Len wrote:

1:1

SB:

1. 전체적으로 스펙트럼의 반응속도가 느립니다. 큰비트가 먼저 나오고 그 뒤에 스펙트럼이 커집니다. playback rate를 100%로 해도 확실히 느리다는게 보일정도면 전체적으로 문제가 있다는건데 확인 부탁드립니다. (그런데 뒤에 키아이부분은 맞는거같기도하고.. 뭔가 이상하네요) 엨 프로그램으로 돌려가지고 제가 손볼수있는게 아니네요..
2. 01:26:074 - 이부분에 1/3간격으로 무슨 터지는 효과같은거 넣고 01:26:740 - 에는 하늘색 배경으로 바뀌었으면 조금 더 좋았을거같다는 생각이드네요. 굿 좋네용
3. 01:45:406 - 여기 잘 보시면 bg가 사라지는동안에도 스펙트럼이 계속 움직이는데 여기서 움직이고있는 스펙트럼을 조금씩 Y축으로 커지는 크기를 줄여서 조금 잔잔하게 03:21:739 - 또는 03:24:406 - 여기에 나오는 스펙트럼같이 바꿔도 괜찮다싶은데 이 부분에 대해서는 엄청 생각해보셔야할것같습니다. 아니면 움직이지 않는 상태 http://puu.sh/mvgOY/3445b7c293.png 이렇게 모아만 주셔도 꽤나 괜찮을것같은데.. 지금 상태로는 엄청 거슬립니다. 꼭 수정을 해주시면 좋을것같네요. 음..새로운 표현을 하기위해서 스펙트럼을 bg로 가렸습니다. Y축크기 줄이는 것은 제가 아까 말했다시피 불가능합니다. 일단 의도는 스펙트럼을 가린다는 것을 알아주셨으면 합니다.
4. 01:45:406 - 이부분 파란색 동그라미 올라오는게 너무 빠르다는 생각이듭니다. 조금만 속도가 느렸다면 조용한 부분인 이 파트를 조금 더 살릴수있었지 않았을까 라는 생각입니다. 조용하지만 연타스트림 부분도 있기에 느리게 할 필요까지는 없어보입니다.
5. 01:51:739 - 이부분을 포함한 나머지 심장박동부분 너무 뜬금없이 나오지않나 라고 생각이듭니다. 게다가 scale도 너무 커요. 그냥 다른걸로 대체해보시는게 좋을것같네요. 뜬금없지 않고 음악안에 심장소리가 들리길레 한번 넣어봤습니다. 이부분에 대해서는 여러 의견들을 더 받아보겠습니다. 저는 제 의도대로 잘 나온듯해서 빼기 아깝다고 생각합니다.
6. 03:25:406 - 마찬가지로 조금 빠른거같다는 생각이듭니다. 조금 속도를 낮췄습니다.
7. 03:36:072 - 여기는 회색의 배경이 조금 더 밝아지는것보단 하늘색 배경을 조금 어두운상태로 넣는게 좋을것같네요. fix
8. 04:42:739 - 여기서 원 나오는거 04:42:739 (1) - 노트의 시작지점에서 나왔다면 더 어울렸을텐데 라는 생각이있네요. fix
9. 마지막 스핀이 끝나는 부분인 05:01:405 - (수정하면 바뀔지도 모름) 에서 bg가 갑자기 없어져서 검은화면으로 바뀌면 좀더 멋졌을거같다 라는 생각이 있네요. 이부분은 참고해뒀다가 나중에 수정이 거의 끝날때 쯤에 넣어보겠습니다.

