Mir wrote:

Some suggestions. (haha i lied i ended up modding the whole damn thing cuz I love this map)

curse you bonsai for making me find this

[ General]

1. You have two unsnapped slider ends 00:37:413 (2) - 04:38:328 (2) - easiest way to fix this is just remove a reverse. Sound is so fast no player would notice. yeah, will do
   
2. 00:53:841 - Two green points with different volume settings exist here. One should be removed.

yep

[ Striking Fire From The Heart of Man]

1. 00:55:286 (1) - This doesn't seem to get very much emphasis aside from an NC so maybe have the direction change here instead of at 00:55:376 (2,3) - ? done
   
2. 02:06:337 (1,2) - Spacing seems extremely low for such an intense set of sounds. Perhaps try 3x? // 02:09:228 (1,2) - 01:50:441 (1,2) -
   
3. 02:11:668 (1,1) - Uhh, is this intentional? xD If so I don't see a need for it personally, at least for 02:11:668 (1). i think it looks fine but i can see it not fitting with the rest of the map
   
4. 02:26:393 (1) - Finish intentional? Doesn't seem to happen at 02:29:307 (1). Perhaps change to a whistle instead. Finishes don't seem to fit the song very much. it's not intentional
   
5. 02:58:050 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - I think these are the highest intensity jumps in the map but at 01:18:558 they don't reach nearly this level of spacing. Maybe nerf these a bit? slightly nerfed (they were actually the easiest jumps to hit because vertical 1-2-1-2 lol
   
6. 02:59:513 (1) - This is a pretty awkward angle to come into, maybe ctrl+g this? Especially considering the next note is under the reverse. If the 2 were above it it would be okay imo. i like the angle
   
7. 03:36:915 (4,5) - These stood out to me as kind of unnecessary. In the song there is a background piano that does have constant 1/4 but only blending part of it into the layer you're mapping to feels kind of weird. I think you can remove this or if you really want to keep notes here add a kickslider instead? // 03:37:472 (2,3) - i really don''t want to ignore that 1/4 but i can use a kickslider instead
   
8. 04:37:268 (1,1) - This increase of SV feels very sudden and might be a bit surprising to players. Maybe try to lower the SV of 04:38:859 (1) - a bit more?i can see where you're coming from
   
9. 05:04:740 (1,2,1) - If this DS is intentional it looks kind of out of place, could you possibly make it the same ds as the rest of the stream? yeah i like that better too
   
10. 05:17:940 (1,2) - I understand the progression but 1 is way weaker than 2, and making them stacked gives them both the same emphasis. I think what might work is if you instead stacked 05:17:760 (7,1) - slightly off like so: http://i.imgur.com/HcQCE4z.png or by just unstacking them and using regular spacing emphasis because what you have now kind of threw me off. The stack anyways forces a stop in movement which is very weird when it only happens on the first set of two and not on the rest, you know? i totally misheard this and mistook the 1 for being strong, i will use regular spacing emphasis
    
11. 05:32:263 (1,2) - This also caught my ear as the 2 isn't very audible in the song, in fact I'd dare to say it doesn't exist and is just a continuation of the background piano. In which case I'd recommend removing it and extending the 1 instead to cover that note. alright
    
12. 06:13:611 (4,1) - Spacing increase felt a little too underwhelming when the song picks up much faster. Perhaps space 06:13:521 (3,4,1,2,3,4) - slightly im all for buffing things <3, i also buffed 06:16:593 (1) - more? Could be said for all the streams here, they felt a little bit weak compared to what the song is doing. You're definitely not afraid of going bonkers like 06:23:095 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - so a little buff wouldn't hurt, right?
    
