1. Easy (1.33 stars, 87 notes)
2. Kencho's Hard (2.87 stars, 182 notes)
3. konG's Insane (3.81 stars, 222 notes)
4. Normal (1.71 stars, 102 notes)
5. Review (4.27 stars, 234 notes)

Hantsuki wrote:

M4M

Review

00:04:394 (2) - I prefer new combo from this circle Sure
00:26:478 (4) - 00:28:978 (4) - different sv = new combo (it's more clearly, better to read) I think it's same paragraph so I can't NC
00:32:728 (6) - new combo ^
00:54:394 (2,3) -
better to play Sure

Hard

00:00:283 (1,2,3,4,5,6) -
looks better Sure
00:03:978 (7,8,9,10) -
looks alot better ok but, can i put here?

00:38:978 (2) - replace it, it doesn't fit Sure

Normal

Looks great! :DDD

Easy

Change CS3 -> CS2,5: Easy diff cannot have more than 1,5* Sure

00:01:533 (2,3) - Change it, slider is not in good standing, circle is kinda not in the beat Sure
00:21:478 (2) - doesn't fit Sure
00:35:228 (1,2) - stick them together Sure
00:46:478 (2) - doesn't fit, I prefer Sure

Ametrin wrote:

M4M

寫了一大串英文後想起好像中文也行的我宛如一個智障orz

Easy&Normal

挺好的，只是在EZ和NM裏一般都是全程相同DS哦……要rank的話你的EZ和NM間距太豐富了沒問題麼……但是好玩啊XD
看看rank圖的EZ和NM吧
其餘都好 想試試不用DS哈哈

Hard

00:00:283(1,2,3,4,5,6) 三組的形狀和相互之間的間距不一樣啊（強迫症）好我全部打掉重做了
00:04:811(9) flow不太舒服 建議轉-60度後放到280|224wow很棒的位子
00:08:561(3) 也是flow不順我換了個位子了
00:19:811(3) 疊在136|136上修正
01:02:519 雖然這裡音樂沒有音 但我還是建議在這裡補上個note 我想是不用
01:12:728 - 01:21:269 音樂還這麼激烈 就不要空這麼多拍啦……間距或許也要調整下 DT初見打起來有點懵看不出間隔多放幾個note了

Review

00:42:728(1) finishok
00:47:519(3,1) 太近了，重音感覺沒出來 建議1放到350|320 2放到400|176 又是個很棒的位子orz
01:02:728(1) finishok
01:10:019 放個note疊在1上 ok
01:15:019 放個note在504|104 ok
在副歌段不要輕易放空拍 音樂激烈的時候突然一停會有點奇怪 間距控制不好的話DT起來也沒法讀

另外全程無連打啊（個人怨念不要在意 你給我去看看https://osu.ppy.sh/b/954692這首也沒連打

挺好的圖 GOOD LUCK！

_Stan wrote:

M4M yeah~ :3

[Easy]
00:02:754 - 相同的节奏却有着不同的ds 不好吧..

pic

00:03:978 (1) - 这里前后ds不一致哦
00:07:728 (4) - 比如这里 上ds1.4 下ds1.25 没有相同
00:08:978 (1) - 然后这里1.82 扩开太大了吧
00:10:228 (2) - 2.96是绝对不可以的（for ez
00:11:478 (3) - ds
00:16:478 (2) - 一下子ds变小了 很奇怪 明明节奏没有变化
00:17:728 (1,2,3) - ds太乱 控制成这样就很好00:20:228 (1,2,1) -
00:22:728 (1) - 之前有人给我建议了 说ez太短的滑条不要折返2次 这样第一次玩怕折返回来以为就结束了导致break 我建议

pic

00:27:728 (4) - 想前面一样控制在1.0把 00:25:228 (1,2,3) -
00:30:228 (1) - 呃...
00:36:061 (2) - 如果前后物件看起来的距离相同的话 00:36:894 (3) - 到这里突然慢下来是不是会觉得不舒服（对于新手来说，因为是EZ
00:38:978 (2) - 前后ds
00:40:644 (1) - 同样折返的问题，第一次不太清楚这里要折返3次 导致折了一次就放开 break
01:03:561 (2,3) - 没有包好
01:06:478 (2,3,1) - 让他们中心对称 所以让中间的note和两侧的滑条距离same
01:21:478 (3,4,1) - 三角不正
01:23:978 - 和后面多余的绿线删除把

