forum

JUN. K - love letter remix [CatchTheBeat]

posted
Total Posts
50
show more
Topic Starter
Ollapeu

_Asriel wrote:

sorry to very late modding ;w;

Rain

■ 00:07:309 (1,2,3) - this rhythm would be better because 00:07:309 is high pitch but 00:07:709 is low pitch so using same slider wouldnt be good and between 000:08:109 and 00:08:409, it'll be nice if there is dash ok
■ 00:11:309 (1) - if you want keep this spinner time, add note on 00:12:909 but if you dont want, make 00:10:909 (5) be slider and move spinner to 00:11:709 added a note
■ 00:14:509 (3,4) - make more distance. compared with previous patterns, it's too near yes
■ 00:15:309 (5,6) - ^ ^
■ 00:16:409 - there's lyric so you should add note on here or use slider I don't think it's that noticeable, the current slider fits here imo
■ 00:18:109 (1) - this rhythm would be nice because lyrics are on 00:18:309 and 00:18:509 I tried to focus on music here, I won't change it
■ 00:32:909 (2,3) - move the the left to maker more distances ok
■ 00:36:109 (3,4) - make more distance. it's too near Made it better
■ 00:54:909 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - I think you can change these hitsounds too loud to use at this song I think they're fine, I wanted to emphasize the unique sounds here.
■ 01:04:509 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - ^ ^

good luck!
Thanks for the mod!
celerih
Salad and Platter are missing kpop as a tag

[
Salad
]

  1. 00:03:709 (1,2) - 00:04:809 (2,3) - both of these are pretty large distances, and while they are fully walkable they kinda look like dashes. If these are meant to be dashes, buff the distances, if they're supposed to be walks nerf them
  2. 00:07:309 (1,2) - 00:09:709 (2,3) - same as above, these are pretty ambiguous, nerf of buff them depending on if they're walks or dashes
  3. 00:15:909 (7,8) - changing these two notes to a slider would be nice because of the held vocal there
  4. 00:25:309 (4,5) - rhythm here could be better, start by removing 00:25:309 (4) - and moving 00:25:509 (5) - so it start on 00:25:309 - . Going over the vocals on 00:25:709 - doesn't work very well since you've been following them a lot in the map
  5. 00:36:709 (3,4,5) - Since you dash to this could you give it an angle so it's harder to overshoot it?
  6. 00:43:709 (3,1) - The distance between the slider and spinner here is unrankable right now. You'll need to end the slider on 00:44:109 - for it to be alright
  7. 01:26:109 (1,2) - Increase the distance here, distance is a bit ambiguous
  8. 01:28:109 (5,6) - Should be a dash here, 01:29:309 - is just a very strong sound

[
Platter
]

  1. 00:08:009 (2,3) - 00:08:109 (3,4) - make these distances equal cuz it's pretty obvious they're not rn
  2. 00:29:909 (2) - Here the rhythm is kinda weird since the vocals actually land around 00:30:009 - You can change it to have a circle on 00:29:909 (2) - and then a 1/2 slider on 00:30:109 - with a dash to it. See box below
  3. 00:52:309 (4,5) - Should be a dash, due to the strong vocals here
  4. 00:54:909 (1,2,3) - Like in the rain, should ctrl-g this rhythm
  5. 01:01:309 (1,2) - Distance here is wayy too low compared to anything else in the map. With the strong vocals and the instruments here should at least be a dash

[
Rain
]

  1. 00:08:409 (2,3) - Should make this a dash to have progression towards 00:10:009 (2,3) - being an hdash and also the sound on there is stronger
  2. 00:11:309 (1) - Would make the spinner start on 00:11:109 - and end in the same place still because the sound the spinner is following starts earlier
  3. 00:18:809 (2,3) - Should be a hyper or dash imo since the sound on 00:18:909 - is stronger than the one on 00:19:709 - and that has an hdash
  4. 00:43:709 (1) - Having a spinner here doesn't really work, since for this kind of sound you've been using 1/6 streams
  5. 00:45:709 (2) - you'd be better off doing a 1/1 slider here to follow the vocal since it has so much importance in this section of the song, where the other instruments are very quiet
  6. 00:48:509 (4) - NC this note
  7. 00:48:909 (5,6,7) - since there isn't really a sound on 00:49:109 (6) - you could try the rhythm in the box below for this part with a 3/4 slider
  8. 00:55:509 (4,5) - You followed the 1/4 wooshy noise here so you should also follow it on 00:55:009 -. The rhythm for 00:54:909 (1,2,3) - should be ctrl-g'ed to follow the song consistently (actually just doing a ctrl-g also makes the pattern work with the new rhythm so it's best to just do that)
  9. 01:04:509 (1,2,3,4) - these kinda play awkwardly, have them be more like 00:36:509 (4,5) - so you don't have to just stand under them to catch them

