eINess wrote:

m4m[

CoMMUNICATIoN]

1. 00:10:189 (1) - add NC for match in front of parttern
2. 00:12:064 (1) - rhythm is very abstract. circle is not enough?
3. 00:26:689 (2,3,4) - I think it is much better to look at the coordinates by modifying a bit
   
   SPOILER

   
4. 01:01:752 (3,4,1,2) - same above
   
   SPOILER

   
5. 02:48:439 (2,3,4) - try this
   
   SPOILER

   
6. 03:55:752 (1) - add NC
7. 04:04:752 (7) - ^
8. 04:08:689 (4) - remove NC
9. 04:21:252 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - I think this is relatively difficult
10. 04:40:939 (4) - 04:41:314 (7) - 04:41:689 (10) - why don't use NC like the first part
11. 04:52:752 (5) - change 2 circle better

GL

Left wrote:

M4


[Communication]
BG to 1366x768 or same ratio pls kk

- 00:10:189 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - can I know the intention of lowering DS? slowmotion
- 00:13:752 (1,2) - there's drum kick, snare, not same with the part before spinner, but same usage of rhythm. It's kinda nonsense i think. you can show that drumbeat with another rhythm like 1/2 slider
- 00:19:189 - really strong beat, should catch it.
- 00:20:689 - ^
- 00:25:002 (3,1,2,3,4,5,1) - slider-stream flow can be improved. I will remap this whole part soon
- 00:38:877 (3,1,2,1) - I can't your SV usage overall, song isn't that dynamic i think..but SV is lol maybe using one SV is better. fixed
- 00:51:252 (1) - this is reasonable SV change i think.
- 02:01:189 (1) - tail's sound is strong. I'm not sure whether that beat is enough with just slidertail, not clickable. changed
- 02:07:752 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3) - I didn't like this kind of overlap patterns. really messy in editor.. ok....
- 02:19:002 (4,1,2) - , 02:27:252 (2,3,4,1) - spacing is irregular. I think second one is absolutely high vocal and should have more distance. sure
- 03:53:502 (1,2,3,4) - also should thinkl more about spacing fixed

I really couldn't understand your SV use. maybe you heard something and intended to show that. but normal users won't feel as much as you can, it's just simple kick-snar-kick-snare rhythm with melody, vocal. you have to think more about it for rank.
and I saw some wrong usages. example -> 01:25:752 (1,2,1) - surely strong beat and high vocal. but SV super low. nonsense i think.

another problem is, overuse, misuse of 1/4 rhythm. 01:40:752 (1,3) - why first one is 3/4? these two is almost same. if you wanna use 1/4, then make this two to 3/4. or just 1/2. 01:12:252 (5) - and sometimes miss some beats by using sijmple 1/4 rhythm, 00:22:002 (1,1,2,3,4,1) - here, you made 'sticky' feeling by using 1/4, not like song intended here.

will also fix those sloppy sv and 1/4 soon

Good Luck!

Thank you so much

1. 00:01:752 (1,1) - Blanket
2. 00:21:627 (2,1) - A double blanket could look great
3. 00:37:658 (1,1) - Blanket
4. 00:49:377 (1,2,3,4) - Maybe add some silent custom hitsounds for the slider ends, the sounds are actually really loud for nothing.
5. 01:01:752 (3,3,1,2,2,1,3,4,1,2,3,1,2,3,5) - Really repetitive sliders, this moment looks a bit "too much"
6. 01:14:502 (1,1,2,3) - Overlap
7. 01:15:533 (1,2) - Maybe make them go under 01:14:502 (1) - to avoid a bit the overlap
8. 01:32:877 (1,2) - Improve blanket
9. 01:36:627 (4,1) - I don't really appreciate this overlap, there's no reason for this circle to be here.
10. 01:54:252 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - Some silent custom HS on slider ends here ?
11. 02:00:064 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) - Same
12. 03:27:252 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,1,2,3,1,2,1,2,3,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,1,2,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,3,4,5) - The song is really silent at the beginning of this section, but it becomes loud, so to follow this moment, I'll recommend a SV changes.
13. 03:54:814 (2) - Maybe move it a bit higher for a better visibility

Lexis wrote:

CoMMUNICATIoN

I'll talk about an hitsound in this mod, downloadable here : http://up.ppy.sh/files/blank.wav

1. 00:01:752 (1,1) - Blanket
2. 00:21:627 (2,1) - A double blanket could look great
3. 00:37:658 (1,1) - Blanket
4. 00:49:377 (1,2,3,4) - Maybe add some silent custom hitsounds for the slider ends, the sounds are actually really loud for nothing.
5. 01:01:752 (3,3,1,2,2,1,3,4,1,2,3,1,2,3,5) - Really repetitive sliders, this moment looks a bit "too much" don't think so
6. 01:14:502 (1,1,2,3) - Overlap the overlap is intended
7. 01:15:533 (1,2) - Maybe make them go under 01:14:502 (1) - to avoid a bit the overlap ^
8. 01:32:877 (1,2) - Improve blanket
9. 01:36:627 (4,1) - I don't really appreciate this overlap, there's no reason for this circle to be here. if not there where?
10. 01:54:252 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - Some silent custom HS on slider ends here ?
11. 02:00:064 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) - Same this part is actually 1/8 so no
12. 03:27:252 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,1,2,3,1,2,1,2,3,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,1,2,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,3,4,5) - The song is really silent at the beginning of this section, but it becomes loud, so to follow this moment, I'll recommend a SV changes.
13. 03:54:814 (2) - Maybe move it a bit higher for a better visibility

[ -Scarlet- ] wrote:

Hey there~

Some first attempt score without warm ups lel

• [General]

1. Not sure why there's a need for CS4.1 when you can just stick with CS4. There's not much difference though, need around 0.3 difference to be noticeable likewise it doesn't bother much even I adjust the cs by 0.1
2. I believe the source of this song is from Hatsune Miku -Project DIVA- X. Should consider adding this into the source
3. Maybe add EXIT TUNES PRESENTS Vocalocreation into the tag. Source: Bad Source metadata all fixed

• [Modding Stuff]