其实感觉挺有想法的，包的也很好看
只是ds问题，后面ds问题我没指出来。我觉得EZ的话最好还是keep same ds all the time 不要变换他，确定一个ds用snap工具做 会好很多哦，因为好多rank图的ez你可以看一下 都是same ds 哦

[Normal]
00:01:533 (1) - 加点距离，有点分不出来节奏了
00:02:728 (1) - ^ 00:03:978 (1) - 这里就做的不错
00:06:478 (2) - ds问题
00:07:728 (3,4,1,2,3) - 这一段ds一直在变化 可是节奏没有变化啊
后面的ds问题我就不指出啦~ rank图里面可以看看哦 NM基本也是走ds的 要相同哦

remap!!!

[hard]
00:00:908 (2,3) - 这里我觉得好有节奏感但又觉得不太好..那...是要怎樣xd
00:11:478 (2) - 加一点距离吧 第一次玩的人怕区分不出来这里的节奏呀我不太懂你的意思..
00:21:478 (2) - ^
00:38:978 (2) - 这里
00:40:228 (1,2,3,4) - 这四个要保持等距把ok
00:51:478 (6) - 近了点不過我想放這樣:>
00:58:561 (4) - 3.00 跳太大ok
01:06:478 (3,4,1) - 不同节奏 却看起来相同距离ok

[Review]
00:26:478 (4) - 滑调速度的改变需要NC一下好吧既然有兩個人都這樣說了，我也只能改了=.=(抱歉第一個modderxd)
00:32:728 (6) - 不要保持差不多ds 要不远一点 要不overlap or something 会误导ok
01:00:228 (1) - ds我不太懂你的意思..
跳的很好啊 我觉得这个难度做的很不错

总的来说觉得你做的挺好的 ds问题很大 最好是重新摆一下EZ NM 把他们跟着相同的DS Hard有些也需要check一下 最后 包的什么都很好看很美观 flow也可以 加油

我的map在queue里面哦

Chalwa wrote:

Hello! Mod from my queue!
I'm not good at anime songs modding, but request is request!

Easy

Open AiMod and fix all DS :/
00:22:728 (1) - Double repeats is unreadable to beginners
00:40:644 (1) - ^ triple repeats too
I can't mod more, cuz this DS :/

Normal

Open AiMod and fix DS :/
00:04:394 (2) - Make two 1/2 sliders
00:24:394 - Why there aren't any object??
00:45:228 (4) - NC
01:05:228 (4) - ^
01:17:728 (4) - ^
01:20:228 (7) - ^
01:21:478 (1) - Remove NC
The same like Easy

Hard

00:02:728 (5) - NC??Nope D:
00:08:561 (3,4) - Improve blanketok
00:26:061 (3,4) - ^
00:43:978 (4) - ^
00:51:478 (6) - ^
00:55:228 (1,2,3) - Bad flow imook
Fix DS too :/ok:/

It's good timing, but DS is very brake :/
You have potential, but you have to try...
GOOD LUCK!

ts8zs wrote:

选张质量好点的背景 http://pan.baidu.com/s/1c2dVGrQ
高潮部分音效不给力
01:28:353 - spinner end here
[Review]
00:12:728 (1,2) - 看起来像1/2
[Hard]
01:05:644 (2) - 这个折返感觉好怪
00:43:978 (4,1) - 这个重叠很别扭
01:14:603 (5,6) - swap
[Easy]
00:20:228 (1) - 别包了 往外拐吧
00:51:478 (1) - 这个折返感觉好怪
01:16:478 (5) - ^

23konG wrote:

Hello, modding from M4M request.
My map:https://osu.ppy.sh/b/643607
歌好好听 好想做GD...

[General]
音效上有些欠缺, 首先没有在高潮段的开始下finish, 其次在音乐比较高昂的地方使用默认的soft-whistle会显得绵软无力。建议重新找一个或者直接从其他的图里扒一个就行了
clap的话虽然24clap没问题啦但是这个曲子还有发挥的空间啊...
[Review]
00:05:228 (1,2) - 好像贴的太近了
00:13:561 (4,1) - 像这样滑条接滑条的梗最好统一一下DS, 个人觉得00:12:311 (3,1) - 也就是1.2比较合适。后面类似的就不提了
00:20:019 (4,1) - 有点远啊
00:36:478 (1,3) - 也是有点近了
00:40:644 (1,1,1) - 这个应该可以摆的更正一点,再调整下
00:48:144 (3) - 这个折返箭头被挡住了,这是unrankable的
都接受
[Hard]
Nothing
[Normal]
感觉DS1.2大了,1.0更好些ok
[Easy]
一样的问题, DS0.9更合适些ok