Posting now so I don't lose progress, don't reply yet
Gonna go make some food, I'm hungry, brb to mod salad
Gonna finish modding tomorrow


Okay, call me back once you've replied to the stuff
Topic Starter
Ollapeu

celerih wrote:

Salad and Platter are missing kpop as a tag fixed

[
Salad
]

  1. 00:03:709 (1,2) - 00:04:809 (2,3) - both of these are pretty large distances, and while they are fully walkable they kinda look like dashes. If these are meant to be dashes, buff the distances, if they're supposed to be walks nerf them done
  2. 00:07:309 (1,2) - 00:09:709 (2,3) - same as above, these are pretty ambiguous, nerf of buff them depending on if they're walks or dashes done
  3. 00:15:909 (7,8) - changing these two notes to a slider would be nice because of the held vocal there ok
  4. 00:25:309 (4,5) - rhythm here could be better, start by removing 00:25:309 (4) - and moving 00:25:509 (5) - so it start on 00:25:309 - . Going over the vocals on 00:25:709 - doesn't work very well since you've been following them a lot in the map done
  5. 00:36:709 (3,4,5) - Since you dash to this could you give it an angle so it's harder to overshoot it? sure, but a little bit different. I just don't want an oblique angle in this case.
  6. 00:43:709 (3,1) - The distance between the slider and spinner here is unrankable right now. You'll need to end the slider on 00:44:109 - for it to be alright okay
  7. 01:26:109 (1,2) - Increase the distance here, distance is a bit ambiguous sure
  8. 01:28:109 (5,6) - Should be a dash here, 01:29:309 - is just a very strong sound done


[
Platter
]

  1. 00:08:009 (2,3) - 00:08:109 (3,4) - make these distances equal cuz it's pretty obvious they're not rn done I guess
  2. 00:29:909 (2) - Here the rhythm is kinda weird since the vocals actually land around 00:30:009 - You can change it to have a circle on 00:29:909 (2) - and then a 1/2 slider on 00:30:109 - with a dash to it. See box below sure
  3. 00:52:309 (4,5) - Should be a dash, due to the strong vocals here yes
  4. 00:54:909 (1,2,3) - Like in the rain, should ctrl-g this rhythm okay
  5. 01:01:309 (1,2) - Distance here is wayy too low compared to anything else in the map. With the strong vocals and the instruments here should at least be a dash Totally forgot about it, you're right


[
Rain
]

  1. 00:08:409 (2,3) - Should make this a dash to have progression towards 00:10:009 (2,3) - being an hdash and also the sound on there is stronger I want to keep it walkable, making a dash makes it worse to play imo.
  2. 00:11:309 (1) - Would make the spinner start on 00:11:109 - and end in the same place still because the sound the spinner is following starts earlier done
  3. 00:18:809 (2,3) - Should be a hyper or dash imo since the sound on 00:18:909 - is stronger than the one on 00:19:709 - and that has an hdash I mainly focused on the vocals here, that's why there's a hdash, I pretty much wanted to highlight the transition from lighter to stronger vocals. Anyways, Increased the distance a little bit.
  4. 00:43:709 (1) - Having a spinner here doesn't really work, since for this kind of sound you've been using 1/6 streams Added a 1/6 slider.
  5. 00:45:709 (2) - you'd be better off doing a 1/1 slider here to follow the vocal since it has so much importance in this section of the song, where the other instruments are very quiet I'd prefer to keep it, I like the rhythm of instruments, they're not that quiet imo.
  6. 00:48:509 (4) - NC this note okay
  7. 00:48:909 (5,6,7) - since there isn't really a sound on 00:49:109 (6) - you could try the rhythm in the box below for this part with a 3/4 slider
    sure
  8. 00:55:509 (4,5) - You followed the 1/4 wooshy noise here so you should also follow it on 00:55:009 -. The rhythm for 00:54:909 (1,2,3) - should be ctrl-g'ed to follow the song consistently (actually just doing a ctrl-g also makes the pattern work with the new rhythm so it's best to just do that)
    ok
  9. 01:04:509 (1,2,3,4) - these kinda play awkwardly, have them be more like 00:36:509 (4,5) - so you don't have to just stand under them to catch them
I really like that pattern, It was meant to be played like that, more personal I guess. I would love to keep it that way. Also, I didn't want to repeat the same thing.


