1. osu!community
  2. Beatmaps
  3. Ranked/Approved Beatmaps
posted
This beatmap was submitted using in-game submission on 04 November 2017 at 11:37:29

Artist: League of Legends
Title: Hanami ON THE RIFT (PV ver.)
Source: League of Legends
Tags: riot games japan dnb drum and bass sakura event akitoshi hootowlstar hos lasse
BPM: 160
Filesize: 3845kb
Play Time: 00:59
Difficulties Available:
  1. Akitoshi's Normal (1.86 stars, 90 notes)
  2. Easy (1.58 stars, 68 notes)
  3. HOS' Hard (3.21 stars, 142 notes)
  4. Insane (4.35 stars, 193 notes)
  5. Lasse's Expert (4.81 stars, 221 notes)


Download: League of Legends - Hanami ON THE RIFT (PV ver.)
Information: Scores/Beatmap Listing
---------------




Welcome to Summoner's Rift





Difficulties
Easy - Log Off Now
Normal - Akitoshi
Hard - HootOwlStar
Insane - Log Off Now
Insane #2 - Antares-
Expert - Lasse
Special Thanks
Metadata Check - Kagetsu + Lasse
posted




:thinking:
posted
sik metadata
posted
Ok, that's one of my first mod, don't kill me.
NM here
[General]
  1. What do you think about this wallpaper? https://orig00.deviantart.net/8015/f/20 ... 96pwmk.png Yasuo is always bad. (Remember to credit the artist)
[Easy]
  1. It could be OD2/HP2. Normal diff is OD4/HP4, so it should be okay?
[Akitoshi's Normal]
  1. 00:12:710 (4) - What about put it at x:496 y:232? It's just a little thing, I know.
  2. 00:30:448 (6) - Mh, I think if you make it long 3/4 instead of 2/4, it sounds better, the sound on sliderend is not too strong, so it could fit.
  3. 00:36:029 (5) - Same as above, but here can fit too at 2/4, just to warn the player that song is changing.
  4. 00:41:611 (5) - Same as 00:30:448.
  5. 00:59:053 (1) - Personal opinion: x:336 y:176?
[HOS' Hard]
  1. 00:29:401 (4) - x:240 y:104
  2. Part at 00:57:657 : I think it lacks of some sounds. Here is how I thought: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/9344951. It's just an idea, don't take that as an order, but in the actual state, it's like it's missing some strong sounds to tap.
[Insane]
  1. 00:44:053 (1) - This pattern is not hard, but it's weird to tap. Strong sounds start at red tick, what about shortening the slider to 1/4 and putting another note on red tick?
  2. 00:44:401 (3,4) - 3 rotated 20° counter-clockwise and put on x:392 y:224; 4 same rotation, put on x:216 y:160. It looks cool.
  3. 00:46:843 (1,1,2,3) - About this pattern. Triplet is weird to start, but again: not hard. You can shorten the slider and lower volum on sliderend, putting another note, or leave it in this way, it's good in both ways.
  4. About the star at 00:49:285 (1,2,3,4,5) :
    00:49:285 (1) - on x:22 y:277;
    00:49:459 (2) - on x:173 y:201;
    00:49:634 (3) - on x:93 y:351;
    00:49:808 (4) - on x:70 y:182;
    00:49:983 (5) - on x:187 y:305.
    It looks cooler.
  5. 00:58:180 (1,2,3,4) - Rotate 15° counterclockwise? Against, small thing.
[Lasse's Expert]
  1. 00:05:585 (3,4,1) - I suppose it's your choice, but that different spacing triggers me. Just fyi (Not that you should care, lol).
  2. 00:37:250 (1,1) - SV seems a bit high. Making them at same SV?
  3. 00:45:012 (7) - Stack on 00:45:099 (1) or make them closer?
  4. 00:46:669 (2) - Previous slider got high SV, isn't better spacing it a little more?
  5. 00:51:901 (1) - Adding finish hitsound on sliderend? Even an inherited point with volume on 60% could be nice with finish.
  6. 00:54:692 (1) - Same as above, but without inherited point.
posted

Paski wrote:

Ok, that's one of my first mod, don't kill me.
NM here
[General]
  1. What do you think about this wallpaper? https://orig00.deviantart.net/8015/f/20 ... 96pwmk.png Yasuo is always bad. (Remember to credit the artist)
maaaybe, idk lol
[Easy]
  1. It could be OD2/HP2. Normal diff is OD4/HP4, so it should be okay? ok
[Insane]
  1. 00:44:053 (1) - This pattern is not hard, but it's weird to tap. Strong sounds start at red tick, what about shortening the slider to 1/4 and putting another note on red tick? i see what you mean, but the sound that i was following also extends to the red tick so im not sure, if more people suggest this i'll change
  2. 00:44:401 (3,4) - 3 rotated 20° counter-clockwise and put on x:392 y:224; 4 same rotation, put on x:216 y:160. It looks cool. nty, i like my current loop motion atm
  3. 00:46:843 (1,1,2,3) - About this pattern. Triplet is weird to start, but again: not hard. You can shorten the slider and lower volum on sliderend, putting another note, or leave it in this way, it's good in both ways. same comment as 00:44:053 (1) -
  4. About the star at 00:49:285 (1,2,3,4,5) :
    00:49:285 (1) - on x:22 y:277;
    00:49:459 (2) - on x:173 y:201;
    00:49:634 (3) - on x:93 y:351;
    00:49:808 (4) - on x:70 y:182;
    00:49:983 (5) - on x:187 y:305.
    o i didnt notice i made a star shape lol, fixed altho a bit differently, since i made it bigger
    It looks cooler.
  5. 00:58:180 (1,2,3,4) - Rotate 15° counterclockwise? Against, small thing. nty i like my current shape
thanks for the mod!
posted
Mod for anything I can find in everything>
I already explained why in modhelp

EASY
00:38:471 (2,3,4) - looks awkward without nc I would just add 00:36:727 (1) - to previous combo

Akitoshi's Normal
00:08:960 (3) - I would just start this slider at 00:08:772 - because everything is following 1/1 spacing, song is strong enough to confuse players

HOS Hard
00:05:983 (1) - is this unsnapped on purpose?
00:19:460 (1) - maybe in this slider you can put a red slider node to reflect the sound at 00:19:835 -
spacing on 00:21:710 (1,2) - doesn't make sense especially when I look at the size of spacing on 00:23:585 (2,1) -
I would put a circle at 00:39:692 -
00:39:888 (1) - is unsnapped

Nothing noteworthy for me to comment on in Insane

Lasse's Expert
00:04:460 (3) - the whole playfield is available and this is made an overlap with 00:03:522 (2) - I mean its fine but just not my preff
same for this one 00:16:460 (3) -
00:51:901 (1) - this threw me off so hard, it fits but just not taste although if you are leaving it I would make slider shape diff, its the same as 00:51:553 (3) - which is probably a good reason why it threw me off

and ya
goodluck with mapset, its pretty gud


posted

Lafayla wrote:

Mod for anything I can find in everything>
I already explained why in modhelp

EASY
00:38:471 (2,3,4) - looks awkward without nc I would just add 00:36:727 (1) - to previous combo

and ya
goodluck with mapset, its pretty gud


i think its ok as it is as your suggestion breaks my current nc pattern, + i think its more helpful having the arrow lines pointing to the next object in this manner

thanks for the mod!
posted
heyo you better return my mod lol.
Easy

  1. 00:10:460 (1,2) - not in slider path triggered
  2. 00:19:460 (1) - 3/4 works better here to represent piano
  3. 00:51:727 (2,3) - not in slider path angery
  4. 00:59:053 (4) - center pls
corinn

  1. 00:02:960 (3,4) - imo two 1/1 sliders work better here to represent the piano, one starts 00:02:960 - and the other starts 00:03:522 - (but then again you repeat this rhythm, if you apply then change it with every other instance too)
  2. 00:19:460 (1) - should have rhythm like 00:14:960 (3,4) - for consistency (3/4 reverse slider has the reverse on a lower-pitched repeated note zzz no emphasis)
HOS

  1. 00:05:983 (1) - whomst'd've struck with the 1/16 snap
  2. 00:11:022 (2,3) - ctrl g for flow? also emphasizes high pitch piano
  3. 00:19:460 (1,2) - make 00:20:022 - clickable pls
  4. 00:22:460 (1,2,1,2,1) - did you just use hexgrid in my christian server
  5. 00:23:960 (1) - emphasize note by stacking on 00:22:835 (2) - ?
  6. 00:24:053 (1) - spinner should end 00:26:960 - here for prep time
  7. 00:33:239 (4) - have 00:33:500 - this be clickable for pulse
  8. 00:39:888 (1) - aaaaa 1/16 strikes again
  9. 00:44:401 (4) - same (in both instances it also emphasizes thicc snare)
  10. 00:46:843 (2,3,4,5) - slider end triple is a little too far from next note imo, nudge to right a little bit
  11. 00:48:413 (1,1) - remove nc lol
  12. 00:51:727 - oof strong sound unrepresented when the difficulty below you clearly emphasizes the same sound!?!?!
  13. 00:51:378 (2,3,1) - could be reworked as this rhythm https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/9347699
  14. 00:54:343 (3) - my bones
  15. 00:57:308 - bone hurting juice
Insane

