1. Hard (4,8 stars, 329 notes)
2. Insane (4,9 stars, 530 notes)
3. Normal (3,17 stars, 201 notes)

Papysh wrote:

Nie visual using of sliders i like it :3

1. 00:07:025 (1) - this slider is better speed up (1.20x)
2. 00:09:562 (1) - ^
3. 00:23:519 (2,3) - make these sliders like this (not the same with (1)) http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/690438
4. 00:29:386 (10,11,12) - keep a spacing in 8-10-12 here, this looks good http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/690405
5. 01:19:342 (6,7) - better rotate this ~11 degrees anti-clockwise o.o
6. 01:22:989 (12,13) - triangle jump like before o.o?
7. 02:33:561 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - volume up> 65%-75%-85%
8. 1/2 rhythms and round sliders all over the map, i think you can try some different sliders

1. 00:23:519 (4,5) - same shape ww http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/690438
2. 01:27:271 (1) - change slider head to drum set, clap hitsound
3. 01:28:222 (3) - drum set (addition)
4. 02:33:561 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - volume up? 65%-75%-85%

1. 00:13:051 (2) - 1-2 spacing is 0.86x

1. 00:49:210 (5) - add NC, and remove NC on next note (so that combo is consistent with here for example 01:27:271 (1) - )
2. 00:53:016 (5) - ^
3. 00:56:822 (5) - ^
4. 01:34:883 (5) - NC
5. 01:03:165 (2) - add finish at beginning
6. 01:05:703 (1) - ^
7. 01:13:315 (1) - ^
8. 01:15:853 (2) - ^
9. 01:38:689 (2) - add finish
10. 01:41:226 (2) - ^
11. 01:48:839 (1) - ^
12. 01:51:376 (5) - ^
13. 02:05:966 (1) - this spinner and gap up until 02:10:090 - seems kind of random, i suggest just filling the whole place with notes
14. 02:33:561 (3) - NC?

• - i feel it should have more notes on red ticks x)

1. 00:17:175 (1,2,3,4) - make more square formation?
   
   SPOILER

   
2. 01:36:469 (5) - add finish
3. 01:38:689 (1) - add finish to beginning (like i said with normal diff., i won't mention again ~)
4. 01:57:403 (1) - extend spinner to 01:59:623 -
5. 02:22:460 (4) - curve better around 02:22:143 (3) -
   
   SPOILER

   

• OD -1

1. 00:05:915 (6) - i think it will have better flow if you ctrl+G this slider
2. 00:06:391 (8) - ctrl+G here also if you changed above mod
3. 00:21:140 - add note
4. 00:59:677 (7) - you can put in the center of all those notes surrounding it, move to x:144 y:128 or something xD
5. 01:21:879 (7) - NC
6. 02:07:552 (8) - ^

Flower wrote:

Hi~ m4m~

[General]
00:45:087 - I think rhythm is still 4/4 here.
01:23:148 - ^
nope, this is definitely 3/4

[Insane]
00:33:668 - remove whistle
-
00:37:157 - remove clap, add whistle
-
00:37:475 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) - I wonder why you don't continue adding whistles. they fit good imo.
added some
00:42:550 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5) - is that only hard for hard? it's the hardest pattern in the song but not the most intense part. Besides, I think consequent triangles also fit well and is not too hard.
this pattern is not so hard to play, but I'll consider to make some changes
01:27:271 (1) - 0.75x?
yes 0.75
01:39:799 (4) - replace with a 1/2 slider and a note?
01:42:336 (5) - ^
replaced
01:59:940 (1) - stack or separate with 2. it reads strange.
don't see a reason why this should reads strange
02:08:028 (11,12,13,14,15,16,1) - I think the shape is a bit twisted. use ctrl+shift+d to make a perfect one.
not at all
02:18:178 (5) - shorten to 1/1 and add note at 02:18:654 - ?
-

[Normal]
00:22:884 - soft whistle?
-
01:35:518 (1) - is it too short? the bpm is high so a bar length may not be enough
will see. I think this one is fine

