1. Easy (1 stars, 98 notes)
2. Hard (1,68 stars, 174 notes)
3. Normal (1,27 stars, 132 notes)

But why I knew what it will happened XD

FruityEnLoops wrote:

Hello! M4M from my queue!
My map : https://osu.ppy.sh/s/588544
Since your map only has 2 diffs, don't force yourself to mod all diffs on my set.

[General]
Why is the MP3 encoded with -lowpass? You shouldn't be using this since it's a 192 kbps file. it was 320 kbps and i reduced it to 192 - idk what is -lowpass sry

The BG name could cause issues with people that installed osu! in a different directory than usual, since Windows has a ~255 characters limit. Your BG's name is 155, which can cause problems when importing the file if the player has installed osu! in a path with 100 characters.
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa365247.aspx
(yeah it's only in a few cases but you never know..)
First time hear it can make some issues to osu, i doubt on it

Both difficulties doesn't have Kiai time.
I would suggest this 02:10:328 - to 02:37:757 - I will consider correct place for kiai during this map hasn't 12 SP. I'm sure it will be not place pointed by you.


[Easy]
Welp, there's clearly nothing to say about structure or timing, both are almost perfect.

00:47:185 (5,1) - Since it's a 70bpm song, why using breaks? Ok, the drum filler stops here, but you why not doing sliderarts instead of a break?
It just makes the map boring and the player'll fall asleep :c
Same for the second break, though I think you should keep the 2nd one. Since the map is made for new players... even 70 bpm song needs a break, i'm a mapper who doesn't enjoy slider arts so much, but why i have two long breaks? drums are stopped at these parts

Maybe higher a little bit OD? I don't know, maybe it would add some difficulty to acc the map, because OD 1 agree for OD 2, also i will give HP+1


[Normal]
Again, structure and timing are almost perfect here.

01:18:899 (2) - Maybe changing this reversing slider? since it's normal, i gave permission for myself to use it

00:17:185 (5) - missed sounds on red ticks
https://puu.sh/vPwmJ/14fcbec794.png
I know this is a normal but since you used the rythm with the circles before... i want to let this slider follow sound placed on 1/1 beat -
also your situation on timeline looks uncomfortable for me

00:21:471 (2,3) - overlaps of course, objects are in 1/4 beat gap, distance snap is actived

00:23:185 (4,1) - doesn't seem to stack correctly fixed even it would not effect while playing

00:30:899 (1) - same, missed sound on red ticks...i'm doing by this slider some rest from 1/2 sounds

00:33:471 (2) - https://puu.sh/vPwqa/ecee59c1b3.png ? maybe i will do something another with it, but it will not be slider 1/2 with reverse

00:43:757 (4,1,2,3) - Why using a square-ish shape when you're using circular shapes the whole diff? suares are my base igredients on my style, i'm using it everywhere

00:47:399 (6) - Maybe Ctrl+J this one? no because i want to move cursor on down for a sound on slider end

01:18:899 (2) - again, changing the reversing slider to add more notes i don't want to click for this vocal

01:22:328 (1,1) - maybe delete this break? the HP is so low it wouldn't affect the player AR is high enought to let this break exist, i excluded it on easy because lower AR

01:37:328 (2,3) - player won't make a difference between this 01:34:114 (2,3) - and 01:37:328 (2,3) - and will end up doing a 50. (it's in general, there's more cases like this next) it's noticeable since 01:32:614 (1,2) has higher spacing sue to beat distance then spacing on 01:36:899 (1,2) is shorter

I also reduced AR from 5 to 4 - main reason is smooth playing with HardRock mode, additional bonus is the 1/1 beat stacks are now visible

Welp your map is almost perfect, most of what i've pointed out is just minor issues.
Good look on ranking!

ReFaller wrote:

[General]
Why is the MP3 encoded with -lowpass? You shouldn't be using this since it's a 192 kbps file. it was 320 kbps and i reduced it to 192 - idk what is -lowpass sry

1. 01:08:504 (1,2,3,4) - This square looks off, try making it with the polygon creation command.
2. 01:18:790 (1) - This could very well just be 1/1. It would actually fit the music (which right now, it does not) and would also fit with the even lower intensity of the song right here.
3. 02:17:075 (1,2,3,4) - Same, square looks off.

