I'm sorry ;__;
At least now I'm known for reckless, risky moves.
But, what if I'm not Doctor~ My plan could be working.
At least now I'm known for reckless, risky moves.
But, what if I'm not Doctor~ My plan could be working.
If I were to guess at this very moment, NoHItter and either Q or DxS.0_o wrote:
If you were to guess the mafia right now, who would it be?
Right now, we don't have a cop and if we mislynch tonight, we are likely to lose this game. We must lynch a mafia twice to win the game and we are only left with one mislynch chance. Which means, if we mislynch, we have to get those mafias twice in a roll. I want to make sure we can get everything out of thisrust45 wrote:
So would you consider yourself a player who tries to get the job done quickly? (I'm not accusing you of anything but you seem to be trying to do that right now if you're a townie, as you're doing a great job of trying to scum hunt.)
That is the questionrust45 wrote:
Anyway, I'm kinda curious as to why Q Fos'd bmin, I don't quite see what bmin has done lately (if at all) is suspcious in my book.
"It would be good if we lynched the roleblocker" isn't exactly a useful piece of insight.DeathxShinigami wrote:
Personal thoughts however.
Imagine if we do lynch a mafia member today.
Obviously whoever we lynch determines who dies during night as well.
If we lose a key vocal townie during night and we mislynch either way...it's pretty much over with animask already roleclaiming.
However, what happens if we find out that the person we lynched is the mafia roleblocker? This would actually put us in a better position to protect a town member during night (considering if animask really is doctor) and we'd actually gain some ground against mafia.
tl;dr
If we lynch a mafia roleblocker that means we can find out who the other mafia person easier on Day 3. But if we only capture a lynch on a generic mafia man someone will end up suiciding to even it out still with the mafia roleblocker in play. And lastly if we fail to lynch a mafia player consider it GG.
FoS on rust and Player Q for the time being.
FoS on rust and Player Q for the time being.Reasoning?
mafia? shouldn't that be everyone in general? remember that buddying thing as I said earlier bmin?bmin11 wrote:
Well, if you are not the doctor, thing will get interesting (I can already see mafias being confused)
Your suspicion on Mashley was based on your gut (as you stated) at the very beginning. No other reasons were purposed until animask also gave on opinion of "Mashley is trying too hard to fit in" + Ph0X's reversed FoS list (even I stated SOME COULD BE OUTDATED). It moved way too quickly and even that didn't mind DxS and you for voting the last two votes. Was it that convincing or supportive to your suspicion on Mashley? That not even a second thought on to wait for a defence?NoHItter wrote:
I've already explained that I suspected Mashley from the start.
Sounds like something you'd have to ask Lady, unless you're saying if the person doesn't post their HoS as a vote before they log off that's a no vote?bmin11 wrote:
I got an idea, lets say HoS (Hand of Suspicion) to be our vote. Just before we make our log out on the last moment, we will vote on whatever we HoSed on. It should work similar to vote with unvote rule
He just means that we simply keep an HOS on whoever we want to vote for, then officially vote at last minute so we don't have another Mashley incident where someone wants to change their mind.DeathxShinigami wrote:
Sounds like something you'd have to ask Lady, unless you're saying if the person doesn't post their HoS as a vote before they log off that's a no vote?bmin11 wrote:
I got an idea, lets say HoS (Hand of Suspicion) to be our vote. Just before we make our log out on the last moment, we will vote on whatever we HoSed on. It should work similar to vote with unvote rule
The person with no HoS would be saying "I'm not voting", but he can still vote technically. Of course, I'm not going to look that person as a reliable townie.DeathxShinigami wrote:
Sounds like something you'd have to ask Lady, unless you're saying if the person doesn't post their HoS as a vote before they log off that's a no vote?
Yeahhh we could have avoided a lot of drama if you had just said that in the first place. The mafia already knew you were the doctor because of the successful roleblock so there wasn't any point in hiding it.Also, you asked a question that everyone answered again.
If you're telling the truth that is.