1. 00:02:689 (1) - 00:03:814 (1) - 00:05:689 (1) - 00:06:814 (1) - There's no need for NCs for this part. It's not particularly hard to read and is a nice follow ups from the triples before. Same applies to the later part but I nc every triples so I'd rather do the same to those sliders
2. 00:05:408 (2) - 00:06:158 (2) - Very inconsistent spacing here fixed
   00:08:033 (2,3,1,2,3) - 00:09:064 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - Not sure about these, but it would be nice if you keep the pattern consistent with the earlier parts. Should be fine though, at least keep 00:08:033 (2,3) - similar with 00:08:314 (1,2,3) - fixed as well
3. 00:12:064 (1) - Not a big fan of random 1/8 here. Sure it emphasizes the loud beat but it is somewhat similar to 00:11:502 (3,4) - . And normal circle plays better especially when there's a slight pause before this note but it fits imo
4. 00:13:752 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - This is kinda over-exaggerated. The pattern is fine, but if you want to do this, similar pattern should be applied to the rest of the map though like 00:16:752 (1) - 00:17:502 (1) - etc fixed
5. 00:16:564 (1) - 00:17:127 (1) - 00:19:377 (1) - 00:20:877 (1) - 00:22:377 (1) - Not sure why these parts needs NC, it doesn't really make the stream easier to read, nor it emphasize the music. Highly recommend to remove it all fixed
6. 00:19:002 (1) - 00:20:502 (1) - 00:22:002 (1) - I'm not really fond with these kind of sliders, they are ignoring the interesting vocal here. This rhythm should be better fitting the vocal along with 1/4 beat too http://puu.sh/tkLs0/91e554eccc.jpg fixed in my own way
7. 00:26:314 (2) - Remove NC they are in different stanzas
8. 00:28:752 (2) - This spacing really catches people offguard, it doesn't flow really well too. Much prefer it to be closer to the slider end fixed
9. 00:31:377 (2) - Maybe make this slider similar to what you've done before 00:29:877 (1) - 00:28:377 (1) - fixed
10. 00:38:502 (1) - 00:39:814 (1) - 00:41:314 (1) - 00:42:814 (1) - 00:44:314 (1) - 00:45:814 (1) - Remove NC fixed
11. 00:50:877 (1) - 00:53:877 (1) - maybe make this similar to 00:52:377 (1) - they are totally different sounds
12. 01:23:127 (3) - 01:24:252 (7) - Prefer these kind of note bigger distance away from the 1/4 slider for better readability fixed
13. 01:25:189 (1) - 01:28:564 (1) - Remove NC fixed
14. 01:29:127 (1,2,3,4) - All the stream in this section should have been spacing though, I think it fits the chorus better okay
15. 01:40:939 (2,3,4) - The slider (4) has a rather awkward spacing, just stack them together fixed
16. 02:01:189 (1,2) - Try to unstack them, create a jump or something. Quite difficult to play this part especially spamming through 02:00:064 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) - 1/8 stream, making the players easily overstream at 02:01:377 (2) - fixed
17. 02:11:877 (2,3) - Awkward rhythm, just use 3 1/6 sliders like this http://puu.sh/tkLRB/237adc6856.jpg slightly fixed in my own way
18. 02:13:752 (1) - 02:16:752 (1) - 02:19:752 (1) - Don't really like these long sliders. Sure it fits the ending cymbal but you're also ignoring a lot of important beats and vocal like 02:17:877 - etc would keep them
19. 03:03:533 (1) - No need for NC here, and the distance is kinda too large to distinguish the change in rhythm fixed
20. 03:59:502 (2) - This slider completely hides behind the previous slider, extremely difficult to read especially when there's a loud beat at 03:59:502 - , if you replaced it with circle it also fits the song really well kk
21. 04:31:752 (1) - 04:33:252 (1) - Please remove NC for these note, hard to compare the difference between 04:31:752 (1,2,1,2) - 04:32:877 (1,2,1,2) - in terms of reading sure
    
    Definitely agree with Left's statement. Lots of questionable Slider Velocity change, random NCs, and inconsistent spacing. I'm not gonna point out every single flaws I found in this map though, since the things I've mentioned pretty much applies throughout the entire map. Good luck with this map though

Screwdrivers wrote:

hi from modreqs M4M if u wanna

CoMMUNICATIoN

1. 00:10:752 (1,2,3) - space these out a bit? having them overlap is underwhelming since the beats are so strong, and the gaps would still be easily readable fixed
2. 00:12:064 (1) - making this a single instead of a 1/8 slider would represent the song just as well without being awkward and out of place fixed
3. 00:18:439 (3) - this should be a single instead. making it identical to 00:18:064 (1,2) - and keeping the same rhythm is misleading and plays poorly because it's a very different and weaker sound ik but the reason I do like that is to simplify the rhythm and let players read the pattern more easily
4. 02:11:502 (1,2,3,4) - the new rhythm here is tricky enough, making it so difficult to read as well creates an inappropriate amount of strain but I still wanna keep it atm
5. 03:55:377 (1,2,3,4) - curve this upwards to make the stream look better this is intended
6. 03:59:877 (1,2,3,4) - this should also be more curved ^
7. 04:06:814 (6) - this should end on the blue tick because it's the same sound as 04:06:252 (1) - yea that was my mistake
8. 04:51:064 (1) - make this closer to 04:51:627 (1) - to emphasize the suddenly low sv
9. 04:54:064 (1) - ^ fixed

1. 00:10:658 (6,1) - I really didn't the spacing between these two notes, how about adding some space between them? maybe move the slider few grids to the left
2. 00:14:127 (1,1) - Again the spacing is badly here, like it looks kinda random to me maybe do something like this instead?
   
   
3. 00:39:814 (1) - I really didn't like this slider shape, so how about fixing it up a bit, like this?
   
   
4. 00:40:377 (2) - ^
5. 00:58:752 (1) - making many repeats like this, can be annoying to play tbh, so how about changing to one repeat+note? would fits much better tbh
6. 01:32:877 (1) - how about making a notes for this one? I think it would fits much better here =3=/
7. 01:36:814 (1,1) - This overlap between these two sliders kinda looks bad, so move this slider a bit more to the left 01:37:752 (1) -
8. 02:07:752 (1,2) - ^

Sekaii wrote:

Mod4Mod from my queue :3

CoMMUNICATIoN:
Why AR9.2? I think AR9 would fit nicely here, so I suggest you to change it to AR9.
I just don't understand why OD 8.4, maybe OD 8 or 7.5 would fit much better for this map, so maybe change it? >< I copy those settings from maps with similar bpm and SR aka remote control

1. 00:10:658 (6,1) - I really didn't the spacing between these two notes, how about adding some space between them? maybe move the slider few grids to the left fixed
2. 00:14:127 (1,1) - Again the spacing is badly here, like it looks kinda random to me maybe do something like this instead?
   
   
   fixed
3. 00:39:814 (1) - I really didn't like this slider shape, so how about fixing it up a bit, like this?
   
   
4. 00:40:377 (2) - ^ fixed
5. 00:58:752 (1) - making many repeats like this, can be annoying to play tbh, so how about changing to one repeat+note? would fits much better tbh fixed
6. 01:32:877 (1) - how about making a notes for this one? I think it would fits much better here =3=/ nah would prefer keeping it
7. 01:36:814 (1,1) - This overlap between these two sliders kinda looks bad, so move this slider a bit more to the left 01:37:752 (1) - k
8. 02:07:752 (1,2) - ^ I think it's fine

I actually think this map really need more work on slider shapes, most of the sliders needs fixing since they look a bit random to me, but it's good map so I can't complain =w=

That's all I could find tbh. Good luck with your map :3

Kotori-Chan wrote:

m4m~

CoMMUNICATIoN

00:16:189 (1,2) - why are these two a seperate combo,the whole stream could be one combo~ nope different instruments
00:25:752 (6,1) - that jump from 6 to 1 is kinda HUGE mignt consider lowering it a bit >.< could be fixed by making the stream go upwards fixed
00:39:814 (1) - maybe a ctrl+j and then a ctrl+g thats alot better for flow imo jumping from that slider to the next note is kinda weird especially if its an reverse slider,easy to hit a 100 on fixed
00:42:814 (1) - same for this one ^^^ j and g fixed
00:55:752 (2) - didnt you forget to NC this one ? different sv :> fixed
00:55:752 (2) - same with these ^^^^^
01:07:752 (1,2,3) - ^^^^^ fixed
01:15:064 (1,2,3,1,2,1,2,1,2) - nice work on patterns like this,love them <3 xd
01:23:127 (3,4,5) - placing these a bit more to 2 would make it a bit easier to read fixed
01:33:064 (2) - NC because sv ~ fixed
02:15:627 (3) - NC aswell because different sv
02:18:627 (3) - ^^^^^ fixed

well there are probably alot more points where you need to NC because of different sv but you can find them easily on your own,otherwise this map is really almost perfect imo,just maybe some more minor thingys here and there but its pretty much fine~ so yeah,cant really find any more rhyhtm/flow problems D:

dont forget to give kudos and your mod on https://osu.ppy.sh/s/549479
ty <3 !

