Pata-Mon wrote:

[Easy]

1. 00:14:001 - 00:14:364 (4,5) - 00:15:092 - , 00:16:910 - 00:17:273 (3,4) - 00:18:001 - Red line rhythm like these... Adding some hitsound (I prefer default soft-whistle) will make player more comfortable. Normal diff as well. hmm maybe
   
2. 00:41:092 - 00:41:455 - these hitsound is a bit weird. Maybe you can use lower volume or do sth. Other diffs as well. will try and find a replacement but leave for now
   
3. 00:44:001 (5,1,2) - https://puu.sh/vfG6O/83793d8ca3.png sure
   
4. 00:46:910 (5,1,2) - ^
   
5. 00:54:364 (2) - this sound do not snap so precisely, I suggest to ignore it. Normal diff as well. ok
   
6. 01:03:273 (4,1,2,3,4) - 5 notes with stack, too hard i think this is reasonable for Easy diff but i can nerf it if more people agree
   
7. 01:05:092 (5,6) - https://puu.sh/vfGjq/0122fa08b6.png there's a scale in the instrumentals i want to emphasize more than vocals
   
8. 01:21:092 (1,2) - 1/1 slider fit the vocal better i think current pattern provides some nice variety and also fits vocals pretty well

[Normal]

1. 00:06:182 (5) - 1/3 in normal diff is a bit too hard. just follow vocal is better hmm i think the 1/3 is okay for Normal but will listen to more opinions first
   
2. 01:03:637 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - too many notes disagree, i think the number of circles here is reasonable for a Normal
   
3. 01:14:546 - In the whole kiai time, you only ignore this white line sound i ctrl + g 01:14:364 (4,5) - so that it lands on white tick now

[Hard]

1. 00:41:092 (1,2,1) - use lower ds than player will know it's not 1/4 slider i think current ds is reasonable for players to identify 1/3,
   since the 1/4 sliders used in this diff touch with the next circles which gives them visual distinction. can change if more people have trouble reading this though

[Soliloquy]

1. 00:29:637 (4,5) - Ctrl+G? Than flow will change at 00:30:182 - instead of 00:29:637 - , change flow → emphasize i could try that,
   sure
   
2. 01:19:273 (4,5) - similar^ but only ctrl+G seems not good enough, maybe you need to change something other if you want to fix it i like the current flow here though

GL

Akitoshi wrote:

Easy

1. 00:34:546 (3) - maaaybe can place this something lower, try dragging 00:33:819 (2,3) - and adjust the later part ya i was worried about this being a bit high
2. 01:09:455 (1,2) - uhm conver to 1/1 slider would be great for consistency with 00:57:819 (1,2,3) - i think some pattern variety is okay because second half of kiai is a bit more intense on the vocals
3. idk maybe try put some 2/1 rhythm on kiai? I aware that u want to make more intense on that chorus but ye it plays/looks bit repetitive. u can put them when u follow held sound vocals like 01:15:273 (1,2) - 01:22:546 (4,5) - i personally don't think this is a problem since the variety of patterning prevents it from feeling repetitive imo, but i see what you mean. maybe if more people have issue with this, but very unlikely i'll change this since it's more of a subjective matter

Normal

1. 00:23:819 (7,1) - flow looks somewhat forced with the angle of ur curved slider with 00:23:819 (7) - so ye maybe try like this i just made the slider straight to make it look less forced
   
2. 01:14:364 (4,5) - maybe u can try this rhythm as u already using a lot of 1/2 opted for long slider slider instead of 1/2 + circle, but yeah
   
   this can help following the vocals on 01:14:364 - and instruments on 01:14:546 - at the same time

Hard

1. 01:14:364 (2) - circle + 1/2 slider works better for both vocals and drums tbh. Also can be consider as making somewhat consistent density with previous patterns as well agree, but i decided to make this a 1/2 + circle instead
2. 00:59:819 (3) - 01:11:455 (3) - that two slider has some bell(?) sound on their sliderbody but ye it's not even a problem so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ there's a kick on the white tick, actually. opted to make this a 1/1 slider for spread balance, so i had to compromise and ignore the kick