Quy, you're using the same reasoning that got Mashley vote lynched on the first day (except for the contribution part).Quaraezha wrote:
Okay so about my suspicion on bmin11
(Not that's it's much of a big deal, but these are my 2 cents)
I believe bmin11 is a bit TOO active and trying TOO hard to fit in with townies.
Even though bmin11 has contributed a lot, I say these are just elements of trying to blend in.
(Although considering that this is bmin11's first game, this might probably be normal and bmin11's townie)
0_o, you should have realized that Ph0X and myself both voted for Mashley.Yes, but for different reasons. You said that you thought he was trying too hard to fit in, and Ph0X voted for him because Mashley had the most FoS's out of everyone (although when you actually look at everyone's explaination for their Mashley FoS's most of them are fairly mild. Ph0X himself didn't even state any strong suspicions about him)
Also, the mafia shouldn't know if their roleblock was succesful or not.The first thing I thought when you posted the "any doctors or cops" post is that you were a (noob) doctor looking for a cop to protect (I had a feeling there were others that thought this as well but didn't say anything in order to keep you hidden, though I could be wrong of course). I believe the mafia had the same idea, which is probably why they roleblocked you. If you hadn't have said anything about it the next day then there would still been have some uncertainty, but blatantly saying "there must be a roleblocker" completely tipped your hand as doctor is the only townie that would know there is a roleblocker.
DeathxShinigami wrote:
In response to animask, it was infighting about the past day 1 that you accused me on mostly when a lot of those accusations were cleared up. I am trying to stay relevant in my posts by continuing to say what I believe in but somehow you like to bring up the past with your reckless playing style which really disturbs me. However it isn't wise to just evade that and immediately accusing someone else without dealing with what others bring up against you first. (such as in my case) Gotta like the bigger shift in playing style since you claimed doctor however.
Firstly I'm pretty sure you aren't getting lynched today.animask wrote:
ty~ I think. I'm getting lynched anyways so I might as well contribute like crazy.
(or maybe I just raised my lynch rate...)
Also, how much time do we have left? Approx.?
I know they would also try to distance themselve to avoid alignment, but you suggested "mafia trying to lynch a mafia" not "mafia trying to distance eachother by putting suspicion" and I was a bit humoured by it. Well now I understand what you are trying to say, so there's no problem with this anymore (to me).animask wrote:
bmin11, you accused my idea of the mafia targeting another mafia to be stupid, when you forgot about how it is opposite
of the mafia buddy system. You also refused to believe it could be possible (I didn't claim you as mafia. I just made an example of a possible mafia pairing like that.)
I wasn't upset by your assumption, but how you ignored my respond TWICE and ASKED AGAIN. *ahem* It wouldn't have been a big deal (since most knew you were a doctor anyway), but ignoring me is a different matter. I'm going to remind you again (because I'm worried you might have missed it again), please read my posts.animask wrote:
You shouldn't have gotten too upset by my assumptions unless you were actually guilty
Everyone will vote on their last log in before the lynch. Voting means "I have made my decision and I'm not going to change my vote no matter how you defense". So ya, remember to vote if you can't log in before the lynch. We need eveyones voteanimask wrote:
I agree with the HoS pseudo-vote/unvote idea. Except, will we have to vote at the last minute or something similar?
And how did I not see this until now ;_; Sorry NoHItter for accusing you...NoHItter wrote:
Ahh crap. I forgot that since the votes are permanent, claiming when you are about to get lynched is useless.
Next day I suggest we really go through with a pseudo-voting system before actually voting to give leeway for any changes in suspicions
NoHItter wrote:
Ahh crap. I forgot that since the votes are permanent, claiming when you are about to get lynched is useless.
Next day I suggest we really go through with a pseudo-voting system before actually voting to give leeway for any changes in suspicions
Basically all of what I mentioned about you in my previous post. Stuff you did or said that I found incriminating.NoHItter wrote:
Incidentally rust, what are those "dirt" you mentioned?
When I read this post in context (both when it was posted and through my re-read), it seemed more like you were talking about claiming when one's about to get lynched. The post didn't seem to have to do with your vote at all.NoHItter wrote:
Ahh crap. I forgot that since the votes are permanent, claiming when you are about to get lynched is useless.