1. normal-hitwhistle2.wav有超过5ms的delay，unrankable。我帮你搞了一下，这是修改过的音效
2. 00:19:189 (2) - Unsnapped slidertail
3. 00:08:033 (2,3,1,2,3) - 这种擦边球不好看啊。把右边的挪开点
4. 00:10:189 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - 减距有点让人费解。我感觉这里节奏应该越来越强才对啊，毕竟后面那么重的鼓点。保持均距或者适当增距会好一点
5. 00:12:064 (1) - 挪开，叠起来看得很奇怪。
6. 00:26:689 (2,3) - 不要这样摆，要么就叠起来要么就不要overlap。一个是容易误读成1/4，另一个是也没找到这样摆的低于1.0x DS的理由……现在连怀旧都不这样怀了。
7. 00:32:877 (2,3) - 00:31:377 (1,2) - ^ 00:59:877 (1,2) -
8. 00:34:752 (3) - 同理，我建议放到00:33:814 (1) - 的滑条尾端
9. 00:27:252 - 音乐这么重的鼓点，没有音效？
10. 00:29:314 (1,1) - blanket 做好一点？
11. 00:29:877 (1,2) - 如果不是顺滑条方向的叠法的话，最好就要讲究一点姿势。这种random的方向实在是不好看。比如把circle 2摆到x353, y72？虽然我也不觉得有多好看，但至少有点规矩吧
12. 00:31:752 (2) - 00:33:252 (3) - 音效？
13. 00:35:314 (1,1) - 相差1倍的变速有点过分了。一般差0.5倍还能读得出来。差1倍就基本上很难一次性读出来了。00:36:064 (1,2) - 1.2x SV差不多了
14. 00:37:658 (7,1,2) - 这个梗打起来一脸懵逼。反正我没进editor是没看懂咋回事。减速太重是第一，0.75x其实就够了。第二是00:37:658 (7) - 要NC。
15. 00:40:377 (2,3) - flow? 滑条的弯曲方向像是乱摆的
16. 00:42:814 (1,2,3) - 同样是美观和flow的问题。大概感觉到弯曲度和倾斜角度有自己的规律变化（？？），但是给大家这种不会去精细检查或者计算你的梗的人来看，这就是乱摆的，而且很乱。一般00:43:752 (3) - 这种高曲度的滑条要有另一个一样的来组成一个小的梗，或者是用高曲度来强调一些什么。这种无缘无故出来的高曲度的滑条就不好看。整个difficulty都有这种曲度不够规整的问题。
17. 00:46:564 (5,1) - 打起来很奇怪。明明重音还要叠起来，又不是停顿，没有大一点的移动玩起来是很别扭。
18. 00:50:877 (1) - 去掉NC，明显的NC abuse。NC一般是用来标记重复梗和变速的，不是用来标记每个独立的梗的。
19. 00:53:877 (1) - ^
20. 00:55:377 (1) - 为什么这个是老版的滑条？麻烦重新做一个。这种老版的滑条曲线很不自然。
21. 01:07:752 - 到01:10:377 - 首先，完全没感觉到这里的音乐有什么不同，需要这种8段变速。其次，这种梗不能把滑条形状和距离做的乱七八糟的。否则根本看不出你变速的用意。此外，前后使用的变速不一致也是不好的。后四个的变速和前四个的变速最好一致。
22. 01:23:127 (3,4,5) - 01:23:689 (2,3,4,5) - 其实你整个难度里的连打都不太好看，感觉就是开了个DS就直接摆了。没考虑到弧度的变化和美观。
23. 01:25:752 (1) - 这种slider已经不能用了。自己路径重叠至无法看清。Unrankable
24. 01:33:627 (1) - Move to (x275, y222)。现在的01:33:064 (1,1) - DS感觉还是太小了
25. 01:35:314 (1,2) - Ctrl+G
26. 01:43:752 (1,1) - Overlap以及NC spam。去掉后一个的NC，把后一个滑条往左移
27. 01:48:252 (5,1) - 这个DS变化有毒。后面一个滑条已经完全读不出来是1/2了。把后面一个滑条改成0.75x速度
28. 01:55:564 (2,1) - 为什么遮的这么严实啊？麻烦把后面的circle拖出来一点，因为这个距离比前面的1/4跳要小很多，看起来不自然
29. 02:00:064 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) - 你用1/8倒是用的顺手。只是太长太容易断了，和整个difficulty的难度差太多。而且也没觉得这里音乐要用1/8啊。1/4再加点花样为何不好？
30. 02:12:252 (3) - Snap slidertail to 02:12:439 -
31. 02:33:252 (2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3) - 你的图的难度就被这种连打给赚走了。然而你这里音乐并不重。没必要这么大的距离吧
32. 02:39:252 (1,4) - 把stack弄好
33. 02:41:877 (3,1,2,3) - 不一样的音乐用一样的梗很容易产生不必要的误导
34. 02:50:877 (1) - 有点丑。短滑条不要弄得太扭曲了
35. 03:06:533 (2,1) - 再挪近一点，现在这样读不清楚。还以为是你把1/2摆错了
36. 03:08:220 (1,2) - 漏掉了03:08:127 - 和03:08:314 - 两个很重的鼓点。打起来很奇怪。建议你模仿03:06:627 (1) - 这个，或者拆成这样
37. 03:13:752 (1) - 同样是曲度不自然
38. 03:14:923 (1,2,3) - 变速不NC？
39. 03:16:002 (1,2) - 容易误读成1/4。这个肯定要把距离拉开，因为大部分人作图的时候1/4开头就是这么做的
40. 03:19:314 (1) - 应该snap在03:19:283 - ，同时你漏了03:19:377 - 重鼓点
41. 03:20:127 (1,2,3) - 距离容易误读，挪开1/2的距离
42. 04:19:939 (7) - 插在连打里很容易断combo
43. 04:22:939 (2) - 几乎没人能反应的出这是1/4滑条，因为你前面摆的全是圈啊。至少要减小SV到1.5x以下
44. 04:28:377 (1,2,3) - 1/2距离比1/4距离还大，这也是不利于读图的。最简单的方法是把04:28:939 (3) - NC一下
45. 大概看了一遍。有些我没提到地方但是指出问题的你还需要自己找一找。

F D Flourite wrote:

乍一看起来很有意思的图

[Communication]