굿럭

1. personally I prefer ar 9.5 instead of 9.6, which makes objects like 00:01:410 (1,2,3,4) - appear not that suddenly
2. unsnapped notes: 00:46:244 (2) - 00:47:242 (4) -
3. according to RC, your mp3's bitrate must be 192kbps maximum. the current one is 320kbps, you have to remake it for your map.
4. 00:54:742 - the beats are still based on 3/4 here, 4/4 is incorrect. you should delete this timing point.
5. seems like your storyboard is made by Down. though it's not a rule, i suggest you to add "Down" in tags.
6. can't find the correct metadata of this song. you should better find someone to confirm it.
7. I'll be glad if you can make the difference between your two gray combo color bigger. it will help on some stacked patterns like 00:53:409 (5,6,1,2,3) - this kind of stacked stream transition.

1. 00:19:743 (1,2) - I think (2) need the NC more to clarify the stack. maybe switch NC?
2. 00:40:909 (4) - if i were you I would add an NC on it to specify this stream, so it would be more similar to 00:48:742 (1,2) - , which has a totally different color on the stream itself.
3. 00:54:742 - the beats are based on 3/4 here, which means after the timing change you should change those NCs as well.
4. 01:50:073 (1,2,3,4,1) - there's a slight spacing difference between (3)~(1), it will be good if you can adjust it, since this kind of straight line is hard to be played well.
5. 02:17:073 (3) - to be honest, i hope you can make this hold end on 02:17:323 - , so the hit window will be bigger and players won't lose their combo easily here
6. 02:21:406 (1,2) - personally i'll suggest you to make their distance shorter, so it won't make people confused and correctly recognize the slider is a part of the stream
7. 02:25:739 (5,6,7) - don't you think this kind of speed up should be specified by NCs and colors?
8. 02:28:573 - maybe you can try to end the slider here. lots of the notes are based on piano samples here, but 02:28:656 - this one is not emphasized well. I think it will be better if you can place a circle at that place.
9. 02:36:906 (4,5,6) - (pattern suggestion) ummm i think this straight line is not really good to play, and the burst on (6) is not really emphasized. I'll suggest you to reduce the distance between (4) and (5).
   
   image

   
10. 02:39:073 (1) - same on the length reducing as above.
11. 03:19:906 (2,3) - (pattern suggestion) if this double is spaced and added a back'n'forth, this pattern can be good, and the spacing can also be a warning for the following high spaced notes. maybe?
    
    image

    
12. 03:51:405 (7) - NC for clear piano sound emphasizing? and 04:02:072 (6) - ?
13. 04:02:072 (6) - this one is a strange ignorance on piano, because most of the objects are following the piano here, like 04:15:239 (5,7,8,9) -
14. 04:25:405 (1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1) - this kind of stream is really dangerous, it has a high chance to cause problem on reading. especially 04:25:405 (1,1) - is shorter than others, the speed change on this stream is questionable too.
15. 04:42:739 (1) - yeah, this slider art can be improved because it's almost like a finisher...

1. use sayakaBG.jpg instead of sb\bg.jpg so the background will become black when there's no sprite, and your SB load will reduce by 1.33x. if you're using SGL for this SB, it will be easy to change.
2. To reduce the SB load, start these particle sprites when you need them:
   
   image

   

jieusieu wrote:

fd

2016-01-23 15:11 Reol: 렉이 심하다면 BG와 osb파일을 지우고 보는것은 어덜가욧????
2016-01-23 15:12 Reol: 저도몰믐
2016-01-23 15:13 jieusieu: fd
2016-01-23 15:13 jieusieu: ㄹㅇ
2016-01-23 15:13 jieusieu: http://puu.sh/mGeY0.osu
2016-01-23 15:13 jieusieu: ㅋㅋ
2016-01-23 15:13 jieusieu: 님
2016-01-23 15:14 jieusieu: 161,191,282739,6,0,B|103:223|23:192|23:192|74:214|102:235|136:279|192:352|98:437|29:390|-11:366|-38:213|97:232|175:300|185:352|185:352|217:260|217:260|239:325|298:311|298:311|339:340|383:312|383:312|419:321|458:311|506:294|521:216|499:156|440:130|393:125|340:170|340:170|250:186|209:127|205:55|249:8|313:-2|366:16|394:70|370:122,1,1684.80005655762
2016-01-23 15:14 jieusieu: 이부분만
2016-01-23 15:14 Reol: 넵
2016-01-23 15:14 jieusieu: 한번보고
2016-01-23 15:14 jieusieu: 버리셈
2016-01-23 15:14 jieusieu: ㅋㅋ
2016-01-23 15:15 Reol: 님아
2016-01-23 15:15 Reol: ㄹㅇ
2016-01-23 15:15 jieusieu: ㄹㅇ
2016-01-23 15:15 Reol: 깔끔해보이네
2016-01-23 15:15 jieusieu: 님그게
2016-01-23 15:15 jieusieu: 정말ㅇ미??
2016-01-23 15:15 Reol: 로그 올리면
2016-01-23 15:15 Reol: 제가 특별히 쿠도스 드림
2016-01-23 15:15 jieusieu: wow~~xDDDDDD