Next day I suggest we really go through with a pseudo-voting system before actually voting to give leeway for any changes in suspicions
If I feel less lazy after I get up tomorrow, or if I still feel this lazy but someone has posted the links to D1 and D2 start.rust45 wrote:
Mod: may you please update the OP to show the starts of the days, I remember this being in other games and it's useful for reference.
I knew I was forgetting something...bmin11 wrote:
I still haven't got any posts about suspicion against rust45
and animask, you didn't post anything about rust45 on your last suspicion list (or similar to) for some reason.
If I was mafia, I wouldn't even kill him, as when I'm mafia, I go for those who did participate as much as others, that way I get get someone who was slowing down the game, and possibly an aux role who was trying to go noticed. Ph0x did not meet my conditions for a night 1 kill.
There's more to mafia than winning IMO. As a townie there's not really anything you can do to make it fun (espcially in small games like this), but as a mafia, killing good players will make it less interesting. I dunno though, I haven't actually been mafia in a game so I don't know if doing this is really that great of an idea.animask wrote:
Why take out the bad player if you were mafia? That seems more like what a townie would think.
But if you don't play to win, its not really as fun. I could probably make the game fun on the townie side ( I think I have. ) Also, evenrust45 wrote:
There's more to mafia than winning IMO. As a townie there's not really anything you can do to make it fun (espcially in small games like this), but as a mafia, killing good players will make it less interesting. I dunno though, I haven't actually been mafia in a game so I don't know if doing this is really that great of an idea.animask wrote:
Why take out the bad player if you were mafia? That seems more like what a townie would think.
If you really are town I'm voting NoHItter then...cause he doesn't seem to be anymore willing than you to roleclaim. x:rust45 wrote:
I dunno though, I haven't actually been mafia in a game so I don't know if doing this is really that great of an idea.
Or the Roleblocker~NoHItter wrote:
FWIW, It's useless to roleclaim.
animask claimed Doctor.
Mashley was Cop.
All other possible roles now are either Scum or Vanilla Townies.
And speaking of which, I am a Vanilla Townie.
DxS voted rust45 by the way0_o wrote:
If he turns up town I'm going with DxS + rust for mafia.
Wait until there is a solid and general consensus. If by any chance, any one town submits a vote on a fellow townie, the mafia will just bandwagon to win.And wow, never thought of that. This is really dangerous indeed... we should come up with some opinion list or questionnaire so we can have everyone to post and not waste times like Day 2
Hmm, well DxS COULD be simply deepening his cover, but I'll admit that I forgot to take that into consideration so I'll revise that statement:bmin11 wrote:
DxS voted rust45 by the way
Yikes bmin, way to get edgy on me all of a sudden eh?bmin11 wrote:
Wait until there is a solid and general consensus. If by any chance, any one town submits a vote on a fellow townie, the mafia will just bandwagon to win.And wow, never thought of that. This is really dangerous indeed... we should come up with some opinion list or questionnaire so we can have everyone to post and not waste times like Day 2
And DxS, why am I getting the feeling of a bandwagon from you? I'm asking this leaving the friendship behind us at the moment (this is a game this is a game this is a game)
This is giving me a weird feeling.... I might have to think about it deeper about this.....rust45 wrote:
Well, just like yesterday, there basically two people on the chopping block
Err I'm pretty sure this just means that we are either lynching either No or rust today.bmin11 wrote:
As I claimed earlier, I'll vote rust45, but I notice that rust45 came with a valid pointThis is giving me a weird feeling.... I might have to think about it deeperrust45 wrote:
Well, just like yesterday, there basically two people on the chopping block
Oh right "Two people on the chopping board". I read it the other way >_>;;0_o wrote:
Err I'm pretty sure this just means that we are either lynching either No or rust today.
0_o wrote:
If NoHItter turns town then rust45 is most likely mafia. Not sure who his partner would be, but I'm thinking either DxS or Q.
Though it looks like rust45 is kicking the bucket anyway so that scenario is likely moot.
