Scyla rn: 👀Kobold84 wrote:
It happens on rare occasions, but you have to actually ignore all the red flags for that to happen, so if you're not actually seeking to get banned or have a forum addiction, it's practically impossible.Karmine wrote:
I wonder is it possible to get banned or silenced forever for shitty forum/chat posts?
forum
the grand edict: rules of Off-Topic (read before posting)
posted
Total Posts
1,290
idk if there even is such a thing as a perm silence, doesn’t it max out at 1 month or smth?Karmine wrote:
I wonder is it possible to get banned or silenced forever for shitty forum/chat posts?
Correct.Farfocele wrote:
idk if there even is such a thing as a perm silence, doesn’t it max out at 1 month or smth?Karmine wrote:
I wonder is it possible to get banned or silenced forever for shitty forum/chat posts?
I don't even participate in any mafia games because I'm still lost as to what you're supposed to do in them.Kobold84 wrote:
Rigbyuis wrote:
@abraker @Kobold84 @EphemeralYyottaCat wrote:
If it ((The mafia forum) was straight up accessible from the main forums then there would probably be more people.
is this a good idea?Coming in lazer™.
Problem is, while it might get some boost in popularity, it doesn't change the fact these kinds of games are mostly for people who are already into forums and know how to properly browse one. So while you can get a few wandering souls every now and then, it's not enough to actually revive the subforum.
I've read the rules and stuff about it several times and never understood any of it[ Sebastian ] wrote:
Kobold84 wrote:
Rigbyuis wrote:
@abraker @Kobold84 @EphemeralYyottaCat wrote:
If it ((The mafia forum) was straight up accessible from the main forums then there would probably be more people.
is this a good idea?Coming in lazer™.
Problem is, while it might get some boost in popularity, it doesn't change the fact these kinds of games are mostly for people who are already into forums and know how to properly browse one. So while you can get a few wandering souls every now and then, it's not enough to actually revive the subforum.
I don't even participate in any mafia games because I'm still lost as to what you're supposed to do in them.
just participate and you will figure it out as you goKarmine wrote:
I've read the rules and stuff about it several times and never understood any of it[ Sebastian ] wrote:
Kobold84 wrote:
Rigbyuis wrote:
@abraker @Kobold84 @EphemeralYyottaCat wrote:
If it ((The mafia forum) was straight up accessible from the main forums then there would probably be more people.
is this a good idea?Coming in lazer™.
Problem is, while it might get some boost in popularity, it doesn't change the fact these kinds of games are mostly for people who are already into forums and know how to properly browse one. So while you can get a few wandering souls every now and then, it's not enough to actually revive the subforum.
I don't even participate in any mafia games because I'm still lost as to what you're supposed to do in them.
or you will die
either way have fun
unexile scyla
Maybe in the same way MUDs are FFXIV og versionCerno wrote:
aint mafia technically just among us og version
I miss where everyone got exiled.Ephemeral wrote:
*please stand by, while I choose a random name from a hat*
hooray scyla! congratulations for the unexile!JustABeginner wrote:
I miss where everyone got exiled.Ephemeral wrote:
*please stand by, while I choose a random name from a hat*
plz don't exile me
i miss when "nobody" was exiled and i summoned him into the threadJustABeginner wrote:
I miss where everyone got exiled.Ephemeral wrote:
*please stand by, while I choose a random name from a hat*
a better question is how Scyla got unexiled, i guess everyone gets unexiled eventually
and looks like "nobody" is exiled again
exscylad
Rule 11-1: Don't make new rules.
I've already crossed thatKobold84 wrote:
Rule 11: Don't make new rules.
It's not a rule 11 anymore, is it? All right, I have an idea.THETM wrote:
I've already crossed thatKobold84 wrote:
Rule 11: Don't make new rules.
Huh i got silenced?
check ur profileAireunaeus wrote:
Huh i got silenced?
Yes I've already seen itTHETM wrote:
check ur profileAireunaeus wrote:
Huh i got silenced?
this is not a rule: hey, the
sonictehhedgeho
a few questions
let's say i post a thread on regular OT, then i post a thread on the surverys or fourm games. does this count as breaking the one thread a day rule? (same can go for vise versa)
if i post a thread on OT, can i go into other forums (general, modding and skinning, you know) and post there, or does that also break the one thread a day rule?
let's say i post a thread on regular OT, then i post a thread on the surverys or fourm games. does this count as breaking the one thread a day rule? (same can go for vise versa)
if i post a thread on OT, can i go into other forums (general, modding and skinning, you know) and post there, or does that also break the one thread a day rule?