1. 00:20:504 (1) - 00:27:361 (1) - 02:58:218 (1,2) - Slider curves are inconsistent throughout the map.
2. 00:23:933 (1,2) - 01:44:504 (2,3) - 01:48:790 (4,1) - 02:30:790 (1,2) - Some objects don't properly lead into sliderbodies when there is no reason to have unnatural movement and some sliderbodies don't lead into the next object.
3. 00:47:075 (5) - Flip vertically for comfortable movement.

1. 00:08:504 (3,4) - 00:11:504 (2,3) - 00:23:075 (4,1,2,3) - According to the ranking criteria's guidelines, Stacks are acceptable, but avoid switching between 1/1 and 1/2 stacks repeatedly..
   You should differentiate between 1/1 stacks and 1/2 stacks, and keep it consistent.
2. 00:28:647 (2,3) - This would probably fit better as a 1/2 stack, since right now 2 doesn't really land on an important sound.
3. 00:35:076 (2,3) - Slightly off implied cursor movement.
4. 00:45:361 (3,4) - Again, inconsistencies in slider curves. You should keep visuals for sliders that represent the same sounds consistent.
5. 01:18:790 (2) - According to the ranking criteria's guidelines, you should Avoid 1/2 sliders with multiple reverses. Since it's a guideline it can be broken, but the song isn't doing anything to break a guideline for.
6. 01:37:218 (2,3) - This would also fit better as a 1/2 stack. This happens another couple of times, so look into it please.
7. 02:35:075 (2,3) - Slightly off implied cursor movement.
8. 02:37:647 (1,2,3) - Rhythm structure isn't emphasizing the white tick, where the important sound is. this would work wonderfully.
9. 02:39:361 (4,5,6) - You may want to apply the same rhythm structure here because it's kinda awkward otherwise.
   
   
   
   Nice map overall.
   
   
   I hope I was of help. Cheers

Mombei wrote:

Hi, from #modreqs

[Easy]

1. 01:08:504 (1,2,3,4) - This square looks off, try making it with the polygon creation command.
2. 01:18:790 (1) - This could very well just be 1/1. It would actually fit the music (which right now, it does not) and would also fit with the even lower intensity of the song right here. this is attept to follow vocal on alternate way
3. 02:17:075 (1,2,3,4) - Same, square looks off.

Squares were failed at 4-th circle which was placed to much down, i fixed it without polygon command since i know alternate ways

Besides that, it's a very solid map rhythm-wise. Though, there are some minor aesthetic inconsistencies;

1. 00:20:504 (1) - 00:27:361 (1) - 02:58:218 (1,2) - Slider curves are inconsistent throughout the map. don't believe that shapes should be always consistent - mapping is a doing variable things (of course you can keep consistency when imitating EBA mapping style)
2. 00:23:933 (1,2) - 01:44:504 (2,3) - 01:48:790 (4,1) - 02:30:790 (1,2) - Some objects don't properly lead into sliderbodies when there is no reason to have unnatural movement and some sliderbodies don't lead into the next object. You met mapper who enjoys old mapping style - also i'm aware of fact that such slow objects can't make flow too much uncomfortable
3. 00:47:075 (5) - Flip vertically for comfortable movement. this is specific moment when i want to let slider go little down while is ending

[Normal]