  1. 00:05:585 (5) - peak is here but you choose to emphasize 00:05:773 (6) - instead >:(
  2. 00:06:710 (2,3,4) - no emphasis zzzzz
  3. 00:09:710 (4,5,6) - resident sleeper
  4. 00:11:022 (2) - should be like 00:03:522 (2,3) - in terms of rhythm
  5. 00:12:522 (2) - place at 165:200 instead b/c the sounds (2) and (3) represent are equal in intensity and pitch
  6. 00:15:522 (5) - same thing about the rhythm 00:03:522 (2,3) -
  7. 00:17:585 (5,6) - same thing about "wrong emphasis peak"
  8. 00:22:460 (3) - just do normal wave slider lol
  9. 00:28:355 - WHERE MY DOWNBEAT AT REEEEEE
  10. 00:33:936 (1,2,3,4,5) - proper star pls
  11. 00:58:355 (3,4) - jumps pls
Lasse

  1. 00:11:960 (1,2,3) - i dont really see the need of overemphasizing a resolution (music term) lol
  2. 00:17:585 (3,4) - you should stack these or unstack the ones prior for consistency (also helps to set up a th e m e)
  3. 00:32:890 (2) - how bout making the bump on the other side for the "here's a slider except it's mirrored" motif you used in the intro (also helps with reading minimally)
  4. 00:58:268 (2,1,2,3,4,1) - you got your spacing reversed if you were following piano (which i'm 99% certain that you are), should be descending spacing instead of ascending spacing


rawr mod outbreak
posted
Paski

Paski wrote:

[Lasse's Expert]
  1. 00:05:585 (3,4,1) - I suppose it's your choice, but that different spacing triggers me. Just fyi (Not that you should care, lol). intentional with pitch
  2. 00:37:250 (1,1) - SV seems a bit high. Making them at same SV? sv is never too high
  3. 00:45:012 (7) - Stack on 00:45:099 (1) or make them closer? same ds as my other 1/4s
  4. 00:46:669 (2) - Previous slider got high SV, isn't better spacing it a little more? they're all spaced like that
  5. 00:51:901 (1) - Adding finish hitsound on sliderend? Even an inherited point with volume on 60% could be nice with finish. nothing in the song to support
  6. 00:54:692 (1) - Same as above, but without inherited point.
Lafayla

Lafayla wrote:

Lasse's Expert
00:04:460 (3) - the whole playfield is available and this is made an overlap with 00:03:522 (2) - I mean its fine but just not my preff
same for this one 00:16:460 (3) -
00:51:901 (1) - this threw me off so hard, it fits but just not taste although if you are leaving it I would make slider shape diff, its the same as 00:51:553 (3) - which is probably a good reason why it threw me off
that'S thew whole point of both of these though
Pika

[[Pika]] wrote:

Lasse

  1. 00:11:960 (1,2,3) - i dont really see the need of overemphasizing a resolution (music term) lol makes a nice transition imo
  2. 00:17:585 (3,4) - you should stack these or unstack the ones prior for consistency (also helps to set up a th e m e) think this follows piano better
  3. 00:32:890 (2) - how bout making the bump on the other side for the "here's a slider except it's mirrored" motif you used in the intro (also helps with reading minimally) I'd rather keep the repetition as that fits the song better
  4. 00:58:268 (2,1,2,3,4,1) - you got your spacing reversed if you were following piano (which i'm 99% certain that you are), should be descending spacing instead of ascending spacingthis is way more engaging to play and a nice end to the map, starting with high spacing would be ???


rawr mod outbreak


thanks!

update
https://0paste.com/16508.txt
posted

[[Pika]] wrote:

heyo you better return my mod lol.
Easy

  1. 00:10:460 (1,2) - not in slider path triggered fix i think, it was pretty fine as it was lol
  2. 00:19:460 (1) - 3/4 works better here to represent piano yes, i also mapped 00:22:085 (3) - with a circle
  3. 00:51:727 (2,3) - not in slider path angery fix
  4. 00:59:053 (4) - center pls lol ok
Insane

  1. 00:05:585 (5) - peak is here but you choose to emphasize 00:05:773 (6) - instead >:( yea
  2. 00:06:710 (2,3,4) - no emphasis zzzzz yea
  3. 00:09:710 (4,5,6) - resident sleeper yea
  4. 00:11:022 (2) - should be like 00:03:522 (2,3) - in terms of rhythm no because in the first pattern the piano repeats the same note twice so i reflect that with the half beat slider, it doesn't happen second time around so i dont map it
  5. 00:12:522 (2) - place at 165:200 instead b/c the sounds (2) and (3) represent are equal in intensity and pitch mm i disagree, their is definitely more emphasis on the last (3) here, theres an extra piano note added + the string background changes
  6. 00:15:522 (5) - same thing about the rhythm 00:03:522 (2,3) - yes this time because theres another double piano note
  7. 00:17:585 (5,6) - same thing about "wrong emphasis peak" ya
  8. 00:22:460 (3) - just do normal wave slider lol no, that slight bump adds a little bit of visual emphasis on the soft piano that occurs on the slider tick
  9. 00:28:355 - WHERE MY DOWNBEAT AT REEEEEE o lol i forgot to shorten the spinner and replace with a circle from months ago lol gg
  10. 00:33:936 (1,2,3,4,5) - proper star pls i tried
  11. 00:58:355 (3,4) - jumps pls no because they repeat the same note, altho i spaced 4 further away