Soliloquy

1. 00:04:364 (3) - 00:10:182 (3) - maybe NC regardless of circle spams for drums. And to signal the smaller spacing as well i guess ya since this came up before
2. 01:05:092 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3) - deym son those circles are scary lol, consider to add some 1/2 sliders that how u did on previous parts. Maybe somewhere like 01:07:273 - 01:10:182 - 01:10:546 - very unlikely i'll change. 01:05:092 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - is a buildup/bridge between the first and second half of the kiai and i think it represents the scaling up in the instrumentals well. meanwhile, the rest of the chorus/kiai is mapped in a way that every vocal syllable, as well as every bell ding, has emphasis via clicking. since this part has a lot of vocal syllables and the bell dings at 01:08:728 (5) - they're all circles

idk cant find anything cuz the set is already good qq
goodluck and feel free to no kds if no change

Chromoxx wrote:

quick mod :3

[Soliloquy]
the diffname is probably something that most people will have to research in order to know what it's supposed to mean...
you're basically translating the japanese title, but i'd suggest something easier to understand such as "Monologue" or another synonym that is more commonly known a soliloquy and a monologue are actually two different things. a soliloquy is when you're talking to yourself for the sake of talking to yourself; a monologue is when you're talking to yourself but you're addressing an audience. basically, a soliloquy is "thinking out loud" whereas a monologue is "explaining what's happening". Soliloquy also sounds fancier so yeah :3

00:23:819 (6,7,1,2,3,4) - hm, i see you're using the stacked triplet in the stream to emphasize the drum at 00:24:001 - but i feel like it could be done better if you have high her spacing going towards this hit and then lower the spacing for the rest of the stream instead of having no spacing until the hit, since it would convey more emphasis toward the strong hit itsself and also flow more naturally into the slider imo... you could also emphasize it by using a kickslider for 00:23:819 (6,7) - and having a slight jump into 00:24:001 - ... either way i feel like the lack of movement toward this hit compared to the weaker notes later in the stream isn't emphasizing the hit to its full potential (i also feel like a slightly more curved stream would look better here) curved the stream a bit more, but you're right in that the stacked triplet is to emphasize the drums. this is how i usually design streams that start on a red tick ("doormat streams" as kalibe would say) and i think it's a good fit and good way to emphasize the music while staying somewhat unique

00:41:092 (1,2,1) - i don't really think this pattern looks too good (briefly explained in pm lol), maybe try rotating 00:41:819 (1) - a bit to the left or just having the slider curve from left to right or something.... it's a pretty personal thing anyway tbh i changed the shape of the long slider to make the patterning at this section slightly more consistent, hopefully it's better now

00:50:001 - since you seem to be following the vocals for this combo (based off the slider at 00:49:092 (1) - ) i think there should be a slider at this timestamp instead of 00:50:182 - if you wanna emphasize the trumpets that kick in here a bit more you could shorten the slider at 00:49:092 (1) - to the blue tick and add a note at 00:49:455 - to emphasize the first of the trumpets that kick in here more there's a pattern change here to show that the trumpets are slightly more emphasized than before, as well as to show to reflect the change in the song. i think it works, but i'm okay with changing it if more people have issue with this

00:54:001 (3) - i feel like this slider could be extended to the blue tick for better emphasis on the lower pitch it has, which also works well with the sudden nature of 00:54:364 - that being said i think 00:54:364 (1) - should also be shortened to the red tick since the onset of the kiai isn't that sudden and it would add a little bit of clearer emphasis imo i'm worried that by extending 00:54:001 (3) - the distance between the notes might be too big.
i opted to have 00:54:364 (1) - extended instead because the piano roll extends from the red tick to the at the chorus start

01:06:546 - you have quite a lot of single notes in a row in this part so i'd suggest maybe making this one into a 1/2 slider like you did at 00:54:910 - explained in aki's response

[Hard]
00:04:364 (3,4) - these notes look identical to 00:04:001 (1,2) - 00:02:546 (1,2) - 00:02:546 (1,2) - which all had the 2 very strong sounds on them as opposed to these ones which don't... stacking them in the same way kinda puts them on the same level as the other ones i just mentioned, whereas they should be somewhat less emphasized so i would suggest either making this one a 1/2 slider or finding a way to differentiate them good point. changed to a 1/2 slider
00:10:182 (3,4) - same

00:56:910 (3,4) - i feel like these would work better as a 1/1 slider or a 1/2 repeat slider for better emphasis on the vocals, i feel like you're emphasizing that tiny "ting" sound in the background a little too much here the emphasize of the "ting" is intentional due to how unique and uncommon it is