Good luck

_IxApplePie_ wrote:

Hihi NM req from my WQ

Review

1. HP // 6 ; AR // 8.8 or maybe 8.6~8.7?NO +DT=AR10.3too highx.x[/color]
2. 00:01:533 (3,4) - blanketfix
3. 00:13:144 (2,3) - slider to fit the vocalIt's a prominent vocal
4. 00:18:769 - note? feels quite emptyok
5. 00:24:394 - any means of following vocal here?no
6. 00:26:061 (3) - change to circles
7. 00:28:144 (2) - ^no
8. 00:28:561 (3) - sliderfix
9. 00:30:853 (3) - best to not start slider at red tick so add a note and move the slider to the white tickfix
10. 00:40:644 (1,1,1) - blanketfix
11. 00:53:144 (2,3) - ^fix
12. 00:57:519 - note?fix
13. Plays really well, i gotta say thxxxx:D

Insane

1. I need to say this first. Do you want to curve your sliders or not. If you do, pls make it more obv xD not that i mind having few of it lol
2. 00:53:978 (1,2) - blanketfix
3. 01:15:228 (1,1) - blanket well the arsfix

All seems fine (I didn't play Eaz and NM though)
The distance for kiai time in Hard for some notes are quite big but idk whether it's fine or not
Good luck ranking this, it's quite nice

1. 00:00:283 (1,2,3) - This arrangement is not pretty ( △ arrangement ) how about this?
   
   SPOILER

   
2. 00:18:978 (4) - Listening to the songs, this rhythm is a pity. what about the rhythm with circles and slide? ↓
   
   SPOILER

   
3. 00:21:478 (2) - Rather than matching the rhythm on the red line, what about match the white line?difficulty easy it is to become better.
4. 00:22:728 (1) - I think more better, blanket with no.2 slide.
5. 00:40:644 ~ 00:42:728 - This during time, not put siider velocity multiplier. there will not be accepted (unrankedble)
6. 00:40:644 (2,3) - distance miss. you can see AI mode.
   
   SPOILER

   
7. 00:46:478 (6) - ^
8. 01:03:561 (2) - How about this arrangement? i think more better.
   
   SPOILER

   
   
   
   NC put and remove
9. 00:10:228 (1) - put
10. 00:22:728 (1) - Here to bits continue.
11. 00:26:478 (1) - Remove.
12. 00:27:728 (1) - ^
13. 00:30:228 (4) - put
14. 00:35:228 (1) - put
15. 00:36:478 (1) - Remove.
16. 00:45:228 (5) - put
17. 00:48:978 (1) - Remove.
18. 00:50:228 (1) - ^
19. 00:51:478 (1) - ^

1. 00:03:144 (6) - What think to move a little place? ↓
   
   SPOILER

   
2. 00:15:228 (3) - How about this?
   
   SPOILER

   
3. 00:58:978 (3) - Not good view. because due to overlap the slide. Also,not stable flow. how about this?
   
   SPOILER

   
4. 01:02:728 (1,2) - The place is not pretty.There is also a sense of distance between the notes. how about this? I do not know you are satisfied. but this more better.
   
   SPOILER

   
5. 01:09:394 (6) - Awkward flow with ago slide. how about this?
   
   SPOILER

   
   
   
   NC put and remove
6. 00:10:228 (5) - put
7. 00:12:728 (1) - Remove.
8. 00:15:228 (1) - put
9. 00:18:978 (1) - Remove.
10. 00:20:228 (1) - put
11. 00:28:978 (1) - Remove.
12. 00:30:228 (1) - put
13. 00:45:228 (5) - put
14. 00:48:978 (1) - Remove.
15. 00:50:228 (1) - ^
16. 00:51:478 (5) - ^
17. 01:05:228 (5) - put
18. 01:06:478 (3) - Remove.
19. 01:07:728 (5) - put
20. 01:11:478 (1) - Remove.

1. 00:11:478 (2) - I recommend a blanket with no.1 slider.
2. 00:11:478 (2,3) - This is a jump does not suit the song. also,please continue the rhythm same as before. that's more natural.
3. 00:28:769 (3,1) - This is a jump does not suit the song. how about this?
   
