insane (4.34 stars, 299 notes)
4. Lasse's Extra (4.87 stars, 385 notes)
5. Normal (2.01 stars, 177 notes)

HappyRocket88 wrote:

Hellow! :3

I was told to give a look how the lower difficulties execute the BPM change part and see whether the current pattern is approachable for players.

[Easy]
00:11:740 (1,3) - Take a look of this. Beginners will likely to get confuse for this due to the stack covering the slider-head when (1) hasn't even finished its path. I think it would be less risky if (3) wasn't stacked over in order to allow players catch and differentiate how each note relates. SUGGESTION: Doing a little mustache here would hurt no one and will keep the smooth flow you intended here. https://up.ppy.sh/files/1-269.png it's kinda readable a bit there, i guess? i'll see how this goes
00:31:622 (3) - Would be cool if you could follow the NC pattern you were following before by adding NC here. i wanna keep the NC as it is
01:27:007 (1) - The BPM change is so drastic here and while you did it great highlighting with this reverse arrow, I slightly doubt players would get how slowly this becomes at playing. Wouldn't it be better to add a green line here that by increasing SV here the effect of the BPM wouldn't be that sudden as it is currently. uh about that slider reverse by that bpm change, idk what i should do with it, but i rly need more help here D:

[Normal]
00:16:533 - This felt somewhat empty since it is slightly inconsistent according to what instruments you followed at the beginning of this stanza 00:11:740 - . I'm not sure whether it was intentional or not, but it would play rhythmically better if there was a note to click here. that's intentional, and i see no problem with it having it consistent or not, as long as it follows well enough for me :shrugs:
00:28:782 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2) - Patterning as these whilst they still highlight the combination of vocals and instruments they turn a very challenging arrangement for players. Certainly, stacking 00:31:445 (5) - over the next 1/2 pattern creates a very confusing pattern since the rhythm-choice was slightly lowered with the 3/2 sliders and by adding this, it would possibly lead to a really tricky space to catch the beat-placement aimed here. SUGGESTION: Removing this circle 00:31:445 (5) - would soothe the appearance and the way it plays due to the relevance-wise this beat 00:31:267 - represents compared to 00:31:445 - woops didn't realize that. did on my own
01:28:149 (2,1) - I'm afraid this would play well along with the spacing you had managed just before. The reason I say that is the stack turning rather a misleading pattern if players aren't aware when will the piano sound start again. Hence, I do believe placing (1) somewhere else nearer but avoiding the stack would fit the best. agreed, but on what DS? orz

Hard difficulty executes well the BPM change safely and I'm sure players can handle over it, in my perspective. Good job and best of luck!

Rizkihayan wrote:

Hey M4M ,MOD DIKIT

Ini mohon di kondisi kan HP-nya untuk easy mz
OD=3 | HP=3 X
OD=3.5 | HP=4 √


ini mohon dikondisikan HP-nya untuk insane mz
OD=4 | HP=7 X
OD=4.5 | HP=7.5 √

ahsoka08 wrote:

NM mod from my queue <3

Easy
00:11:740 (1,2,3) I don't like the overlap here that's not an overlap tbh. this should be ok for them i guess?
00:40:143 (1,2,3) ^ same

Normal
this is in 1/16 lmao not pretty necessary since i was doing stuff on that bpm change part LOL
00:56:474 (1,1) This should be one combo disagree. having 00:57:184 (1) - NCd is important for me since it emphasize the vocal and its instrument well right going to its chorus part

Hard
Why is the stack leniency so low cuz why not? i dislike having a note skipping to 1/1 as "unstacked" completely
01:08:190 (6) I think this should be a stream i won't call that as Hard diff for that tbh
01:32:988 (1) The slidershape pattern is gone help

Insane
stacking leniency again same reason
besides that I really like this diff


This is a great map, Have a wonderful day <3

Net0 wrote:

[General]

1. On hard diff are you sure about the snap here 01:28:197 (2) - ? can't be so sure about it, but i'll leave that as it is for a while
   

[Insane]

1. C’mon 01:32:988 (1) – you can do betterhttps://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8527298 i suck at slider art, thx
2. Insane SV increase from 1.0x in such a CALM part to 1.1x in a way more intense part was really odd to see on Insane diff. 4* map should give you more room to better reflect the song intensity which is not being done with such small change on SV. i can always do that, but this time sadly. i want to keep the spread more balanced enough as it is tbh