01:13:637 - there should be a 1/1 slider starting here to emphasize the vocal imo since the one at 01:13:819 (1) - isn't really mapped to any strong held sound there's actually a cymbal in the music at 01:13:819 (1) - which is why there's a 1/1 slider on the downbeat instead

that should conclude things for now since i'm not too knowledgable about lower diffs :3

Kalibe wrote:

:thinking:

Easy

- 00:38:910 (1,2) - 00:44:728 (1,2,3) - 01:19:637 (3,4,1) - kinda inconsistent spacings w im nazi lo fix lo

Normal

- 00:53:455 (1,2) - rip stack fixed

Hard

- 00:18:364 (5) - for hitsounds u can add here also clap, as you can clearly hear it lol mmm maybe, not as loud as the claps imo. will try experimenting around with this
- 00:32:182 (2,3) - spacing ??? lol must've moved by accident
- 00:34:182 (6) - nice whistle instead clap, well remove whistle and add clap actually xd lol oops
- 00:36:001 (1) - stack !!! ok

last diff is cool

that's all gl! what a shitmod lol

Adore wrote:

very short mod cuz there isn't too many problems i could point out

anime

[Hard]
00:10:364 (4,5,6) - make those form an equilateral triangle :d ya
01:18:910 (3,4) - nazi blanket woops
[Soliloquy]
00:19:273 (3,1) - would recommend to blanket these two k
00:23:819 (6,7,1,2,3,4) - perhaps this would play better due to 00:24:182 having a different sound in the music? there's actually a drum roll in the music here. it's kind of faint, but it's still pretty audible
00:28:546 (8,1) - Flows better if you ctr-g these two IMO flow break was intentional to highlight the change in vocal emphasis
00:59:455 (2,3,4,5,6) - Would flow better if 3 were to lead into 4 but then if you ctr-g 01:00:182 (4,5) - it'll make going into 6 even more awkward so idk really will leave alone for now then, since i think the current flow is good
01:12:182 (7,8,1) - move up a bit so it aligns with 01:11:455 (4) - ? ok
01:14:728 (4,5,6) - Looks better if placed like this imo you are absolutely correct
01:28:273 - There's a strong beat here and I know you emphasized it with the end of the spinner but what are your thoughts on having an abrupt slider here. In the music is kind of sounds as if the end suddenly had a surprise twist to it. It is fine right now but it is up to you hmm, i'll have to put some more thought into this. will leave alone for now since the spinner still ends on the strongest note here

anime

scanter wrote:

• Hard

1. 00:23:455 (3,4,5,6) - what about this? not a bad idea
   
   SPOILER

   

• Insane

1. 00:20:910 (4) - isn't good extended distance like before? I'm felt gap when I playing. what about move it like x:340, y:132? moved somewhere else but there is more distance now
2. 00:52:728 (3) - it is really invisible when playing. needs to NC or move somewhere. tried moving it so that it's more noticeable

• Soliloquy

1. 01:26:728 (6) - there is a little inconvenience to move. it might better if you extend distance of this. increased jump distance here by a bit

nice mapset. good luck!

Linada wrote:

hi

• [Hard]

1. 00:05:092 (5) - since you're following vocals here it would makes sense to make this 2 circles, but yea not necessary it's a slider because i want the clicking emphasis to the (1,2) where the loud sounds are
2. 00:10:910 (5) - if you apply above
3. 00:23:819 (6) - i feel like it feels better if you've done circle + reverse here instead, to make the trumpet stand out more followed scanter's suggestion instead, which is similar to this. should feel better for emphasis
4. 01:17:819 (4) - make this 2 circles instead like 01:20:728 (4,5) - ? since 2 vocals true

• [Soliloquy]

1. 01:24:910 (4) - i think that sliderend would be better clickable, slider would fit better on 01:24:728 (3) - there's actually a trumpet sound on the red tick i want to emphasize which is why i made that the slider start, but i'm not against this idea either.. maybe if more people suggest it because i kind of prefer what i currently have

Deppyforce wrote:

[g]
01:26:182 - check snapping here i tried with 25% playback and its like this http://puu.sh/vhY0v/d7fef90b7d.jpg
i think 1/3 fits best tho for playability this is impractical to play with a snap like that, and it also sounds more like 1/4 to me. you can hear a pretty distinct drum roll here that has 9 hits if you listen close enough. actually i think the reason you're hearing it like that at 25% playback is because the slowdown is distorting the sound lol