rawr mod outbreak
thanks for the mod! updated
posted
Hi, nm from my queue

expert:
  1. 00:11:960 (1,2,3) - is there really need to be such a big spacing? i mean previously you made 00:09:897 (4,5) - such spacing for 1/2 gaps and there suddenly it went crazy but music doesn't do much here, its the same calm piano
  2. 00:24:147 - how about spinner here?

insane:
  1. 00:04:460 (1,2) - 00:16:460 (1,2) - i'm not sure if this is just me, but this spacing is really confusing, i couldn't get that this is a 1/2 gap
  2. 00:26:960 - why not map 1/4 drum thing here? its pretty audible, spinner here doesn't seem fitting tbh

hard:
  1. seems cool

normal:
  1. 00:30:448 (6) - i think synth sound here is pretty important so i suggest making this thing 3/4 reverse (same for similar instances)

easy:
  1. 00:51:727 (2) - this thing starting here seems unnatural, perhaps move it to red tick or even big white. i think 2/1 gaps would work pretty well to show contrast with kiai, lower object density and stuff


Sorry for short mod, nothing much to say really, looks pretty solid. Good luck!
posted
hi m4m

how2mod 1 min map

[Easy]

00:05:960 - Note density is a bit high for a calm section, this could be mapped as a slider end to reduce it as it is barely snapped. I mean 00:05:210 (2) - this could be a reverse slider instead. Same for 00:17:960 -

00:29:576 (3) - 00:35:157 (3) - The wave sliders aren't symmetrical *triggered* so these could be the same side as they are the same sound.
00:46:320 (3) - the vertical ones look pretty ew

00:20:960 (2) - Slider body is 2 degrees off from the linear hitcircles reee

00:22:460 (1) - Not sure if this broken wave is intentional but I guess you went for the violin thing in the background shrug

[Akitoshi's Normal]

00:05:585 - I don't really like how you skipped those sounds, I think they could be mapped with a reverse slider.

00:23:960 - I guess this is mapped passively because of the non-snappy thing but would like to hear your reason for not mapping this with a circle as well.

00:37:773 (3,4,5,6) - This pattern looks a bit sloppy imo, maybe a zigzag on the hitcircles would do better.

[HOS' Hard]

00:13:460 - Exaggarating this curve pattern for the effect would do better if you want to go for the asymmetry, else just make it more symmetrical cause it looks half assed xd


00:33:936 (1) - Considering you did the finish sounds with red anchors, shouldn't this be a red anchor as well?
Same for 00:42:308 (1) -

00:35:179 (1) - Unsnapped also no hs

00:51:727 - I don't like how you ignored these kicks, they are pretty distracting and could potentially mess up the rythm, they could atleast mapped with some reverses if you wanted to map passively.

[Insane]

00:05:773 (6) - This could be the same ds because lower ds actually puts more pressure by trying to slow down, as the note is higher than the first ones but not much lower than the previous one. So I don't think it needs extra emphasis also makes the pattern tidier.
Same 00:17:022 (2,3,4,5,6) -

00:06:710 (2,3,4) - They look like they are meant to be linear but if they were I don't think the overlap works well flow wise, a stack would do better on the emphasis or atleast a lower overlap.
Same 00:09:710 (4,5,6) -

00:23:960 - Well as this is a higher diff I think this could be mapped as a reverse slider like the top diff to not map it passively.

The doubles connecting to sliders need a bit of work cause they are off by small margins but visible enough to bother me xd
00:29:314 (5,6) -
00:32:105 (5,6) -
00:34:896 (6,7) -
00:36:553 (5,6) -
00:47:716 (5,6) -
Mostly ds stuff but if you wanted to emphasize the sounds at the end of triples they don't need extra spacing or something cause they are already emphasized by ending a triple, emphasizing a small amount just makes them look off.

[Lasse's Expert]

00:22:460 (1,2) - These could use a smaller spacing as you used the varied spacing on emphasizing stronger and weaker notes

00:37:773 (1) - The mouse movement is much harsher on this than 00:48:936 (1) - but it could be cheesed so idk

00:58:529 (2,3,4,1) - This could be mapped by gradually decreasing spacing but both work fine I guess

plays fine imo
posted

h4d0uk3n1 wrote:

Hi, nm from my queue

insane:
  1. 00:04:460 (1,2) - 00:16:460 (1,2) - i'm not sure if this is just me, but this spacing is really confusing, i couldn't get that this is a 1/2 gap mmm, nobody has had trouble with this in testplays so i think its ok
  2. 00:26:960 - why not map 1/4 drum thing here? its pretty audible, spinner here doesn't seem fitting tbh didn't want to overdo it, if more people suggest then i'll add one in


easy:
  1. 00:51:727 (2) - this thing starting here seems unnatural, perhaps move it to red tick or even big white. i think 2/1 gaps would work pretty well to show contrast with kiai, lower object density and stuff idk how i feel about this, i understand your point but then its ambiguous as to what im following, if more people suggest i will consider further tho


Sorry for short mod, nothing much to say really, looks pretty solid. Good luck!