1. normal-hitwhistle2.wav有超过5ms的delay，unrankable。我帮你搞了一下，这是修改过的音效
2. 00:19:189 (2) - Unsnapped slidertail all fixed thanks
3. 00:08:033 (2,3,1,2,3) - 这种擦边球不好看啊。把右边的挪开点 k
4. 00:10:189 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - 减距有点让人费解。我感觉这里节奏应该越来越强才对啊，毕竟后面那么重的鼓点。保持均距或者适当增距会好一点
5. 00:12:064 (1) - 挪开，叠起来看得很奇怪。 不了，我想跟05:03:064 (1,1) 保持一致
6. 00:26:689 (2,3) - 不要这样摆，要么就叠起来要么就不要overlap。一个是容易误读成1/4，另一个是也没找到这样摆的低于1.0x DS的理由……现在连怀旧都不这样怀了。這個我都不知道自己為什麼會這樣放...已經將它放到滑條前面
7. 00:32:877 (2,3) - 00:31:377 (1,2) - ^ 00:59:877 (1,2) -
8. 00:34:752 (3) - 同理，我建议放到00:33:814 (1) - 的滑条尾端
9. 00:27:252 - 音乐这么重的鼓点，没有音效？ k
10. 00:29:314 (1,1) - blanket 做好一点？ k
11. 00:29:877 (1,2) - 如果不是顺滑条方向的叠法的话，最好就要讲究一点姿势。这种random的方向实在是不好看。比如把circle 2摆到x353, y72？虽然我也不觉得有多好看，但至少有点规矩吧 重新排列過一遍
12. 00:31:752 (2) - 00:33:252 (3) - 音效？ done
13. 00:35:314 (1,1) - 相差1倍的变速有点过分了。一般差0.5倍还能读得出来。差1倍就基本上很难一次性读出来了。00:36:064 (1,2) - 1.2x SV差不多了 k
14. 00:37:658 (7,1,2) - 这个梗打起来一脸懵逼。反正我没进editor是没看懂咋回事。减速太重是第一，0.75x其实就够了。第二是00:37:658 (7) - 要NC。k
15. 00:40:377 (2,3) - flow? 滑条的弯曲方向像是乱摆的 k
16. 00:42:814 (1,2,3) - 同样是美观和flow的问题。大概感觉到弯曲度和倾斜角度有自己的规律变化（？？），但是给大家这种不会去精细检查或者计算你的梗的人来看，这就是乱摆的，而且很乱。一般00:43:752 (3) - 这种高曲度的滑条要有另一个一样的来组成一个小的梗，或者是用高曲度来强调一些什么。这种无缘无故出来的高曲度的滑条就不好看。整个difficulty都有这种曲度不够规整的问题。 k
17. 00:46:564 (5,1) - 打起来很奇怪。明明重音还要叠起来，又不是停顿，没有大一点的移动玩起来是很别扭。 done
18. 00:50:877 (1) - 去掉NC，明显的NC abuse。NC一般是用来标记重复梗和变速的，不是用来标记每个独立的梗的。 k
19. 00:53:877 (1) - ^
20. 00:55:377 (1) - 为什么这个是老版的滑条？麻烦重新做一个。这种老版的滑条曲线很不自然。 k
21. 01:07:752 - 到01:10:377 - 首先，完全没感觉到这里的音乐有什么不同，需要这种8段变速。其次，这种梗不能把滑条形状和距离做的乱七八糟的。否则根本看不出你变速的用意。此外，前后使用的变速不一致也是不好的。后四个的变速和前四个的变速最好一致。 all fixed
22. 01:23:127 (3,4,5) - 01:23:689 (2,3,4,5) - 其实你整个难度里的连打都不太好看，感觉就是开了个DS就直接摆了。没考虑到弧度的变化和美观。fixed
23. 01:25:752 (1) - 这种slider已经不能用了。自己路径重叠至无法看清。Unrankable 稍微移動了錨點
24. 01:33:627 (1) - Move to (x275, y222)。现在的01:33:064 (1,1) - DS感觉还是太小了 done
25. 01:35:314 (1,2) - Ctrl+G done
26. 01:43:752 (1,1) - Overlap以及NC spam。去掉后一个的NC，把后一个滑条往左移 done
27. 01:48:252 (5,1) - 这个DS变化有毒。后面一个滑条已经完全读不出来是1/2了。把后面一个滑条改成0.75x速度 done
28. 01:55:564 (2,1) - 为什么遮的这么严实啊？麻烦把后面的circle拖出来一点，因为这个距离比前面的1/4跳要小很多，看起来不自然 done
29. 02:00:064 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) - 你用1/8倒是用的顺手。只是太长太容易断了，和整个difficulty的难度差太多。而且也没觉得这里音乐要用1/8啊。1/4再加点花样为何不好？ 這部份的音樂跟前面我用1/4的有很明顯的分別吧...要是我用相同的梗才奇怪。我聽過蠻多遍十分肯定是1/8。但我同意你difficulty spike這個問題所以調低了它們的ds
30. 02:12:252 (3) - Snap slidertail to 02:12:439 - done
31. 02:33:252 (2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3) - 你的图的难度就被这种连打给赚走了。然而你这里音乐并不重。没必要这么大的距离吧 k fixed
32. 02:39:252 (1,4) - 把stack弄好 k
33. 02:41:877 (3,1,2,3) - 不一样的音乐用一样的梗很容易产生不必要的误导 是不同的吧...
34. 02:50:877 (1) - 有点丑。短滑条不要弄得太扭曲了 k
35. 03:06:533 (2,1) - 再挪近一点，现在这样读不清楚。还以为是你把1/2摆错了 done
36. 03:08:220 (1,2) - 漏掉了03:08:127 - 和03:08:314 - 两个很重的鼓点。打起来很奇怪。建议你模仿03:06:627 (1) - 这个，或者拆成这样 用了前者
37. 03:13:752 (1) - 同样是曲度不自然 不太懂所以我將它變得更曲？
38. 03:14:923 (1,2,3) - 变速不NC？ k
39. 03:16:002 (1,2) - 容易误读成1/4。这个肯定要把距离拉开，因为大部分人作图的时候1/4开头就是这么做的 my mistake
40. 03:19:314 (1) - 应该snap在03:19:283 - ，同时你漏了03:19:377 - 重鼓点 fixed
41. 03:20:127 (1,2,3) - 距离容易误读，挪开1/2的距离 kk
42. 04:19:939 (7) - 插在连打里很容易断combo 已經將它改成notes
43. 04:22:939 (2) - 几乎没人能反应的出这是1/4滑条，因为你前面摆的全是圈啊。至少要减小SV到1.5x以下 但前面一直都是用sv1.5，而這部份的節奏比前面更要強烈，1.75我覺得問題不大
44. 04:28:377 (1,2,3) - 1/2距离比1/4距离还大，这也是不利于读图的。最简单的方法是把04:28:939 (3) - NC一下 done
45. 大概看了一遍。有些我没提到地方但是指出问题的你还需要自己找一找。

个人感觉，整个难度缺乏整体性。這個很多人都有提到。我map了這張圖兩個月，day one 到 day 60 前前後後我對這首曲的看法都會有所變化吧...
一是美观上，滑条鲜有彼此的对应与互补，看起来都很孤立。
二是DS上，除了一些特殊段，DS基本上没有一个定性。相似的音乐段用的DS也可能差的很远，而很强的音可能也就是1.0x左右的DS糊过去。
三是梗上，在我看来基本上是想到什么用什么，除了往返跳和重音变速滑条贯穿整个diff以外。但是这两点不足以成为你这个图的特色。因为这种梗一是烂大街，二是你这种梗之间彼此也有不小的差别，三是这种梗其实就是用来点缀的，把它拿来当难度的支柱在我看来不是一个好的选择（除非你有很好的美观设计以及大量的重复）在這5頁mod之前整張圖我都在用stacking這個梗，所以我才把stack leninecy 調成3，但最後很多人都抱怨說readability很差所以才改成這個樣子。

还是得加油。我并不否认你脑子里可能有很多的创意，但是梗多并不等于图好。还是要规划好整个图的架构，才能让你的图看起来更加的fully considered and well designed。至于美观上，虽然不太符合我的审美，也可能符合别人的审美，但是当你把一个东西做出架构来，就算我可能觉得不好看，但是依然会是一张不错的图。比如这张图。而且恕我直言，人家的图在图案设计上比你用心多了，毕竟滑条的曲度都是多个锚点调出来的。

还有，以后给别人M4M的时候希望你能更加努力一点，多摸几个层次不同的难度。这样会提高你的mod水平。好的

Good luck!

mindmaster107 wrote:

For M4M

[CoMMUNICATIoN]
The map is pretty great, the spacing made sense most of the time
I understand your map is ment to be hard to read, but the flaws in reading I am pointing out are in sections which don't look like they are meant to deceive.

