00:14:917 (1,2) - we have our first opportunity to blanket something, this slider end should blanket the 2 slider
00:18:751 (1,2) - blanket here as well
00:24:616 (3,4) - at 00:17:398 (5,6) ds .8 was used, but now ds 1.1 was used in the newest combo, but it feels like there is no change in emphasis, especially considering the following pattern has
lower ds than thew combo following 00:17:398 (5,6)
00:27:323 (4,5) - blanket suggestion
https://puu.sh/rqdZC.jpgyou will have to alter the 6 circle to maintain consistent ds as well
00:29:804 (2,3) - blanket is off
00:32:059 (9) - i think this circle needs to be more emphasized by a higher ds because of the incredibly strong backbeat at this section
00:33:864 (5) - same as above
00:38:375 (3) - another blanket suggestion, you will again have to alter the ds of the note afterwards to maintain consistent ds
https://puu.sh/rqedk.jpg00:40:856 (3,6) - there is actually no sounds here to emphasize, highly recommend removing these (
“Well timed silence has more eloquence than speech.”)
00:45:593 (1,2) - blanket please
00:50:781 (5) - seems like an accident, just fit it into the line, the emphasis is self intuitive by the stream
00:51:909 (3,4,5) - not proper blanket, the slider's curvature is to blame
00:53:714 (7) - meaning of this circle? i see nothing it could be mapped to
00:54:616 (1,2) - blanket by pulling the 1 back
00:58:676 (4,5) - keep at ds 1.2, just blanket it better
01:03:638 (2,3) - what is the purpose of this slider stack, seems really awkward just to look at
01:09:954 (3,4) - why stack the 4, 01:09:052 (1,2) had the same sound and emphasis, and even same hitsound. There's no reason to tuck the note away
01:14:804 - highly reccomend removing 01:14:917 (7) and adding a 1/4 slider to tackle both the dominant backbeat on the blue tick, and maybe hitsound the slider end to also emphasize the voice on the white tick
01:15:368 - start spinner here
01:31:608 (4,5) - blanket
01:39:503 (1,2) - blanket
01:42:435 (2) - again, immense backbeat, emphasize this please, your ds is actually getting lower
01:44:240 (6) - same, at least un-overlap for emphasis
01:47:623 (2) - x192 y164 for proper blanket
01:50:105 (5) - this note doesn't deserve 1.4 emphasis, this one does 01:50:330 (1)
01:54:165 (5) - again unnecessary note
01:57:548 (6) - x252 y192, to blanket
01:59:127 (4,5,6) - I was gonna mod thew blankets and spacing here, but i actually have no idea what rhythm you are following. Please remap this
02:06:120 (6) - x336 y160, to blanket
02:11:082 (2,3) - figure out a compromise to blanket this
02:13:112 (2,3,4) - again, I have no idea what rhythm you are following, why is it mapped this way?
02:24:390 (1,2,3,4,5) - very un-aesthetically pleasing, please make a nicer slider and ctrl+shift+f to make into a well formatted and spaced stream
02:31:157 (2) - why are you stacking such a strong beat, it should be emphasized with ds
02:32:962 (3) - same as above
these two circles would be a great place to utilize your soft-hitclap.wav a little more
02:34:541 (1) - soft-hitclap.wav
02:36:571 (3) - ^, also emphasize with higher ds
02:38:375 (3) - ^
02:39:503 (2) - if you are following the bass rhythm, move this circle to the blue tick right after it, 02:39:616
02:39:277 (1,2,3) - that being said, please normalize the spacing between these 3, as they are a rhythm witch the exact same rhythmic value, and then further emphasize the circle after it
02:41:984 (3) - ^^
02:43:789 (3) - it's almost insulting to hide this under the slider end, after even using 1.6 ds. please fix
02:53:939 (6) - why does this beat exist?
03:04:315 (4,6) - awkward overlap, suggest moving the slider down
03:09:954 (1,2) - blanket these in some way
03:16:496 (1,2) - needs a blanket, and more emphasis, especially with an emphasis hitsound
https://puu.sh/rqgQ9.jpg03:18:074 (4) - remove whistle, seems arbitrary