GL and you didn’t read rules of the queue :> "complicated" rules orz

MaridiuS wrote:

Ticket = redeemed , here i come

[hitsounds + keysounds diff]
EWWW what is this this is the worst mapping i've ever seen lol. Do you know that even NC exist? You can press 3 and then place sliders, also whats up with the ar and bad flow lol. Note you can make blankets with sliders and make rankable maps, its okay there's still hope for you, this is a blanket http://i.imgur.com/sy4a7sv.png. Also please get a background, there are some nice backgrounds on pixiv.net. Oh also please watch some pishi videos about osu! that could also help. Anyways, unreadable and unrankable please delete osu! thanks. xd yeah i suck at mapping. thanks for letting me know that!

[Lasse's Extra]
Should this even be called an extra? Its 4.9* and it doesn't have any groundbreaking gimmick to separate it much from usual insanes, just a bit denser rhythm and bigger spacing. he/i can change the diff name to Lasse's Hana if he wants to, up2him

[Insane]
Hmm, I don't believe that the style of the map supports ar 8. Its not that i hate ar8, its just that i feel like 8.3 ar would fit more. 8 is enough imo
00:07:303 (4) - since this is a drum hit, 00:08:545 (4) - this is a bit similar to it, so i suggest just reducing spacing, not stacking. let's say that i want to keep it simple play before the next part
00:21:149 (4,5,6,1,2,3,4) - hm you're kind using same visual spacing/triangles/hexagrid in the map, so this kinda stands out aesthetically. I suggest doing hexagrid or smeth here. if this points out again, i'll change it
00:23:811 - in this section, every pattern has a close circle to it. 00:28:072 (2,3,4) - this one stands out, there's nothing visual right next to 2, so, by keeping the same DS on (3) you can move 4 right next to the slider. http://i.imgur.com/lZiAZqg.jpg to preserve the structure. that'll mess things up and inconsistent spacing with those heads if i do that
00:35:705 (1) - doing ctrl+G here you get to emphasize this. This flow it creates is kinda fun, so i suggest doing it. One more reason to do it, is that on stronger vocals/beats you usually give bigger spacing like here 00:39:078 (3,4,5) - good idea, but 00:35:705 (1) - is just a vocal without kicks, so having a 1x DS is ok though, but 00:39:078 (3,4,5) - is vocal's pitch getting higher + kicks there, so that'd be fun to see for its sense ww
00:45:823 - the song gets more intense here, so i suggest increasing the SV a bit. 00:45:823 (1) - also is it really necessary to use twice reverse arrow, you end the slider on a strong beat 00:46:533 - that should need accentuation. increasing SV huh... i don't think it's necessary though. about the reverse, yeah it's intentional
01:01:445 (1,2,3) - Hmm i aesthetically prefer 00:39:078 (3,4,5) - this kind of structure, and also it flows kinda better, so i suggest doing just that here too. too boring to make it same. i only did the stack play from 01:00:024 (1) - and 01:00:912 (3) - LOL
01:07:125 (1,3) - think that this is a tad bit too close to the slider, please make it more further away. i don't think it is a big deal. besides, it's a triangle shape also if you look at it again haha

[hard]
00:00:380 (1) - since this is straight make these two straight too 00:02:687 (4,1) - um, it doesn't have to be the same, ya know .-.
00:25:587 (5) - think it actually fits more to delete this note. too empty for such present note there orz
01:00:557 (2,3) - make em touch like this or don't touch em at all http://i.imgur.com/i4Td1rb.jpg having just the tips overlap is gay. keep, but i'll see how this goes
01:09:788 (1,2) - i really prefer if you could instead blanket them, this style of aesthetics is kinda 2011 2011 style cuz why not? ww
01:16:178 (2,3) - tips again
yep i suck at modding below insane xd

YukiZura- wrote:

hello .. nm from my q

Lasse's Insane Extra

Insane

00:25:764 - this part .. the sound is strong and loud here.. i dont think you should leave just like that .. but this part 00:25:764 (5,6,1) - you cover it pretty well lol i prefer the way it is, since i don't think that emphasize really well to start such triplets from a guitar
00:17:066 (6) - nc here? i kinda get what you're suggesting me for
01:16:533 (3,4,5,1) - can be better blanket pretty subjective since i was using a slider angle play, but i fixed the stacks there
01:17:066 (1,2) - swap nc? nah
01:19:374 - nc nice

