Underdogs wrote:

im the one requested that sorry scanter-san

Enon wrote:

scanter is the one of best mapper in korea

Ascendance wrote:

Enon wrote:

scanter is the one of best mapper in korea

I agree!

Unfortunately, I don't believe the osu!catch diffs are ready to be qualified.

General

Difficulty naming scheme

1. While, yes, the name "Expert" comes from the game, I don't think it's appropriate to add non-traditional names when there is not a full spread to support those names. If there was an entire spread for ctb with Easy/Normal/Hard/Expert, this wouldn't be a problem, but right now, there's no correlation to make Expert = Rain. I kinda agree with this tho i think it's still up to scanter's preference

Difficulty settings spread issue

1. The current spread of AR and CS is pretty bad. The rain has nothing to really constitute it being AR9.1, so reducing it to the standard value of 9 would be much better. the song has bpm of 195 which is pretty high, no need to make it down to 9
2. The same can be said for the CS. A pretty large jump from 4 -> 4.5 in a 2 diff spread is not really welcoming. even if it's a 2 diff spread there's no valid reason to reduce the gap of 0.5 between them, I also thick it plays fine with 4.5

Crystal's Captivation

Emphasis and structure

1. To note, pretty much every object in this difficulty is a hyperdash. This is really not okay as it makes hyperdashes feel less emphatic and thus can ruin the complexity of a map. In places like 00:15:033 - , there is no real reason for the high amount of hdashes. They really feel pretty forced. They play fine and fun for me and the part isn't that relaxing as well
2. If you're following your previous structure, 00:26:879 (1) - should not be a new combo. If it is a new combo, the structure should be more involved with 00:26:879 (1,2,3,4) - and less with 00:26:571 (1,2,1) - . agree with this one
3. 00:25:187 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,1) - These could definitely use a reduction. As it is, if you're even a slight bit behind, this pattern is unforgiving and can cause instant fails due to the necessity of the HDashes in these patterns. they're already pretty easy imo :thinking: don't need that much nerf
4. 00:29:956 - Another place where every note is a hyperdash for seemingly no reason. Besides a slight snare hit (which is amplified by the hitsounds, creating artificial emphasis), there is no outstanding reason to use a hyperdash on every object. Reducing the hyper density to create more of a contrast between here and... well... every other part of the map would be very good. yeah agree with this
5. 00:34:263 (4,5) - Cross screen hypers aren't really recommended unless there's real reason to them, which there isn't for this. It's a strong vocal, but not strong enough to warrant such a huge distance. I can reduce it but it still seems reasonable to me due to strong vocals
6. 00:58:263 (1) - The low SV of this slider makes this really uncomfortable to play. Not only that, you miss such huge vocal potential with the song at 00:58:879 - . it's intended to follow the guitar I guess + plays actually fine with low SV for me. but yeah I agree with vocal one
7. 01:07:802 (5,1) - Another instance of cross-screen hyperdashes. Yeah, it's the kiai but the strong sound is on 01:07:956 - if you wanted such a strong dash to it. makes sense
8. 01:09:956 (3,1) - structural inconsistency with 00:59:340 (1,2,3,4) - it's fine to have such change that isn't that major

I'm willing to mod both diffs fully should this be DQ'd.

scanter wrote:

okay. I do not have time anymore to rank, and also I haven't any personnal connection.

I've done enough. give up now. thank you everyone!

1. 00:00:263 (1) - tilting this a bit more to the left makes this a bit easier to play, the vertical nature of the slider makes it a bit sharp for an opening note of a rain.
2. 00:25:648 (3,4,3,4) - Reducing the circles closer to the sliders by a little bit would make this less harsh for a rain player. The distances are pretty far as they are now.
3. 00:35:417 (3,3) - The top diff didn't have these grace 1/4's, delete them for consistency please!
4. 00:58:263 (1,2,3) - this is pretty boring and the small movements make it awkward to play. Maybe a reverse C shape here would be cool like this

1. 00:02:571 (3,1) - is this supposed to be a hyperdash? if not, reduce it please
2. 00:09:956 - add a green volume increase line here please, this is pretty much inaudible
3. 00:34:263 (4,5) - still could really be reduced, it's a strong note, but not deserving of cross screen hyper imo.
4. 00:43:956 (2,3) - same

Ascendance wrote:

Let's not make this wait anymore then

Just some small stuff from me and we can move this forward once more!

Rain:

1. 00:00:263 (1) - tilting this a bit more to the left makes this a bit easier to play, the vertical nature of the slider makes it a bit sharp for an opening note of a rain. I don't see a difference by changing that tho :l
2. 00:25:648 (3,4,3,4) - Reducing the circles closer to the sliders by a little bit would make this less harsh for a rain player. The distances are pretty far as they are now. yes
3. 00:35:417 (3,3) - The top diff didn't have these grace 1/4's, delete them for consistency please! yes
4. 00:58:263 (1,2,3) - this is pretty boring and the small movements make it awkward to play. Maybe a reverse C shape here would be cool like this small movements here actually fit with the song so I'll keep this

Captivation:

1. 00:02:571 (3,1) - is this supposed to be a hyperdash? if not, reduce it please yes
2. 00:09:956 - add a green volume increase line here please, this is pretty much inaudible sure
3. 00:34:263 (4,5) - still could really be reduced, it's a strong note, but not deserving of cross screen hyper imo.
4. 00:43:956 (2,3) - same both fixed

@scanter sorry for holding up the set. I didn't mean to upset you.
@BNs after this mod is replied to, I have no more issues with the set and won't hold it back from moving forward from here.

eltmtlqkf wrote:

go go~

UndeadCapulet wrote:

grats ascendance for adding 1 more map to my dq'd list

-Aqua wrote:

regratz

666th post omf

Gaia wrote:

welcome back!!!!!!!!!!!!!

caren_sk wrote:

omedetoo!!

Satellite wrote:

congrats!

Nitrous wrote:

I didn't have to sell my bandori account after all

grats!

Enon wrote:

축하드립니다