[solo loquor]
00:12:001 (1) - http://puu.sh/vhVRY/b8e2b6990a.jpg move it more to the right for aesthetics thing (nazi 00:12:001 (1,2,3) - forms a ring around the slider end. moving this breaks that, so no. it looks fine the way it currently is
00:24:273 - since this drum 1/4 thing is kinda fainted change 00:24:182 (3) - to kickslider would fit better rhythm wise and also following dat instrument thing this has come up a few times, and i can see why. changed
00:44:001 (3,4,5) - adding some kind of custom whistle to these sound in the verse would be pretty col don't think it's necessary; it'll make this section stand out too much which is not what the song is really calling for imo
00:54:001 (3) - can u make this a extend slider no, i explained why in chromoxx's mod
00:57:728 - 01:00:637 - r ze 1/4s missing :thoankg: actually not really. i decided to put 1/4s for the second half of the chorus to keep it from feeling the same as the first half, as well as because the second half is slightly more intense vocal-wise which i wanted to reflect . i think the slight overmap is okay in that regard

[normal]
widescreen_is_disabled atm oop
00:27:273 (1,2) - ee this thing looks more dense than it should be imo maybe change this 00:27:637 (2) - to just circle on head works btter idk it just feels wrong rn when stuff like 00:30:001 - is completely ignored but ok i guess (tho i'd just map dat drum for more balance lol) i disagree,
i think the density is appropriate for a Normal difficulty. 00:30:001 - is ignored because i don't want this section becoming too long of a slider train, so compromises have to be made
00:33:455 (2) - same
01:24:910 - hi pls map this sound / change next slider to 1/1 starts here works cool this last part is focusing more on the vocals rather than the instruments so i don't see a need to map to the trumpet here

[littles normal]
00:05:455 (1) -try 3/2 + 1/1 fits a lot better tbh
00:54:910 (1) - i_think_1/2+circle works better cuz u dont use this reverse slider thing before in map
01:16:546 - add circle? lol

cool

Kaifin wrote:

claris

Easy part 2

1. 00:04:728 (2,3) - oh dear oh my
   
   SPOILER

   
2. 00:08:001 (2,3,4) - surprised these arent the same angle k something must've happened to it accidentally when i moved this entire to the right a bit because this was same angle before
3. 00:09:818 (1,2,3,4) - all of these in the square are really super off
   SPOILER

   
4. 00:09:818 (1,2,3,4) - also any specific reason for the rhythm change between 00:04:001 (1,2,3) - and this? just checking was originally because the song starts to pick up after this, but i realized that the change in rhythm is kind of stupid since it's still relatively calm here, so i changed the rhythm
5. 00:13:455 (3,4,5,6) - this looks a little funny because you go out of your way to make this triangle perfect which i appreciate, then have the spacing of 00:15:092 (6) - go back to the uneven spacing of the rest of the map i tried a thing
6. 00:15:092 (6,1) - this is minorly off all blanket fixes after this post are also applied i'm just getting tired of replying to every single one lol
   SPOILER

   
7. 00:17:273 (3,4,5) - then this triangle goes back to being off after the other one was right D: chill it was off by a pixel
8. 00:33:819 (2,3) - minorly off
   SPOILER

   
9. 00:43:273 (4,1) - on the left side
   SPOILER

   
10. 00:44:001 (1) - wouldn't it make more sense for this not to be NC'd, and have 00:45:455 (2) - NC'd yeah it was one or the other tbh lol
11. 00:46:910 (1) - same NC structure as above
12. 00:55:637 (2,3) -
    SPOILER

    
13. 00:57:819 (1,2,3,4,5) - there is something very slightly off about your square if you care to fix it, its the top right corner (as you can see by the DS of 5) it was just a broken stack lol
14. 01:21:819 (2,3,4) - wouldn't this look a lot nicer if it was even just based off the shape that you're making? this is pretty subjective,
    there's nothing wrong with the pattern design here
    
    i know theres 2 easies but there is a lot of circles in a row in this diff, just an observation
    
    this mod was way more nazi than the other easy sorry my aids kicked in

Normal part 2

1. 00:16:909 (5,6,7) - making this even would make this shape look a lot better because it's not so defined in any direction other than being a triangle honestly i think this looks fine. the movement for the cursor between these notes is triangular to make it more intuitive for beginners
2. 00:33:455 (2,3) - why isn't this one like the other ones like 00:13:455 (3,5) - where is looks super nice and is clear instead of having this ugly overlap spacing in the middle i tried a thing, maybe it looks better now?
3. 01:19:637 (4,5,6,7) - pointing out the off square because it's noticable stack broke lol
4. 01:23:273 (6,1) -
   SPOILER