00:04:939 (1,2,3,1,2,3) and 00:06:064 (1,2,3,1,2,3) and so many other triples in the beginning - This makes the beginning a lot harder than most of the song for me. Maybe compress the triples. unneccessary cuz it's not that hard actually
01:31:658 (5,1) - Rotate the slider so the jump can ease into it. fixed
02:13:002 (3) - This slider misses the major sound. Move it half a measure earlier. they are 1/3 drums
02:16:189 (1,2) - The gap between these two should match 02:15:439 (1,2,3) . If this is impossible, try to change the slider into something like 02:22:189 (1,2) for consistency, and to tell the two spacing pairs apart. remapped the whole part
03:03:252 (1,2) - I think these should be symmetrical against the center, to be easier to read. again unnecessary. Also symmetry doesn't fit the whole style of this map
04:25:377 (2,3,4,5) and 04:26:033 (2,3,4,5,6) - The use of these streams is to accelerate the player into the speeds needed for the fast sections. If their spacing was gradual, rather than 2 small then 2 big, it would be more intuitive to play. you are prolly right but i'd rather keep it atm

1. 00:22:377 (3,4,5,6) - missing claps like the previous parts 00:19:377 (3,4,5,6) - and 00:20:877 (3,4,5,6) -
2. 00:22:752 (1,2) - feels undermapped compared to the previous pattern and next patterns
3. 00:37:658 (1) - there's no sound here on the slider head, this slider feels overmapped. i recommend deleting this slider and placing a circle on the red tick 00:37:939 -
4. 00:52:752 (1) - why is the slider end silenced? has the same pitch as 00:49:752 (1) - but that one doesn't have silenced slider end. also applies to 00:55:752 (1) -
5. 01:22:752 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5) - this stream has confusing clicking rhythms for the player and doesn't really suit the music all that well. for starters, 01:23:502 - should be clickable due to how emphasized it is; 01:22:939 (3,4) - this placement is really tricky to read due to how clumped it is; 01:24:064 (5) - shouldn't be a repeat slider imo. downbeat is the loudest note and end of the stream so i think it should be clickable
6. 01:26:314 (2,3,4) - i'd space this out more. it looks very close to the spacing you used for your streams
7. 01:30:252 (1,2,3,4,5) - nobody's going to be able to read or expect the stream underneath the slider here. same with 01:31:002 (1,2,3,4,5) -
8. 01:30:908 (5,1) - likewise, nobody's going to expect this huge jump in spacing, especially since there's only 1/4 difference between the notes. this just plays bad.
9. 01:49:752 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - 01:55:752 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - i get that this is intentionally undermapped since it's a calmer part, but it isn't even mapped to the music here
10. 02:00:064 (1) - the sound here doesn't buzz this much, the intensity of the buzz slider here doesn't make sense
11. 02:12:814 - i don't think you should ignore this red tick. maybe you can make 02:12:627 (2) - a 1/2 slider or something
12. 02:22:752 (1,2) - sliders are too long. they should be 1/1, not 5/4
13. 02:36:064 (5) - ending on a blue tick feels off. i think it'd be more appropriate to end this on the white tick at 02:37:377 -
14. 02:41:502 (2) - this slider doesn't fit the vocals; you skipped over the sound at 02:41:595 -
15. 02:42:252 (1,3) - why are these sliders so slow? your SV usage doesn't really make much sense from time to time due to how it changes from fast to slow so much for what appears to be no good reasoning
16. 02:44:783 - not going to map to the vocal here?
17. 02:48:252 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5) - this stream here also plays pretty awkwardly

Doormat wrote:

m4m, sorry i'm a bit late, had irl stuff. i don't let holidays or irl stuff affect the quality of my mods so i waited until i had more time to mod properly

[CoMMUNICATIoN]

1. 00:22:377 (3,4,5,6) - missing claps like the previous parts 00:19:377 (3,4,5,6) - and 00:20:877 (3,4,5,6) -
2. 00:22:752 (1,2) - feels undermapped compared to the previous pattern and next patterns
3. 00:37:658 (1) - there's no sound here on the slider head, this slider feels overmapped. i recommend deleting this slider and placing a circle on the red tick 00:37:939 -
4. 00:52:752 (1) - why is the slider end silenced? has the same pitch as 00:49:752 (1) - but that one doesn't have silenced slider end. also applies to 00:55:752 (1) -
5. 01:22:752 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5) - this stream has confusing clicking rhythms for the player and doesn't really suit the music all that well. for starters, 01:23:502 - should be clickable due to how emphasized it is; 01:22:939 (3,4) - this placement is really tricky to read due to how clumped it is; 01:24:064 (5) - shouldn't be a repeat slider imo. downbeat is the loudest note and end of the stream so i think it should be clickable
6. 01:26:314 (2,3,4) - i'd space this out more. it looks very close to the spacing you used for your streams
7. 01:30:252 (1,2,3,4,5) - nobody's going to be able to read or expect the stream underneath the slider here. same with 01:31:002 (1,2,3,4,5) -
8. 01:30:908 (5,1) - likewise, nobody's going to expect this huge jump in spacing, especially since there's only 1/4 difference between the notes. this just plays bad.
9. 01:49:752 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - 01:55:752 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - i get that this is intentionally undermapped since it's a calmer part, but it isn't even mapped to the music here
10. 02:00:064 (1) - the sound here doesn't buzz this much, the intensity of the buzz slider here doesn't make sense
11. 02:12:814 - i don't think you should ignore this red tick. maybe you can make 02:12:627 (2) - a 1/2 slider or something
12. 02:22:752 (1,2) - sliders are too long. they should be 1/1, not 5/4
13. 02:36:064 (5) - ending on a blue tick feels off. i think it'd be more appropriate to end this on the white tick at 02:37:377 -
14. 02:41:502 (2) - this slider doesn't fit the vocals; you skipped over the sound at 02:41:595 -
15. 02:42:252 (1,3) - why are these sliders so slow? your SV usage doesn't really make much sense from time to time due to how it changes from fast to slow so much for what appears to be no good reasoning
16. 02:44:783 - not going to map to the vocal here?
17. 02:48:252 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5) - this stream here also plays pretty awkwardly

hmm gonna stop here. i think the map needs a lot more work.

all fixed except the 1/8 slider and the sv change. Thanks

crystalinfusion wrote:

NM from q

CoMMUNICATIoN

00:15:440 (1,2,3) - I don't know if this has been mentioned in previous mods or so but from what I see it's a 1/8. But as of now I think what you did is fine.
01:01:752 (2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4) - because the song became more upbeat, having the vocals supported by the instruments, emphasis on these parts can do
01:43:189 (1,2,3,4,5) - Check if giving all of them clap sounds is better k done
02:03:814 (1,1,2) - give space for these three, they're sticking. Try moving them each a bit farther from each other intended
02:41:408 (1,2) - I believe this is following the vocals? If so then this part is conflicting the vocals. But if it is for the person to develop the habit of receiving these kinds of patterns, then ok. yup
03:05:314 (4,5,6,1,2,1,1,2,3,1,2,3,4) - for this part, I've noticed that you have ignored a lot of sounds, but for the sake of simplicity wew yup

So far this map has been given lots of modification from a lot of people, so I won't be able to really point out every single thing.