   SPOILER

   
   
   
   NC put and remove
4. 00:26:478 (1) - remove
5. 00:28:978 (1) - ^
6. 00:31:478 (1) - ^
7. 00:48:978 (1) - ^
8. 00:50:228 (1) - ^

1. 00:00:283 ~ 00:03:978 - Please mapping. easy,normal,hard and review is mapped.
2. 00:12:728 (1) - Spoil the flow.continuous rather than the reverse slide,it's better one use.
3. 01:00:853 (2) - Ctrl + G?

1. 00:17:103 (2) - stack with no.1 slide? it can give a proper jump.
2. 00:40:644 (1,1) - Ctrl+G Given the consistency, it looks neat.
3. 00:46:061 (3,4) - Changing the rhythm sequence and 00:46:478 (1) how about this arrangement?
   
   SPOILER

   
4. 00:55:019 (3) - Blanket with no.2 slider?

Hi ! from your Q (m4m) :>


Easy

Image
Duplicate line. this is meaningless.

00:00:283 (1,2,3) - This arrangement is not pretty ( △ arrangement ) how about this?
collapsed text
00:18:978 (4) - Listening to the songs, this rhythm is a pity. what about the rhythm with circles and slide? ↓
collapsed text
00:21:478 (2) - Rather than matching the rhythm on the red line, what about match the white line?difficulty easy it is to become better.
00:22:728 (1) - I think more better, blanket with no.2 slide.
00:40:644 ~ 00:42:728 - This during time, not put siider velocity multiplier. there will not be accepted (unrankedble)
00:40:644 (2,3) - distance miss. you can see AI mode.
collapsed text
00:46:478 (6) - ^
01:03:561 (2) - How about this arrangement? i think more better.
collapsed text


NC put and remove
00:10:228 (1) - put
00:22:728 (1) - Here to bits continue.
00:26:478 (1) - Remove.
00:27:728 (1) - ^
00:30:228 (4) - put
00:35:228 (1) - put
00:36:478 (1) - Remove.
00:45:228 (5) - put
00:48:978 (1) - Remove.
00:50:228 (1) - ^
00:51:478 (1) - ^


Normal

Not put slider velocity multiplier. Easy and Normal is unrankedble.

Image
Duplicate line.

00:03:144 (6) - What think to move a little place? ↓
collapsed text
00:15:228 (3) - How about this?
collapsed text
00:58:978 (3) - Not good view. because due to overlap the slide. Also,not stable flow. how about this?
collapsed text
01:02:728 (1,2) - The place is not pretty.There is also a sense of distance between the notes. how about this? I do not know you are satisfied. but this more better.
collapsed text
01:09:394 (6) - Awkward flow with ago slide. how about this?
collapsed text


NC put and remove
00:10:228 (5) - put
00:12:728 (1) - Remove.
00:15:228 (1) - put
00:18:978 (1) - Remove.
00:20:228 (1) - put
00:28:978 (1) - Remove.
00:30:228 (1) - put
00:45:228 (5) - put
00:48:978 (1) - Remove.
00:50:228 (1) - ^
00:51:478 (5) - ^
01:05:228 (5) - put
01:06:478 (3) - Remove.
01:07:728 (5) - put
01:11:478 (1) - Remove.


Hard

Image
Duplicate line.

I would like to give some advice to you.
The map currently has a number of unnecessary jumps.
Listen to a lot of songs,searching for a suitable place jumping. 

00:11:478 (2) - I recommend a blanket with no.1 slider.
00:11:478 (2,3) - This is a jump does not suit the song. also,please continue the rhythm same as before. that's more natural.
00:28:769 (3,1) - This is a jump does not suit the song. how about this?
collapsed text


NC put and remove
00:26:478 (1) - remove
00:28:978 (1) - ^
00:31:478 (1) - ^
00:48:978 (1) - ^
00:50:228 (1) - ^


konG's Insane

00:00:283 ~ 00:03:978 - Please mapping. easy,normal,hard and review is mapped.
00:12:728 (1) - Spoil the flow.continuous rather than the reverse slide,it's better one use.
01:00:853 (2) - Ctrl + G?


Review

00:17:103 (2) - stack with no.1 slide? it can give a proper jump.
00:40:644 (1,1) - Ctrl+G Given the consistency, it looks neat.
00:46:061 (3,4) - Changing the rhythm sequence and 00:46:478 (1) how about this arrangement?
collapsed text
00:55:019 (3) - Blanket with no.2 slider?