Posting now so I don't lose progress, don't reply yet
Gonna go make some food, I'm hungry, brb to mod salad
Gonna finish modding tomorrow


Okay, call me back once you've replied to the stuff
Thanks for the mod!
celerih
Recheck time!!!! Sorry for the wait, busy with uni all week aaaaaaaaaahhh

Salad:
-00:04:809 (2,3) - Increase distance here, since it's a pretty ambiguous dash right now
-00:25:109 (2,3,4,5) - I absolutely loved what you did with this pattern! :D
-00:43:709 (3,1) - the time between the two here is still unrankable, you'll need to end the slider earlier on 00:44:109 - since you need at least a 1/1 distance between the two
-00:44:509 (1) - also why doesn't this end on 00:45:309 - ?

Platter:
-00:55:909 (5,6,7) - 01:08:709 (8,9,10) - Should be 1/6
-01:02:109 (3,4,5) - Same here. There isn't any sound on the blue tick to justify this being 1/4. 1/6 is the correct snap here

Rain
-00:59:309 (4) - Why not have this be the same as 01:12:109 (1,2) - since those 1/6 sounds are introduced there

Okay, that's gonna be it
Topic Starter
Ollapeu

celerih wrote:

Recheck time!!!! Sorry for the wait, busy with uni all week aaaaaaaaaahhh

Salad:
-00:04:809 (2,3) - Increase distance here, since it's a pretty ambiguous dash right now yes
-00:25:109 (2,3,4,5) - I absolutely loved what you did with this pattern! :D <3
-00:43:709 (3,1) - the time between the two here is still unrankable, you'll need to end the slider earlier on 00:44:109 - since you need at least a 1/1 distance between the two done
-00:44:509 (1) - also why doesn't this end on 00:45:309 - ? right, fixed

Platter:
-00:55:909 (5,6,7) - 01:08:709 (8,9,10) - Should be 1/6 yes
-01:02:109 (3,4,5) - Same here. There isn't any sound on the blue tick to justify this being 1/4. 1/6 is the correct snap here fixed

Rain
-00:59:309 (4) - Why not have this be the same as 01:12:109 (1,2) - since those 1/6 sounds are introduced there I wanted to highlight the end of the section with those 1/6 at the end. I want to keep it 1/4, because it fits as well.

Okay, that's gonna be it
celerih
(:

okie dokie, looks ready to me now :3c Sorry again for the wait too long wait for this
Topic Starter
Ollapeu

celerih wrote:

(:

okie dokie, looks ready to me now :3c Sorry again for the wait too long wait for this
Aaa, I'm so grateful, thanks again!
celerih
(:

Rebubbling due to me not checking metadata properly, my bad

Artist was fine, but song title needed to be changed http://2pm.jype.com/discography.asp?idx=14&page=2
JierYagtama
OWO
Topic Starter
Ollapeu

JeirYagtama wrote:

OWO
owo
JierYagtama
(:

I think there are a few more Issues on dashes, hitsounds, and NCs before we can move this set forward


General

  1. There is some inconsistenccy in your hs here when 00:26:109 (1) - has a finish hs in platter while salad doesnt have any