TequilaWolf wrote:

mod

CoMMUNICATIoN-

00:10:752 (1,2,3,4) - both times while playtesting it, I found this part a little weird to hit. maybe you can consider https://puu.sh/ua6hr/83b05624f2.jpg done
00:11:689 (4) - I also think this is a bit too far from 00:11:502 (3) - fixed
00:12:252 (1) - I would map objects here actually, feels like a waste not to you are not the only one who feel this way but I'd like to keep the spinner
00:14:502 (1) - is there any reason behind changing the speed of this? I'm not sure ??
00:33:814 (1) - maybe make this a repeat slider just like the previous few like 00:32:314 (1) - 00:30:814 (1) - 00:29:314 (1) - 00:27:814 (1) - fixed
00:39:814 (1) - maybe change repeat slider into a 1/2 slider and a circle? wanna click 00:40:189, also applies to the next few similar patterns nah it's fine
01:13:377 (1) - consider making it 4 1/4 notes (short stream), feels better for me nah
01:31:658 (4,1) - a little hard to read with the sudden change of direction changed
01:32:877 (1) - ctrl+g seems good slightly fixed in my own way
01:36:814 (1) - you can consider this pattern https://puu.sh/ua7Mg/9d29fd9aca.jpg, original feels slightly undermapped but the music is rather calm
01:51:064 (2,1) - transitioning from 2 to 1 feels a bit awkward especially since there's nothing on 01:51:439 to click when there's a 'te' sound there, same with 01:52:564 actually and the previous few ones, for example I really feel the slider should not end at 01:51:814 but instead start on it, or you could map a circle there you are right fixed
02:09:252 (1,2) - consider circle+slider changed
02:11:877 (2) - maybe ctrl+g nah
02:12:252 (1) - maybe replace with 4 1/2 circles yea
02:22:752 (1,2) - I would flip both so they're all facing right and move 2 further right and also maybe consider doing some sort of curve on both of them I think right now is good
02:31:377 (1,2,3,4) - wouldn't start with the stream that early and instead remove on 2 and 4 repeat slider now
02:32:314 (1,1) - difficult to read, we can't tell what type of slider is the second one fixed
02:34:377 (1,2,3) - would remove 2 nah
02:36:064 (1) - maybe consider moving slider 2 ticks to the right so it starts on white tick, and adding circle at 02:36:064 changed
03:03:252 (1,2) - difficult to read. maybe change 1 into a long slider and place 2 nearby k done
03:04:189 (1,2,3,4) - flows weird because all 3 sliders are moving to the left fixed
03:06:252 (1,2) - same as previous, difficult to read fixed
03:18:252 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2) - hard to read the double because of the long wait between 5 and 1, and spacing is a little too big on the jumps, all we played were slow sliders up till now slightly reduce the spacing, but for reading-wise nc is good enough to let players notice the rhythm change
03:54:252 (1,2,3,4,1,2) - never got this perfectly on testplay, hard to read. maybe move 03:55:002 (1,2) - somewhere else done
03:55:377 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - I feel like the stream should only start on 3, maybe remove first 2 circles and use 2 1/4 sliders like before nah
04:01:002 (1,2,3) - ctrl+g 2 and 3 and move 2 even further away. not all of the time but most of the time you want the distance in timeline to reflect the distance in the playfield
04:21:252 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - reduce distance, it's way too big kk
04:30:252 (1,2,1,2,1,2,3,4,1,2,1,2,3,4,1,2,1,2) - huge slightly nerfed those jumps

#

1. 00:01:752 (1) - why 1/4 slider? it's kinda like overmap on that blue tick there due to a note is not present there
2. 00:04:189 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3) - this looks wrong... try this http://puu.sh/ud6Qo/b72eb2f6ea.jpg
3. 00:19:002 (1,2,3) - why is this look weird for its visual...? could have set a little gap jump there at least
4. 00:22:002 (1,2,3) - ^
5. 00:26:689 (2) - missing tail hitsound
6. 01:28:752 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5) - these stream patterns' flow are really weird to play here. it's like curving all the way to the slider, but yeah, it's weird
7. 01:40:002 (1) - kinda like confusing to find its number of repeated sliders, so use 2 1/2 sliders instead .-.
8. 01:49:752 - 01:58:752 - idk how2say this, but the sliders are touching on tails there, which is likely as overlap slider there
9. 02:15:252 (1,2) - pls fix them by manually stacking them
10. 02:18:252 (1,2,3) - again
11. 02:21:252 (1,2,3) - ^
12. 02:32:595 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,1,2,3) - it feels like the streams here are circling around. was expecting something different like different stream view like this for example http://puu.sh/ud8uP/ce0d5fee62.jpg
13. 02:38:502 (1) - 2 beats there on 1/2. better to have a 1/4 slider + mute the end than 3/4 slider
14. 02:54:252 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1) - that stream flow is rly weird
15. 02:59:877 (3,4,5,6,1) - i'd make a proper zigzag stream neatly or a line or a curve one if i were you
16. 03:13:752 (1) - this one instead of having a lot of repeat sliders http://puu.sh/ud8Io/7a4e8d55d7.jpg
17. 03:19:002 (5,1,2) - just go with 3/4 slider there rather than leaving a note only .-.
18. 03:21:252 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - every slider's speed changes --> NC it at all times
19. 03:27:252 (3) - NC, 03:27:533 (1) - remove NC
20. 03:27:252 - 03:39:252 - the way how you play the NC is really strange and it doesn't fit to its guitar strum as its emphasize or its vocal, so try this one as the example http://puu.sh/ud8U2/2fc7bb2397.jpg rests are still the same
21. 03:54:252 (1,2,3,1,2,1) - pls don't do this. it's really unreadable a lot here
22. 04:02:877 (4,5,1) - the flow and its emphasize are rly weird
23. 04:06:252 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - don't do this. this ain't gonna work out really good here
24. 04:07:658 (4) - why would u end it on blue tick? change that 1/4 slider into 2 notes for the stream note emphasize pls
25. 04:10:002 (1) - yes same reason here
26. 04:13:002 (2) - it's fine to do this instead http://puu.sh/ud94t/e1a9f536a9.jpg
27. 04:18:439 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,1) - why do i feel like something ain't right about this... check again on 25% playback rate for its rhythm. it doesn't really play and suit well on its visual play and the way how it works about its rhythm choice of yours
28. 04:24:627 (2,3,4,5,1) - why would u give a huge stream gap on (1)?
29. 04:34:377 (1,2) - why a huge gap here? this doesn't make any sense for its emphasize loud beat here
30. 04:44:314 (1,2,3,4,5) - this doesn't play well on its 1/2 spacing for those 1/4 sliders
31. 04:48:064 - 04:50:877 - why didn't u add any clap hitsound here?
32. 04:48:064 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - this doesn't look really good here. try this one instead. it fits well ya know http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7385596 (oh, include that note on that blue note)
33. 04:52:002 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,1,2,3) - the only correct note to use http://puu.sh/ud9tD/80199c85d3.jpg
34. 05:01:752 (1) - use soft hitsound
35. 05:03:064 (1) - finish for emphasize beat

PandaHero wrote:

Hey! Hitsounds check as requested.

