wow wow wow, gj blocko
forum
xi - Happy End of the World [OsuMania]
posted
Total Posts
390
06:06:580 (366580|0,366777|5) - after doing some testing, this is a bit late, on the ranked ver. it's snapped on the white tick, i think around 40ms to be exact, not the timing but the placement of note
gratz D:
HYPE YAY
!!!!!!!
Around 188 minutes in total, I guess It's a record. Congratz!
Blocko graaaaatz!!! >w<
Topic Starter
Disqualified for snapping errors, as pointed out by zSkill.
Gonna fix this now and try to spot any errors before moving this forward again.
woops
Gonna fix this now and try to spot any errors before moving this forward again.
woops
THE ABSOLUTE MADMAN
HE DQ'D HIS OWN MAP
HE DQ'D HIS OWN MAP
i didnt know qat can dq their own map directly lmao
-[ AmiShici ]-
why would that be an issue, GD'ers can mark their diffs how they want and exusagi is one of his nicknames-[ AmiShici ]- wrote:
How could a map with unsnap issue can be qualified
lol DQ'ed his own map
good luck on re qualify~
good luck on re qualify~
Must have hurt ;-;Fullerene- wrote:
THE ABSOLUTE MADMAN
HE DQ'D HIS OWN MAP
I just doubt about the qualify process of this map. It remind me of what Loctav said in #BN before.Starry- wrote:
Considering 188 minutes of drain time and sections containing a ton of 1/16 & 1/12 snaps, along with a bunch of different timing points...ZZHBOY wrote:
How could a map with unsnap issue can be qualified
Anyways, I've checked through with Blocko the ending snaps and they should be fine now.
Mistakes happen. The problem was that the section with the wrong snap (see: not unsnapped, therefore not detected by AIMod or w/e) was easily overlooked because that section is so minimally layered and insignificant to the charts themselves. Considering that there's generally no other objective errors with the rest of the mapset (which is close to 65,000-70,000 notes), I think it's just an unfortunate situation; albeit somewhat justified.ZZHBOY wrote:
I just doubt about the qualify process of this map. It remind me of what Loctav said in #BN before.
Chill. In any case, the problem should be fixed soon.
Sorry, unsnap in my sense includes wrong snap. You are not a BN, you can think that a map with a little wrong snap issue is fine for qualify. That's why you are not a BN.Shoegazer wrote:
Mistakes happen. The problem was that the section with the wrong snap (see: not unsnapped, therefore not detected by AIMod or w/e) was easily overlooked because that section is so minimally layered and insignificant to the charts themselves. Considering that there's generally no other objective errors with the rest of the mapset (which is close to 65,000-70,000 notes), I think it's just an unfortunate situation; albeit somewhat justified.ZZHBOY wrote:
I just doubt about the qualify process of this map. It remind me of what Loctav said in #BN before.
Chill. In any case, the problem should be fixed soon.
I'd like to claim I have no malice to this map, and your mania guys. I just think this mistake happened after some cautions is unreasonable.
-[ AmiShici ]-
just asking xD-Kamikaze- wrote:
why would that be an issue, GD'ers can mark their diffs how they want and exusagi is one of his nicknames-[ AmiShici ]- wrote:
Topic Starter
There we go.
Should be good to go now!
And thanks to everyone for their kind words! I really appreciate it!
Should be good to go now!
And thanks to everyone for their kind words! I really appreciate it!
I wouldnt surprise if this map get dq for several times before it truly rank
30 diff/gd is hard to handle
30 diff/gd is hard to handle
You misinterpreted my post completely. I was uncertain about what your definition of an "unsnapped" note is because a note that is incorrectly snapped is generally not labelled as "unsnapped", it is simply labelled "not snapped". Not many people use that term interchangeably, so it's a communication error on my part. I did not say anything about whether or not the map should be qualified with unsnapped/wrongly snapped notes, there is no need to be so assumptive and insult me for something that I blatantly did not say.ZZHBOY wrote:
Sorry, unsnap in my sense includes wrong snap. You are not a BN, you can think that a map with a little wrong snap issue is fine for qualify. That's why you are not a BN.
I'd like to claim I have no malice to this map, and your mania guys. I just think this mistake happened after some cautions is unreasonable.