Hard

00:16:533 (3,4) - only a suggestion it breaks the flow

image

00:35:705 (1) - remove nc
00:36:060 (2) - put nc here instead these 2 points here aren't pretty necessary for having an NC there tbh. it doesn't have to be sth strong or what. normally red ticks can be NCd before the white tick if it is reasonable

i like how tidy your map is
that all.. i cant find much to mod
gudluck ^^

Fushimi Rio wrote:

you don't need to put chenwu in tags lol

-Latias- wrote:

m4m for ticket

normal

00:14:581 (1) - u can just copy and paste 00:11:740 (1) - to make the repeater to show more consistency um it doesn't have to be consistent. besides, i was trying to follow a guitar sound and predicted which tick ends the best to emphasize with the drums too
00:17:421 (1) - change shape to give it more emphasis on downbeat and to make it stand out from 00:16:001 (3,4) - um this looks ok, but also a shape as well that doesn't have to be changed to emphasize it
00:17:421 (1,2,3,4) - i really dont think this pattern works both aesthetically and rhythmically, since 00:17:953 - and 00:18:486 - dont have same sounds, and hardly and sound on 00:19:019 -. the sound u emphasise on 00:17:953 - only happens on every red tick, and for both 00:18:486 (3) - 00:17:421 (1) - to ignore it sounds really off. tl;dr-the sounds u try to map are very inconsistent, and sounds very off what? they don't have sounds? dude, u didn't know that i was following a guitar sound that sounds 3/2 beat there, right?
00:35:705 (3) - 00:38:190 (4) -01:00:557 (2) - this is the only time's u use straight sliders likes this and looks inconsistent, since most of the time u use slightly rotated straight sliders. u can just rotate 00:35:705 (3) - 00:38:190 (4) - by -5 degrees and 01:00:557 (2) - by 5 you know that it doesn't have to be the same for both straight and curve in Normal diff, right?

insane

00:00:912 (2) - u can ctrl+g this to do counterclockwise flow better not, cuz i have to use DS intentionally for that. besides, i want to have 00:01:445 (3) - not as a jump gap there, since it's a weak note
00:19:018 (2) - ctrl+h since the sliderbody doesnt really help with the clockwise flow 00:18:486 (1) - was settting up it's flowable enough. besides, that'll ruin both symmetry from 00:17:421 (1,2) -

those were the only things i could find :c im really bad at modding orz
other than that, pretty good mapset

[Nemesis] wrote:

M4M.

Not mentioning hitsounds as noted in the map's description.

My map for reminder: https://osu.ppy.sh/s/621851

Insane

00:33:930 (1,2) - for such an insignificant *pop* in the music this jump is too overdone what...? those 2 notes are from drums, and could use a bit of jumps there instead, since that calm part was like too calm to have a big gap of jumps than this
00:42:095 (2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - two different parts of the music emphasized the same way, think of something more creative lol i don't even know what to do with it, but i'll keep the way as it is
00:44:758 - this sound is a little to important to be emphasized as a sliderend imo but that slider follows the vocal well enough, as it looks different from the others that i used 1/2s before this
00:52:568 (3,1,3,4) - if you ignore the vocals you'll notice that the BGM there is nearly identical, yet the second jump is about four times as big, why? both emphasized the vocal by its high pitch on 00:54:344 (1) - and the instruments well enough to have such jumps there
01:08:190 (5,3) - stack not really needed and it's intentional
01:32:988 (1) - I don't really enjoy this <3 as much as Lasse's since it looks a little clunkier yee i'm bad at slider art

I really can't judge easier diffs, I'm sorry bout that it's ok www

gl

Yahuri wrote:

m4m return from my q

Easy
00:30:202 (2,3) - flow looks a bit weird here imo because the flow direction shifts ~90 degrees and then immediately reverses again, i think it would be better if you move 2 to the left or 3 to the right i think this looks fine
00:45:113 (4,1) - really small overlap doesnt look good maybe something with a bit additional space of overlap would work i think
00:45:823 (1,2) - aesthetics looks weird, try making them parallel to each other, so sth like this https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8546093 (tail1-head2 and tail2-head1 will have the same spacing) um, i don't like having it parallel there
01:01:445 (3,4,5) - move 5 down a bit so that you can get the same spacing away from tail3 and 4 isn't this enough to give space for (4)? besides, they can see the number difference for newbie players
01:08:190 (4,3) - pixel stack, move 3 down left a