161,191,282739,6,0,B|103:223|23:192|23:192|74:214|102:235|136:279|192:352|98:437|29:390|-11:366|-38:213|97:232|175:300|185:352|185:352|217:260|217:260|239:325|298:311|298:311|339:340|383:312|383:312|419:321|451:308|477:284|500:239|495:194|476:157|437:118|381:113|340:170|340:170|253:180|203:131|202:58|247:6|310:-11|393:11|403:78|377:116|368:118,1,1684.80005655762

Nerova Riuz GX wrote:

welp though i don't accept mod requests before exams but this is really interesting

[SB]
Because of your sprite usage, your SB load is skyrocketing...That's not a good thing.

1. use sayakaBG.jpg instead of sb\bg.jpg so the background will become black when there's no sprite, and your SB load will reduce by 1.33x. if you're using SGL for this SB, it will be easy to change. Bg1 deleted.
2. To reduce the SB load, start these particle sprites when you need them:Erased the effect of snow. XD
   
   image

   

[]

nice, solid and fun.

Reol wrote:

@Down 마지막 슬라 위치가 바뀌었기때문에 제가 모딩 고친 뒤에 SB 수정 부탁드려욧!

Sonnyc wrote:

zz

Sonnyc wrote:

zz

1. 01:10:764 - the red/green lines on this point conflict in volume
2. 03:25:429 - sampleset conflict
3. 03:14:679 (4,1) - this is the very first 1/4 jump in the entire map; it's pretty unexpected with no setup 3 minutes in and it's also going into a lower spaced stream which makes it pretty weird to play
4. 03:54:095 (1,2,3,4,5) - pretty much the same thing as above
5. 03:18:429 (1) and 03:18:762 (1) - both have a crash yet they're lacking emphasis since they don't really stand out within the entire pattern... also 03:18:762 (1) - is missing a finish on the head

sukiNathan wrote:

yo

1. 01:10:764 - the red/green lines on this point conflict in volume
2. 03:25:429 - sampleset conflict
3. 03:14:679 (4,1) - this is the very first 1/4 jump in the entire map; it's pretty unexpected with no setup 3 minutes in and it's also going into a lower spaced stream which makes it pretty weird to play
4. 03:54:095 (1,2,3,4,5) - pretty much the same thing as above
5. 03:18:429 (1) and 03:18:762 (1) - both have a crash yet they're lacking emphasis since they don't really stand out within the entire pattern... also 03:18:762 (1) - is missing a finish on the head

really cool map
obviously the red/green line thing is unrankable now, but you'll also have to get rid of the 1/4 jumps if you want me to icon

Skystar wrote:

http://puu.sh/qozho/c3fc116ff6.osu

fixed cya

Down wrote:

http://puu.sh/qp5VL/dc295d496f.osz

captin1 wrote:

Ascendance wrote:

in the case of 2 diffs for approval, doesnt the lower difficulty one need to have some indicator of difficulty? ascension and descent don't give that indicator, so reol's diff name should be changed