Fursum wrote:

hi m4m

how2mod 1 min map

[Easy]

00:05:960 - Note density is a bit high for a calm section, this could be mapped as a slider end to reduce it as it is barely snapped. I mean 00:05:210 (2) - this could be a reverse slider instead. Same for 00:17:960 - i ctrl + g'd the rhythm

00:29:576 (3) - 00:35:157 (3) - The wave sliders aren't symmetrical *triggered* so these could be the same side as they are the same sound. fix i think
00:46:320 (3) - the vertical ones look pretty ew fix

00:20:960 (2) - Slider body is 2 degrees off from the linear hitcircles reee2 d e g r e e s

00:22:460 (1) - Not sure if this broken wave is intentional but I guess you went for the violin thing in the background shrug
ya its intentional


[Insane]

00:05:773 (6) - This could be the same ds because lower ds actually puts more pressure by trying to slow down, as the note is higher than the first ones but not much lower than the previous one. So I don't think it needs extra emphasis also makes the pattern tidier.
Same 00:17:022 (2,3,4,5,6) -
i remapped these instead since im terrible at making stuff like this

00:06:710 (2,3,4) - They look like they are meant to be linear but if they were I don't think the overlap works well flow wise, a stack would do better on the emphasis or atleast a lower overlap.
Same 00:09:710 (4,5,6) -
did a smaller overlap

00:23:960 - Well as this is a higher diff I think this could be mapped as a reverse slider like the top diff to not map it passively. did this as a repeat since i don't want to make the soft piano clickable since i think the violin pedal note is more important here

The doubles connecting to sliders need a bit of work cause they are off by small margins but visible enough to bother me xd
00:29:314 (5,6) -
00:32:105 (5,6) -
00:34:896 (6,7) -
00:36:553 (5,6) -
00:47:716 (5,6) -
Mostly ds stuff but if you wanted to emphasize the sounds at the end of triples they don't need extra spacing or something cause they are already emphasized by ending a triple, emphasizing a small amount just makes them look off.
fix all uglyness here
thanks for the mods!
posted
m4m

[easy]
  1. 00:05:210 (2,3) - reversing the rhythm here would be better, ending 3 on that chord thing seems weird (also something about downbeats etc etc)
  2. 00:17:210 (2,3) - ^
  3. 00:36:727 (1) - should really be angled like the rest, the curve doesnt give off that sharp feel that the sound here has - 00:50:680 (1) - and this are completely different sounds. a slightly sharper angle than the rest (but still rankable for easies ofc) could work here.
  4. 00:47:890 (1) - ^


[akitoshi's normal]
  1. 00:08:397 (2) - 1/1 slider could work here to catch that piano on 00:08:772 - and so people dont think that 3 starts on that piano thing. you used a 1/2 gap at 00:11:960 (3,4) - so it shouldnt be a problem
  2. 00:10:460 (1) - this stands out way too much compared to the other sliders in this section, curve out? imo the first part in general shouldnt contain really sharp anchors since it's calm instead of aggressive.


[hos' hard]
  1. 00:01:460 (1) - minor suggestion but i think you should move this closer to the center so that new players will have an easier time seeing and reacting to this when it comes out
  2. 00:16:460 (1) - way too aggressive looking for this calm section imo
  3. 00:22:835 (2,1) - stack 1 on 2 for increased emphasis to the end of the calm section? you break ds in this section so i think this would still be readable
  4. 00:44:401 (4,5) - bit nazi but i really feel that all the drumbeat things covered by this should have equal emphasis instead of mapping the second one passively


[insane]
  1. first of all stuff like 00:46:843 (1,1,2,3) - is kinda cool
  2. 00:05:397 (4,5,6) // 00:05:022 (2,3) - these could be spaced out to differentiate them more noticeably from the much calmer 00:05:022 (2,3) -
  3. 00:44:576 (4) - this ends on a really important drum


[lasse's expert]
  1. 00:20:210 (4) - this should probably be ctrlged since the same sort of stack into slider that starts on new chord thing was done that way on 00:05:585 (3,4,1) - too
  2. 00:26:960 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) - i feel like instead of starting with a stack and developing it into a constant spaced stream, you couldve gone all the way and gradually spaced the stream out every note
  3. 00:51:901 (1) - these sliders would probably feel more emphasized if they werent directly part of the circle thing created by 00:50:680 (1,2,3) - etc


solid set, sorry if the mod seemed too short to be of value or something

good luck!
posted
h4d0uk3n1

h4d0uk3n1 wrote:

Hi, nm from my queue

expert:
  1. 00:11:960 (1,2,3) - is there really need to be such a big spacing? i mean previously you made 00:09:897 (4,5) - such spacing for 1/2 gaps and there suddenly it went crazy but music doesn't do much here, its the same calm piano think it makes a nice transition and this part is lower bpm anyways
  2. 00:24:147 - how about spinner here? not sure, will keep it as is for now



Sorry for short mod, nothing much to say really, looks pretty solid. Good luck!
Fursum

Fursum wrote:

[Lasse's Expert]

00:22:460 (1,2) - These could use a smaller spacing as you used the varied spacing on emphasizing stronger and weaker notes it's already way less spaced

00:37:773 (1) - The mouse movement is much harsher on this than 00:48:936 (1) - but it could be cheesed so idk there are no sliderticks to hit so people will play it differently anyways

00:58:529 (2,3,4,1) - This could be mapped by gradually decreasing spacing but both work fine I guess yea as explained before
newton-

newton- wrote:

[lasse's expert]
  1. 00:20:210 (4) - this should probably be ctrlged since the same sort of stack into slider that starts on new chord thing was done that way on 00:05:585 (3,4,1) - too piano is way stronger here
  2. 00:26:960 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) - i feel like instead of starting with a stack and developing it into a constant spaced stream, you couldve gone all the way and gradually spaced the stream out every note added some progression
  3. 00:51:901 (1) - these sliders would probably feel more emphasized if they werent directly part of the circle thing created by 00:50:680 (1,2,3) - etc i think that is exactly what makes them stand out since they break the player expectation of sv, people will expect the same speed but suddenly it's way slower so it stands out a lot


solid set, sorry if the mod seemed too short to be of value or something

good luck!


thanks!

https://0paste.com/16517.txt
posted
hey

[Easy]
  1. 00:19:460 (1,2) - Messed up with spacing here
  2. 00:59:053 (4) - NC?

[Akitoshi's Normal]

  • Looks good

[HOS' Hard]
  1. 00:24:053 (1) - You should have a longer spinner recovery time because this is only a hard so it might be a bit difficult for players (According to Monstrata's BN guide it should be at least 1 beat)
  2. 00:14:960 (1,2,3) - 00:02:960 (1,2,3) - Really minor, but the two patterns are emphasizing different notes. I like it better emphasizing 2
  3. 00:46:843 (2,3,4) - The triple at the end looks a bit wonky, it's slightly curved and has slightly different spacings

[Insane]
  1. 00:05:210 (3,4,5,6) - I think that 3 is just as important as 4, 5, and 6 here but the spacing really puts emphasis on 4 for no reason. also add a whistle on 3 if you accept this suggestion
  2. 00:17:022 (2,3,4,5,6) - This is actually different from the previous part, you shouldn't map it the same way. Really only 5 and 6 should be emphasized because of the higher piano part, unlike in the first part when 3/4 notes were emphasized. Change up the spacing to make it fit better and remove the whistle on 4
  3. 00:44:576 (4) - There's a loud snare on the end of this, the 1/4 slider rhythm really doesn't fit here
  4. 00:32:715 (2,1) - 00:43:878 (2,1) - The emphasis with the spacing in these two similar parts is different

[Lasse's Expert]
  1. 00:45:012 (7,1) - Just wanted to point out that this is kinda unexpected and hard to read. Don't know if it's intentionally supposed to be like that
  2. 00:50:157 (2,3) - 00:50:419 (4,5) - Kinda minor but the second part is two snares on both the circle and the sliderhead while the first is a kick then a snare. You could change the spacing or something

Solid map, hope I helped!
posted

newton- wrote:

m4m

[easy]
  1. 00:05:210 (2,3) - reversing the rhythm here would be better, ending 3 on that chord thing seems weird (also something about downbeats etc etc) lol ok i'll ctrl + g it back, i agree the clicking rhythm feels weird
  2. 00:17:210 (2,3) - ^ ya
  3. 00:36:727 (1) - should really be angled like the rest, the curve doesnt give off that sharp feel that the sound here has - 00:50:680 (1) - and this are completely different sounds. a slightly sharper angle than the rest (but still rankable for easies ofc) could work here. mm i disagree, this sound is significantly different to the rest of the other sounds in the kiai and also leads into a drum fill, i think changing the visuals of the slider here is a cool way to represent that
  4. 00:47:890 (1) - ^ same


[insane]
  1. first of all stuff like 00:46:843 (1,1,2,3) - is kinda cool thanks man :d
  2. 00:05:397 (4,5,6) // 00:05:022 (2,3) - these could be spaced out to differentiate them more noticeably from the much calmer 00:05:022 (2,3) - i think they already are? i dont know what you mean here
  3. 00:44:576 (4) - this ends on a really important drum these two kick sliders are in the stream because im focusing on the synth here more than the drums, if you listen closely theirs two distinct pitch changes on the slider heads of both of them which i wanted to get across through gameplay


solid set, sorry if the mod seemed too short to be of value or something

good luck!