Normal
01:02:510 (6,1) - fix blanket a
01:13:871 (7,1) - ^ rework the pattern as well
01:10:675 (5,1) - dont rly like how the tails almost overlap done

Hard
00:05:705 (7,1,1,2,3,1) - had a hard time reading the stacks on HD cuz of time spacing differences, but up to u if u wanna change imo that looks readable enough, even with or without mods
00:19:018 (1,2) - pixel stack, move 2 right a
00:39:788 (4,2) - ^ move 2 down
00:47:066 (1,1) - ^ move the second slider right
00:47:776 (1,2) - ^ move 2 up left
00:51:149 (4,2) - ^ move 2 up
ignoring mods from above since i've fixed that
00:33:930 (3,4) - would have a cooler effect if you move 4 onto the y-axis imo (then stack 3 on top) i prefer easy stack play here
01:00:557 (2,3) - slight overlap doesnt look good flipped 01:00:912 (3) -
01:16:178 (2,3) - ^ did a bit of work on 01:15:646 (1,2) -
01:00:912 (3,4,1,2,3) - fix blankets that's intentional
01:13:161 (2,3,4) - ^ a
01:05:705 (1,2) - doesnt look good because of slider angles, you can make these parallel i don't think this requires a parallel imo
01:32:988 (1) - not sure if you wanted this to be mostly symmetrical, but these https://puu.sh/wFeMv/4807578a32.jpg sections of the slider are different sizes (the right hole is bigger than the left) reworking this on my own a bit

hitsound + keysounds
delet thi ye

Insane
00:06:060 (1,2) - fix blanket a
00:28:427 (3,1) - ^ a
00:09:433 (2,2) - pixel stack, move the circle down right a
01:02:865 (1,3) - ^ move 3 up right a
00:36:060 (2,3) - jump isnt necessary here imo, 3 isnt that strong wdym? it is strong enough from the kicks
01:21:149 (1,3) - blanket? that's intentional
01:32:988 (1) - same as Hard doesn't have to be symmetrical tbh

not much notable stuff, mapset already looks pretty clean to me. add hitsounds tho
good luck!

1. 00:06:060 (1,1) - second slider doesn't fit fully with first, fix it
   
2. 00:11:740 (1,3) - Bad stack I think
   
3. 00:40:143 (1,3) - ^

1. 00:17:421 (1,2,3,1) - and 00:20:261 (1,2) - are completely different sounds, why you do patterns like they are identical?

1. 00:08:900 (1) - Maybe space this out to emphasize strong sound?

1. 00:06:060 (1,2,3,4) - Kinda strange spacing here, maybe put NC on 00:07:125 (3) - ? Tho I can't hear anything on 00:06:859 (2) - , why is it even mapped?
   
2. 00:18:664 - Strong sound missed
   
3. 00:35:350 (4) - 2 circles would be better here to show vocals
   
4. 00:45:823 (1) - Reverse slider here isn't good I think, strong vocal on the tail, bad
   
5. 01:07:125 (1) - 2 circles or maybe 2 kick sliders here would be much better

1. 00:07:125 (1,2) - Spacing between these notes does not correlate with SV you choosed, it should be bigger imo
   
2. 00:08:368 (1,2) - Here as well ^

MrDorian wrote:

hi owo/

Insane

00:02:865 (2) - maybe stack it on 00:03:752 (2) - this slider, flow would be better in my opinion flow's fine
00:32:155 (2,3) - this jump doesn't fit here. You used almost constant spacing in this part (besides 00:27:717 (1,2,3) -) so why is it so different? there's like kick ish sound, so i think it suits well. for that vocal, i think it emphasize based on before the next emphasize note

really solid mapset, I like it, but my mod is literally useless, no kudosu please

MashaSG wrote:

Easy:

1. 00:06:060 (1,1) - second slider doesn't fit fully with first, fix it
   
2. 00:11:740 (1,3) - Bad stack I think
   
3. 00:40:143 (1,3) - ^
   
   remake stuff from above

Normal:

1. 00:17:421 (1,2,3,1) - and 00:20:261 (1,2) - are completely different sounds, why you do patterns like they are identical? did u notice that at first it was like 3/2 guitar notes there, then the second one was emphasize note on every 3/2 beat?