13. 06:32:714 (1,1,1) - How about, to go with the decrease in pitch, you do something like this: http://i.imgur.com/ZAuFVCK.jpg might be a cool effect considering the downwards spiral has to do with pitch as well (and is pretty damn cool). i like that a lot
    
14. 06:47:882 (3) - This slider whistle is probably a mistake. yes
    
15. 06:54:770 (1,1) - Might do nicely with a lot more spacing because for me the song is calling for a lot of emphasis on these notes, but the player doesn't really need to move much to hit them.

alright

Almost there! Keep going! Good luck! thanks <3

Bonsai wrote:

ok here's the timing-fix! :3

..

jk lol, that's how converting the MIDI into osu! ends up like and it's completely bonkers and doesn't help fixing the timing a single bit because it's so fucked up

not relevant or anything, just wanted to share it bc it's so fun
(shoutout to Dudehacker for converting that)

1. Artist should be the creator of the MIDI, which is "Bernd Krueger"
2. The most 'beautiful' version that I found for the Title is the one you get from opening the original MIDI-file from the website which is "Sonata No.14 in cis-Moll, Op. 27/2 - 3. Satz" - This is pretty much the most common way to cite classical pieces in german (the creator is german), all the other versions you get by looking at the website ("Sonata No. 14 C# minor (Moonlight) , Opus 27/2 (1801) 3. Movement") / downloading the mp3 ("Beethoven: Moonlight 3rd movement") / whatever are all somewhat ugly so I'd recommend to just use this one.

I wrote:

while I procrastinate for another month

Bonsai wrote:

I wrote:

while I procrastinate for another month

IT ONLY TOOK ME 29 DAYS AHAHAHA

hmu concerning cutting the intro-silence / finding the right offset afterwards

oh also I'ma steal Oko's star bc I was here first
ätschbätsch

1. 00:05:606 (1,2) - This jump seems very low compared to all the other ones, why not move (2) more to the right?
2. 00:27:296 (1,2) versus 00:24:407 (1,2) seems random too, I find the low spacing quite fitting here but whatever you want, just not so different from each other, assuming that there's no particular reason for that ^^
3. 00:30:579 - Kinda a matter of taste, but I personally dislike the fact that you basically NC'd every object in this section, it completely removes the musical.. line, emphasis.. idk words, but I feel like just NCing every measure would be more fitting
   Also you decided to barely do that at 03:24:094 so :psy:
4. 00:36:975 - For this section I think I suggested unstacking the different harmonies/measures multiple times in irc but you never responded, idk, did you understand what I meant? Do you dislike it? Bc I dislike how the note-placement completely ignores all the changes in the harmony and makes it into one long stagnant pattern, I don't find that to be very fitting tbh
   
5. 00:16:635 (1) - Why do you start putting the Whistles on these sliderheads here? You didn't do it at 00:13:672 (1) either, I kinda find it weird to change the use from offbeats to onbeats, and if you leave them out here too it would build a stronger contrast to 00:17:746 (1)
6. 00:42:929 (2,4,6) - You set drum-hitnormals for those but didn't for 00:44:747 (2,4,6) -, idc which way you prefer but it being inconsistent feels weird to me
7. 00:43:384 (5) - 00:46:293 (5) - Just a personal suggestion, I feel like NCs would fit quite well here!
8. 00:45:929 (3,4) - No good mod without a bit of nazi'ing, those two are spaced a little too low for a follow-point to appear, which appears between all the other objects of the combo
9. 00:48:111 (5,1) - I realize you spaced this so low to have the slider perfectly go through the circle, but tbh I don't find that to be looking any better or any worse than spacing it normally and having it overlap, imo the sound on (1) is "radical" enough for it to "justify" an overlap like that, but it really deserves more emphasis imo
10. Also I think you messed up your Kiais here lol, like, here the strong note at 00:48:475 isn't Kiai but the following quiet stream is Kiai, whereas at 00:54:666 the strong note is Kiai and then ends at the next measure lol, I feel like using the second version at the first spot too would make most sense
    Also I feel like it would be more fitting to start the next Kiai at 01:00:053 bc that's kinda the climax of the phrase, and also the map is actually changing something there, putting more emphasis on that note by making it a hold-slider, whereas 00:58:617 is just continuing the stream but making it less intense which seems contradictive to KiaiTime xd
11. 00:53:152 - I don't find the Clap here very fitting because that's not the same sort of note like those that have been Clapped on before
12. 00:55:742 (5) - I very much like that you only use NCs on the strong notes here, but if you do it that way here I feel like you should also not NC 00:49:543 (1) - 00:50:260 (1) - 00:50:983 (1) -, and not NC at 00:58:976 (1,1,1) at all either
    