1. 00:08:504 (3,4) - 00:11:504 (2,3) - 00:23:075 (4,1,2,3) - According to the ranking criteria's guidelines, Stacks are acceptable, but avoid switching between 1/1 and 1/2 stacks repeatedly..
   You should differentiate between 1/1 stacks and 1/2 stacks, and keep it consistent. actually they are readable by fact how fast slider approaches after stacked circle
2. 00:28:647 (2,3) - This would probably fit better as a 1/2 stack, since right now 2 doesn't really land on an important sound. yyy it's already 1/2 stack
3. 00:35:076 (2,3) - Slightly off implied cursor movement. as i planned
4. 00:45:361 (3,4) - Again, inconsistencies in slider curves. You should keep visuals for sliders that represent the same sounds consistent. you know...this works best if they are in Etna position
5. 01:18:790 (2) - According to the ranking criteria's guidelines, you should Avoid 1/2 sliders with multiple reverses. Since it's a guideline it can be broken, but the song isn't doing anything to break a guideline for. due to it's bpm it can be assumed as 1/1 slider
6. 01:37:218 (2,3) - This would also fit better as a 1/2 stack. This happens another couple of times, so look into it please. XD it's a 1/2 stack
7. 02:35:075 (2,3) - Slightly off implied cursor movement. this not really works for circles after slider
8. 02:37:647 (1,2,3) - Rhythm structure isn't emphasizing the white tick, where the important sound is. this would work wonderfully. to be variety, i take follow priority for violin
9. 02:39:361 (4,5,6) - You may want to apply the same rhythm structure here because it's kinda awkward otherwise. normal rhythm, don't really understand it
   
   
   Nice map overall.
   
   
   I hope I was of help. Cheers

wkdalstn29 wrote:

hi m4m from modreq(google translate)
noremal
00:09:575 (4) - 4/1 beat slow recommendation since you used google tlanslator idk what you want to be fixed here
00:47:290 (6) - i want you use 2 circles of 2/1 beats easy actually represents 1/1 slider at this moment, on normal i decided for circle and 3/4 slider to raise difficulty a little
01:49:647 (1) - Please raise a little. it does not make problems when playing, it just looks questinable on editor - i know that you afraid it may be offscreen
02:50:504 (3,4) - I would like to merge them into one slide. this set has same act as 00:47:075 (5,6)

t/588826
its my beatmap m4m please~~ I would condired this modding as NM due to your actual mapping skill - but if you are willingly to learn mapping better, this serie of Pishifat tutorials should tech you lots of useful informations

xChorse wrote:

Hello, M4M from my queue.

General

You could try making the audio at the end fade out faster and cut it just to be safe. Right now the ending of the mp3 that's not mapped almost breaks the rule. before submitting it i cut only last 6 seconds just to not having a notice from aimod recalculated

Easy

00:10:218 (3) - could be replaced with a CTRL+H, CTRL+G 00:06:790 (1) - don't understand it

00:44:504 (4) - shouldn't this be a 1/1 return slider like 00:37:647 (3) - ? i don't consider it as consistent

01:18:790 (1) - has a stronger sound on 01:20:504 - than 01:20:075 - so I would end it on 01:20:504 - without having it return this slider follows vocal line

01:56:504 (1) - and 00:47:932 - are similar in intensity but one is clickable while the other isn't. I'd try making them consistent i don't think intensity would be similar between them

Normal

00:07:647 - I think this sound should be mapped with a sliderhead instead of a slidertail usually i choose slidertail for it

00:08:504 (3) - this should be a slider that extends until 00:09:361 - or 00:09:575 - depending if you want to focus on vocals or instrumentals in this part 1/1 slider is better atm

You have a lot of different stacked objects. For example:
00:23:075 (4,1) - 1/1 between them
00:28:647 (2,3) - 1/2 between them
00:25:433 (2,3) - 1/4 between them
This can be confusing for newer players so I'd suggest removing the stacks from all 1/2 intervals between objects. This way the 1/1s will be easier to distinguish from all the other ones and 1/2s won't be misread as 1/4s due to approach circles being small at this AR. i always use stacks with different intervals on normals - consider this difficulty for more experienced players

01:18:790 (2) - could be changed into 2 hitcircles and a slider like at 00:44:504 (1,2,3) - both patterns are used in different secions, they are not supposed to be consistent

this isn't a very good mod so you don't have to mod all diffs from my map lol

Really nice and calm song, good luck!