I don't know about surveys and forum games, but you are allowed to post once in Off-Topic, as well as once in the other forums, everyday.
Subforums don't count
Also the 1 thread rule is only for OT afaik
Also the 1 thread rule is only for OT afaik
Only OT counts, sub-subforums like FG or Surveys don't. Although if you make a thread in OT and then it gets moved to either one of these, it still counts as a daily OT thread.
And yes, this rule only applies to OT.
And yes, this rule only applies to OT.
I made a post in GD and it was moved to OT by abrakerKobold84 wrote:
Only OT counts, sub-subforums like FG or Surveys don't. Although if you make a thread in OT and then it gets moved to either one of these, it still counts as a daily OT thread.
And yes, this rule only applies to OT.
does this count as a daily thread?
1k
Okay, now that's a difficult one. Maybe not, unless you made it intentionally.THETM wrote:
I made a post in GD and it was moved to OT by abrakerKobold84 wrote:
Only OT counts, sub-subforums like FG or Surveys don't. Although if you make a thread in OT and then it gets moved to either one of these, it still counts as a daily OT thread.
And yes, this rule only applies to OT.
does this count as a daily thread?
I wouldn't count it personally.
Fuck I was 5 days lateigorsprite wrote:
1k
I have already broken all of these.
Based.BlueChinchompa wrote:
I have already broken all of these.
let's just hypothetically say, that i make a thread at 11:59 PM. then it turns 12:00 AM. can i make a post then? (joke btw)
good questionsametdze wrote:
let's just hypothetically say, that i make a thread at 11:59 PM. then it turns 12:00 AM. can i make a post then? (joke btw)
every 24 hours, not every dayFarfocele wrote:
good questionsametdze wrote:
let's just hypothetically say, that i make a thread at 11:59 PM. then it turns 12:00 AM. can i make a post then? (joke btw)
With exceptions of courseluminar wrote:
every 24 hours, not every dayFarfocele wrote:
good questionsametdze wrote:
let's just hypothetically say, that i make a thread at 11:59 PM. then it turns 12:00 AM. can i make a post then? (joke btw)
I mean it's possible to technically bypass that rule by posting a thread every 23 hours I thinkI AM VERY SMART wrote:
With exceptions of courseluminar wrote:
every 24 hours, not every dayFarfocele wrote:
good questionsametdze wrote:
let's just hypothetically say, that i make a thread at 11:59 PM. then it turns 12:00 AM. can i make a post then? (joke btw)
i guess, but someone might find out you are doing this on purposeB0ii wrote:
I mean it's possible to technically bypass that rule by posting a thread every 23 hours I thinkI AM VERY SMART wrote:
With exceptions of courseluminar wrote:
every 24 hours, not every dayFarfocele wrote:
good questionsametdze wrote:
let's just hypothetically say, that i make a thread at 11:59 PM. then it turns 12:00 AM. can i make a post then? (joke btw)
And that someone is meFarfocele wrote:
i guess, but someone might find out you are doing this on purposeB0ii wrote:
I mean it's possible to technically bypass that rule by posting a thread every 23 hours I thinkI AM VERY SMART wrote:
With exceptions of courseluminar wrote:
every 24 hours, not every dayFarfocele wrote:
good questionsametdze wrote:
let's just hypothetically say, that i make a thread at 11:59 PM. then it turns 12:00 AM. can i make a post then? (joke btw)
@Corne2Plum3 @Kobold84I AM VERY SMART wrote:
And that someone is meFarfocele wrote:
i guess, but someone might find out you are doing this on purposeB0ii wrote:
I mean it's possible to technically bypass that rule by posting a thread every 23 hours I thinkI AM VERY SMART wrote:
With exceptions of courseluminar wrote:
every 24 hours, not every dayFarfocele wrote:
good questionsametdze wrote:
let's just hypothetically say, that i make a thread at 11:59 PM. then it turns 12:00 AM. can i make a post then? (joke btw)
As long as no one notices it's only been 23, 22, 21 or if you are daring even fewer hours, it's fine.yoony1 wrote:
@Corne2Plum3 @Kobold84I AM VERY SMART wrote:
And that someone is meFarfocele wrote:
i guess, but someone might find out you are doing this on purposeB0ii wrote:
I mean it's possible to technically bypass that rule by posting a thread every 23 hours I thinkI AM VERY SMART wrote:
With exceptions of courseluminar wrote:
every 24 hours, not every dayFarfocele wrote:
good questionsametdze wrote:
let's just hypothetically say, that i make a thread at 11:59 PM. then it turns 12:00 AM. can i make a post then? (joke btw)
Personally if it's a few hours early, as long it's only 1 thread by day it's okay (as long you don't abuse and if the delay is reasonable, e.g. at least 18 hours)yoony1 wrote:
@Corne2Plum3 @Kobold84I AM VERY SMART wrote:
And that someone is meFarfocele wrote:
i guess, but someone might find out you are doing this on purposeB0ii wrote:
I mean it's possible to technically bypass that rule by posting a thread every 23 hours I thinkI AM VERY SMART wrote:
With exceptions of courseluminar wrote:
every 24 hours, not every dayFarfocele wrote:
good questionsametdze wrote:
let's just hypothetically say, that i make a thread at 11:59 PM. then it turns 12:00 AM. can i make a post then? (joke btw)
paranoic people who check OT every 5 mins (i was like this months ago) will notice and remember every time that a user has posted and if his next thread breaks the rules, even if it is for a minute. the only difference between these people, at least in OT terms, is that some will be announcing this every time they have the opportunity, and others won't.
I love fart
snitchesRigbyuis wrote:
paranoic people who check OT every 5 mins (i was like this months ago) will notice and remember every time that a user has posted and if his next thread breaks the rules, even if it is for a minute. the only difference between these people, at least in OT terms, is that some will be announcing this every time they have the opportunity, and others won't.
I feel like scyla is gonna get exiled again sooner or later
i feel like the old times are returning 😀Farfocele wrote:
I feel like scyla is gonna get exiled again sooner or later
Aireunaeus wrote:
i feel like the old times are returning 😀Farfocele wrote:
I feel like scyla is gonna get exiled again sooner or later
Why are you responding with a music video 💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀Scyla wrote:
Aireunaeus wrote:
i feel like the old times are returning 😀Farfocele wrote:
I feel like scyla is gonna get exiled again sooner or later
It’s ScylaAnaxii wrote:
Why are you responding with a music video 💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀Scyla wrote:
Aireunaeus wrote:
i feel like the old times are returning 😀Farfocele wrote:
I feel like scyla is gonna get exiled again sooner or later
of coursePolyspora wrote:
It’s ScylaAnaxii wrote:
Why are you responding with a music video 💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀Scyla wrote:
Aireunaeus wrote:
i feel like the old times are returning 😀Farfocele wrote:
I feel like scyla is gonna get exiled again sooner or later
Rule 11-2: If there's one more rule, it will be cancelled.
another rule: scyla has immunity (for now)Anaxii wrote:
Rule 11-2: If there's one more rule, it will be cancelled.
no way, pls take away my perksFarfocele wrote:
another rule: scyla has immunity (for now)Anaxii wrote:
Rule 11-2: If there's one more rule, it will be cancelled.
NoFarfocele wrote:
another rule: scyla has immunity (for now)Anaxii wrote:
Rule 11-2: If there's one more rule, it will be cancelled.
good, that makes me happy. i swear i thought they had some sort of itCorne2Plum3 wrote:
NoFarfocele wrote:
another rule: scyla has immunity (for now)Anaxii wrote:
Rule 11-2: If there's one more rule, it will be cancelled.
I can make you more happyFarfocele wrote:
good, that makes me happy. i swear i thought they had some sort of itCorne2Plum3 wrote:
NoFarfocele wrote:
another rule: scyla has immunity (for now)Anaxii wrote:
Rule 11-2: If there's one more rule, it will be cancelled.
why do you have to always say sus things i stgScyla wrote:
I can make you more happyFarfocele wrote:
good, that makes me happy. i swear i thought they had some sort of itCorne2Plum3 wrote:
NoFarfocele wrote:
another rule: scyla has immunity (for now)Anaxii wrote:
Rule 11-2: If there's one more rule, it will be cancelled.
It's because that was his 69th post and he was attempting to be extra "Nice."Anaxii wrote:
why do you have to always say sus things i stgScyla wrote:
I can make you more happyFarfocele wrote:
good, that makes me happy. i swear i thought they had some sort of itCorne2Plum3 wrote:
NoFarfocele wrote:
another rule: scyla has immunity (for now)Anaxii wrote:
Rule 11-2: If there's one more rule, it will be cancelled.