13. 01:18:859 (1,1) - NCing here destroys the consistency with the combo at 01:08:826 (1) and also keeps you from highlighting 01:20:685 (2) with an NC which it would very much deserve imo, so I'd suggest not to NC those but the (2) instead. You didn't do it at 02:55:415 (4) anyways so that's just inconsistent hehe
14. 01:25:371 (1) - 01:28:693 (1) - I don't find NCs like these necessary bc again I feel like it destroys the musical pattern, do you?
15. 01:33:659 (1,2) - 01:34:059 (1,2) - 01:34:459 (1,2) - 01:34:848 (1,2) - Why do you space these out so much when you stop doing that at 01:35:238 -? imo since those first notes are generally quieter they should be spaced that low too
16. 02:08:531 - There's no note on the sliderhead here, should just be a circle on the 1/8-tick
17. 02:36:625 - Why did you lower the volume so much to here? Seems very weird when you did it completely different at 01:00:053 -, those sections sound completely the same to me but give completely different feedback
18. 02:45:376 (1,2,3) - This looks really weird to me, visual spacing of (1,3) is really cramped and doesn't really fit to the rest of the patterns in these sections, seems more like a I-had-to-fix-something-and-make-up-for-different-placement tbh lol
19. 03:07:421 (1) - If you put the funky green into the NC-mix here, why not at 01:30:871 (1) too? looks kinda boring there anyways, also the following ones too ofc
    Haha I just realized that all those NC-suggestions/-changes are gonna need you to re-colorhax everything xddd sorry
20. 03:12:925 (1,1,2,3,1) - uuuh since you forced so much variation in that previous pattern-section already I feel like having 03:13:292 (1) - be a slider is really out of place bc it's not special at all anymore, I'd rather suggest to make it like this so that there's some more recognizable difference between these two sections
    Also I just noticed that the timing isn't smooth here which seems stupid to me, my bad, just make 03:12:552 be 162,0 bpm; I'll most likely have to rebubble anything so this doesn't matter anymore either but makes it more accable in case you decide to apply the point I just made
21. 03:27:150 (1) - Why aren't you splitting this slider into 1/1+circle like the previous ones anymore? o:
22. Another thing I mentioned in irc already but you didn't respond, why do you leave out notes from the main-melody-line like 03:31:233 but randomly map some of the perma-background-1/4s like 03:31:638 -? Also your NCing in this section seems completely random so maybe try to bring structure into that too, tho I guess that's hard without bringing structure into the 1/4s first
23. 03:48:669 (3) - 03:50:244 (3) - Again I feel like NCs on these would fit very nicely for strong and equal emphasis on equally strong notes, and not having any on 03:51:036 (5) seems out of place anyways
24. 03:53:542 (2,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2) - uhmm I can kinda see what the reason for the NCing here is, but just let me tell you that it seems messy as fuck so I'd really recommend to make it a bit more.. logical, like, 03:53:728 (1,2,3,1,2,3) being two 3-object-combos in a musical pattern that only consists of groups of 4 does not fit at all, I guess it would already feel a lot more fitting if you simply don't NC 03:53:728 bc there's really no reason at all for that, and with that not being NCd everything else seems a bit more reasonable
25. 04:04:528 (1) - 04:05:344 (1) - Those being NCd doesn't seem very fitting to me, especially after 04:02:894 (1,2,3) being in one combo too