Salad



  1. 00:26:109 (5,1) - Ok now this is basically an edge dash with how large distance between these 2 is with 2.77ds so please reduce the ds here until its 2.00ds atleast
  2. 00:26:509 (1,2,3) - Is this meant to be dash between 2 and 3 or no? If not then please make them have equidistance with each other
  3. 00:26:109 (5,1) - NC should in 5 here due to a loud downbeat with a big white tick
  4. 00:31:909 (3,1,2) - Yeah I think the dash here is a bit too harsh. Nerfing it when 00:32:509 (1,2) - is moved at x:91 and 00:32:909 (2) - x:358 will do the trick
  5. 00:37:109 (1) - Ending a slider in a big white tick with a loud downbeat isnt gonna pass for me in this section If you make this into 2 circles and adjust the pattern a bit itll do the trick
  6. 01:01:309 (5,6) - I knoww theres a really loud vocal sound you're mapping here but please keep in mind about the ds of your dashes its sort of an edge dash atm but dw moving 01:01:709 (6,1,2,3,4,1) - this to x:283 can fix it

Platter

  1. 00:21:309 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10) - Combo is a bit too long here which I would suggest that you NC 5 to fix it
  2. 00:37:309 (1,2,3,4) - Got some confirmation that this is a hyper following an antiflow pattern which is unrankable in platter. You can fix this by copypasting 00:37:309 (1,2) - then make it a hyper and a little bit of adjusting here 00:38:909 (1,2,3,4) - by moving to x:77 can do the trick
  3. 00:23:309 (6,7,8,9) - The dash here should be swapped to 00:23:309 (6,8) - since 8 is a clear loud downbeat but 1/4 hypers are unrankable at this bpm so I suggest removing 00:23:709 (2) - if that is the case then adjust the pattern to your liking to fix this
  4. 01:26:909 (1) - density in rhythm between salad and platter is a little bit questionable here since you mapped this section in salad with 3 circles yet this one is just one slider. I think you should keep the consistency of your rhythm here as to how it feels off that you didnt map the vocals here
  5. 00:19:709 (4) - There should be a NC here since its a loud downbeat and its on a big white tick


Call me back once you've applied the changes
Topic Starter
Ollapeu

JeirYagtama wrote:

(:

I think there are a few more Issues on dashes, hitsounds, and NCs before we can move this set forward


General

  1. There is some inconsistenccy in your hs here when 00:26:109 (1) - has a finish hs in platter while salad doesnt have any
fixed

Salad



  1. 00:26:109 (5,1) - Ok now this is basically an edge dash with how large distance between these 2 is with 2.77ds so please reduce the ds here until its 2.00ds atleast fixed
  2. 00:26:509 (1,2,3) - Is this meant to be dash between 2 and 3 or no? If not then please make them have equidistance with each other made it walkable
  3. 00:26:109 (5,1) - NC should in 5 here due to a loud downbeat with a big white tick yes, that's right
  4. 00:31:909 (3,1,2) - Yeah I think the dash here is a bit too harsh. Nerfing it when 00:32:509 (1,2) - is moved at x:91 and 00:32:909 (2) - x:358 will do the trick yes
  5. 00:37:109 (1) - Ending a slider in a big white tick with a loud downbeat isnt gonna pass for me in this section If you make this into 2 circles and adjust the pattern a bit itll do the trick fixed
  6. 01:01:309 (5,6) - I knoww theres a really loud vocal sound you're mapping here but please keep in mind about the ds of your dashes its sort of an edge dash atm but dw moving 01:01:709 (6,1,2,3,4,1) - this to x:283 can fix it fixed

Platter

  1. 00:21:309 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10) - Combo is a bit too long here which I would suggest that you NC 5 to fix it
  2. 00:37:309 (1,2,3,4) - Got some confirmation that this is a hyper following an antiflow pattern which is unrankable in platter. You can fix this by copypasting 00:37:309 (1,2) - then make it a hyper and a little bit of adjusting here 00:38:909 (1,2,3,4) - by moving to x:77 can do the trick done
  3. 00:23:309 (6,7,8,9) - The dash here should be swapped to 00:23:309 (6,8) - since 8 is a clear loud downbeat but 1/4 hypers are unrankable at this bpm so I suggest removing 00:23:709 (2) - if that is the case then adjust the pattern to your liking to fix this so basically after conversating, I came up with new ideas. 00:22:909 (1) - It's a hdash, 00:23:709 (4,5) - removed the hdash
  4. 01:26:909 (1) - density in rhythm between salad and platter is a little bit questionable here since you mapped this section in salad with 3 circles yet this one is just one slider. I think you should keep the consistency of your rhythm here as to how it feels off that you didnt map the vocals here changed the pattern is salad
  5. 00:19:709 (4) - There should be a NC here since its a loud downbeat and its on a big white tick
fixed