   
   
   why is there way more nazi minute shit in the easy diffs than the normal diffs lol

Hard part 2

1. 00:05:455 (1,2) - this is slightly slightly off
   SPOILER

   
2. 00:55:092 - wouldn't this rhythm be a bit better if this was clickable? you could stack the note on 00:55:273 (2) - like the others in the kiai and leave 1 where it is rn as a circle i intentionally start the chorus off with a slider instead of circles. i feel that the increase in sv is a better indicator of showing that the map is more intense here

Insane part 1

1. 00:28:001 - i dont understand why you switch the circular flow here on this pattern while keeping it the same for 00:33:819 - it's not as much of a problem as much as i just want an explanation as to why if you did it consciously this was actually done subconciously lmao; it felt fine to me but i can see the complaints for this (also because gaia keeps complaining about it lol). changed this pattern and the next one so that the flow is more uniform
2. 00:34:728 (2,1) - these ARENT THE SAME ANGLE and if they are somehow the stack is making them look like they arent, you could unstack the notes and have them in the same angle of line as the sliders, that would be a cool touch no they were intended to be same angle
3. 00:51:273 (3,2) - can you find a way to separate these two? goes completely against your structure so far D: done
4. 01:10:182 (3,5,6) - fix line and make it the same angle as 01:11:455 (4) - for a really good meme??? fixed line; i want the (4) to be a different angle though
5. 01:14:546 - imo this sounds too clickable to skip, i know you're doing the same rhythm as before but these are two vastly different vocal sounds, i think it'd be really nice to make this clickable and change the rhythm here maybe if more people suggest this; i kind of prefer having a longer slider here for lowest insane
6. 01:21:092 (1,2,3) - might as well make this a proper triangle with how close it is i'm not good at eyeballing things lol
7. 01:26:182 (1,2,3,4,5,1) - going to speak for everyone farming this map and say that putting the only 5 note stream at the very end like this is quite mean, i think stacking this would honestly be more fair it's really meme with the shape it has rn even though it blankets it's just kinda bleh fine,
   two kick sliders then

500

1. 01:26:182 - same thing as in insane, except it makes a lot more sense here in the top diff: your call not for this diff though i think the stream is appropriate for the top diff

zoom

UndeadCapulet wrote:

From my queue or whatever, modding only Insanes as requested:

---

Insane

00:01:092 (1,2,1) - put this kind of thing in your extras i think both patterns get the job done and i want the diffs to be distinct from each other; using same patterning like this makes it lose some of that distinction

---[/notice]
I looked at the other diffs
they were diffs!

Hiicantpk wrote:

yo

So like i said your maps are p clean already so I'm mostly gonna just find personal preference stuff, but its still a different perspective so meh.

Not Oreimo Topdiff
00:06:182 (1,2,3) - and 00:12:001 (1,2,3) - I feel like these would play a little better as 1/3 beat sliders instead of 1/2. I know its the top diff but the 1/6th gap between them feels a bit awkward considering its spaced even larger than 1/4 beat gaps you used in the kiai like 00:54:364 (1,1) - actually i had these as 1/3s originally but changed them to 1/2s to fit more with starr's insane. i'll discuss with him and we'll see which one is more appropriate

00:54:364 (1) - I'd probably map this as a stacked triplet with the slider being from the white tic to the blue (something like this) the piano roll here is too fast to be 1/4, so i don't think a triplet is the best idea here

01:28:273 I don't think the end of a spinner does this justice but I can't really think of a way to put a note here that doesn't sound badly with the end of the spinner (unless the end of the spinner is silenced and ends on the previous blue tic) i decided to put this as spinner end because having to hit a note on a blue tick like this right after a spinner is even more confusing due to how it doesn't land on-beat (white tick).

Ok is past midnight and I have a GD to map and sleep to get before i work in the morning, GL.