26. 04:47:213 - seems like the volume here is 10% too high on accident
27. 05:26:379 (2,1) - wth lol, I do see that that blue tick is much louder than the white tick for some reason but really this is weird as fuck and if you just map it normally the hitsounds are much too loud to notice that anyways so I'd suggest mapping it normally xd
28. 05:28:378 (1,2,3) - :thinkgin.. (it's 3, the blanket looks very off)
29. 05:35:570 (1,1,2,3,1,1) - Same issue as before but pointing it out again to make sure, you see, even visually this bundles 05:35:831 (3,1) together but seperates 05:35:919 (1,1) which is the exact opposite of what's happening in the music, I understand that you wanna emphasize 05:35:657 (1,2,3) more than the previous notes, but I strongly recommend to try finding another way to do that that still allows you to seperate these combos/sections fittingly
30. 05:45:824 - You 5%-ed other overmapped tails like this before, why not this one too?
31. 05:47:800 (6) - Shouldn't this be NC'd and in the not-so-fresh green? xd
32. 05:50:451 - NCing in this section is all over the place, like why is 05:54:285 (1) NC'd and why not 05:55:087 (3) but why 05:55:491 (1) - blabla, just try to bring some more structure into it yourself, also I don't feel like it's necessary to NC 05:52:402 (1,1) but whatever
33. 05:57:788 - I didn't double-check but I feel like everytime this section occurs you found a different way to NC it lol
34. 06:03:683 (2) - Feels weird to not put a Whistle on this when it's emphasized just as much as the other notes, I'd rather break the hitsounding-pattern in order to match the gameplay tbh
35. 06:19:154 (1,1,2,1) - Not 100% sure about this but I feel like this will be more playable if you let these reverse five times instead of using circles, like, it doesn't really change how it will be read because someone who would misread the five reverses as four would also misread the four reverses as three; Since the speed of those reverses is higher anyways I think players are less likely to focus on the amount of reverses but simply on the time-gap to the next clickable note, which is shorter when you insert those circles, while it stays the same when jsut using five reverses (bc the rhythm is actually accurate 1/5s to the same BPM)
36. 06:22:113 (1,1,1,1,1,1,1) - (and a few more 1s) - I don't really get what your Clap-structure is here, I'd just go for always putting Claps on either the first or the second note of the big intervals, so either of 06:23:070 (1,1) and 06:23:896 (1,1) and 06:25:344 (1,1) and 06:25:857 (1,1) and 06:26:456 (1,1) and 06:26:862 (1,1) and 06:27:221 (1,1) - Personally it seems like musically the accentuation is more on the low/first ones of the two, but if you place them on the high/last of the two then you end this pattern with a Clap which might be something you like, so idc ^^
37. 06:45:619 (1,1) - not really important so feel free to ignore: Related to some previous point, here the two (1)s are visually more separated than 06:45:526 (4,1) which is kinda not what's really happening in the music ofc, so maybe not putting that jump between the (1)s and instead just DSing regularly would be cool for you, but I can't recall if that would apply to more streams that just this final one (it probably does), so that's why you can freely ignore it if it does
38. 06:49:403 (1,1) - Highly personal-taste-suggestion again but I feel like it would fit to place these on the borders of the playfield for maximum emphasis ^^