Shame it'll be the last one they ever make. RIP Scyla.
OT posts don't countunknownamus wrote:
It's because that was his 69th post and he was attempting to be extra "Nice."Anaxii wrote:
why do you have to always say sus things i stgScyla wrote:
I can make you more happyFarfocele wrote:
good, that makes me happy. i swear i thought they had some sort of itCorne2Plum3 wrote:
NoFarfocele wrote:
another rule: scyla has immunity (for now)Anaxii wrote:
Rule 11-2: If there's one more rule, it will be cancelled.
Shame it'll be the last one they ever make. RIP Scyla.
+ He's always acting weird and horny on Discord 😑
We love him for thatAnaxii wrote:
OT posts don't countunknownamus wrote:
It's because that was his 69th post and he was attempting to be extra "Nice."Anaxii wrote:
why do you have to always say sus things i stgScyla wrote:
I can make you more happyFarfocele wrote:
good, that makes me happy. i swear i thought they had some sort of itCorne2Plum3 wrote:
NoFarfocele wrote:
another rule: scyla has immunity (for now)Anaxii wrote:
Rule 11-2: If there's one more rule, it will be cancelled.
Shame it'll be the last one they ever make. RIP Scyla.
+ He's always acting weird and horny on Discord 😑
I agreeReyalp51 wrote:
We love him for thatAnaxii wrote:
OT posts don't countunknownamus wrote:
It's because that was his 69th post and he was attempting to be extra "Nice."Anaxii wrote:
why do you have to always say sus things i stgScyla wrote:
I can make you more happyFarfocele wrote:
good, that makes me happy. i swear i thought they had some sort of itCorne2Plum3 wrote:
NoFarfocele wrote:
another rule: scyla has immunity (for now)Anaxii wrote:
Rule 11-2: If there's one more rule, it will be cancelled.
Shame it'll be the last one they ever make. RIP Scyla.
+ He's always acting weird and horny on Discord 😑
Wait I thought there was a rule of 3 posts in a row made by the same person.
What's that rule?eblf2013 wrote:
Wait I thought there was a rule of 3 posts in a row made by the same person.
If a person makes three posts in a row in the same thread, they must be silenced.Anaxii wrote:
What's that rule?eblf2013 wrote:
Wait I thought there was a rule of 3 posts in a row made by the same person.
thats a non written rule, it gets ignored sometimes thougheblf2013 wrote:
If a person makes three posts in a row in the same thread, they must be silenced.Anaxii wrote:
What's that rule?eblf2013 wrote:
Wait I thought there was a rule of 3 posts in a row made by the same person.
No idea why this rule exists but mehhhhReyalp51 wrote:
thats a non written rule, it gets ignored sometimes thougheblf2013 wrote:
If a person makes three posts in a row in the same thread, they must be silenced.Anaxii wrote:
What's that rule?eblf2013 wrote:
Wait I thought there was a rule of 3 posts in a row made by the same person.
To avoid the same person postingAnaxii wrote:
No idea why this rule exists but mehhhhReyalp51 wrote:
thats a non written rule, it gets ignored sometimes thougheblf2013 wrote:
If a person makes three posts in a row in the same thread, they must be silenced.Anaxii wrote:
What's that rule?eblf2013 wrote:
Wait I thought there was a rule of 3 posts in a row made by the same person.
and posting againeblf2013 wrote:
To avoid the same person postingAnaxii wrote:
No idea why this rule exists but mehhhhReyalp51 wrote:
thats a non written rule, it gets ignored sometimes thougheblf2013 wrote:
If a person makes three posts in a row in the same thread, they must be silenced.Anaxii wrote:
What's that rule?eblf2013 wrote:
Wait I thought there was a rule of 3 posts in a row made by the same person.
PLEASE DO NOT SILENCE ME THIS IS JUST A DEMONSTRATION ON WHY THE SAME PERSON POSTING SEVERAL TIMES IN A ROW IS ANNOYING.eblf2013 wrote:
and posting againeblf2013 wrote:
To avoid the same person postingAnaxii wrote:
No idea why this rule exists but mehhhhReyalp51 wrote:
thats a non written rule, it gets ignored sometimes thougheblf2013 wrote:
If a person makes three posts in a row in the same thread, they must be silenced.Anaxii wrote:
What's that rule?eblf2013 wrote:
Wait I thought there was a rule of 3 posts in a row made by the same person.
