fuk ur m4m im giving you freemod instead
i deaded rethink because by the time we were done i was so ashamed of my parts that i never uploaded, now that i'm competent i may remap
dude nice map i fucking love the song
it's 1 am i should really sleep i'll leave it at that rethink soon smash that like button be sure to subscribe and may the 4th be with you
i deaded rethink because by the time we were done i was so ashamed of my parts that i never uploaded, now that i'm competent i may remap
dude nice map i fucking love the song
Wrench
00:13:794 (6) - This last slider is a distinctly different sound (a kick rather than a snare) compared to the other notes, you should visually represent it as such.
00:21:294 (1) - This sound is held, I'd recommend making it a 3/4 slider and moving 00:21:567 (2) - accordingly.
00:22:658 (3,3) - These are the only 2 curved sliders for miles, and they don't really look like they fit. I'd recommend either using sharp anchors or straight sliders.
00:36:022 (1,2,3) - The rest of this section has some consistent breaking of flow, so this rather straightforward curve really doesn't fit. 01:02:748 (6,7,8,9,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,1) - this curve disgusts me
01:02:476 - im having a seizure help
01:06:566 (5) - Sharp corners in streams are used for the sake of emphasizing specific beats. Is there anything out of the ordinary, stronger than the previous guitar notes that aren't emphasized, here or in the antecedent sharp corners?
01:07:385 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,1) - These are 2 streams representing very different sounds mapped exactly the same way.
01:14:135 (4) - Is there actually something here? If there is, I cannot hear it.
01:32:612 (6) - Again (these are present throughout the map) this is noticeably held, much unlike the sound on 01:32:885 (7) - represented the exact same way right after it. I'd lengthen this by one tick and move the other slider accordingly.
01:37:385 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - you know, you are a real asshole if you make spaced back and forth stacked 220bpm streams around the end of a map
01:40:521 (4,5,6) - 5 is notably stronger than 6, yet movement to 5 is the same as movement to 6.
01:58:658 (1) - The sudden snap followed by an extreme lowering of movement here needlessly very heavily emphasizes a softer note. Perhaps it could fit just to show the change in the music, but even that is quite vague as it uses the same spacing. I can't wait to see the sliderbreak ragequits here.
Overall: Rhythm is good, spacing emphasis is good, has some questionable points where it represents different sounds in the same way, that's pretty much it. Dank storyboard hurt my eyes.
00:21:294 (1) - This sound is held, I'd recommend making it a 3/4 slider and moving 00:21:567 (2) - accordingly.
00:22:658 (3,3) - These are the only 2 curved sliders for miles, and they don't really look like they fit. I'd recommend either using sharp anchors or straight sliders.
00:36:022 (1,2,3) - The rest of this section has some consistent breaking of flow, so this rather straightforward curve really doesn't fit. 01:02:748 (6,7,8,9,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,1) - this curve disgusts me
01:02:476 - im having a seizure help
01:06:566 (5) - Sharp corners in streams are used for the sake of emphasizing specific beats. Is there anything out of the ordinary, stronger than the previous guitar notes that aren't emphasized, here or in the antecedent sharp corners?
01:07:385 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,1) - These are 2 streams representing very different sounds mapped exactly the same way.
01:14:135 (4) - Is there actually something here? If there is, I cannot hear it.
01:32:612 (6) - Again (these are present throughout the map) this is noticeably held, much unlike the sound on 01:32:885 (7) - represented the exact same way right after it. I'd lengthen this by one tick and move the other slider accordingly.
01:37:385 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - you know, you are a real asshole if you make spaced back and forth stacked 220bpm streams around the end of a map
01:40:521 (4,5,6) - 5 is notably stronger than 6, yet movement to 5 is the same as movement to 6.
01:58:658 (1) - The sudden snap followed by an extreme lowering of movement here needlessly very heavily emphasizes a softer note. Perhaps it could fit just to show the change in the music, but even that is quite vague as it uses the same spacing. I can't wait to see the sliderbreak ragequits here.
Overall: Rhythm is good, spacing emphasis is good, has some questionable points where it represents different sounds in the same way, that's pretty much it. Dank storyboard hurt my eyes.
expert
oh god i have to watch this sb again im a masochist but im too lazy to turn off sb in editor and will forget to turn it back on
00:08:476 (2,3,4,5) - I find it interesting that you place these all perfectly horizontal and vertical relative to each other and then start going ham with crazy distortions around 00:09:294 (2,3,4,5) - . It makes this pattern seem like it just doesn't fit in the map.
00:13:795 (6) - Same issue that topdiff had. Different sound, represented the same way.
00:28:113 (2,3) - Are you sure you want to use these visuals when everything else of this nature is a jump?
00:29:749 (2,3) - aforementioned
00:44:409 (2) - The fact that spacing remains so consistent to the previous pattern leaves much to be desired in telling the player the song is so heavily changing here.
01:03:021 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - Playing this gives me whiplash, it contradicts implied flow so heavily at an extremely high BPM. The movement here is terribly uncomfortable, and I cannot fathom the reason why when the rest of this section isn't nearly as painful.
00:08:476 (2,3,4,5) - I find it interesting that you place these all perfectly horizontal and vertical relative to each other and then start going ham with crazy distortions around 00:09:294 (2,3,4,5) - . It makes this pattern seem like it just doesn't fit in the map.
00:13:795 (6) - Same issue that topdiff had. Different sound, represented the same way.
00:28:113 (2,3) - Are you sure you want to use these visuals when everything else of this nature is a jump?
00:29:749 (2,3) - aforementioned
00:44:409 (2) - The fact that spacing remains so consistent to the previous pattern leaves much to be desired in telling the player the song is so heavily changing here.
01:03:021 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - Playing this gives me whiplash, it contradicts implied flow so heavily at an extremely high BPM. The movement here is terribly uncomfortable, and I cannot fathom the reason why when the rest of this section isn't nearly as painful.
Tragic Love Extra
00:09:294 (2,3,4) - Any particular reason spacing from 3-4 is almost twice spacing from 2-3?
01:33:976 (3,4,5) - This rhythm here is represented consistently in this and higher difficulties with one huge jump to the downbeat and a jump of half of that distance to the next. Here, instead of that, they are nearly the same distance. Why the change?
01:41:067 (6,7,8) - Pretty sure 8 is weaker than 6 and 7, why is movement to it greater than movement to them?
i am getting tired, there's probably a lot more in there
01:33:976 (3,4,5) - This rhythm here is represented consistently in this and higher difficulties with one huge jump to the downbeat and a jump of half of that distance to the next. Here, instead of that, they are nearly the same distance. Why the change?
01:41:067 (6,7,8) - Pretty sure 8 is weaker than 6 and 7, why is movement to it greater than movement to them?
i am getting tired, there's probably a lot more in there
it's 1 am i should really sleep i'll leave it at that rethink soon smash that like button be sure to subscribe and may the 4th be with you