1. Oko apparently gave you an improper blank hitsound-file lol, here's a proper one
2. A few red lines and green lines on the same spot have conflicting settings:
   1. 01:00:053 (kiai)
   2. 04:06:676 (volume level)
   3. 04:55:591 (kiai)
3. These green lines aren't snapped properly, some of them being too late so they don't give the desired effect for the right note so they might actually matter I guess
   
   1. 01:09:011
   2. 03:51:827
   3. 05:30:455
   4. 06:17:722
   5. 06:18:079
   6. 06:18:436
   7. 06:39:213

Bonsai wrote:

So for the last few days I was considering whether to actually mod this on my regular level of detail or just say fuck it and qualify, sadly here I am with a wall of text lol

Since most sections of the song occur multiple times, the points I raise apply to those repeated section too more often than not, I just didn't mention them bc (hopefully) you have more orientation in this map than I do
(pls don't feel demotivated xdd)

1. 00:05:606 (1,2) - This jump seems very low compared to all the other ones, why not move (2) more to the right? ok
2. 00:27:296 (1,2) versus 00:24:407 (1,2) seems random too, I find the low spacing quite fitting here but whatever you want, just not so different from each other, assuming that there's no particular reason for that ^^ spaced 00:24:407 (1,2) out a bit because it doesnt break flow
3. 00:30:579 - Kinda a matter of taste, but I personally dislike the fact that you basically NC'd every object in this section, it completely removes the musical.. line, emphasis.. idk words, but I feel like just NCing every measure would be more fitting i did it because of slider velocity changes and colorhax, ill do the same on the part you mentioned to keep it consistent
   Also you decided to barely do that at 03:24:094 so :psy:
4. 00:36:975 - For this section I think I suggested unstacking the different harmonies/measures multiple times in irc but you never responded, idk, did you understand what I meant? Do you dislike it? Bc I dislike how the note-placement completely ignores all the changes in the harmony and makes it into one long stagnant pattern, I don't find that to be very fitting tbh 00:37:891 (2,3) - 00:38:258 (4,5) - i feel like i want to emphasise these a bit more now that you mention. I dont really notice too big of a difference though
   
   
5. 00:16:635 (1) - Why do you start putting the Whistles on these sliderheads here? You didn't do it at 00:13:672 (1) either, I kinda find it weird to change the use from offbeats to onbeats, and if you leave them out here too it would build a stronger contrast to 00:17:746 (1) alright
   
   
   WILL CONTINUE APPLYING LATER
   
6. 00:42:929 (2,4,6) - You set drum-hitnormals for those but didn't for 00:44:747 (2,4,6) -, idc which way you prefer but it being inconsistent feels weird to me done
7. 00:43:384 (5) - 00:46:293 (5) - Just a personal suggestion, I feel like NCs would fit quite well here! ok
8. 00:45:929 (3,4) - No good mod without a bit of nazi'ing, those two are spaced a little too low for a follow-point to appear, which appears between all the other objects of the combo yes
9. 00:48:111 (5,1) - I realize you spaced this so low to have the slider perfectly go through the circle, but tbh I don't find that to be looking any better or any worse than spacing it normally and having it overlap, imo the sound on (1) is "radical" enough for it to "justify" an overlap like that, but it really deserves more emphasis imo changed curve a bit
10. Also I think you messed up your Kiais here lol, like, here the strong note at 00:48:475 isn't Kiai but the following quiet stream is Kiai, whereas at 00:54:666 the strong note is Kiai and then ends at the next measure lol, I feel like using the second version at the first spot too would make most sense
    Also I feel like it would be more fitting to start the next Kiai at 01:00:053 bc that's kinda the climax of the phrase, and also the map is actually changing something there, putting more emphasis on that note by making it a hold-slider, whereas 00:58:617 is just continuing the stream but making it less intense which seems contradictive to KiaiTime xd this was all just a blunder, nice pointing it out
11. 00:53:152 - I don't find the Clap here very fitting because that's not the same sort of note like those that have been Clapped on before alright
12. 00:55:742 (5) - I very much like that you only use NCs on the strong notes here, but if you do it that way here I feel like you should also not NC 00:49:543 (1) - 00:50:260 (1) - 00:50:983 (1) -, and not NC at 00:58:976 (1,1,1) at all either i like this
    