Hard:

1. 00:08:900 (1) - Maybe space this out to emphasize strong sound? i like stacking this

Insane:

1. 00:06:060 (1,2,3,4) - Kinda strange spacing here, maybe put NC on 00:07:125 (3) - ? Tho I can't hear anything on 00:06:859 (2) - , why is it even mapped? i fixed something on my own since i noticed something wrong with it. then, for the NC, i don't think it is needed since i could hear that piano note was still on, so i think having no NC there by that piano should be fine. and yes, there's a note
   
2. 00:18:664 - Strong sound missed that's intentional since i was following the guitar sound based on its pitch
   
3. 00:35:350 (4) - 2 circles would be better here to show vocals isn't that following vocals well?
   
4. 00:45:823 (1) - Reverse slider here isn't good I think, strong vocal on the tail, bad personally, i like this one better
   
5. 01:07:125 (1) - 2 circles or maybe 2 kick sliders here would be much better personally i was about to use that, but for now i have to use a 1/2 slider. i'll see how this goes

Sorry for delay, tho didn't know this map that good, so you can not mod back if you want

Sorry again, GL!

yShadowXOP_ wrote:

NM

INSANE

00:19:462 - circle ? uh no, that'll ruin the symmetry. besides, i was following the guitar sound there
00:44:403 (1,6) - a blanket here maybe? um, that's not a blanket look, cuz i had to use start pattern there
01:21:149 (1) - why did you pick up the sound that least highlights in the song? wdym? but that sounds better with a bass, right?
01:21:504 - is not it better to put a circle? i'd like to keep the way as it is due to a bass sound
01:25:409 - circle? k
01:25:498 - ^ k


Rank this please because I want pp hauhauhauahua <3 [/color]

1. Ending with the slow down - Slider are kinda similar in lenght but with different duration dont know if thats ok for an easy? Prolly ok cause of the slow down but I've already been told having different lenght slider looking too similar wasnt ok so just pointing that out.. Maybe they are ok now too, I've seen that something similar have been pointed out in first mod too

1. 00:31:445 - Would feel so much better if there could be a circle there but that might be too much for a normal. I know that using two reverse on the next slider to move it earlier isnt ok for a normal so yeah would be great if its doable I think.

1. 00:52:391 (2,3,1) - I feel the movement into 1 is kinda awkward to play. Maybe having it play more like this 00:50:439 (2,3,4) - would be fine but would kinda ruin the pattern tho :/

1. 00:36:859 (2,3,4) - First time in the map you use a 1/2 stacked. I feel under slider those work fine but this one feel a bit awkward from another circle

Shanipika wrote:

From mod queue

[Easy]
I'm not good with lower diff but still gonna do what I can

1. Ending with the slow down - Slider are kinda similar in lenght but with different duration dont know if thats ok for an easy? Prolly ok cause of the slow down but I've already been told having different lenght slider looking too similar wasnt ok so just pointing that out.. Maybe they are ok now too, I've seen that something similar have been pointed out in first mod too ummm, i had a chat with Lasse about this from few weeks ago, and this seems fine as it is for a bpm change part here

[Normal]

1. 00:31:445 - Would feel so much better if there could be a circle there but that might be too much for a normal. I know that using two reverse on the next slider to move it earlier isnt ok for a normal so yeah would be great if its doable I think. i had a mod like that when i had a note there, but it's way too much to set a note there for a calm part like this

Other than that everything seems fine for a normal I think

[Hard]
Would be great if heart could be fixed but saw other people mentionning those heart at the end so yeah xD i suck at it

[Insane]

1. 00:52:391 (2,3,1) - I feel the movement into 1 is kinda awkward to play. Maybe having it play more like this 00:50:439 (2,3,4) - would be fine but would kinda ruin the pattern tho :/ flow's fine. just play like straight curve ish there if u play this diff, you'll see

Other than that I like this diff (oh and same as hard about the heart x) ) yes .-.

Set is pretty good owo

Mir wrote:

asdf

[General]
Are these used?
soft-hitfinish2.wav
soft-hitfinish82.wav
soft-hitwhistle2.wav
soft-sliderslide89.wav
deleted them

Check for delay:
soft-hitwhistle92.wav ok

[Easy]

Fine.

