nice map, good luck for qualify !
wtf ex-ray is so masterpiece
wtf ex-ray is so masterpiece
Fixed, great thanks![ S a k u r a ] wrote:
01.wav delay more than 5ms
J1.wav not over 100ms
J2.wav
J3.wav
J4.wav
J5.wav
J6.wav
J7.wav^
……………………1023*767 _(:3」∠)_[ S a k u r a ] wrote:
BG resolution should be 16:9 or 4:3
thanks, woc so late reply until i didnt realize this map get bubbledIchigaki wrote:
Mod Requested from QQ
Column setup
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |Pew's Insane
- 00:25:618 - How about add note on 3 because its sound is same with 00:25:337 - nope, they LN are present to strings on previously
- 00:26:837 - 00:27:025 - Should be added by note like the previous - can be added but looks no rest before new chorus. i think empty is a good way
- 00:31:900 - Should be 2-notes like the previous (00:28:900 - and 00:30:400 - ) removed, nice catch
- 01:15:775 - 01:17:275 - 01:18:775 - 01:27:775 - 01:29:275 - Should be 3-notes like previous - added
- 01:19:056 - Add a note to 2 - all fixed/added
- 01:19:150 - Add a note ^
- 01:26:650 - Add a note to 5 ^
- 01:29:650 - Add a note to 3 ^
- 01:35:837 - Add a note for soft drum - prefer solo stream on there
- 01:57:118 - 01:57:212 - Should be added by a note - no good/fit enough to add for ending note instrument
Kuo Kyoka wrote:
Grats ExPew and ljqandylee <3
IN GAME normal 1,98*, maybe its not an issue for the DQ
Charles445 wrote:
http://puu.sh/gsnFC/815877c55f.png
Jacks on weak finger make me sad
It also depends on where it is / what it's paired with._S u w a k o_ wrote:
Charles445 wrote:
http://puu.sh/gsnFC/815877c55f.png
Jacks on weak finger make me sad
Depend on players' skill. lol'd. It's not even trill
Nobody said 1.5 stars gap is unrankable.Paulmrm wrote:
Aren't SR gaps wider than 1.5 stars unrankable? The gap between Insane's star rating and Ex-ray's is 1.87.
I can't say for others, but the confusion I saw myself was because I saw this being referenced in other maps by BNs like in the link in my earlier post p/3772733Spy wrote:
Nobody said 1.5 stars gap is unrankable.Paulmrm wrote:
Aren't SR gaps wider than 1.5 stars unrankable? The gap between Insane's star rating and Ex-ray's is 1.87.
logicallyFullerene- wrote:
I can't say for others, but the confusion I saw myself was because I saw this being referenced in other maps by BNs like in the link in my earlier post p/3772733
In addition, and I know others can say as well, but I distinctly remember the shi-ren trello saying "1.5+ star gap between diff = unrankable" in its ranking criteria page. Yes, I know it's not official documentation, and said documentation is gone now, but that page was referenced a lot many times in the past by many as a quick summary of ranking criteria that applies to mania only.
In any case, this has been cleared up so I don't think there's anything further to say about this.why does anyone care about star rating anyway it's broken
1.5 is the standard discussed by me and ExPew. Actually I didn't say it in public. And we just said we'll consider the condition(BPM, patterns..etc) to decide disqualify it or not. I remember I wrote in ShiRen board before, but I wrote, "unacceptable", is there anyone can't distinguish "unacceptable" and "unrankable" ?Fullerene- wrote:
I can't say for others, but the confusion I saw myself was because I saw this being referenced in other maps by BNs like in the link in my earlier post p/3772733
In addition, and I know others can say as well, but I distinctly remember the shi-ren trello saying "1.5+ star gap between diff = unrankable" in its ranking criteria page. Yes, I know it's not official documentation, and said documentation is gone now, but that page was referenced a lot many times in the past by many as a quick summary of ranking criteria that applies to mania only.
In any case, this has been cleared up so I don't think there's anything further to say about this.
when Negative Legacy thing you guys forced that mappers to make less gapSpy wrote:
1.5 is the standard discussed by me and ExPew. Actually I didn't say it in public. And we just said we'll consider the condition(BPM, patterns..etc) to decide disqualify it or not. I remember I wrote in ShiRen board before, but I wrote, "unacceptable", is there anyone can't distinguish "unacceptable" and "unrankable" ?Fullerene- wrote:
I can't say for others, but the confusion I saw myself was because I saw this being referenced in other maps by BNs like in the link in my earlier post p/3772733
In addition, and I know others can say as well, but I distinctly remember the shi-ren trello saying "1.5+ star gap between diff = unrankable" in its ranking criteria page. Yes, I know it's not official documentation, and said documentation is gone now, but that page was referenced a lot many times in the past by many as a quick summary of ranking criteria that applies to mania only.
In any case, this has been cleared up so I don't think there's anything further to say about this.
So, why should I say it clearly ? Controlling gap well is mapper and BN's jobs. From start to finish, how come "unrankable" ? I don't get it, and I never heard that.
QATs' works are not only one can decide it, it have to discuss.shionelove wrote:
when Negative Legacy thing you guys forced that mappers to make less gap
they made really hard effort,you know,because you are experienced mapper
but this time you won't unrank this or even consider,just say not logical thing
hhh just AXION's mappers are your friends in QQ
ok then i talk about this mapSpy wrote:
QATs' works are not only one can decide it, it have to discuss.
About "hhh just AXION's mappers are your friends in QQ", I can't get your logic. I've said we'll consider the condition(BPM, patterns..etc) to decide disqualify it or not. I've discussed with other QATs, still wait for response, do you know that ? I think you're not. You only see the side of a thing.
I still can't get what you want to express. Your behavior is just like as my mistake that post your twitter in the thread before.
Be mature, okay ? We're talking about the map, not the relationship. Stop your nonsense.
Oh please. I've said, "All in all, over 1.5 stars not means unrankable, but it is not mean will 100% acceptable for mania QATs."shionelove wrote:
ok then i talk about this map
this map has more than 1.5 gap
when Negative Legacy unranked,BN(then BAT)forced mapper to make less gap then 1.5
and QAT or another BAT don't disagree this opinion
so if you don't DQ this map,it's not unfair
WITHOUT QUALITY thing,this map should be unrank
1.8 gap is too more than 1.5
It's a standard example, if you noticed that.-Kamikaze- wrote:
Wow, why do you always bring up AiAe as example for everything Spy?
Oh god, please.Hazelnut- wrote:
If it's not something you want to discuss,
why do you bring it up every time?
Gotcha. I was just curious.Spy wrote:
Oh god, please.Hazelnut- wrote:
If it's not something you want to discuss,
why do you bring it up every time?
There was a person took Negative Legacy as example that be popped by gap issue.
And I take AiAe for the example, the gap is big but ranked. If you don't hope I take AiAe as example, hmm, maybe you should give me better one for the example.
I hope you can just read the posts, understand why I take it as example.
If you want to ask why I always take AiAe for example, I just can say I often remind AiAe in the first moment.