Call me back once you've applied the changes
JierYagtama
rank love letter
Topic Starter
Ollapeu

JeirYagtama wrote:

rank love letter
<3

celerih
(:

Good luck in qualified, rechecked stuff, looks good
Topic Starter
Ollapeu

celerih wrote:

(:

Good luck in qualified, rechecked stuff, looks good
I'm grateful, thanks again!
JBHyperion
00:50:709 (4,5) - 00:57:109 (2,3,4) - 01:01:709 (2,3) - 01:09:709 (2,3,4) - Hyperdash into total antiflow, however weak, is unrankable in Platter difficulties. 01:08:109 (2,3,4) - is an especial offender, since you have a stronger hdash followed by a borderline dash in the opposite direction

Got a few other concerns to throw down, let me know what you think:

Salad:
  1. 1/1 Dash spacing is not very clear on this difficulty, with most dashes using 2.1-2.2x DS despite some walks like 1.8-1.9x being comfortable to pull off. I would ensure readability by increasing the 1/1 dash distancing, making it more obvious to see what is intended to be dashed and what should be walked.
Rain:
  1. 00:36:909 (1,2) - Strong antiflow dash after hyper, could probably be reduced for a little extra leniency
  2. 01:06:109 (1,2) - 01:15:709 (4,5) - Unexpectedly strong dash compared to those around it, could be decreased slightly for better flow. The second especially so since you're into a much calmer part of the song
Topic Starter
Ollapeu

JBHyperion wrote:

00:50:709 (4,5) - 00:57:109 (2,3,4) - 01:01:709 (2,3) - 01:09:709 (2,3,4) - Hyperdash into total antiflow, however weak, is unrankable in Platter difficulties. 01:08:109 (2,3,4) - is an especial offender, since you have a stronger hdash followed by a borderline dash in the opposite direction
Yes, I totally agree. Somehow didn't notice. Fixed all of them (I pretty much abdicated some of the hdashes and the ones that I decided to keep are now proper).

Got a few other concerns to throw down, let me know what you think:

Salad:
  1. 1/1 Dash spacing is not very clear on this difficulty, with most dashes using 2.1-2.2x DS despite some walks like 1.8-1.9x being comfortable to pull off. I would ensure readability by increasing the 1/1 dash distancing, making it more obvious to see what is intended to be dashed and what should be walked.
I don't really agree, I feel like the spacing is okay, but I still managed to improve it here and there..

Rain:
  1. 00:36:909 (1,2) - Strong antiflow dash after hyper, could probably be reduced for a little extra leniency fixed
  2. 01:06:109 (1,2) - 01:15:709 (4,5) - Unexpectedly strong dash compared to those around it, could be decreased slightly for better flow. The second especially so since you're into a much calmer part of the song fixed
JBHyperion
Whoops, here's some hypers into antiflow I missed (on Platter):
00:22:508 (4,1) - 00:35:509 (4,1,2) -

Fix these as well, kudosu either one of the posts and I'll rebubble
Topic Starter
Ollapeu

JBHyperion wrote:

Whoops, here's some hypers into antiflow I missed (on Platter):
00:22:508 (4,1) - 00:35:509 (4,1,2) - Done

Fix these as well, kudosu either one of the posts and I'll rebubble
JBHyperion
Okay looks much better now, here's your bubble back
Ascendance
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

Hey there! I have a pretty big issue with this set:

  1. This map needs at least 1 Easy/Normal diff.

Call me back when the fixes are applied! JK it's kpop NEVER call me back.
JBHyperion
keep posts constructive and on topic please >_>
celerih
(:

Okay, let's do this again, thanks for the help JBH
Topic Starter
Ollapeu

celerih wrote:

(:

Okay, let's do this again, thanks for the help JBH
<3
Please sign in to reply.

New reply