Good luck~

Roxas wrote:

Hi, M4M
Hello :3

[General]
Nothing

[Normal]
01:08:240 (5,1) - I think it's better to switch NC cause 01:08:240 (5) - here starts singer's voice
01:10:460 (5) - NC
01:15:535 (1,2) - Swiitch NC
01:18:073 (1,2) - ^
01:40:909 (1,2) - ^
01:43:446 (1,2) - ^
01:51:376 (5) - NC
01:53:596 (1,2) - Switch NC

Sorry for only NC mod, patterns and hs are perfect D:
np, but I don't see a big reasons to change any NC here

[Hard]
00:07:977 (3) - Copypaste from (2) and make a thing like this

SPOILER

left as it is
00:26:690 (4,5) - I don't like this antijump D:
changed
00:38:743 (5) - Use 1.2x distance for this slider too, like in (1,2,3,4) before
changed in some other way
00:40:964 (8) - NC for antijump? You made that here too xD 01:36:469 (1) -
yep
02:32:610 (1,2,3,4) - Make 0.9x distance? If you do, make these 02:33:561 (1,2,3,4) - 1.0x and 02:34:513 (1,2,3,4) - 1.1x
I'll thins about this, sounds fun

Delete useless green lines
uguu

[Insane]
00:21:140 - Add a circle in 116|208
-
00:46:990 (4) - Ctrl+g?
-

For the rest is perfect, make a thing like the easy with the combos if you want Good luck

tiper wrote:

00:04:969 (2) - Приглуши этот софт-нормалхит(конец) и все следующие вплоть до 00:10:520 (4). Думаю, 45-50% должно хватить.
не хочу прям совсем беззвучными их делать

00:12:106 (1) - финиш на начало и
00:12:423 (2) - сюда на конец?
Если будешь применять, то и на следующие два слайдера поставь.
ага

00:15:119 (2) - Попробуй убрать финиш на этом белом тике(конец слайдера) и на следующих до конца 00:20:194 (2) этого слайдера.
там не хочу трогать

00:21:621 (2) - D:C2 финиш на начало?
слишком в этом месте тогда много финишей будет, надо подумать тут

00:25:110 (2) - -финиш
00:25:269 (3) - убрать финиш с конца, добавить на начало
00:26:062 (6) - -финиш
00:26:221 (7) - убрать с конца, добавить на начало
00:27:648 (2) - -финиш
00:27:806 (3) - поставить на начало, убрать с конца
00:28:599 (6) - убрать
00:28:758 (7) - поставить на начало, убрать с конца
00:30:185 (2) - убрать
но они же должны подчеркивать сильный бит, ох... подумаю тоже тут

00:32:406 (1,2) - пустота остается, добавь им по реверсу
да надо бы

1. 00:24:793 (1,2) - try to make better blanket.
2. 01:34:573 (4) - move it a bit righttop to make hexagonal structure.
   
   SPOILER

   
3. 02:00:263 (2) - move center point to (192,132) to make better blanket.
4. 02:34:519 (4) - replace it with rotated (3) by 90 degrees.

1. 00:24:793 (1,2,3) - I suggest straighten it like this:
   
   SPOILER

   
2. 00:27:331 (1,2,3) - ^
3. 00:34:943 (1,2,3) - sliders started on white ticks sounds better.
   
   SPOILER

   
4. 00:54:291 (4) - what about something like this?
   
   SPOILER

   
5. 01:13:955 (2) - ctrl+g? It should better flow.
6. 01:16:493 (2,3,4) - - make like this:
   
   SPOILER

   
7. 01:50:113 (3) - move center point to ~(328,280) to better flow.
8. 02:22:466 (4) - make better circular shape.
9. 02:31:664 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - these patterns can be too hard. I suggest make it easier.