[Normal]
- 00:11:740 (1) - NC density from here starts to get a bit low, maybe NC every two downbeats cuz your combos never go past 3. i don't quite get this tbh .-. but i think this NC looks ok if i can understand this enough...?
- 00:22:569 (3,1) - Might be worth distiguishing this 1/1 gap a bit better cuz atm the visual spacing could confuse players since the border of the slider is the same distance fro 3 as 3 is to 2. i'll just make 00:23:811 - clickable there after that 3/2 slider as a fixed

[Hard]
- 00:08:368 (2,3,1) - I don't know how readable this is because there is a sound between these gaps and players may accidentally click too early. stacked on 00:07:125 (1) - would be better
- 00:46:711 (2,1,2,1) - 00:49:729 (3,1,2,3,4) - I think there are some NC shenanigans going on here but I'm not sure which method you want to use so stick with one. after u pointed them out, i realized sth that i should've noticed from the start... removed NC on 00:47:776 (1) -
- 00:52:746 (1) - Maybe remove NC? i'd like to keep the NC here since it emphasize the vocal well there
- 01:07:303 (2,3) - If you wanna emphasize the violin things you can make this a slider probably because 01:07:480 - has no violin, only a drum. Then afterwards you can ctrl+g rhythm of 01:07:658 (4,5) - if you want. (01:07:658 - ) i experimented for following a violin that emphasized well there, but i'd like to keep the current here, cuz this build up part works fine to have it like that as it is. also, 01:07:835 (5) - is where the vocal started with 1/1 length there, so i had to use 1/2 slider there at least
- 01:09:788 (1,2) - These aren't the same and noticably so, can you flip one? i don't think this is a problem for me imo
- 01:32:988 (1) - lol WHY DO YOU GUYS KEEP POINTING THIS SINCE I'M BAD AT SLIDER ART AAAAAAAAAAA orz

[Insane]
- 00:21:504 (6,3,4) - I feel like emphasis on these notes are quite lacking.. perhaps use more spacing or contrast between the other notes more. was thinking about this at the start, but worried about the diff balanced from the start too, but oh well. remade it and buffed
- 00:35:350 (4) - Not a fan of this slider since it kind of interjects the middle of this vocal phrase. The rhythm I hear is this for lower density and I think fits well at least to cover the vocals by clicking the stronger more noticeable ones.　this should do
- 00:47:776 - Mhh, does the vocal need to land on a slider end like this? It's weird because with 00:47:953 (4) - if looks like you wanted to follow the vocals but you left it on a slider end right before. Maybe making 00:47:598 (3) - two circles would help? imo this suits enough for me to make that snare more clickable and having 00:47:598 (3) - as a slider before the drums
- 00:52:214 - Having the vocal that 00:52:391 (2,3,1,2,3) - continues land on a slider end kind of doesn't make sense for me. Removing the reverse and putting a circle there or making 00:51:504 (1) - a 3/2 slider would help imo. for me, it makes sense enough. although, that 1/1 reverse is intentional since there's nothing to follow on that red tick, but a note that is there on white tick at first before the vocal, so i'll keep it for now. and about that 3/2 slider, i don't think there's something to follow on that red tick tbh
- 00:58:427 (1,3,4,1) - http://i.imgur.com/PvR4Hfx.png 01:02:155 (3,5,6,1) - http://i.imgur.com/auNdral.png aaaaaaa -> http://i.imgur.com/kWZSpEW.png http://i.imgur.com/rX4D8J7.png =w= stack leniency 4 play, but i'll just stick the way it is for now, idk if this should work since some players are able to read it
- 01:07:125 (1) - There are two very strong sounds here and I don't understand why you'd put a slider over both of them. Two circles would fit way more here imo. // 01:08:013 - Also a passive strong sound that might be cooler mapped actively. ok, but i wanna keep 01:07:835 (4) - as the vocal started there
- 01:12:095 (3) - Two circles would work a lot better to follow vocals. You could stack them if you want since sounds are similar. seems ok for me now
- 01:26:119 (2,3,1) - Moving 1 away would make the slowdown more readable imo since atm they're all spaced the same. i think players would be able to guess the timing there, so yah. if i find it misleading for their reading, i can change that nope, changing its spacing for now including some changes

