M4M request >w<
Sorry if it doesn't help, I'm noobie
Good luck ranking!
Sorry if it doesn't help, I'm noobie
Normal
00:42:157 (1,3) - These should stack if ds is consistent...
01:02:041 (1,2) - Looks awkward... try to do some tilted symmetry?
01:12:506 (3,1) - Pretty sure constant ds for normal? Anyway feel like there is a note missing at 01:12:855
01:14:076 (2,3) - Blanket?
01:41:809 (2) - Redo this slider
01:43:204 (4,1) - Blanket?
01:51:227 (2,1) - Make it so that 01:51:227 (2) tail is blanketed
02:05:180 (4,1) - Blanket?
02:17:389 (1,2) - Looks awkward...
02:28:204 - Again with missing note and increased ds
02:29:424 (2,3) - And ofc fix this blanket a bit
02:52:797 (4,1) - Blanket?
I guess the rawness of this diff can be attributed to its age in the graveyard
01:02:041 (1,2) - Looks awkward... try to do some tilted symmetry?
01:12:506 (3,1) - Pretty sure constant ds for normal? Anyway feel like there is a note missing at 01:12:855
01:14:076 (2,3) - Blanket?
01:41:809 (2) - Redo this slider
01:43:204 (4,1) - Blanket?
01:51:227 (2,1) - Make it so that 01:51:227 (2) tail is blanketed
02:05:180 (4,1) - Blanket?
02:17:389 (1,2) - Looks awkward...
02:28:204 - Again with missing note and increased ds
02:29:424 (2,3) - And ofc fix this blanket a bit
02:52:797 (4,1) - Blanket?
I guess the rawness of this diff can be attributed to its age in the graveyard
Hard
00:14:599 (1,2) - Not a very good blanket
00:14:599 (1,4) - Blanket?
00:15:995 (5) - NC here for less awkward with the short combo after?
00:17:390 (1,2) - Not a very good blanket
00:17:913 (2,3) - ^^^
00:18:436 (3) - Make this into a 1/2 slider to make a note/ slider on 00:18:785?
00:29:599 (3) - Awkward and doesn't fit the music (no notes on 00:29:774 nor 00:30:123)
00:31:169 (6,1) - The looks can be improved
00:33:262 - Note here
00:33:436 - Would recommend a repeating slider here that covers 00:33:698 (4)
00:35:529 (5,6) - Blanket?
00:36:925 (1,2) - ^^^
00:42:157 (1) - 1/2 slider and a note at 00:42:506 seems better (you can make it similar to 00:42:855 (2,3) )
00:48:785 (3) - copy paste 00:48:262 (2) and blanket?
00:51:053 - Missing note and I'd like a note at 00:50:878 instead of tail
00:54:890 - Missing a note
00:56:285- ^^^
01:00:471 (3,4) - Blanket?
01:01:169 (5,6) - ^^^
01:02:739 (3,4) - ^^^
01:04:657 - Missing note
01:14:948 (1,2) - Messy blanket
01:14:948 (1,3) - Stack?
01:17:913 (3,4,5) - Messy; I'd like to see a perfect pentagon going counter clockwise maybe
01:43:029 (6,7) - Messy blanket
01:43:902 (2,3) - ^^^
01:52:971 (3,4) - Make this look better?
02:03:610 (2,3) - Blanket?
02:06:402 - Missing note
02:16:517 (5,6) - Messy blanket
02:30:296 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4,5,6) - Since this is copy paste, same comments from before
02:45:297 (1,3) - Perfect stack?
02:47:913 - Missing
02:50:704 - ^^^
02:59:948 (3,4) - Blanket?
03:28:204 (1) - Doesn't feel right; map it instead?
00:14:599 (1,4) - Blanket?
00:15:995 (5) - NC here for less awkward with the short combo after?
00:17:390 (1,2) - Not a very good blanket
00:17:913 (2,3) - ^^^
00:18:436 (3) - Make this into a 1/2 slider to make a note/ slider on 00:18:785?
00:29:599 (3) - Awkward and doesn't fit the music (no notes on 00:29:774 nor 00:30:123)
00:31:169 (6,1) - The looks can be improved
00:33:262 - Note here
00:33:436 - Would recommend a repeating slider here that covers 00:33:698 (4)
00:35:529 (5,6) - Blanket?
00:36:925 (1,2) - ^^^
00:42:157 (1) - 1/2 slider and a note at 00:42:506 seems better (you can make it similar to 00:42:855 (2,3) )
00:48:785 (3) - copy paste 00:48:262 (2) and blanket?
00:51:053 - Missing note and I'd like a note at 00:50:878 instead of tail
00:54:890 - Missing a note
00:56:285- ^^^
01:00:471 (3,4) - Blanket?
01:01:169 (5,6) - ^^^
01:02:739 (3,4) - ^^^
01:04:657 - Missing note
01:14:948 (1,2) - Messy blanket
01:14:948 (1,3) - Stack?
01:17:913 (3,4,5) - Messy; I'd like to see a perfect pentagon going counter clockwise maybe
01:43:029 (6,7) - Messy blanket
01:43:902 (2,3) - ^^^
01:52:971 (3,4) - Make this look better?
02:03:610 (2,3) - Blanket?
02:06:402 - Missing note
02:16:517 (5,6) - Messy blanket
02:30:296 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4,5,6) - Since this is copy paste, same comments from before
02:45:297 (1,3) - Perfect stack?
02:47:913 - Missing
02:50:704 - ^^^
02:59:948 (3,4) - Blanket?
03:28:204 (1) - Doesn't feel right; map it instead?
Collab
So tired bc I can't mod right x.x00:15:471 (4,5) - Blanket?
00:15:471 (4,5) - Seems really awkward (spacing) and if you dont reduce the ds, at least make a more neat banket?
00:17:216 - A note here instead of tail fits the music better
00:24:541 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1) - /me personally has a dislike towards stuff like this that isn't really jumps but has big ds anyway >.<
00:22:623 (6) - Have this start on 00:22:535 to match lyrics? (and stretch it a bit ofc)
00:36:925 (1,2,3,4) - Inconsistencies; seems like 00:36:925 (1,2) is mapped to the base line but 00:38:146 (3,4) is for the lyrics; I would either expect a note at 00:37:797 to match lyrics or a note at 00:38:582 for the bass (tl;dr stick with one instrument?)
00:40:239 - Should be a note here instead of tail?
00:53:146 (10) - I feel that NC should be here, because musical phrase ends at 00:52:971 (9)
00:59:512 (3) - Inconsistencies; why map here when music doesn't support but skip a note on 01:01:954? :<
01:04:483 (3) - Musical phrase starts here so mapping is a bit awkward especially with patterns...
02:07:448 (1,3) - These don't blanket well (looks uneven) and the intersection looks a bit awkward
02:07:448 (1,3) - Make this look better?
These mappers mapped 5x better than how I map now x.x
00:15:471 (4,5) - Seems really awkward (spacing) and if you dont reduce the ds, at least make a more neat banket?
00:17:216 - A note here instead of tail fits the music better
00:24:541 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1) - /me personally has a dislike towards stuff like this that isn't really jumps but has big ds anyway >.<
00:22:623 (6) - Have this start on 00:22:535 to match lyrics? (and stretch it a bit ofc)
00:36:925 (1,2,3,4) - Inconsistencies; seems like 00:36:925 (1,2) is mapped to the base line but 00:38:146 (3,4) is for the lyrics; I would either expect a note at 00:37:797 to match lyrics or a note at 00:38:582 for the bass (tl;dr stick with one instrument?)
00:40:239 - Should be a note here instead of tail?
00:53:146 (10) - I feel that NC should be here, because musical phrase ends at 00:52:971 (9)
00:59:512 (3) - Inconsistencies; why map here when music doesn't support but skip a note on 01:01:954? :<
01:04:483 (3) - Musical phrase starts here so mapping is a bit awkward especially with patterns...
02:07:448 (1,3) - These don't blanket well (looks uneven) and the intersection looks a bit awkward
02:07:448 (1,3) - Make this look better?
These mappers mapped 5x better than how I map now x.x
Good luck ranking!