1. 00:10:837 (1) - I suggest move hit to 00:10:837 (1).
2. 01:03:171 (3,5) - try to connect sliders like this:
   
   SPOILER

   
3. 01:15:858 (2,4) - make better blanket.
4. 01:48:845 (3) - reverse it?
5. 01:52:969 (7) - move it top to previous slider's height? (use ctrl+h)

wa_ wrote:

Hello Sieg!
Hello :3
There are no important issues, just suggestions.

[Normal]

1. 00:24:793 (1,2) - try to make better blanket.
   fixed a little
2. 01:34:573 (4) - move it a bit righttop to make hexagonal structure.
   
   SPOILER

   
   I don't like to make such shapes
3. 02:00:263 (2) - move center point to (192,132) to make better blanket.
   changed a little
4. 02:34:519 (4) - replace it with rotated (3) by 90 degrees.
   nope

[Hard]

1. 00:24:793 (1,2,3) - I suggest straighten it like this:
   
   SPOILER

   
2. 00:27:331 (1,2,3) - ^
   niceee
3. 00:34:943 (1,2,3) - sliders started on white ticks sounds better.
   
   SPOILER

   
   idk...
4. 00:54:291 (4) - what about something like this?
   
   SPOILER

   
   oh... maybe
5. 01:13:955 (2) - ctrl+g? It should better flow.
   not sure that this will be better flow
6. 01:16:493 (2,3,4) - - make like this:
   
   SPOILER

   
   nope
7. 01:50:113 (3) - move center point to ~(328,280) to better flow.
   fixed
8. 02:22:466 (4) - make better circular shape.
   fixed
9. 02:31:664 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - these patterns can be too hard. I suggest make it easier.
   they not so hard

[Insane]

1. 00:10:837 (1) - I suggest move hit to 00:10:837 (1).
   
2. 01:03:171 (3,5) - try to connect sliders like this:
   
   SPOILER

   
   i'll think about this looks funny
3. 01:15:858 (2,4) - make better blanket.
   fixed
4. 01:48:845 (3) - reverse it?
   nope
5. 01:52:969 (7) - move it top to previous slider's height? (use ctrl+h)
   nah... fark symmetry :3

Mapset is quite good, but Hard would follow vocals better

SPOILER

SPOILER

317,93,137708,2,0,P|326:285|194:93,1,600

GL again

mancusojuanmattos wrote:

Hi! From my m4m Queue.

[Normal:]

all fixed

- Sometimes the 4-plets in 1/1 note usage could be difficult to be the easiest diff. in the mapset and looking the high BPM, but it is up to you if you want to change them or not (for that reason i didn't mention them in my mod), I think that if you change some of them for sliders the rhythm will be pretty similar since you use Slider tick rate 1 but the difficult of the map will be lower than now.
Well, other than that, nice diff. (you abused a bit with your blankets xD)
I replace 3 or 4 4-notes with note-slider-note but left on finishes in 3\4 parts 00:47:947 (1,2,3,4) - because notes fits much much much better here.

[Hard:]

all fixed

• 00:58:256 (x) - Hmm.. I think a Note is pretty necessary here
I don't think so and this consistent with note skip on 00:49:850 (2,3,4,5) -
there is parts like 00:53:656 (2,3,4) - with this note covered but we have a guitar in it.
So I don't wont to change this.

[Insane:]

all fixed

Ok, that's all.
Give me a call later (and sorry for the delay).

eveless wrote:

as your request.

[Insane]
00:49:216 (1,2,3) - the Pattern itself is not perfect imo, how about make a tiny change with the placments like this:

SPOILER

"1(x:52 y:141) 2(x:25 y:34) 3(x:132 y:64)"

done
00:55:084 (5,6) - Does the sudden changed spacing on purpose or not?
oh, fixed that
01:22:361 (9,10,11,12,13) - It doesnt flows well imo, move 01:22:995 (12,13) - them a bit right can ease the problem, but to be honest it will be better if you can remake the pattern.
that was on purpose to keep dynamic, tbh I think this of course flows not naturally but plays well
01:48:369 (13,1,2) - ^same, I suggest you do sth like this

SPOILER

same goes here :3
just that, call me back if you're ready to rank.