I understand where you're coming from regardless, but do understand that whether or not there are multitudes of warnings these things will happen anyway, you can only ensure that everything is right up to a certain point - that point is not perfection. What I wanted to say is that you shouldn't be too worked up over it because it's an accident and that we are not flawless in searching for errors. Are these errors annoying? Sure they are, but there's no point creating a fuss that something that could be cleaned up with a cooperative mapper.
Anyway, that should be enough. Good luck Blocko.
Topic Starter
Thanks, Kawawa and Julie, for taking time off your schedules to check this map and eventually bubbling and qualifying it!
I can't stop saying thanks.
I can't stop saying thanks.
I can't get your means. The bad mapping situation maybe due to your guys thinking:" oh, mistakes, just fix them then requalify is ok haha"Shoegazer wrote:
You misinterpreted my post completely. I was uncertain about what your definition of an "unsnapped" note is because a note that is incorrectly snapped is generally not labelled as "unsnapped", it is simply labelled "not snapped". Not many people use that term interchangeably, so it's a communication error on my part. I did not say anything about whether or not the map should be qualified with unsnapped/wrongly snapped notes, there is no need to be so assumptive and insult me for something that I blatantly did not say.ZZHBOY wrote:
Sorry, unsnap in my sense includes wrong snap. You are not a BN, you can think that a map with a little wrong snap issue is fine for qualify. That's why you are not a BN.
I'd like to claim I have no malice to this map, and your mania guys. I just think this mistake happened after some cautions is unreasonable.
I understand where you're coming from regardless, but do understand that whether or not there are multitudes of warnings these things will happen anyway, you can only ensure that everything is right up to a certain point - that point is not perfection. What I wanted to say is that you shouldn't be too worked up over it because it's an accident and that we are not flawless in searching for errors. Are these errors annoying? Sure they are, but there's no point creating a fuss that something that could be cleaned up with a cooperative mapper.
Anyway, that should be enough. Good luck Blocko.
Qualify process in your sense is nothing. Use your brain, can one BN who gave an icon here can judge whether the high diffs of this set is perfect to qualify?
Keeping this behaviour longer, is not good to mapping field. I just feel discontent with more and more shit map in qualified maps.
Of course, i have no knowladge about mania, so i never mean anything about this map. I feel sorry to mapper blocko for speaking something not everyone want to here, in your map's thread.
Anyway i just want to let some BNs know, thinking more than twice before use your manage power.
At the same time graz bloko for requalify :3
ZZHBOY: You are disregarding the triviality of the error that was presented here. Saying that you are not happy with recent maps being qualified is not merited for this map, nor should it be for any map of this caliber.
Congratulations on the requalify - hopefully the mania community can experience this before the year is out.
Congratulations on the requalify - hopefully the mania community can experience this before the year is out.
I once ordered a burger with fries and they served me burger with friesZZHBOY wrote:
How could a map with unsnap issue can be qualified
The thing that aggravates me is that I noticed that they served me 1 fry less compared to my friend Pete
God dammit I swear I will sue this whole franchise
Anyways gratz, I forgot to gratz you somehow
Regratz Blocko, wish you the best of the lucks here with this set in this qualify week!
oh god, that's so annoying. It's called BUBBLE. not BOOBLE. It's so disturbing, I want to scratch out my eyes ;_;Kawawa wrote:
HAPPY END OF BUBBLU!!
HAPPY END OF BOOBLU!!Loctav wrote:
oh god, that's so annoying. It's called BUBBLE. not BOOBLE. It's so disturbing, I want to scratch out my eyes ;_;Kawawa wrote:
HAPPY END OF BUBBLU!!
OMG THANKS LOCTAV! I did not spot that LOL!! Will fix it next time OUPS!!Loctav wrote:
oh god, that's so annoying. It's called BUBBLE. not BOOBLE. It's so disturbing, I want to scratch out my eyes ;_;Kawawa wrote:
HAPPY END OF BUBBLU!!
Azn's mangLoctav wrote:
oh god, that's so annoying. It's called BUBBLE. not BOOBLE. It's so disturbing, I want to scratch out my eyes ;_;Kawawa wrote:
HAPPY END OF BUBBLU!!