It doesn't need to be a rule since it would be considered as spam, which itself is against the rules
Bro I literally invaded the whole OT page several times and I got NOTHING oofeblf2013 wrote:
PLEASE DO NOT SILENCE ME THIS IS JUST A DEMONSTRATION ON WHY THE SAME PERSON POSTING SEVERAL TIMES IN A ROW IS ANNOYING.eblf2013 wrote:
and posting againeblf2013 wrote:
To avoid the same person postingAnaxii wrote:
No idea why this rule exists but mehhhhReyalp51 wrote:
thats a non written rule, it gets ignored sometimes thougheblf2013 wrote:
If a person makes three posts in a row in the same thread, they must be silenced.Anaxii wrote:
What's that rule?eblf2013 wrote:
Wait I thought there was a rule of 3 posts in a row made by the same person.
Because this is allowedAnaxii wrote:
Bro I literally invaded the whole OT page several times and I got NOTHING oofeblf2013 wrote:
PLEASE DO NOT SILENCE ME THIS IS JUST A DEMONSTRATION ON WHY THE SAME PERSON POSTING SEVERAL TIMES IN A ROW IS ANNOYING.eblf2013 wrote:
and posting againeblf2013 wrote:
To avoid the same person postingAnaxii wrote:
No idea why this rule exists but mehhhhReyalp51 wrote:
thats a non written rule, it gets ignored sometimes thougheblf2013 wrote:
If a person makes three posts in a row in the same thread, they must be silenced.Anaxii wrote:
What's that rule?eblf2013 wrote:
Wait I thought there was a rule of 3 posts in a row made by the same person.
I mean, several consecutive replies in the same thread, just like I did above.Anaxii wrote:
Bro I literally invaded the whole OT page several times and I got NOTHING oofeblf2013 wrote:
PLEASE DO NOT SILENCE ME THIS IS JUST A DEMONSTRATION ON WHY THE SAME PERSON POSTING SEVERAL TIMES IN A ROW IS ANNOYING.eblf2013 wrote:
and posting againeblf2013 wrote:
To avoid the same person postingAnaxii wrote:
No idea why this rule exists but mehhhhReyalp51 wrote:
thats a non written rule, it gets ignored sometimes thougheblf2013 wrote:
If a person makes three posts in a row in the same thread, they must be silenced.Anaxii wrote:
What's that rule?eblf2013 wrote:
Wait I thought there was a rule of 3 posts in a row made by the same person.
If it's the same person but just making a post in many threads, it's fine.
NICE.eblf2013 wrote:
I mean, several consecutive replies in the same thread, just like I did above.Anaxii wrote:
Bro I literally invaded the whole OT page several times and I got NOTHING oofeblf2013 wrote:
PLEASE DO NOT SILENCE ME THIS IS JUST A DEMONSTRATION ON WHY THE SAME PERSON POSTING SEVERAL TIMES IN A ROW IS ANNOYING.eblf2013 wrote:
and posting againeblf2013 wrote:
To avoid the same person postingAnaxii wrote:
No idea why this rule exists but mehhhhReyalp51 wrote:
thats a non written rule, it gets ignored sometimes thougheblf2013 wrote:
If a person makes three posts in a row in the same thread, they must be silenced.Anaxii wrote:
What's that rule?eblf2013 wrote:
Wait I thought there was a rule of 3 posts in a row made by the same person.
If it's the same person but just making a post in many threads, it's fine.
the grand eDICK hahahhahah
Nobody laughedKitte wrote:
the grand eDICK hahahhahah
lol, never noticedKitte wrote:
the grand eDICK hahahhahah
Anaxii wrote:
Nobody laughedKitte wrote:
the grand eDICK hahahhahah
NOBODY LAUGHED 🔪🔪🔪🔪🔪🔪🔪🔪🔪🔪🔪🔪🔪🔪Kitte wrote:
Anaxii wrote:
Nobody laughedKitte wrote:
the grand eDICK hahahhahah
Do you think AMA needs to have its subforum?
This has got to be one of the most common idea of a thread we've ever come up with for years and yet it still has not yet been died down or slowly decreasing.
This has got to be one of the most common idea of a thread we've ever come up with for years and yet it still has not yet been died down or slowly decreasing.