_orange wrote:

hey

[Easy]
  1. 00:19:460 (1,2) - Messed up with spacing here whoops LOL
  2. 00:59:053 (4) - NC? no point in an nc here since nothing in gameplay would change since theres no spinner at the end


[Insane]
  1. 00:05:210 (3,4,5,6) - I think that 3 is just as important as 4, 5, and 6 here but the spacing really puts emphasis on 4 for no reason. also add a whistle on 3 if you accept this suggestion mm i kinda agree, its more emphasised but i don't think its as important as 4,5,6. i've spaced it out a little more but i don't think its worthy of a whistle hitsound/different grouping because its still in the lower end of the piano compared to the other 3
  2. 00:17:022 (2,3,4,5,6) - This is actually different from the previous part, you shouldn't map it the same way. Really only 5 and 6 should be emphasized because of the higher piano part, unlike in the first part when 3/4 notes were emphasized. Change up the spacing to make it fit better and remove the whistle on 4 again i see where you're coming from, but the notes are very very similar/the same in most cases of this pattern, and i think changing how it plays for such minor differences in the music could be a bit misleading gameplay wise. although if more people suggest it i will try something here
  3. 00:44:576 (4) - There's a loud snare on the end of this, the 1/4 slider rhythm really doesn't fit here same comment as the mod above, both streams in this diff follow the synth which imo is more important
  4. 00:32:715 (2,1) - 00:43:878 (2,1) - The emphasis with the spacing in these two similar parts is different ye thats the second one is leading into a stream and i didn't want to copy paste the previous patterning because the stream and build up is different


Solid map, hope I helped!
thanks for the mods! updated
posted
hello
so here's my mod. m4m

Lasse's Expert
00:37:599 (1) - this could be in between 00:37:250 (1,1) - and also rotated by +3 like https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/9362643
00:48:762 (1) - ^ similar
00:48:936 (1,1,1) - this is quite well made placement compared to 00:48:936 (1,2,2) - maybe try adjusting 00:49:460 (2) -
Insane
00:14:960 (4,5) - blanket
00:15:897 (6,1) - check stack 00:14:772 (3) -
00:33:675 (6,7,8,1,3) - blanket
00:34:111 (2) - same ^
00:39:692 - you should map this sound
00:44:053 (1,2) - spacing is different, take a look at 00:41:262 (1,1) - , 00:43:529 (1,2) - i would keep it consistent in kiai
00:43:529 (1,2) - tail touches 00:44:750 (1) - i think you could space objects a little
00:46:843 (1,1) - same ^^
HOS' Hard
00:36:727 (1,1,1) - why not keeping the same spacing? the synth plays the same note like 00:47:890 (1,1,1) -
00:39:888 (1,2) - spacing
00:40:739 (1,2) - compare to 00:46:320 (1,2) - they are the same, right? but i can already tell that the spacing is different for some reason
00:49:634 (2,3) - spacing

besides that, I don't see any issues with this map. visuals, flow, rhythm - well made.
Akitoshi's Normal
00:49:983 (5) - I think you could curve this slider a little like http://puu.sh/y3oNZ/951af59f86.jpg and then also fix the spacing
00:48:936 (3) - this could help ^ this slider could be shorter, reduced to downbeat. Here are some rhythm suggestions:


Easy
seemsgoodman


enjoyed while playing, very nice set
good luck :)
posted
[M4M]


