celerih wrote:

Recheck time!!!! Sorry for the wait, busy with uni all week aaaaaaaaaahhh

Salad:
-00:04:809 (2,3) - Increase distance here, since it's a pretty ambiguous dash right now yes
-00:25:109 (2,3,4,5) - I absolutely loved what you did with this pattern! <3
-00:43:709 (3,1) - the time between the two here is still unrankable, you'll need to end the slider earlier on 00:44:109 - since you need at least a 1/1 distance between the two done
-00:44:509 (1) - also why doesn't this end on 00:45:309 - ? right, fixed

Platter:
-00:55:909 (5,6,7) - 01:08:709 (8,9,10) - Should be 1/6 yes
-01:02:109 (3,4,5) - Same here. There isn't any sound on the blue tick to justify this being 1/4. 1/6 is the correct snap here fixed

Rain
-00:59:309 (4) - Why not have this be the same as 01:12:109 (1,2) - since those 1/6 sounds are introduced there I wanted to highlight the end of the section with those 1/6 at the end. I want to keep it 1/4, because it fits as well.

Okay, that's gonna be it

celerih wrote:

(:

okie dokie, looks ready to me now :3c Sorry again for the wait too long wait for this

JeirYagtama wrote:

OWO

JeirYagtama wrote:

(:

I think there are a few more Issues on dashes, hitsounds, and NCs before we can move this set forward

General

1. There is some inconsistenccy in your hs here when 00:26:109 (1) - has a finish hs in platter while salad doesnt have any

fixed

Salad

1. 00:26:109 (5,1) - Ok now this is basically an edge dash with how large distance between these 2 is with 2.77ds so please reduce the ds here until its 2.00ds atleast fixed
2. 00:26:509 (1,2,3) - Is this meant to be dash between 2 and 3 or no? If not then please make them have equidistance with each other made it walkable
3. 00:26:109 (5,1) - NC should in 5 here due to a loud downbeat with a big white tick yes, that's right
4. 00:31:909 (3,1,2) - Yeah I think the dash here is a bit too harsh. Nerfing it when 00:32:509 (1,2) - is moved at x:91 and 00:32:909 (2) - x:358 will do the trick yes
5. 00:37:109 (1) - Ending a slider in a big white tick with a loud downbeat isnt gonna pass for me in this section If you make this into 2 circles and adjust the pattern a bit itll do the trick fixed
6. 01:01:309 (5,6) - I knoww theres a really loud vocal sound you're mapping here but please keep in mind about the ds of your dashes its sort of an edge dash atm but dw moving 01:01:709 (6,1,2,3,4,1) - this to x:283 can fix it fixed

Platter

1. 00:21:309 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10) - Combo is a bit too long here which I would suggest that you NC 5 to fix it
2. 00:37:309 (1,2,3,4) - Got some confirmation that this is a hyper following an antiflow pattern which is unrankable in platter. You can fix this by copypasting 00:37:309 (1,2) - then make it a hyper and a little bit of adjusting here 00:38:909 (1,2,3,4) - by moving to x:77 can do the trick done
3. 00:23:309 (6,7,8,9) - The dash here should be swapped to 00:23:309 (6,8) - since 8 is a clear loud downbeat but 1/4 hypers are unrankable at this bpm so I suggest removing 00:23:709 (2) - if that is the case then adjust the pattern to your liking to fix this so basically after conversating, I came up with new ideas. 00:22:909 (1) - It's a hdash, 00:23:709 (4,5) - removed the hdash
4. 01:26:909 (1) - density in rhythm between salad and platter is a little bit questionable here since you mapped this section in salad with 3 circles yet this one is just one slider. I think you should keep the consistency of your rhythm here as to how it feels off that you didnt map the vocals here changed the pattern is salad
5. 00:19:709 (4) - There should be a NC here since its a loud downbeat and its on a big white tick

fixed


Call me back once you've applied the changes

JeirYagtama wrote:

rank love letter

celerih wrote:

(:

Good luck in qualified, rechecked stuff, looks good

1. 1/1 Dash spacing is not very clear on this difficulty, with most dashes using 2.1-2.2x DS despite some walks like 1.8-1.9x being comfortable to pull off. I would ensure readability by increasing the 1/1 dash distancing, making it more obvious to see what is intended to be dashed and what should be walked.

1. 00:36:909 (1,2) - Strong antiflow dash after hyper, could probably be reduced for a little extra leniency
2. 01:06:109 (1,2) - 01:15:709 (4,5) - Unexpectedly strong dash compared to those around it, could be decreased slightly for better flow. The second especially so since you're into a much calmer part of the song

JBHyperion wrote:

00:50:709 (4,5) - 00:57:109 (2,3,4) - 01:01:709 (2,3) - 01:09:709 (2,3,4) - Hyperdash into total antiflow, however weak, is unrankable in Platter difficulties. 01:08:109 (2,3,4) - is an especial offender, since you have a stronger hdash followed by a borderline dash in the opposite direction
Yes, I totally agree. Somehow didn't notice. Fixed all of them (I pretty much abdicated some of the hdashes and the ones that I decided to keep are now proper).

Got a few other concerns to throw down, let me know what you think:

Salad:

1. 1/1 Dash spacing is not very clear on this difficulty, with most dashes using 2.1-2.2x DS despite some walks like 1.8-1.9x being comfortable to pull off. I would ensure readability by increasing the 1/1 dash distancing, making it more obvious to see what is intended to be dashed and what should be walked.

I don't really agree, I feel like the spacing is okay, but I still managed to improve it here and there..

Rain:

1. 00:36:909 (1,2) - Strong antiflow dash after hyper, could probably be reduced for a little extra leniency fixed
2. 01:06:109 (1,2) - 01:15:709 (4,5) - Unexpectedly strong dash compared to those around it, could be decreased slightly for better flow. The second especially so since you're into a much calmer part of the song fixed

JBHyperion wrote:

Whoops, here's some hypers into antiflow I missed (on Platter):
00:22:508 (4,1) - 00:35:509 (4,1,2) - Done

Fix these as well, kudosu either one of the posts and I'll rebubble

celerih wrote:

(:

Okay, let's do this again, thanks for the help JBH