Mentai wrote:

m4m

Easy

00:09:361 (2) - 00:12:790 (4) - 00:17:932 (2) - i can't really tell what these whistles are meant to represent. if its the one constant sound in the background, adding a whistle here 00:18:790 (3) - to make it clearer added

01:06:790 (4) - whistle seems random as it only happens here intended whistle, suits better than standard drum finish

01:18:789 (1) - id say whistle could go on sliderend here rather than the reverse arrow because it seems you want to use whistle with the corresponding background melody, think it would fit better imo let's test it

01:54:790 (5,6,1) - straight line looks a bit out of place with all of the triangles, could move 1 to emulate the sliderheads during this section? idk what you meant by emulate, but i flipped circles horizontally and adjusted spacing, it should work as well

02:15:361 (4) - as before, whistle seems random to me, maybe add to all 4th white ticks in these sections? whistle suits for my ears only here

03:05:075 (1) - see if youd like whistle on Drum additions on the last note instead i don't practice whistles on last notes, i put finish as always

Normal

SV being almost twice as big than Easy's is a little jarring so...only 2 diff mapset

00:08:076 (2,3) - you could probably follow this curve better, seems more like a straight line not actual, i remapped this before noticing your post - also i did't update it just for realize your mod

00:23:075 (4,1) - not sure if its a good idea for a Normal diff if you do a 1/1 stack here, but then do a 1/4 stack here 00:25:433 (2,3) . even though how you mapped it sets the player up with the knowledge of the rhythm, it could still be confusing for most new players it's typical on my normals, see here - my way to avoid various kind of consistency

00:28:647 (2,3) - and then 1/2 stack here. i think you should make one of these how you plan on stacking and the rest are DS like normal

that's my major complaint with this diff, as even in Hard diffs, switching stacks between 1/1 and 1/2 are normally considered bad practice if they are used in the same section. i'd recommend doing 1/1 stacks and spacing the rest since the DS you use let these be spaced fully and not too cluttered my last red comment is also answer here

01:15:361 (1) - you could move this more to the left to create a nicer zigzag pattern planned it to have on x:256 - middle on screen

01:18:790 (2) - personally, i'm not against this, but again, since it's a Normal, might be too hard for players to react to long double reverse i was warned for using this on easy difficulty, so it means i can easily use it on normal

01:48:790 (4,1) - these aren't parallel at the their current positions xd not even going for it what is pararel?

02:33:790 (3) - move this up a little to make a nicer curve, i think its a little too straight again i prefer straight than curve in most cases

02:59:933 (5,6) - this looks a little awkward, move 6 slider more to the right to make the flow look, and then adjust the extended slider accordingly it's kinda like square with 03:01:647 (1)

the polygons in this diff look nice! i feel like this diff was designed a lot more like an Advanced. The gap between the 2 diffs is very large though,
be cautious

Polygons are made in oldstyle russian (tieff on lead) mapping, i chose also this path

good luck!

Monstrata wrote:

Normal

00:33:361 (2) - This could be a 1/4 slider imo. The drum on the blue tick is quite important and I think you can map it. quite interesting, but i disagree with your rhythm offer - already i have other idea for my mind and i will think if apply it or not until i will finish additional level
01:18:361 (1,2) - Don't do a 2x repeat slider if you're also doing a stack. The 300 from the circle will cover the 2nd repeat and players generally don't expect 2 repeats. kinda right
01:39:361 (1,2) - Make these the same slider shape? Looks cleaner. at least will be similar
01:52:218 (4,3) - They seem a bit too close together imo xP Is there any way you can just move 01:53:075 (1,2,3,4,5,1) - down a bit? Its a bit packed together imo. moving 01:52:218 (4,1,2) seemed to be better option

Easy

01:54:790 (5,6,1) - How about moving 1 more to the left? Gives it some rotational flow rather than linear movement. moved whole threesome

~

[]

The difficulties are good. But you need an actual Normal. Your current "Normal" is basically a Hard difficulty. The rhythms you use are entirely composed of 1/2 rhythms. If you double the BPM and consider the map as 140 bpm, then your "Normal" is like a typical Normal diff. It uses 1/1 rhythms and some 1/2's through stuff like 01:47:718 (2,3) - . However, if you look at your Easy on 140 bpm, you'll notice, everything is 2/1 rhythm. Therefore I think the spread isn't good because you mapped the Normal like it was 140 bpm, and you mapped the Easy like it was 70 bpm.