There's introductions forum, AMAs here are only a trend that comes up from time to time so it's no big dealJustABeginner wrote:
Do you think AMA needs to have its subforum?
This has got to be one of the most common idea of a thread we've ever come up with for years and yet it still has not yet been died down or slowly decreasing.
If you were to make a new forum for AMAs it would probably be dead
Mine got locked because some people necroposted on it and I'm too old to make a new one ;_;Karmine wrote:
There's introductions forum, AMAs here are only a trend that comes up from time to time so it's no big dealJustABeginner wrote:
Do you think AMA needs to have its subforum?
This has got to be one of the most common idea of a thread we've ever come up with for years and yet it still has not yet been died down or slowly decreasing.
If you were to make a new forum for AMAs it would probably be dead
i hate this trend btwCorne2Plum3 wrote:
Mine got locked because some people necroposted on it and I'm too old to make a new one ;_;Karmine wrote:
There's introductions forum, AMAs here are only a trend that comes up from time to time so it's no big dealJustABeginner wrote:
Do you think AMA needs to have its subforum?
This has got to be one of the most common idea of a thread we've ever come up with for years and yet it still has not yet been died down or slowly decreasing.
If you were to make a new forum for AMAs it would probably be dead
Very insightful post, I'm glad you made it.Anaxii wrote:
i hate this trend btwCorne2Plum3 wrote:
Mine got locked because some people necroposted on it and I'm too old to make a new one ;_;Karmine wrote:
There's introductions forum, AMAs here are only a trend that comes up from time to time so it's no big dealJustABeginner wrote:
Do you think AMA needs to have its subforum?
This has got to be one of the most common idea of a thread we've ever come up with for years and yet it still has not yet been died down or slowly decreasing.
If you were to make a new forum for AMAs it would probably be dead
Im very impressed that noone got exiled for 9 months already 😮
Be the change you want to see.My Angel Anaxii wrote:
Im very impressed that noone got exiled for 9 months already 😮
The only people that get exiled are people who do it on purpose tbh.Kobold84 wrote:
Be the change you want to see.My Angel Anaxii wrote:
Im very impressed that noone got exiled for 9 months already 😮
Few times there has been someone who got exiled due to their sheer stupidity.
i was exiled once for being stupid and once on purposeKarmine wrote:
The only people that get exiled are people who do it on purpose tbh.Kobold84 wrote:
Be the change you want to see.My Angel Anaxii wrote:
Im very impressed that noone got exiled for 9 months already 😮
Few times there has been someone who got exiled due to their sheer stupidity.
how do you guys manage to get exiled?igorsprite wrote:
i was exiled once for being stupid and once on purposeKarmine wrote:
The only people that get exiled are people who do it on purpose tbh.Kobold84 wrote:
Be the change you want to see.My Angel Anaxii wrote:
Im very impressed that noone got exiled for 9 months already 😮
Few times there has been someone who got exiled due to their sheer stupidity.
HardworkAnaxii wrote:
how do you guys manage to get exiled?igorsprite wrote:
i was exiled once for being stupid and once on purposeKarmine wrote:
The only people that get exiled are people who do it on purpose tbh.Kobold84 wrote:
Be the change you want to see.My Angel Anaxii wrote:
Im very impressed that noone got exiled for 9 months already 😮
Few times there has been someone who got exiled due to their sheer stupidity.
being retarded is not work
Yes i agree thats why u get exiled because of hardworkYmir wrote:
being retarded is not work
tbh i am shocked you didn't get exiled any more times Scyla xD
1st timeAnaxii wrote:
how do you guys manage to get exiled?igorsprite wrote:
i was exiled once for being stupid and once on purposeKarmine wrote:
The only people that get exiled are people who do it on purpose tbh.Kobold84 wrote:
Be the change you want to see.My Angel Anaxii wrote:
Im very impressed that noone got exiled for 9 months already 😮
Few times there has been someone who got exiled due to their sheer stupidity.
community/forums/topics/1279365?n=1
2nd and 3rd was because i talked too much e.e
Is anyone okay to make the exiled list private, so people that don't deserve it don't get attention?
No. People would speculate anyway.Corne2Plum3 wrote:
Is anyone okay to make the exiled list private, so people that don't deserve it don't get attention?
not a GMT but i agree with this statementKobold84 wrote:
No. People would speculate anyway.Corne2Plum3 wrote:
Is anyone okay to make the exiled list private, so people that don't deserve it don't get attention?