Easy
  1. 00:28:355 (1,2,3,4) - I personally would use this rhythm for the kiai It would feel a lot better for newer players. I can understand why 00:28:704 (2) - ends on a red tick, for pure simplification to make it a 1/1 gap with 00:29:576 (3) - . The issue it's that the heavy beats are ignored both here 00:29:053 - and here 00:29:401 . Making it really awkward imo.
  2. The rest of the diff is fine.
Akitoshi's Normal
  1. 00:05:585 - I have no idea why you skipped this piano sound, since you are clearly following it by using sliders like this 00:07:460 (1) -. Unlike 00:17:585 - , you don't have a strong sustained sound to justify skipping that piano hit. Please consider it.
  2. 00:42:308 (1,2) - Woops spacing?
  3. You really do make really good clean normals Aki~
HOS' Hard
  1. In general, I highly disagree with the spacing used in the intro. Jumps like this 00:07:085 (3,1) - and 00:10:085 (4,1) - are overkill for just a soft piano intro. The only justified jump would be here 00:12:710 (2,1) - because we are moving to the second part of the intro.
  2. 00:05:983 (1) - I don't know how this happened but it's clearly incorrectly snapped.
  3. 00:19:460 (1,2) - Why does this pattern ignore a clear piano hit when you were following it so closely before?
  4. 00:18:710 (2,1) - Fix blanket (Did you use a custom skin for checking it? Use base skin for checking please)
  5. 00:23:585 (2,1) - Why not move those around to make a pretty pattern with all of this 00:21:710 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1) - . Right now it looks like an incomplete pattern (You ran out of circles to complete it).
  6. 00:36:378 (5,6,1) - This stack stair looks really ugly
Insane
  1. Dude, c l e a n diff. Only nitpicks below.
  2. 00:06:710 (2,3) - I personally would make these ones as spaced as 00:05:398 (4,5,6) - . Since you already used that low spacing for piano notes that are a lot less noticeable here 00:05:022 (2,3) - . In contrast, the piano notes here 00:06:710 (2,3,4) - are a lot more clear
  3. Your whole map has beautifully crafted sliders, and then we have this 00:22:460 (3) - shit in the toilet shaped slider out of nowhere. Why.
  4. HP 6 should work just as fine.
Lasse's Expert is good as it is. Unless you want to pick on structure, sv and spacing choices, but all of that is subjective and bound to the mapper's style due to being the top difficulty.
posted

niyuji wrote:

hello
so here's my mod. m4m

Insane
00:14:960 (4,5) - blanket ya
00:15:897 (6,1) - check stack 00:14:772 (3) - ya
00:33:675 (6,7,8,1,3) - blanket
00:34:111 (2) - same ^
i cant fix this without visual spacing looking crap, and i honestly don't think they're that bad anyway
00:39:692 - you should map this sound mm i disagree, if i map that sound that takes away a lot of the emphasis that the next note has aswell as sits inconsistently with my current rhythm choices
00:44:053 (1,2) - spacing is different, take a look at 00:41:262 (1,1) - , 00:43:529 (1,2) - i would keep it consistent in kiai intentional because of the stream here, i use the same technique earlier with a triple coming off of a slider too
00:43:529 (1,2) - tail touches 00:44:750 (1) - i think you could space objects a little not visible in game, and i don't want to space the rest of the stream out too much or it might become too difficult
00:46:843 (1,1) - same ^^ this one is intentional by design
Easy
seemsgoodman


enjoyed while playing, very nice set
good luck :)

[XV] wrote:

[M4M]


Easy
  1. 00:28:355 (1,2,3,4) - I personally would use this rhythm for the kiai It would feel a lot better for newer players. I can understand why 00:28:704 (2) - ends on a red tick, for pure simplification to make it a 1/1 gap with 00:29:576 (3) - . The issue it's that the heavy beats are ignored both here 00:29:053 - and here 00:29:401 . Making it really awkward imo.

    i get what you mean, and it could be change to a 1.5 beat gap here, but i wanted to encapsulate the whole synth patterning here instead of focus on the drums which is the main reasoning behind the rhythm of the entire kiai (i understand theres a major synth note on the first white tick, but the main synth doesn't end until the red tick (where it is promptly followed by a triple)) but, i also think that the slider anchors that light up with the tick here 00:29:053 - give off at least some emphasis on the drums aswell whilst sticking to my core rhythm and i kinda wanna keep that, the fact that the beat ends up being a 1/1 gap is a side effect here. i think if more people suggest then i will reconsider (and its an easy fix to do) but at the moment i like the current rhythm since its a different type of rhythm compared to most easy diffs out there whilst still being easy to read
  2. The rest of the diff is fine.
Insane
  1. Dude, c l e a n diff. Only nitpicks below.
  2. 00:06:710 (2,3) - I personally would make these ones as spaced as 00:05:398 (4,5,6) - . Since you already used that low spacing for piano notes that are a lot less noticeable here 00:05:022 (2,3) - . In contrast, the piano notes here 00:06:710 (2,3,4) - are a lot more clear i added more spacing but its still not the same as 00:06:710 (2,3,4) - just because the first two notes in this triple are the same, but the last one is different and thats something i wanted to emphasise
  3. Your whole map has beautifully crafted sliders, and then we have this 00:22:460 (3) - shit in the toilet shaped slider out of nowhere. Why. B R E H, the reason behind this slider design is so their is a clear visual emphasis on the soft piano playing in the background, altho if more people get triggered by this ill make it a normal boring wave ResidentSleeper (and does it rly look that badd :( )
  4. HP 6 should work just as fine. yes
Lasse's Expert is good as it is. Unless you want to pick on structure, sv and spacing choices, but all of that is subjective and bound to the mapper's style due to being the top difficulty.
thanks for the mods!
Please sign in to reply.