Ascendance wrote:

in the case of 2 diffs for approval, doesnt the lower difficulty one need to have some indicator of difficulty? ascension and descent don't give that indicator, so reol's diff name should be changed

sukiNathan wrote:

ok

Okorin wrote:

could consider muting sectionfail.wav and sectionpass.wav
also you can skin section-fail.png and section-pass.png to transparency because they aren't elements showing up while there's actual gameplay so they are allowed to be transparent, basically consider running the same setup file-wise as https://osu.ppy.sh/s/53342

i think lower AR like 9.2 on ascension extra would work too, i don't see the need for 9.5 but that's just my opinion

1. Changed offset
2. Changed ar 9.5 -> 9.2
3. Deleted break time 04:46:856 - here (Extra diff)

Naxess wrote:

Found this on the offline #modreqs thread.

Since I noticed some things within the difficulty I was looking at, I might as well point them out as well.

Ascension Extra

1. 03:36:764 - This feels very weird, in my opinion, to skip this sound completely when all the other ones of these are mapped in this section, especially when 03:36:097 - was the same sound and used as an initiation to the phase. Having a sudden pause on a sound mapped just a one or two beats ago like this would be quite counter intuitive, don't you think? I'd suggest doing it like was done at 03:39:431 - . I'll consider about it, because I think more fits well now.

Hitsounds

1. 00:42:767 - Wouldn't this beat have all hitsounds on it, just like 00:46:767 - , since a new hypermeasure begins here?
   ^ 00:50:767 - nah, i don't think so.
   
   
2. 00:56:767 - Looks like whistle and soft addition was missed here, due to the previously enforced pattern. Straying from said pattern randomly like this would make no sense, or am I wrong? Is it not random? Because I can't see the pattern. it's not random. your misunderstanding here.
   ^ 00:58:101 -
   ^ 01:04:767 -
   ^ 01:06:101 -
   
   
3. 01:08:767 - Looks like this is missing a whistle when looking at 01:09:101 - ok
   
   
4. 01:10:267 - 01:08:934 - Again, these don't look intentional. The second one for example, has a soft addition but no hitsound for said addition to apply on. There are multiple instances of this appearing throughout the map. 01:08:934 - miss added addition. you can hear piano or something else here? no, i don't think so. you are completely misunderstanding this. 01:10:267 - fixed.
   
   
5. 01:21:599 - I feel like some hitsounds are being forgotten in this section, namely finishes. The hitsounds currently placed do not seem to fully reflect what the song is suggesting. I'm not forgotten here. I just don't added. because not so fits.
   ^ 01:44:598 -
   
   
6. Well, I'll stop here since the set is already supposed to be ready. If the above were actually mistakes or did not receive sufficient explanations and arguments, then perhaps asking for some hitsound mods before ranking it would be a good idea.

Good luck!

Lasse wrote:

asc
01:00:767 (1,2,1,2,1) - why the nc spam when you never do it for similar patterns here?
01:09:017 (3,4,5,6) - really awkward to play cause of how forced movement here feels, how about mobing 2-3-4 a bit like http://i.imgur.com/hgtMFH8.jpg or even rotating it a bit http://i.imgur.com/UZhxeDU.jpg ?
01:45:431 (1) - shouuldnt this be placed higher to match the sb? http://i.imgur.com/L5LSnR3.jpg
judging from skystar's diff it's not supposed to do so, but because it's so close, why not adjust the pattern a bit?
02:04:098 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) - just feels too much rhythm+spacing wise for what the song offers and makes 02:05:098 (13,14,15,16) - stand out much less, reducing spacing or rhythm (something with less 1/4 clicking like on skystar's diff) both would work better for that
Right now it's like the same as 02:05:764 (5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16) - which stands out much more in the song...
02:26:098 (7) - transition into this is really weird and at this sv I always feel like a have to follow these a bit, maybe try something more like http://i.imgur.com/0RlaB4Z.jpg
02:39:098 (1) - buffer? xD
03:18:931 (2) - can you just map this as 1/4 slider? the 1/8 doesnt even stand out much and it becomes stupid to play because this has to held longer than the 1/4 sliders before, but it's in the same pattern, so people will expect similar tapping I think it's really fit for song. I want to keep it. sorry.
04:26:264 (2,3,4) - do you really need a burst that plays like 270 bpm 1/4 90% into the map lol