13. 01:18:859 (1,1) - NCing here destroys the consistency with the combo at 01:08:826 (1) and also keeps you from highlighting 01:20:685 (2) with an NC which it would very much deserve imo, so I'd suggest not to NC those but the (2) instead. You didn't do it at 02:55:415 (4) anyways so that's just inconsistent hehe blunder again, nice
14. 01:25:371 (1) - 01:28:693 (1) - I don't find NCs like these necessary bc again I feel like it destroys the musical pattern, do you? the point is to make the drastic SV change from 01:25:067 (1) - more readable and i think it does just that so ill leave it as is
15. 01:33:659 (1,2) - 01:34:059 (1,2) - 01:34:459 (1,2) - 01:34:848 (1,2) - Why do you space these out so much when you stop doing that at 01:35:238 -? imo since those first notes are generally quieter they should be spaced that low too spaced the second part out more to keep consistency
16. 02:08:531 - There's no note on the sliderhead here, should just be a circle on the 1/8-tick
17. 02:36:625 - Why did you lower the volume so much to here? Seems very weird when you did it completely different at 01:00:053 -, those sections sound completely the same to me but give completely different feedback blunder again
18. 02:45:376 (1,2,3) - This looks really weird to me, visual spacing of (1,3) is really cramped and doesn't really fit to the rest of the patterns in these sections, seems more like a I-had-to-fix-something-and-make-up-for-different-placement tbh lol i think its fine? Doesnt really matter too much imo
19. 03:07:421 (1) - If you put the funky green into the NC-mix here, why not at 01:30:871 (1) too? looks kinda boring there anyways, also the following ones too ofc tbh i havent cared about any other color than red being on only 1/6, 1/8 and 1/12 that i havent even noticed
    Haha I just realized that all those NC-suggestions/-changes are gonna need you to re-colorhax everything xddd sorry
20. 03:12:925 (1,1,2,3,1) - uuuh since you forced so much variation in that previous pattern-section already I feel like having 03:13:292 (1) - be a slider is really out of place bc it's not special at all anymore, I'd rather suggest to make it like this so that there's some more recognizable difference between these two sections i think this is ok
    Also I just noticed that the timing isn't smooth here which seems stupid to me, my bad, just make 03:12:552 be 162,0 bpm; I'll most likely have to rebubble anything so this doesn't matter anymore either but makes it more accable in case you decide to apply the point I just made alright
21. 03:27:150 (1) - Why aren't you splitting this slider into 1/1+circle like the previous ones anymore? o: idk but fixed
22. Another thing I mentioned in irc already but you didn't respond, why do you leave out notes from the main-melody-line like 03:31:233 but randomly map some of the perma-background-1/4s like 03:31:638 -? Also your NCing in this section seems completely random so maybe try to bring structure into that too, tho I guess that's hard without bringing structure into the 1/4s first fixing it up a bit
23. 03:48:669 (3) - 03:50:244 (3) - Again I feel like NCs on these would fit very nicely for strong and equal emphasis on equally strong notes, and not having any on 03:51:036 (5) seems out of place anyways nced all 3
24. 03:53:542 (2,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2) - uhmm I can kinda see what the reason for the NCing here is, but just let me tell you that it seems messy as fuck so I'd really recommend to make it a bit more.. logical, like, 03:53:728 (1,2,3,1,2,3) being two 3-object-combos in a musical pattern that only consists of groups of 4 does not fit at all, I guess it would already feel a lot more fitting if you simply don't NC 03:53:728 bc there's really no reason at all for that, and with that not being NCd everything else seems a bit more reasonable 03:53:542 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1) - did this
25. 04:04:528 (1) - 04:05:344 (1) - Those being NCd doesn't seem very fitting to me, especially after 04:02:894 (1,2,3) being in one combo tooagree
26. 04:47:213 - seems like the volume here is 10% too high on accident yep
27. 05:26:379 (2,1) - wth lol, I do see that that blue tick is much louder than the white tick for some reason but really this is weird as fuck and if you just map it normally the hitsounds are much too loud to notice that anyways so I'd suggest mapping it normally xd since players should be pretty used to bpm changes at this point its probably not going to be hard to read, ill keep this as it fits the song the best
