hi m4m
how2mod 1 min map
[Easy]
00:05:960 - Note density is a bit high for a calm section, this could be mapped as a slider end to reduce it as it is barely snapped. I mean 00:05:210 (2) - this could be a reverse slider instead. Same for 00:17:960 -
00:29:576 (3) - 00:35:157 (3) - The wave sliders aren't symmetrical *triggered* so these could be the same side as they are the same sound.
00:46:320 (3) - the vertical ones look pretty ew
00:20:960 (2) - Slider body is 2 degrees off from the linear hitcircles reee
00:22:460 (1) - Not sure if this broken wave is intentional but I guess you went for the violin thing in the background shrug
[Akitoshi's Normal]
00:05:585 - I don't really like how you skipped those sounds, I think they could be mapped with a reverse slider.
00:23:960 - I guess this is mapped passively because of the non-snappy thing but would like to hear your reason for not mapping this with a circle as well.
00:37:773 (3,4,5,6) - This pattern looks a bit sloppy imo, maybe a zigzag on the hitcircles would do better.
[HOS' Hard]
00:13:460 - Exaggarating this curve pattern for the effect would do better if you want to go for the asymmetry, else just make it more symmetrical cause it looks half assed xd
00:33:936 (1) - Considering you did the finish sounds with red anchors, shouldn't this be a red anchor as well?
Same for 00:42:308 (1) -
00:35:179 (1) - Unsnapped also no hs
00:51:727 - I don't like how you ignored these kicks, they are pretty distracting and could potentially mess up the rythm, they could atleast mapped with some reverses if you wanted to map passively.
[Insane]
00:05:773 (6) - This could be the same ds because lower ds actually puts more pressure by trying to slow down, as the note is higher than the first ones but not much lower than the previous one. So I don't think it needs extra emphasis also makes the pattern tidier.
Same 00:17:022 (2,3,4,5,6) -
00:06:710 (2,3,4) - They look like they are meant to be linear but if they were I don't think the overlap works well flow wise, a stack would do better on the emphasis or atleast a lower overlap.
Same 00:09:710 (4,5,6) -
00:23:960 - Well as this is a higher diff I think this could be mapped as a reverse slider like the top diff to not map it passively.
The doubles connecting to sliders need a bit of work cause they are off by small margins but visible enough to bother me xd
00:29:314 (5,6) -
00:32:105 (5,6) -
00:34:896 (6,7) -
00:36:553 (5,6) -
00:47:716 (5,6) -
Mostly ds stuff but if you wanted to emphasize the sounds at the end of triples they don't need extra spacing or something cause they are already emphasized by ending a triple, emphasizing a small amount just makes them look off.
[Lasse's Expert]
00:22:460 (1,2) - These could use a smaller spacing as you used the varied spacing on emphasizing stronger and weaker notes
00:37:773 (1) - The mouse movement is much harsher on this than 00:48:936 (1) - but it could be cheesed so idk
00:58:529 (2,3,4,1) - This could be mapped by gradually decreasing spacing but both work fine I guess
plays fine imo