Some of my suggestions

00:10:752 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1) - pick N:C2 and add claps on 00:10:752 - , 00:11:127 - , 00:11:502 - , 00:11:689 - and 00:12:064 - (for this one N:C1 clap still sounds nice). This sample will be sounds better.
Also remove finishes from here.
00:18:251 (3) - Add clap
00:18:627 - ^
00:19:752 - ^
00:21:252 - ^
00:23:502 (3) - ^
00:23:877 (5) - ^
00:24:252 (1,2,3) - add claps on sliders' head.
00:25:752 (6) - ^
00:35:877 (4) - remove clap from here
00:36:814 (1,2,3) - add claps here
00:43:752 (3,4) - add clap on slider's head and note
00:44:877 (4,5,6) - ^
00:46:377 (2) - ^
00:46:752 (1) - and 00:47:127 (3) - ^
00:48:252 (1,2,3,4) - ^
00:49:002 (5) - ^
00:49:752 (1) - ^
00:50:877 (5) - ^
00:52:377 (1) - ^
00:52:752 (1) - change to N:C2 maybe?
00:53:877 (5) - add clap
00:55:752 (1) - add clap from N:C2?
00:56:877 (5) - add clap on slider's head
00:58:752 (1) - ^
01:00:252 (2,3,4,5,6) - add claps
01:04:002 (2) - add clap on slider's head.
01:05:502 (5) - ^
01:06:252 (1) - add finish on slider's head
01:07:752 (2) - add finish
01:08:502 (6) - add clap
01:08:877 (1) - remove finish
01:09:252 (2) - add finish
01:10:002 (6) - add clap
01:10:377 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - same situation here
01:12:252 (2,3) - add clap on sliders' head.
01:13:752 (2) - add finish on slider's head
01:22:189 (4) - remove clap
01:24:252 (5) - add clap
01:24:814 (2) - remove finish
01:25:002 (3) - add clap
01:25:752 (1) - add finish
01:30:252 (1) - and 01:31:002 (1) - will be better to add clap instead of finish
01:32:877 (1) - add clap
01:36:627 (4) - ^
01:39:627 (3) - ^
01:41:877 (2) - ^
01:44:877 (2) - add clap from N:C1
01:49:752 (1) - add whistle on slider's head
01:50:127 (2) - add whistle on slider's head and end
01:50:689 (1) - ^
01:51:064 (2) - ^
01:51:627 (1) - ^
01:52:189 - , 01:52:377 - and 01:52:564 (4) - add whistle
01:52:752 (1,2,3,1) - make the same whistle melody ^
01:54:252 (1,2) - and 01:54:814 (2,1,2,1,2) - add whistle on sliders' heads.
02:11:502 (1) - add clap
02:12:252 (1,2,3,4) - ^
02:28:377 (3) - ^
02:34:939 (2,3) - remove claps
02:35:689 (2,3) - ^
02:36:064 (5) - remove finish
02:40:002 (4) - remove clap
02:42:064 - ^
02:54:252 (1) - add clap instead of finish?
02:55:002 (1) - ^
02:55:752 (1) - add clap
02:56:502 (1) - ^
02:57:252 (1) - ^
03:01:752 (1) - remove clap
03:02:877 (1) - remove finish
03:03:252 (1) - add clap
03:16:002 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - sounds like clap spam, try to make smth more interesting.
03:27:252 (3) - add whistle on slider's head
03:28:752 (3) - ^
03:30:252 (6) - ^
03:31:752 (3) - ^
03:32:502 (2) - ^
03:33:252 (6) - ^
03:34:752 (2) - ^
03:36:252 (6) - ^
03:37:752 (2) - ^

OKay, I hope it will be useful for you. Good luck~

lit120 wrote:

yes i'm late .-.

[how2capital&how2noncapital]

1. 00:01:752 (1) - why 1/4 slider? it's kinda like overmap on that blue tick there due to a note is not present there k
2. 00:04:189 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3) - this looks wrong... try this http://puu.sh/ud6Qo/b72eb2f6ea.jpg k
3. 00:19:002 (1,2,3) - why is this look weird for its visual...? could have set a little gap jump there at least
4. 00:22:002 (1,2,3) - ^ fixed
5. 00:26:689 (2) - missing tail hitsound fixed
6. 01:28:752 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5) - these stream patterns' flow are really weird to play here. it's like curving all the way to the slider, but yeah, it's weird it is meant to flow weird
7. 01:40:002 (1) - kinda like confusing to find its number of repeated sliders, so use 2 1/2 sliders instead .-. fixed
8. 01:49:752 - 01:58:752 - idk how2say this, but the sliders are touching on tails there, which is likely as overlap slider there sry but idk wut u mean
9. 02:15:252 (1,2) - pls fix them by manually stacking them
10. 02:18:252 (1,2,3) - again
11. 02:21:252 (1,2,3) - ^ k
12. 02:32:595 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,1,2,3) - it feels like the streams here are circling around. was expecting something different like different stream view like this for example http://puu.sh/ud8uP/ce0d5fee62.jpg nah
13. 02:38:502 (1) - 2 beats there on 1/2. better to have a 1/4 slider + mute the end than 3/4 slider fixed
14. 02:54:252 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1) - that stream flow is rly weird again intened
15. 02:59:877 (3,4,5,6,1) - i'd make a proper zigzag stream neatly or a line or a curve one if i were you nah
16. 03:13:752 (1) - this one instead of having a lot of repeat sliders http://puu.sh/ud8Io/7a4e8d55d7.jpg done
17. 03:19:002 (5,1,2) - just go with 3/4 slider there rather than leaving a note only .-. fixed
18. 03:21:252 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - every slider's speed changes --> NC it at all times but they appear in pairs, so i don't think they rly happen to confuse anyone
19. 03:27:252 (3) - NC, 03:27:533 (1) - remove NC fixed
20. 03:27:252 - 03:39:252 - the way how you play the NC is really strange and it doesn't fit to its guitar strum as its emphasize or its vocal, so try this one as the example http://puu.sh/ud8U2/2fc7bb2397.jpg rests are still the same all fixed
21. 03:54:252 (1,2,3,1,2,1) - pls don't do this. it's really unreadable a lot here k
22. 04:02:877 (4,5,1) - the flow and its emphasize are rly weird slightly adjust those sliders placement
23. 04:06:252 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - don't do this. this ain't gonna work out really good here rearranged a little bit
24. 04:07:658 (4) - why would u end it on blue tick? change that 1/4 slider into 2 notes for the stream note emphasize pls white tick has no sound but i agree it should be a circle there
25. 04:10:002 (1) - yes same reason here
26. 04:13:002 (2) - it's fine to do this instead http://puu.sh/ud94t/e1a9f536a9.jpg kk
27. 04:18:439 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,1) - why do i feel like something ain't right about this... check again on 25% playback rate for its rhythm. it doesn't really play and suit well on its visual play and the way how it works about its rhythm choice of yours yea remapped this part
28. 04:24:627 (2,3,4,5,1) - why would u give a huge stream gap on (1)? fixed
29. 04:34:377 (1,2) - why a huge gap here? this doesn't make any sense for its emphasize loud beat here ??????
30. 04:44:314 (1,2,3,4,5) - this doesn't play well on its 1/2 spacing for those 1/4 sliders fixed
31. 04:48:064 - 04:50:877 - why didn't u add any clap hitsound here? fixed
32. 04:48:064 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - this doesn't look really good here. try this one instead. it fits well ya know http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7385596 (oh, include that note on that blue note) nah i prefer the current version
33. 04:52:002 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,1,2,3) - the only correct note to use http://puu.sh/ud9tD/80199c85d3.jpg i was mapping those snippets of the vocal
34. 05:01:752 (1) - use soft hitsound done
35. 05:03:064 (1) - finish for emphasize beat k

somehow, those 1/4 slider play are really weird based on its spacing and its view. stream flows are kinda weird though and the NC choice is kinda like a bit of random .-.

