Charles445 wrote:
http://puu.sh/gsnFC/815877c55f.png
Jacks on weak finger make me sad
It also depends on where it is / what it's paired with._S u w a k o_ wrote:
Charles445 wrote:
http://puu.sh/gsnFC/815877c55f.png
Jacks on weak finger make me sad
Depend on players' skill. lol'd. It's not even trill
Nobody said 1.5 stars gap is unrankable.Paulmrm wrote:
Aren't SR gaps wider than 1.5 stars unrankable? The gap between Insane's star rating and Ex-ray's is 1.87.
I can't say for others, but the confusion I saw myself was because I saw this being referenced in other maps by BNs like in the link in my earlier post p/3772733Spy wrote:
Nobody said 1.5 stars gap is unrankable.Paulmrm wrote:
Aren't SR gaps wider than 1.5 stars unrankable? The gap between Insane's star rating and Ex-ray's is 1.87.
logicallyFullerene- wrote:
I can't say for others, but the confusion I saw myself was because I saw this being referenced in other maps by BNs like in the link in my earlier post p/3772733
In addition, and I know others can say as well, but I distinctly remember the shi-ren trello saying "1.5+ star gap between diff = unrankable" in its ranking criteria page. Yes, I know it's not official documentation, and said documentation is gone now, but that page was referenced a lot many times in the past by many as a quick summary of ranking criteria that applies to mania only.
In any case, this has been cleared up so I don't think there's anything further to say about this.why does anyone care about star rating anyway it's broken
1.5 is the standard discussed by me and ExPew. Actually I didn't say it in public. And we just said we'll consider the condition(BPM, patterns..etc) to decide disqualify it or not. I remember I wrote in ShiRen board before, but I wrote, "unacceptable", is there anyone can't distinguish "unacceptable" and "unrankable" ?Fullerene- wrote:
I can't say for others, but the confusion I saw myself was because I saw this being referenced in other maps by BNs like in the link in my earlier post p/3772733
In addition, and I know others can say as well, but I distinctly remember the shi-ren trello saying "1.5+ star gap between diff = unrankable" in its ranking criteria page. Yes, I know it's not official documentation, and said documentation is gone now, but that page was referenced a lot many times in the past by many as a quick summary of ranking criteria that applies to mania only.
In any case, this has been cleared up so I don't think there's anything further to say about this.
when Negative Legacy thing you guys forced that mappers to make less gapSpy wrote:
1.5 is the standard discussed by me and ExPew. Actually I didn't say it in public. And we just said we'll consider the condition(BPM, patterns..etc) to decide disqualify it or not. I remember I wrote in ShiRen board before, but I wrote, "unacceptable", is there anyone can't distinguish "unacceptable" and "unrankable" ?Fullerene- wrote:
I can't say for others, but the confusion I saw myself was because I saw this being referenced in other maps by BNs like in the link in my earlier post p/3772733
In addition, and I know others can say as well, but I distinctly remember the shi-ren trello saying "1.5+ star gap between diff = unrankable" in its ranking criteria page. Yes, I know it's not official documentation, and said documentation is gone now, but that page was referenced a lot many times in the past by many as a quick summary of ranking criteria that applies to mania only.
In any case, this has been cleared up so I don't think there's anything further to say about this.
So, why should I say it clearly ? Controlling gap well is mapper and BN's jobs. From start to finish, how come "unrankable" ? I don't get it, and I never heard that.
QATs' works are not only one can decide it, it have to discuss.shionelove wrote:
when Negative Legacy thing you guys forced that mappers to make less gap
they made really hard effort,you know,because you are experienced mapper
but this time you won't unrank this or even consider,just say not logical thing
hhh just AXION's mappers are your friends in QQ
ok then i talk about this mapSpy wrote:
QATs' works are not only one can decide it, it have to discuss.
About "hhh just AXION's mappers are your friends in QQ", I can't get your logic. I've said we'll consider the condition(BPM, patterns..etc) to decide disqualify it or not. I've discussed with other QATs, still wait for response, do you know that ? I think you're not. You only see the side of a thing.
I still can't get what you want to express. Your behavior is just like as my mistake that post your twitter in the thread before.
Be mature, okay ? We're talking about the map, not the relationship. Stop your nonsense.
Oh please. I've said, "All in all, over 1.5 stars not means unrankable, but it is not mean will 100% acceptable for mania QATs."shionelove wrote:
ok then i talk about this map
this map has more than 1.5 gap
when Negative Legacy unranked,BN(then BAT)forced mapper to make less gap then 1.5
and QAT or another BAT don't disagree this opinion
so if you don't DQ this map,it's not unfair
WITHOUT QUALITY thing,this map should be unrank
1.8 gap is too more than 1.5
It's a standard example, if you noticed that.-Kamikaze- wrote:
Wow, why do you always bring up AiAe as example for everything Spy?
Oh god, please.Hazelnut- wrote:
If it's not something you want to discuss,
why do you bring it up every time?
Gotcha. I was just curious.Spy wrote:
Oh god, please.Hazelnut- wrote:
If it's not something you want to discuss,
why do you bring it up every time?
There was a person took Negative Legacy as example that be popped by gap issue.
And I take AiAe for the example, the gap is big but ranked. If you don't hope I take AiAe as example, hmm, maybe you should give me better one for the example.
I hope you can just read the posts, understand why I take it as example.
If you want to ask why I always take AiAe for example, I just can say I often remind AiAe in the first moment.
Spy wrote:
All in all, over 1.5 stars not means unrankable, but it is not mean will 100% acceptable for mania QATs.
There are issues.. but its not "unrank" issues... because its ranked anyway :3Starry- wrote:
I'm surprised no one has pointed out any other issues yet, being too busy discussing the star rating difference and nothing more.
Just think on this and i hope this is my best answer on it (Actually it's a final question lol). So which is better, make a maps that have gap more than 1.5 or make a maps that have gap less than 1.5?Takane6 wrote:
Orz... Lets make a conclusion here ._.
Question: then can you tell us what should we do to make a map with the "make sense gap even its more than 1.5"? and "100% acceptable for mania QATs?" so this problem can be solved more quickly... and because you are QAT too ._.
[ S a k u r a ] wrote:
