I refuse to believe people are don't use LinuxKarmine wrote:
I refuse to believe people were born after 2010.
Retro gamers.ColdTooth wrote:
there are top players born after osu!'s first day
a person born in 2010 is 13-14 years oldKarmine wrote:
I refuse to believe people were born after 2010.
They shouldn't be here tbh.z0z wrote:
a person born in 2010 is 13-14 years oldKarmine wrote:
I refuse to believe people were born after 2010.
chances are, they probably areKarmine wrote:
They shouldn't be here tbh.z0z wrote:
a person born in 2010 is 13-14 years oldKarmine wrote:
I refuse to believe people were born after 2010.
I knowz0z wrote:
chances are, they probably areKarmine wrote:
They shouldn't be here tbh.z0z wrote:
a person born in 2010 is 13-14 years oldKarmine wrote:
I refuse to believe people were born after 2010.
If I delete this thread will the OT!Gov forgive me?reffty_gag wrote:
OMG this old cookiezi's freedom dive liveplay is uploaded 1 day after i was born !!
yeah sureabraker wrote:
If I delete this thread will the OT!Gov forgive me?reffty_gag wrote:
OMG this old cookiezi's freedom dive liveplay is uploaded 1 day after i was born !!
doesnt that mean u are/were too young to make osu accountreffty_gag wrote:
OMG this old cookiezi's freedom dive liveplay is uploaded 1 day after i was born !!
Seems like this cookiezi FD play just tried to welcome me to my life
What a time to be alive, what a time to be alive
(yes i was bored)
pls do itabraker wrote:
If I delete this thread will the OT!Gov forgive me?reffty_gag wrote:
OMG this old cookiezi's freedom dive liveplay is uploaded 1 day after i was born !!
doesnt mean it needs to be deleted/removed.Winnyace wrote:
but like why bring it back? there's nothing more to add to it, is there?
You didn't answer my question though.Blushing wrote:
doesnt mean it needs to be deleted/removed.Winnyace wrote:
but like why bring it back? there's nothing more to add to it, is there?
unfairly deleted without a concrete reason of why it should be nuked, plus OP made a complaint of its deletion tooWinnyace wrote:
but like why bring it back? there's nothing more to add to it, is there?
there doesnt really need to be for more added posts and stuff (unless op or someone else wants to continue posting on this thread) but more focused on the fact that the thread got deleted and the gov and OP didnt think it was worthy of deletion, so we put it back upWinnyace wrote:
okay, cool, but why bring it back if there's nothing to add to it?
stay away from this guy op ^^^^^^ and you're chilligorsprite wrote:
doubt
>.>Polyspora wrote:
stay away from this guy op ^^^^^^ and you're chilligorsprite wrote:
doubt
me too for some reasonWinnyace wrote:
I refuse to believe people are don't use LinuxKarmine wrote:
I refuse to believe people were born after 2010.
I mean, we're not going to deny an appeal because it's not a "high quality" threadYmir wrote:
What's the point of bringing this back?
I get appealing good and useful threads but this one is exceptionally pointless.
I've got bad news for you: about 8 billion people.BluePyTheWDeer_ wrote:
me too for some reasonWinnyace wrote:
I refuse to believe people are don't use LinuxKarmine wrote:
I refuse to believe people were born after 2010.
It won't. Sadly, people are either unknowing about Linux or they don't want to switch, for good and bad reasons.z0z wrote:
say hello to windows recall, this will reduce the flow of users to windows 11
wait we already are at 8 billion? we need to notify the oligarchs so they can do something about it, this is unacceptable!Karmine wrote:
I've got bad news for you: about 8 billion people.BluePyTheWDeer_ wrote:
me too for some reasonWinnyace wrote:
I refuse to believe people are don't use LinuxKarmine wrote:
I refuse to believe people were born after 2010.
OT mid 2024 I guessPatatitta wrote:
I swear how do you guys keep derailing stuff into linux discussions
That's what not touching grass since birth does to a mf.Patatitta wrote:
I swear how do you guys keep derailing stuff into linux discussions
hey im not a linux userKarmine wrote:
That's what not touching grass since birth does to a mf.Patatitta wrote:
I swear how do you guys keep derailing stuff into linux discussions
said the french guyKarmine wrote:
That's what not touching grass since birth does to a mf.Patatitta wrote:
I swear how do you guys keep derailing stuff into linux discussions
You're worse.Reyalp51 wrote:
hey im not a linux userKarmine wrote:
That's what not touching grass since birth does to a mf.Patatitta wrote:
I swear how do you guys keep derailing stuff into linux discussions
You look like an SS tier asshole. Your PFP absolutely doesn't help you here.Karmine wrote:
You're worse.Reyalp51 wrote:
hey im not a linux userKarmine wrote:
That's what not touching grass since birth does to a mf.Patatitta wrote:
I swear how do you guys keep derailing stuff into linux discussions
/abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzedWinnyace wrote:
You look like an SS tier asshole. Your PFP absolutely doesn't help you here.Karmine wrote:
You're worse.Reyalp51 wrote:
hey im not a linux userKarmine wrote:
That's what not touching grass since birth does to a mf.Patatitta wrote:
I swear how do you guys keep derailing stuff into linux discussions
Wait until you you're out of school and all your friends have moved far away, then you'll really feel old xD.her everything wrote:
i feel like im old ;-;
lmaoooo my friend is actually gonna move out this year soooo it's nearing 😰Karmine wrote:
Wait until you you're out of school and all your friends have moved far away, then you'll really feel old xD.her everything wrote:
i feel like im old ;-;
Ayy good luck with that.her everything wrote:
lmaoooo my friend is actually gonna move out this year soooo it's nearing 😰Karmine wrote:
Wait until you you're out of school and all your friends have moved far away, then you'll really feel old xD.her everything wrote:
i feel like im old ;-;
tsun tsunKarmine wrote:
You're worse.Reyalp51 wrote:
hey im not a linux userKarmine wrote:
That's what not touching grass since birth does to a mf.Patatitta wrote:
I swear how do you guys keep derailing stuff into linux discussions
what is the problem with his pfp lolWinnyace wrote:
You look like an SS tier asshole. Your PFP absolutely doesn't help you here.Karmine wrote:
You're worse.Reyalp51 wrote:
hey im not a linux userKarmine wrote:
That's what not touching grass since birth does to a mf.Patatitta wrote:
I swear how do you guys keep derailing stuff into linux discussions
started happening with me recentlyKarmine wrote:
Wait until you you're out of school and all your friends have moved far away, then you'll really feel old xD.her everything wrote:
i feel like im old ;-;
You made the thread where you said that one's pfp gives off a different vibe, right? Well, to me, his pfp gives off the vibe of someone eternally pissed off by everything and anything. Mix it with his assholistic replies and it really doesn't help.Polyspora wrote:
what is the problem with his pfp lol
When someone is an asshole and I feel like he is an asshole, I will say it. I feel like he is an asshole at the moment. If he isn't, great. He didn't make me feel like he isn't, however.sametdze wrote:
most of the time i root for winny but this time cant say that i do
they go to windows 10, 8, and 7 (yes people do that) insteadWinnyace wrote:
It won't. Sadly, people are either unknowing about Linux or they don't want to switch, for good and bad reasons.z0z wrote:
say hello to windows recall, this will reduce the flow of users to windows 11
I guess I was the idiot, again. I apologize for wrongly accusing you of something.Karmine wrote:
Chill guys I'm just fooling around. If I really wanted to talk shit to someone I'd go in their DM.
I'm a big boy, very serioussametdze wrote:
the idea of someone with an avatar like that talking shit to me makes me laugh for some reason
.What can I say? I'm way too sensitive sometimes and being online, in a sub-forum mostly interested in shitposting and whatnot, it isn't a good idea.sametdze wrote:
the idea of someone with an avatar like that talking shit to me makes me laugh for some reason
i think i sympathize with that;; it did in fact remind me of the poly thread, although im not very deeply affected by... most avatars, maybe, so much as i am by how our typing styles communicate our thoughts... it's our choices in punctuation and capitalization, sure, but also which topics we address and to what extent we elaborate on them. it's in how concretely precise or abstractly tangential our comments are, how we phrase a sentence and how we frame the subject. it's in how introspective or definitive we are in our suggestions or statements. it's how low/high the effort in emotive affect would be, how long you dwell and linger on a subject inside or outside the context of a conversation, how much we may or may not add qualifiers to our suggestions/statements, et ceteraWinnyace wrote:
What can I say? I'm way too sensitive sometimes and being online, in a sub-forum mostly interested in shitposting and whatnot, it isn't a good idea.sametdze wrote:
the idea of someone with an avatar like that talking shit to me makes me laugh for some reason
I believe my attempts at jokes here don't land compared to other members here, so over time, I've began being a bit more serious and whatnot. When I try to joke around, I try to make it obvious, either through the use of emotes or imagery or spelling errors or a combination of different things. Tone is almost impossible to be told through text alone, without hints, clearly stating the tone you have or context and it is easy to miss it too. I've missed with Karmine here.Achromalia wrote:
you've always read to me as being so... i guess... kind of ambiguously dry and terse, and yet also ambivalent? it admittedly is both fascinating and intimidating coupled with at least the impression of an earnestness in your unadultered critiques of various things, so it presents a kind of invisible wall, something like an impression of callousness (where any of the rare moments of whimsy counteracting it, like the pyromania thread, would appear slightly dry) which then is "betrayed"/subverted by very vulnerable glimpses of moments where it seems you place lots of care and effort into advising someone to take care of themself or in moments of admitting to insecurities or in describing yourself as sensitive
oh, that's pretty off topicsametdze wrote:
we went from "you're way too young" to "avatar impressions" and now we're looking at massive walls of text, cover your eyes reffty
mate do you not see the signreffty_gag wrote:
oh, that's pretty off topicsametdze wrote:
we went from "you're way too young" to "avatar impressions" and now we're looking at massive walls of text, cover your eyes reffty
na na nah, i dont wanna read them cuz yeah, im not interested (or even i dont like) conversation like these, like WHY ??sametdze wrote:
oh mb you're covering your eyes uncover them and look to your left
what drives achro to write such big paragraphs is unknown <(0-0)>reffty_gag wrote:
na na nah, i dont wanna read them cuz yeah, im not interested (or even i dont like) conversation like these, like WHY ??sametdze wrote:
oh mb you're covering your eyes uncover them and look to your left
maybe she want to write a novelsametdze wrote:
what drives achro to write such big paragraphs is unknown <(0-0)>reffty_gag wrote:
na na nah, i dont wanna read them cuz yeah, im not interested (or even i dont like) conversation like these, like WHY ??sametdze wrote:
oh mb you're covering your eyes uncover them and look to your left
i imagine the way i read your tone could precisely be informed by that impression of your drive toward... being rational and factually correct, probably, but in my mind it's also about deliberately appearing rational and factually correct (rather than correctness simply composing your appearance)-- almost as though insisting that this is something you should Demonstrate and Be (almost like "wearing a suit" made of these characteristics), and that's specifically what i read from even mentioning "rational and factually correct" + "feeling the need to switch up to *show* [rationality/factuality]", though that could entirely be likely to be an inaccurate made-up conclusion i've held in suspense about youWinnyace wrote:
I believe my attempts at jokes here don't land compared to other members here, so over time, I've began being a bit more serious and whatnot. When I try to joke around, I try to make it obvious, either through the use of emotes or imagery or spelling errors or a combination of different things. Tone is almost impossible to be told through text alone, without hints, clearly stating the tone you have or context and it is easy to miss it too. I've missed with Karmine here.Achromalia wrote:
you've always read to me as being so... i guess... kind of ambiguously dry and terse, and yet also ambivalent? it admittedly is both fascinating and intimidating coupled with at least the impression of an earnestness in your unadultered critiques of various things, so it presents a kind of invisible wall, something like an impression of callousness (where any of the rare moments of whimsy counteracting it, like the pyromania thread, would appear slightly dry) which then is "betrayed"/subverted by very vulnerable glimpses of moments where it seems you place lots of care and effort into advising someone to take care of themself or in moments of admitting to insecurities or in describing yourself as sensitive
I'm, probably, coming off as ambivalent because often I'll have one strong opinion about something, then someone comes and completely destroys the image I've had of that and I feel the need to switch up to show my rationality and factual correctness. I attempt to be as rational as I can, as well as factually correct, which certainly isn't the case always and some might say most of the time, but I do attempt to be rational and factually correct.
My wish to be rational and factually correct most likely stands from my desire to stand-out here, in some fashion. Back in 2020-2021, very few wanted to be logical. A lot of this sub-forum was RP stuff, very fantastical in nature. I didn't fit in at all. Nowadays, most people here are more serious, for the lack of a better word, less whimsy. I guess I also try to seem rational and factually correct than really be. If I was rational, I wouldn't have accused Karmine of being an asshole, would I?Achromalia wrote:
i imagine the way i read your tone could precisely be informed by that impression of your drive toward... being rational and factually correct, probably, but in my mind it's also about deliberately appearing rational and factually correct (rather than correctness simply composing your appearance)-- almost as though insisting that this is something you should Demonstrate and Be (almost like "wearing a suit" made of these characteristics), and that's specifically what i read from even mentioning "rational and factually correct" + "feeling the need to switch up to *show* [rationality/factuality]", though that could entirely be likely to be an inaccurate made-up conclusion i've held in suspense about youWinnyace wrote:
I believe my attempts at jokes here don't land compared to other members here, so over time, I've began being a bit more serious and whatnot. When I try to joke around, I try to make it obvious, either through the use of emotes or imagery or spelling errors or a combination of different things. Tone is almost impossible to be told through text alone, without hints, clearly stating the tone you have or context and it is easy to miss it too. I've missed with Karmine here.Achromalia wrote:
you've always read to me as being so... i guess... kind of ambiguously dry and terse, and yet also ambivalent? it admittedly is both fascinating and intimidating coupled with at least the impression of an earnestness in your unadultered critiques of various things, so it presents a kind of invisible wall, something like an impression of callousness (where any of the rare moments of whimsy counteracting it, like the pyromania thread, would appear slightly dry) which then is "betrayed"/subverted by very vulnerable glimpses of moments where it seems you place lots of care and effort into advising someone to take care of themself or in moments of admitting to insecurities or in describing yourself as sensitive
I'm, probably, coming off as ambivalent because often I'll have one strong opinion about something, then someone comes and completely destroys the image I've had of that and I feel the need to switch up to show my rationality and factual correctness. I attempt to be as rational as I can, as well as factually correct, which certainly isn't the case always and some might say most of the time, but I do attempt to be rational and factually correct.
i thiiink i have some kind of similar impulse, maybe. although i tend to phrase my motive and aspiration as Not being "rational", because i actually generally avoid this self-impression, but rather, it's that i would hope to be "accurate" (which may be considered effectively synonymous with "factual"? but somehow they just seem different) and "perceptive"
ultimately i'm not a very concrete or grounded or realistic person, in terms of my history with those in practice. and so i can't conscionably really be comfortable presuming myself or fashioning myself to appear that way (partly because i have very low logical clarity of mind in my opinion, with hazy impressions that radiate in weblike tangential tendrils to interrelated features), though i will still want to "be right"
in the forms that i critique people, it seems to be more about a mixture of "how harmful/hurtful might they be (inclusive of harm done from being wrong and propagating misinformation, therefore not exclusively a matter of sentiment in that it partly also is about logical consquence, the same way being emotionally hurt is about consequence)?" and "do they make any sense?" and "do they seem to sincerely and curiously introspect?", among some other qualifying conditions
hmmn. it's complicated, though i don't want that to discourage me from examining and parsing it. i just generally am averse to trying to insist that i'm being logical or rational, although i do want to be. i don't think it has to be mutually exclusive from sentimentality and whimsy. i really really don't, and therefore i think i tend to be caught somewhere in an ambiguous midpoint between childlike explorative gentleness and then the need to be soberly accurate and perceptive
idk how you read into this, though i would love to hear more from you about it so... mmyeah
you know what, I'm gonna try to understand what happenedsametdze wrote:
like you're saying you dont wanna read the big walls of text right