1. 00:04:189 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1) - when i looked it, i feel unpolished shape here, cuz i suppose you just hand-made stream without function of editor.
2. 00:10:752 (1,2,3) - i think it's improvable flow, if you put (3) x273, y52. you may understand suggestion what i say.
3. 00:33:814 (1,1) - ^
4. 00:10:189 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1) - so huge DS and so complex shape for relax section.
5. 00:13:752 (1) - actually unsnapped
6. 00:13:752 (1,1,1) - you tried some new partten in here, but it's lack of motivation for that, imo.
   special partten should be use more appropriate with basis.
7. 00:13:845 - overmapped imo, reconsider to change remove this rhythm.
8. 00:25:283 (1,6) - swap NC, new section started at here 00:25:752 -
9. 00:28:377 (1) - idk why suddenly increase sv at here, because music still relax at here.
10. 00:34:939 (3,1) - avoid ambiguous overlap for visual.
11. 00:47:877 (7,2) - ^
12. 01:20:877 (5,1) - ^
13. 00:37:658 (1,2) - swap nc
14. 00:38:502 (1) - remove nc
15. 00:39:439 (5,6,1) - this flow don't looks so good, imo.
16. 00:58:752 (1,2,3) - ^, At base flow, circle-flow is more fluid, i think.
17. 01:12:627 (3) - aa, recommend slider art here. too simple for me.
18. 01:08:970 (2) - overmapped, if you want to use rhythm, then make slience hitsound in here.
19. 01:10:470 (1) - ^
20. 01:13:377 (1,2,3,4,5) - 1/4 rhythm train doesn't cool, expect special situation.
    btw,it's not special situation, imo.
21. 01:16:752 (1) - i wish you don't use sv changing, expect really slow or long vocal.
22. 01:20:127 (2,3) - extreamly huge jump
23. 01:22:189 (4,5) - increase DS as strong beat at (5)
24. 01:22:939 (2) - idk why you use repeat slider in here only. if you want to keep, then 01:23:502 (4,5) - too.
25. 01:24:252 (5) - overmapped
26. 01:25:189 (4,1) - this stacking killing movement imo. because (1) pretty strong beat.
    at strong beat + changing section, recommend to use others, instead of stacking
27. 01:25:752 (1,2) - increase DS plz, suddenly tiny DS, doesn't make sense for player, as compare with other jumpy basic partten.
28. 01:27:064 (1,2,3) - kinda weird for playing, as they placed so claggy.
29. 01:29:408 (5,1) - pretty dirrerent DS with 01:29:408 (5,5,1) - , break consistent.
30. 01:36:627 (4,1) - just unrankable, which circle covering reverse arrow.
31. 01:36:814 (1,1) - so huge jump imo. as anti-flow.
32. etc....

• [CoMMUNICATIoN]

1. 00:14:783 (4,5) - stacking here seems pretty inconsistent, would rather spaced like 00:14:408 (4,1) - or just make consist spacing stream
2. 00:15:439 - 00:15:814 - decreased the spacing here can express better to the music
3. 00:25:284 - y used x0.6 spacing here but x0.7 with others stream
4. 00:35:877 (4,1) - sound here deserved more spacing for emphasis
5. 00:41:877 (2,3) - how abut make them the same shape, would be nicer
6. 01:24:158 (4,5) - 01:30:158 (5,1) - same as 00:14:783 (4,5) -
7. 01:33:627 (1,2) - dont rly prefer this slider shape. normal slider would be fine
8. 01:44:127 (4) - NC for consistency
9. 01:58:752 - sound is rly intense here, should be clickable
10. 02:01:939 (2) - flow would be better ig move to 272 92
11. 02:03:627 (3,1) - the sound at 1 deserved more spacing then 3
12. 02:09:814 (3,4) - same as above
13. 03:20:127 (3) - NC here instead since the 1/1 gap
14. 03:29:783 (1) - 03:32:783 (1) - shouldnt NC here for consistency
15. 04:50:877 (1) - unnecessary NC

SnowNiNo_ wrote:

M4M

• [CoMMUNICATIoN]

1. 00:14:783 (4,5) - stacking here seems pretty inconsistent, would rather spaced like 00:14:408 (4,1) - or just make consist spacing stream done
2. 00:15:439 - 00:15:814 - decreased the spacing here can express better to the music i got what u mean but nah
3. 00:25:284 - y used x0.6 spacing here but x0.7 with others stream cuz it's approaching the calm section
4. 00:35:877 (4,1) - sound here deserved more spacing for emphasis true, fixed
5. 00:41:877 (2,3) - how abut make them the same shape, would be nicer k done
6. 01:24:158 (4,5) - 01:30:158 (5,1) - same as 00:14:783 (4,5) - cuz the sound here is rather weak so stacking does make sense
7. 01:33:627 (1,2) - dont rly prefer this slider shape. normal slider would be fine slightly changed the shape
8. 01:44:127 (4) - NC for consistency fixed
9. 01:58:752 - sound is rly intense here, should be clickable k done
10. 02:01:939 (2) - flow would be better ig move to 272 92 done
11. 02:03:627 (3,1) - the sound at 1 deserved more spacing then 3 changed
12. 02:09:814 (3,4) - same as above
13. 03:20:127 (3) - NC here instead since the 1/1 gap fixed
14. 03:29:783 (1) - 03:32:783 (1) - shouldnt NC here for consistency fixed
15. 04:50:877 (1) - unnecessary NC fixed

• 
  [CoMMUNICATIoN]

1. 00:11:127 (3,4,5) - This is very confusing
   If it is me,(5)I use NC because a strong sound is here.
2. 00:13:752 (1,2) - Why DS0.57?
3. 00:14:783 (4,1) - This flow is not good
   
   image

   
4. 00:16:658 (6,1,2,3,4,5) - It looks like it was very coarse
   
   This method is very easy for aim

   
5. 00:18:439 (5,6) - Since the sound has changed from here, it is better to distinguish it from the slider than the stream
6. 00:23:690 (4) - Add NC
7. 01:24:252 (5) - Why stack?
8. 02:37:752 (1,1,1,2) - I appreciate this highly!
   But the placement is bad
   
   suggest

   
9. 04:19:939 (7) - It is very confusing if it is a stack
   

1. Romanised Artist should be "PinocchioP" according the official video.
   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NOBfKvcWTcg
2. Artist should be "ピノキオピー"
   
   http://pinocchiop.com/
3. What is "ピノキオp様" in Tags ? I think "様" is not necessary for name.

1. 00:34:939 (3) - Flow suggestion : try to make a right handed flow by using ctrl + g like this
   
   SPOILER

   
2. 00:49:002 (5,1) - I feel it's not good flow for next sliders 00:49:377 (1,2,3,4) - , How about this ? 00:49:002 (5) - copied from your slider at here 00:47:877 (7) -
   
   SPOILER

   
3. 00:58:752 - How about using soft sound from here ? It would fit the music!
4. 01:13:752 (2) - add a new combo from here ? since kiai time is started also you added a new combo other part at here 01:25:752 (1) -
5. 01:30:252 (1) - The stack is bad for playing, i prefer to use a distance about x1.00 same as here 01:29:502 (1,2,3,4,5) -.
6. 01:48:814 (1) - same 00:58:752 -
7. 02:48:627 (4,5,6) - suggest to make a jump by using these objects. It would be better for playing.
   
   SPOILER

   
8. 04:40:939 (4,5,6) - ,04:41:314 (7,8,9) - ,04:41:689 (10,11,12) - add a new combo to these like here 05:00:439 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - ?

alacat wrote:

hi from my queue

[General]

1. Romanised Artist should be "PinocchioP" according the official video.
   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NOBfKvcWTcg
2. Artist should be "ピノキオピー"
   
   http://pinocchiop.com/
3. What is "ピノキオp様" in Tags ? I think "様" is not necessary for name.

[CoMMUNICATIoN]

1. 00:34:939 (3) - Flow suggestion : try to make a right handed flow by using ctrl + g like this
   
   SPOILER

   
2. 00:49:002 (5,1) - I feel it's not good flow for next sliders 00:49:377 (1,2,3,4) - , How about this ? 00:49:002 (5) - copied from your slider at here 00:47:877 (7) -
   
   SPOILER

   
3. 00:58:752 - How about using soft sound from here ? It would fit the music!
4. 01:13:752 (2) - add a new combo from here ? since kiai time is started also you added a new combo other part at here 01:25:752 (1) -
5. 01:30:252 (1) - The stack is bad for playing, i prefer to use a distance about x1.00 same as here 01:29:502 (1,2,3,4,5) -.
6. 01:48:814 (1) - same 00:58:752 -
7. 02:48:627 (4,5,6) - suggest to make a jump by using these objects. It would be better for playing.
   
   SPOILER

   
8. 04:40:939 (4,5,6) - ,04:41:314 (7,8,9) - ,04:41:689 (10,11,12) - add a new combo to these like here 05:00:439 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - ?

Good luck

Fixed all. Thank you so much