28. 05:28:378 (1,2,3) - :thinkgin.. (it's 3, the blanket looks very off) i have no idea what happened here
29. 05:35:570 (1,1,2,3,1,1) - Same issue as before but pointing it out again to make sure, you see, even visually this bundles 05:35:831 (3,1) together but seperates 05:35:919 (1,1) which is the exact opposite of what's happening in the music, I understand that you wanna emphasize 05:35:657 (1,2,3) more than the previous notes, but I strongly recommend to try finding another way to do that that still allows you to seperate these combos/sections fittingly just gonna remap the parts alltogether, they dont make sense at all anymore
30. 05:45:824 - You 5%-ed other overmapped tails like this before, why not this one too? done
31. 05:47:800 (6) - Shouldn't this be NC'd and in the not-so-fresh green? xd same as above also redoing all of the colorhax cause of this mod
32. 05:50:451 - NCing in this section is all over the place, like why is 05:54:285 (1) NC'd and why not 05:55:087 (3) but why 05:55:491 (1) - blabla, just try to bring some more structure into it yourself, also I don't feel like it's necessary to NC 05:52:402 (1,1) but whatever fixed the sections NC
33. 05:57:788 - I didn't double-check but I feel like everytime this section occurs you found a different way to NC it lol fixed it all when you pointed it out earlier :p
34. 06:03:683 (2) - Feels weird to not put a Whistle on this when it's emphasized just as much as the other notes, I'd rather break the hitsounding-pattern in order to match the gameplay tbh was a mistake
35. 06:19:154 (1,1,2,1) - Not 100% sure about this but I feel like this will be more playable if you let these reverse five times instead of using circles, like, it doesn't really change how it will be read because someone who would misread the five reverses as four would also misread the four reverses as three; Since the speed of those reverses is higher anyways I think players are less likely to focus on the amount of reverses but simply on the time-gap to the next clickable note, which is shorter when you insert those circles, while it stays the same when jsut using five reverses (bc the rhythm is actually accurate 1/5s to the same BPM) i personally think its easier to read as it is even though both suggestions are harder to read, ill just stick with what i have for now
36. 06:22:113 (1,1,1,1,1,1,1) - (and a few more 1s) - I don't really get what your Clap-structure is here, I'd just go for always putting Claps on either the first or the second note of the big intervals, so either of 06:23:070 (1,1) and 06:23:896 (1,1) and 06:25:344 (1,1) and 06:25:857 (1,1) and 06:26:456 (1,1) and 06:26:862 (1,1) and 06:27:221 (1,1) - Personally it seems like musically the accentuation is more on the low/first ones of the two, but if you place them on the high/last of the two then you end this pattern with a Clap which might be something you like, so idc ^^
37. 06:45:619 (1,1) - not really important so feel free to ignore: Related to some previous point, here the two (1)s are visually more separated than 06:45:526 (4,1) which is kinda not what's really happening in the music ofc, so maybe not putting that jump between the (1)s and instead just DSing regularly would be cool for you, but I can't recall if that would apply to more streams that just this final one (it probably does), so that's why you can freely ignore it if it does
38. 06:49:403 (1,1) - Highly personal-taste-suggestion again but I feel like it would fit to place these on the borders of the playfield for maximum emphasis ^^sure

/run

edit: Modding Assistant found a few more things

1. Oko apparently gave you an improper blank hitsound-file lol, here's a proper one
2. A few red lines and green lines on the same spot have conflicting settings:
   1. 01:00:053 (kiai)
   2. 04:06:676 (volume level)
   3. 04:55:591 (kiai)
3. These green lines aren't snapped properly, some of them being too late so they don't give the desired effect for the right note so they might actually matter I guess
   
   1. 01:09:011
   2. 03:51:827
   3. 05:30:455
   4. 06:17:722
   5. 06:18:079
   6. 06:18:436
   7. 06:39:213

I'm so sorry

now i have to colorhax again

Mismagius wrote:

(reference)

Fenza wrote:

what is this