@lit120 get Lasse to help you with those heart sliders lol he got it

Call me back when these things are addressed

Underforest wrote:

m4m as promised to lit
my map ~ http://osu.ppy.sh/s/639700
if my map gets modded by bn, then mod https://osu.ppy.sh/s/605323 instead

[easy]
01:08:545 (1,3) - I wouldn't recommend this kind of overlaps in an easy that kind of overlap seems ok imo

[normal]
00:55:587 (4,1) - maybe exchange nc (nc in 4, no nc in 1) uh no, i want to have that NC as an initial part where the vocal was about to emphasize the beat in chorus part

[hard]
good

[hitsounds + keysounds]
this is the best diff i ever seen in my life, i want to rate it ign rofl/10, the mapping style on this diff is pretty good and you pay a lot of attention in emphasis, really good job and keep up the good work jk YEP!!! lemme make this diff ranked then :v

[insane]
00:20:261 (1,2,3) - this flow feels so weird i had someone testplayed it, and the flow isn't that bad though
01:01:445 (1,2,3) - ^ ^

in serious notes, mapping is really good. gl~

Ohwow wrote:

[Insane]
00:00:380 (1,2) - spacing emphasis is too small compared to the rest (and specifically 00:03:220 (1,2) - which is similar piano sound) i'd like to make it more different rather than having it the same spacing there to emphasize the piano sound there

00:18:486 (1,2) - i see you are trying to mirror the pattern, but I don't think it's fitting with the music. I think this rhythm is better to follow the guitar better(NC should be on 2) https://i.gyazo.com/2eddc1c2954d825aba5 ... f601c0.jpg imo this follows the guitar well rather than following those drums

00:21:326 (5,3) - these 2 notes are kinda too close to each other. Mir's
00:21:149 (4,5,6) - you could make this a perfect triangle ^
00:21:859 (2,3,4) - currently, the spacing between 2-3 is bigger than 3-4. It should be the other way around imo. ^
Pattern suggestion ^ https://i.gyazo.com/9ac0d12825a6060b581 ... 625a18.jpg

00:28:072 (2,3,4) - similar case with the spacing^ uh this one follows the vocal's well enough based on her pitch there

00:54:877 (2,3,4,5) - 2 should start on the bottom right of the square so it plays more comfortably imo 00:54:877 (2) - looks weak on vocalhttps://i.gyazo.com/9f4f5c84004381d34502d07ec33018b4.jpg

01:19:906 (1,2) - Maybe look better? https://i.gyazo.com/f64527a8eff22249e05 ... e8ac67.jpg k

[Easy]
00:45:823 (1,2) - https://i.gyazo.com/180ef079ddcca00390e ... 1fa0ca.jpg did it on my own

That's all gl

pishifat wrote:

insane 00:55:587 (1,1,2) - 01:02:155 (1,3,4,1) -
hard 00:55:587 (6,1,2) -
^check the "irrelevant things" box on lasse's userpage and consider moving some objects down/to the right by a few pixels fixed that stacks manually on Insane diff only, but i enabled that stacking at first there while mapping this from the start .-. . probably that SL 4 there

ez
01:25:587 (1,1) - try to make the transition between slider speeds more natural. like 1x 169bpm to 1x 100bpm is a pretty big difference lol had a talk with doyak about this a bit, and looks like it's all better now by adjusting the SV + removing NC there

ill qualify if u give a suggestion on https://osu.ppy.sh/beatmapsets/639319/discussion

Pentori wrote:

the stacks still look screwed up lol. should be more like https://puu.sh/wZuFd/c5b8476a37.png i somehow got this point, AGAIN, like i want to change the SL there, cuz i hate those kinds of stacks, wtf. discussed with pentori smh, and manually moved that slider. hope this should do

normal
00:23:101 (1) - doesnt need to be a 3/2, slider ends on nothing significant. could just have this as a 2/1 or follow the vocal on 00:23:456 uh, i heard a note there and it looks better to follow it like that imo
01:30:500 (1,2) - should separate this a bit more from 01:28:600 (1,2) - to help with the reading. distance looks rly similar while the rhythms are different agreed

insane
00:05:172 (3,4,5) - the duplet rhythm works a lot nicer here tbh, like in hard observed again on lasse's and hard. welp...

im here because the qualification cap exists

Pentori wrote:

im here because the qualification cap exists