pop cause of this:
there seems to be a problem with the map caused by the sb
whenever I change something and want to update to latest (no matter which diff) I becomes a 0* map and opening it does

video of the problem:
https://streamable.com/3j0b

if I delete the map and redownload it then doesn't even show up anymore and forces me to process all beatmaps again to get it to appear

confirmed with several other people so it's not just me

let me know once this issue has been fixed

01:00:767 (1,2,1,2,1) - why the nc spam when you never do it for similar patterns here?

Lasse wrote:

yes, sb thing works fine now for me
changes on your diff are okay, just wondering about one thing

01:00:767 (1,2,1,2,1) - why the nc spam when you never do it for similar patterns here?

you didn't reply to this but kept it. It's not a big deal to me so I'm fine if you dont change it. though it seems like you just missed it?

Lasse wrote:

re #1
:0

Sonnyc wrote:

Extra.
01:59:098 (2,3,4) - 이거 다 1픽셀 올려서 (1,2) 사이에 follow point 소거합시다. 그게 더 깔금해보이네요.
02:37:098 (5) - 여기 뉴콤 넣으시는게 더 피니시 소리 강조가 좋을거 같네요. (뉴콤 모딩이라니 무슨소리요!)
04:21:430 (1) - 어중간하게 희색 2개 섞느니 차라리 싱글 콤보 깨지더라도 동일한 색상 사용하는게 더 나아보이네요.
04:42:764 (1) - 슬라 멋지네요. 근데 첫번째 루프 구멍 조금 더 둥글게 처리 가능할듯요.저가 노력ㅎ해봤어요,,,

Sprite,Foreground,Centre,"sb\spotlight.png",320,240
 M,0,120848,,476,316
 F,0,120848,121548,0.9,0.3
 S,0,120848,121548,1.4,0.9
 P,0,120848,121548,A

Sprite,Foreground,Centre,"sb\spotlight.png",320,240
 M,0,121182,,398,137
 F,0,121182,121882,0.9,0.3
 S,0,121182,121882,1.4,0.9
 P,0,121182,121882,A

Sprite,Foreground,Centre,"sb\spotlight.png",320,240
 M,0,82265,,495,317
 F,0,82265,82965,0.9,0.3
 S,0,82265,82965,1.4,0.9
 P,0,82265,82965,A

Sonnyc wrote:

Nominated.

Shiirn wrote:

EDIT: okay they actually injected literal silence between the end of the track and the weirdo noise which is a big no no

Loctav wrote:

there is a silent 5 second break that should have a breaktime inserted, the original version ends on 4:57 after the noise while the song starts at 00:02, which means the song ends after 4 minutes and 55 seconds. The original silence is 2,5 seconds long. In this map, it magically increased to 4,6 seconds, so I assume you stretched the silence part.

Deif wrote:

On top of that, even if we're working with this edited mp3, the spinner at 04:51:430 (1) - ends in absolutely no sound. The sound ends at 05:01:430 - , but as the song starts at 00:01:435 - it'd be less than 5 min drain time anyway.

Ascendance wrote:

Shortening mp3's to get a "TV Size" set is fine, so why is doing the opposite any different anyways? I don't see a huge issue with this, and it's something that's been done plenty of times. It brings no drawbacks, and it's not like he's extending a 3:50 song to 5:00. I have to take the mapper's side on this one and agree with captin. This needs some consistency.

Shiirn wrote:

I don't see why we're screwing with semantics about the dumb static when there's a more elegant solution right there that would easily make everyone happy.