I think this statement was a basis to vote the other in the next Day. Town shouldn't already limit themselves the previous Day. IMO those two statements seem to be a bases to vote the one who didn't get lynched. Thus I am suspicious of it.0_o wrote:
If rust turns town, I am almost certain DxS and No are mafia
If rust turns mafia, I have no freaking idea what to think. I'd probably have to do another readthrough..
I posted those scenarios so I could have all of my thoughts out in the open in case I was nightkilled.NoHItter wrote:
One odd thing about faceman is that he already placed a dichotomy before rust or me was going to get lynched.0_o wrote:
If NoHItter turns town then rust45 is most likely mafia. Not sure who his partner would be, but I'm thinking either DxS or Q.
Though it looks like rust45 is kicking the bucket anyway so that scenario is likely moot.I think this statement was a basis to vote the other in the next Day. Town shouldn't already limit themselves the previous Day. IMO those two statements seem to be a bases to vote the one who didn't get lynched. Thus I am suspicious of it.0_o wrote:
If rust turns town, I am almost certain DxS and No are mafia
If rust turns mafia, I have no freaking idea what to think. I'd probably have to do another readthrough..
Also I think I see a logic error somewhere. (If NoHitter = town, rust = mafia, then why did he not say the reverse if rust were to flip mafia?) ScumIf you turned up town then the possible mafia in my mind would have been two of rust, DxS and Q. There's a 2/3 chance that any one of them could be mafia via random chance, and you turning town would have gave rust even more mafia points, so he would have been a safe bet.
I'm not getting what you mean. Could you elaborate it further?Quaraezha wrote:
NoHItter seems to be defensive to DxS when claiming that he is neutral.
I seem to get what you mean, but you probably should have explained it when you posted it. UnHoS: 0_o0_o wrote:
If you turned up town then the possible mafia in my mind would have been two of rust, DxS and Q. There's a 2/3 chance that any one of them could be mafia via random chance, and you turning town would have gave rust even more mafia points, so he would have been a safe bet.
Now if rust turned up mafia, then only [i]one[/] of you, DxS and Q would be mafia (1/3 chance). You and DxS would have earned town points for lynching him, but seeing as Q was also low on my suspicions list I wouldn't really have a good case against anyone.
Since people are now suspicious of DxS, you try to defend him by saying that he seems neutral.NoHItter wrote:
I'm not getting what you mean. Could you elaborate it further?Quaraezha wrote:
NoHItter seems to be defensive to DxS when claiming that he is neutral.
That was my read/opinion on DxS. I found him Neutral, because despite the suspicious things he done, faceman attacked him, and I though faceman was scum. Now that I don't quite think faceman is scum, DxS is now on top of my suspicions list.Quaraezha wrote:
Since people are now suspicious of DxS, you try to defend him by saying that he seems neutral.
I assume you mean that mafia tend to only target one person as they have better odds of having him lynched?DeathxShinigami wrote:
Keep FWIW'ing me and that just makes you trollish, mafia's tend to target only one user cause they think that at this point that's a town since you have better odds.
I already posted my justification.DeathxShinigami wrote:
Still want some justification.
NoHItter wrote:
Since the start, DxS has been playing oddly. "Bluffing" bmin, etc. His vote on rust, after mine, seems to be just hoping on the bandwagon. Though since I think 0_o is most likely Mafia, then I think DxS isn't Mafia. Neutral
NoHItter wrote:
That was my read/opinion on DxS. I found him Neutral, because despite the suspicious things he done, faceman attacked him, and I though faceman was scum. Now that I don't quite think faceman is scum, DxS is now on top of my suspicions list.
Because he's so certain that you are mafia and NoHItter indeed FoSed 0_o as well until 0_o defenced it back. Why don't you try to defence instead?DeathxShinigami wrote:
Why the hell don't you target someone else if you're not mafia then?
Hey, you left your self outDxS wrote:
if NoHItter's statement is true.
......... being a defeatist is not the right choice and I thought you learnt this on your last game.....DeathxShinigami wrote:
Why should I include myself if I don't see myself as mafia?
it doesn't matter anyways if you guys want to lynch me or if mafia wants to kill me.
I won't be winning the game anyways no matter what alignment I am.
End of story.