EBWODP: "being the first to vote*
When I skimmed rEdo's ISO I didn't really note much interaction between you and rEdo despite both of you being fairly active at around the same time.CalignoBot wrote:
Reasoning?
nope surprise I suck D2 as well ))))Sakura wrote:
Royston said he sux D1 let's see if he gets something done D2
Yeah no.Royston wrote:
nope surprise I suck D2 as well ))))Sakura wrote:
Royston said he sux D1 let's see if he gets something done D2
I think Caligno is scum though, so I'm going to vote for him
vote: CalignoBot
Have i mentioned how scummy you are yet.Royston wrote:
Claim: Vanilla Townie
You two were both active at around the same time yet you two did not have much interaction.Irreversible wrote:
Saki what's wrong being active at the same time? Sakura and Caligno and Quotes have been active too, I don't get that Argument.. although i'm going to unvote now, since I sometimes Focus one Person without really thinking about other things.
Unvote
Them two*SenaSaki wrote:
You two were both active at around the same time yet you two did not have much interaction.Irreversible wrote:
Saki what's wrong being active at the same time? Sakura and Caligno and Quotes have been active too, I don't get that Argument.. although i'm going to unvote now, since I sometimes Focus one Person without really thinking about other things.
Unvote
Usually being active at the same time means some sort of interaction.
Your lack of explanation is noted.Royston wrote:
nope surprise I suck D2 as well ))))Sakura wrote:
Royston said he sux D1 let's see if he gets something done D2
I think Caligno is scum though, so I'm going to vote for him
vote: CalignoBot
The claim was a joke, there's only vanilla roles left (unless the doctor was very silly or very unlucky)DakeDekaane wrote:
@Saki: the point was that I can interpret it as a slight slip.
Royston, claiming when you only has 1 vote is a sign of nervousness imo, why would you do that? Why do you think Caligno is scum? Why shouldn't I vote for you?
...ok...? That seems like a really quick change of opinion. Royston's reason was completely ripped from Saki's post, and the fact that he had to explain his reason after being asked to do it by Dake instead of just doing it during the vote seemed weird.CalignoBot wrote:
I'm getting a more town than mafia vibe in your latest few posts.
So much about telling me I should stop changing my mind so quickly.CalignoBot wrote:
I'm getting a more town than mafia vibe in your latest few posts.
What about this is 'really quick'? It's been a whole sixteen pages since I first voted for Royston. For context, sixteen pages is slightly (as in half a page) less than half of the entire thread.Jinxy wrote:
...ok...? That seems like a really quick change of opinion. Royston's reason was completely ripped from Saki's post, and the fact that he had to explain his reason after being asked to do it by Dake instead of just doing it during the vote seemed weird.CalignoBot wrote:
I'm getting a more town than mafia vibe in your latest few posts.
Well then.CalignoBot wrote:
Your lack of explanation is noted.Royston wrote:
nope surprise I suck D2 as well ))))
I think Caligno is scum though, so I'm going to vote for him
vote: CalignoBot
CalignoBot wrote:
He explained it after that with enough variance from Saki's explanation that I didn't get that scummy sheep feel from it.
SenaSaki wrote:
When I skimmed rEdo's ISO I didn't really note much interaction between you and rEdo despite both of you being fairly active at around the same time.
Personally, their explanations here seem really close to each other, unlike what Cali says. Feels like Cali keeps defending Royston for some reason.Royston wrote:
I voted for Caligno because rEdo ISO seemed to be very passive when talking to him
Could be attempted WK/buddying, though I don't get why Cali would try it again especially since rEdo was caught.CalignoBot wrote:
It actually looks really slimy that people are jumping on him for his posts, anti-town as they are. At this point, he's being so incredibly anti-town that I don't feel it's mafia-motivated.
They're the same subject, but the reason itself is very different. Saki's reason was lack of interaction, while Royston's was the style of interaction.Jinxy wrote:
Personally, their explanations here seem really close to each other, unlike what Cali says. Feels like Cali keeps defending Royston for some reason.
What do you mean by again?Jinxy wrote:
Could be attempted WK/buddying, though I don't get why Cali would try it again especially since rEdo was caught.CalignoBot wrote:
It actually looks really slimy that people are jumping on him for his posts, anti-town as they are. At this point, he's being so incredibly anti-town that I don't feel it's mafia-motivated.