Basically, at 70 BPM, your "Easy" is an Easy, but your "Normal" is a Hard.
At 140 BPM, your "Easy" is like a "Beginner" diff that uses 2/1 rhythm, and your "Normal" is a Normal. I hope that makes sense lol.

If you decide to add an in-between diff that uses a combination of 1/1 and 1/2 rhythms (at 70 bpm) you can call me back to recheck in the future.

Joe Castle wrote:

HI! im here from #modreqs to see if i can help you with your map!
I hope this mod Works with something

Easy:

1. 00:20:504 (1,2,3,1) - the last slider doesnt have the same spacing like the first one with the circles. +/- 0,05x for it (i'm using grid)
2. 01:18:790 (1) - i dont really see the point of this "back and foward" slider like that, why not trying the following https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8186747 (Just look at the top of the screen, not the slider ;n; i was just playing with it for the idea) this rhythm catches less imprtant than current
3. 01:53:075 (4,5,6,1) - why not making with the circles a nice curve? a straight line looks kinda boring applied in Monstrata's mod, i didn't update my map yet


Normal:
1. 00:37:647 (1,2,3,4) - why not making this part like a square, like 02:58:218 (1,2,3,4) because it's a more like diamond and i want it
2. 01:39:361 (1,2) - that curvy slider looks kinda random, use a linear slider instead, or make both sliders curvy :s wait for update

i think this mod is pretty small, but is because the rest looks cool for me i hope it helps a bit

1. 00:22:218 (3) - I don't see why you want it position this slider like this under (2), seems to just result an awkward flow. Move it around x:302 y:279 to get a smoother movement?
   
2. 01:35:075 (4) - Remove the repeat and add a hitcircle on 01:35:932 - to emphasize the downbeat? It sounds fitting that way.
   
3. 02:11:076 (1) - Remove the new combo since at 01:02:504 (2) - is not one. Seems also unnecessary.

1. 00:22:218 (3) - Same suggestion as in Hard: a smoother flow can be achieved if you move it somewhere around x:61 y:269.
   
2. 01:02:932 (2,3) - 01:09:789 (2,3) - 01:18:361 (1,2) - 02:11:503 (2,3) - 02:18:360 (2,3) - I wouldn't suggest you stack them like this, even if some are "half-stacked" because you want to keep the stack pattern to only the 1/4 rhythms, like done on 01:30:575 (2,3) - and 01:34:004 (2,3) -. This would avoid any confusion for beginners for this type of difficulty.

sheela wrote:

[Hard]

1. 00:22:218 (3) - I don't see why you want it position this slider like this under (2), seems to just result an awkward flow. Move it around x:302 y:279 to get a smoother movement? hmm, that kick is a reason for a little flowbreak, it's common for me
   
2. 01:35:075 (4) - Remove the repeat and add a hitcircle on 01:35:932 - to emphasize the downbeat? It sounds fitting that way. applied it with cost of some replacement of these 01:34:004 (2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2)
   
3. 02:11:076 (1) - Remove the new combo since at 01:02:504 (2) - is not one. Seems also unnecessary. i have a slider with number 2 here

[Normal]

1. 00:22:218 (3) - Same suggestion as in Hard: a smoother flow can be achieved if you move it somewhere around x:61 y:269. i kept same concept as Hard since from Normal difficulties players can teach a little less comfortable flows
   
2. 01:02:932 (2,3) - 01:09:789 (2,3) - 01:18:361 (1,2) - 02:11:503 (2,3) - 02:18:360 (2,3) - I wouldn't suggest you stack them like this, even if some are "half-stacked" because you want to keep the stack pattern to only the 1/4 rhythms, like done on 01:30:575 (2,3) - and 01:34:004 (2,3) -. This would avoid any confusion for beginners for this type of difficulty. small fun with replacing and applied

Pretty simple map. Calling you...