HAIL ET BLOCKO [/._.]/
why would that be an issue, GD'ers can mark their diffs how they want and exusagi is one of his nicknames-[ AmiShici ]- wrote:
Must have hurt ;-;Fullerene- wrote:
THE ABSOLUTE MADMAN
HE DQ'D HIS OWN MAP
I just doubt about the qualify process of this map. It remind me of what Loctav said in #BN before.Starry- wrote:
Considering 188 minutes of drain time and sections containing a ton of 1/16 & 1/12 snaps, along with a bunch of different timing points...ZZHBOY wrote:
How could a map with unsnap issue can be qualified
Anyways, I've checked through with Blocko the ending snaps and they should be fine now.
Mistakes happen. The problem was that the section with the wrong snap (see: not unsnapped, therefore not detected by AIMod or w/e) was easily overlooked because that section is so minimally layered and insignificant to the charts themselves. Considering that there's generally no other objective errors with the rest of the mapset (which is close to 65,000-70,000 notes), I think it's just an unfortunate situation; albeit somewhat justified.ZZHBOY wrote:
I just doubt about the qualify process of this map. It remind me of what Loctav said in #BN before.
Sorry, unsnap in my sense includes wrong snap. You are not a BN, you can think that a map with a little wrong snap issue is fine for qualify. That's why you are not a BN.Shoegazer wrote:
Mistakes happen. The problem was that the section with the wrong snap (see: not unsnapped, therefore not detected by AIMod or w/e) was easily overlooked because that section is so minimally layered and insignificant to the charts themselves. Considering that there's generally no other objective errors with the rest of the mapset (which is close to 65,000-70,000 notes), I think it's just an unfortunate situation; albeit somewhat justified.ZZHBOY wrote:
I just doubt about the qualify process of this map. It remind me of what Loctav said in #BN before.
Chill. In any case, the problem should be fixed soon.