How else would I play? So yeah, this is how I play, I guess.DeathxShinigami wrote:
Can you at least tell me straight up if this is how you play? Cause it's really annoying me to animask.
How else would I play? So yeah, this is how I play, I guess.DeathxShinigami wrote:
Can you at least tell me straight up if this is how you play? Cause it's really annoying me to animask.
Cool or chill?animask wrote:
How else would I play? So yeah, this is how I play, I guess.DeathxShinigami wrote:
Can you at least tell me straight up if this is how you play? Cause it's really annoying me to animask.
Interesting. Why so? (as always, I want reasoning)animask wrote:
0_o the replacement. I get the feeling DxS could be working with you. (If I'm right I'll give myself 2 points for guessing right.)
DxS could be the normal mafia goon and 0_o could be the roleblocker/mafia.bmin11 wrote:
Interesting. Why so? (as always, I want reasoning)animask wrote:
0_o the replacement. I get the feeling DxS could be working with you. (If I'm right I'll give myself 2 points for guessing right.)
Huh? *confused*animask wrote:
At first I suspected Quy, but if iMuffin was active, he would try to find out the cop/doctor.
He probably wanted to have a safe vote. By having no counter-claims, Mashley would be very likely to be a cop. If there WAS a cop and counter-claimed? Mashley would be confirmed mafia. Even if he wasn't, we could always just lynch the person to counter-claimed (no townie wants to take the risk of counter-claiming). The cop could have chosen to not claim even knowing that guy is a mafia and this is would be the best option at that moment (Mashley had the most vote and rust was sleeping). Sadly, that wasn't the case.animask wrote:
Originally, I also suspected Quy, because of how he voted for me and wanted me to claim. (He wanted someone to counter-claim as Cop in order to protect Mashley who he thought was cop).
I'm not sure how mafia would want to copy someones playing style. Any thoughts on why?animask wrote:
BUT, DxS seems to be focusing on accusations and sus(s). He isn't providing much to his accusations, because he is
trying to copy me in some ways. That might be why he wants to know my play style. He notices that I "beat around the bush when you're not directly quoting actions".
No.bmin11 wrote:
MOD: Does the Role Blocker gets informed if they role blocked successfully?
Thank youLadySuburu wrote:
No.bmin11 wrote:
MOD: Does the Role Blocker gets informed if they role blocked successfully?
animask wrote:
DxS probably thinks that I'm a threat in some way (to both mafia and townie) due to my reckless newbie playing, but he is using that to eliminate any suspicions on him.
I don't think DxS is on to you, animaskDxS wrote:
animask (Pulled a fast one on me now but hey, newbies learn you get the least of my suspicions)
And because of that, I brought it up here as a list (man, do I love listing)animask wrote:
NoHiTter asked if voting for lurkers was alright or not.
Suprisingly, some semi-lurkers actually answered.
http://www.mafiascum.net/wiki/index.php ... reviations0_o wrote:
Could someone tell me what sus(s) means? animask keeps saying it and I have never heard the term before..
I do have things to say but I'll do it tomorrow when I don't have things I should really be doing right now >_>
This is very true, but a lot of things in mafia are WIFOM. However without concrete evidence, I'm not going to vote on you just for the night kill.NoHItter wrote:
About the NK on Ph0x: It is WIFOM to say that someone is probably "scum" because the person who died suspected him.
This question will just add more WIFOM into the mix. Why did you bring it up? Define "help a lot"rust45 wrote:
If you were mafia, who would you kill on Night 1 if there wasn't a confirmed power role?
I already answered, and it was about killing people who were less active so that lurkers can be killed to move the game faster and since auxs often are less active.
The only reason you posted about me being suspicious was "bmin11 with his roleclaiming thing" on Day 1 and I think it's time for you to refresh your reasoning.Q wrote:
FoS on bmin11
You seem to be very concerned with the leader role. Do we actually need a leader in this game? From what I see from Ph0X, having a leader could be very dangerous, specailly if we have to be carefull with lynching now (we only have 5 townies left)DxS wrote:
(Could be a good game leader as replacing ph0x as he really got more informative in the end of day 1)
bmin11 wrote:
You seem to be very concerned with the leader role. Do we actually need a leader in this game? From what I see from Ph0X, having a leader could be very dangerous, specailly if we have to be carefull with lynching now (we only have 5 townies left)DxS wrote:
(Could be a good game leader as replacing ph0x as he really got more informative in the end of day 1)
Kinda a mix of both, my bro's back from college and I've been hanging out with him, and due to me not being as good at anaslyis I can't keep detailed opinions like Ph0x.DeathxShinigami wrote:
rust however just seems either busy in RL or really vague in mafia games unless that's how he rolls too...
So would you consider yourself a player who tries to get the job done quickly? (I'm not accusing you of anything but you seem to be trying to do that right now if you're a townie, as you're doing a great job of trying to scum hunt.)bmin11 wrote:
For rust45's questionI understand it's only a WIFOM, but I think it's worth a try (even risking the confusion). So, if I was a mafia, I would have went for Ph0X. As I mentioned earlier; "without a cop, only thing we have is someone with an eye and a wit" and Ph0X was definately the biggest threat to mafias even if Ph0X was FoSing them or not at the time being
Anyway, I'm kinda curious as to why Q Fos'd bmin, I don't quite see what bmin has done lately (if at all) is suspcious in my book.Quy and bmin are both mafia and Quy is accusing bmin, because of how much information hes putting in.
I don't get this part. You are saying, Q (the mafia) wants bmin11 (the other mafia) to be lynched because he's giving too much information to the townies??? This is the stupidest idea I've ever heard in this game. No mafia wants his partner to die unless they are having a betrayal issue (in that case, mafia would have told us who were the mafias already by now)animask wrote:
Quy and bmin are both mafia and Quy is accusing bmin, because of how much information hes putting in.
Jesus Christ animask. Do you know the definition of "assumption"? I said: (image below)animask wrote:
bmin doesn't seem to suspicious, but I will keep the thing about him thinking I'm Doctor in mind.
Thank you. Thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you0_o wrote:
For the record I thought animask was pseudo-claiming doctor with his initial comment as well.
Sorry for the lack of activity, I'll try and post more by the end of the day.
Yeahhh we could have avoided a lot of drama if you had just said that in the first place. The mafia already knew you were the doctor because of the successful roleblock so there wasn't any point in hiding it.animask wrote:
Fine, I'm the Doctor already. It's too hard for me to hide it anyways.
I'm having a hard time coming to logical conclusions atm so I'll just wait for some good posts.
Probably getting lynched tonight.
0_o wrote:
Yeahhh we could have avoided a lot of drama if you had just said that in the first place. The mafia already knew you were the doctor because of the successful roleblock so there wasn't any point in hiding it.
If you're telling the truth that is.
Sorry animask, but you've totally got me wrong on this one. I was merely DEFENDING myself. You were thinking I could be the mafia because I was thinking you were a doctor. And I told you not to role claim if mafia doesn't get informed. Another *facepalm* for me. I wasn't trying to prove you were a doctor and you should have known that when I said not to role claim if mafia doesn't get informed. Why do you think I was asking LS if mafia would get informed? Because I wanted to make sure this doctor is safe or not. Well, you just ruined my plan and we are good to say, we lost our doctor.LadySuburu wrote:
No.bmin11 wrote:
MOD: Does the Role Blocker gets informed if they role blocked successfully?
If I were to guess at this very moment, NoHItter and either Q or DxS.0_o wrote:
If you were to guess the mafia right now, who would it be?
Right now, we don't have a cop and if we mislynch tonight, we are likely to lose this game. We must lynch a mafia twice to win the game and we are only left with one mislynch chance. Which means, if we mislynch, we have to get those mafias twice in a roll. I want to make sure we can get everything out of thisrust45 wrote:
So would you consider yourself a player who tries to get the job done quickly? (I'm not accusing you of anything but you seem to be trying to do that right now if you're a townie, as you're doing a great job of trying to scum hunt.)
That is the questionrust45 wrote:
Anyway, I'm kinda curious as to why Q Fos'd bmin, I don't quite see what bmin has done lately (if at all) is suspcious in my book.
"It would be good if we lynched the roleblocker" isn't exactly a useful piece of insight.DeathxShinigami wrote:
Personal thoughts however.
Imagine if we do lynch a mafia member today.
Obviously whoever we lynch determines who dies during night as well.
If we lose a key vocal townie during night and we mislynch either way...it's pretty much over with animask already roleclaiming.
However, what happens if we find out that the person we lynched is the mafia roleblocker? This would actually put us in a better position to protect a town member during night (considering if animask really is doctor) and we'd actually gain some ground against mafia.
tl;dr
If we lynch a mafia roleblocker that means we can find out who the other mafia person easier on Day 3. But if we only capture a lynch on a generic mafia man someone will end up suiciding to even it out still with the mafia roleblocker in play. And lastly if we fail to lynch a mafia player consider it GG.
FoS on rust and Player Q for the time being.
FoS on rust and Player Q for the time being.Reasoning?
mafia? shouldn't that be everyone in general? remember that buddying thing as I said earlier bmin?bmin11 wrote:
Well, if you are not the doctor, thing will get interesting (I can already see mafias being confused)
Your suspicion on Mashley was based on your gut (as you stated) at the very beginning. No other reasons were purposed until animask also gave on opinion of "Mashley is trying too hard to fit in" + Ph0X's reversed FoS list (even I stated SOME COULD BE OUTDATED). It moved way too quickly and even that didn't mind DxS and you for voting the last two votes. Was it that convincing or supportive to your suspicion on Mashley? That not even a second thought on to wait for a defence?NoHItter wrote:
I've already explained that I suspected Mashley from the start.
Sounds like something you'd have to ask Lady, unless you're saying if the person doesn't post their HoS as a vote before they log off that's a no vote?bmin11 wrote:
I got an idea, lets say HoS (Hand of Suspicion) to be our vote. Just before we make our log out on the last moment, we will vote on whatever we HoSed on. It should work similar to vote with unvote rule
He just means that we simply keep an HOS on whoever we want to vote for, then officially vote at last minute so we don't have another Mashley incident where someone wants to change their mind.DeathxShinigami wrote:
Sounds like something you'd have to ask Lady, unless you're saying if the person doesn't post their HoS as a vote before they log off that's a no vote?bmin11 wrote:
I got an idea, lets say HoS (Hand of Suspicion) to be our vote. Just before we make our log out on the last moment, we will vote on whatever we HoSed on. It should work similar to vote with unvote rule
The person with no HoS would be saying "I'm not voting", but he can still vote technically. Of course, I'm not going to look that person as a reliable townie.DeathxShinigami wrote:
Sounds like something you'd have to ask Lady, unless you're saying if the person doesn't post their HoS as a vote before they log off that's a no vote?
Yeahhh we could have avoided a lot of drama if you had just said that in the first place. The mafia already knew you were the doctor because of the successful roleblock so there wasn't any point in hiding it.Also, you asked a question that everyone answered again.
If you're telling the truth that is.
Quy, you're using the same reasoning that got Mashley vote lynched on the first day (except for the contribution part).Quaraezha wrote:
Okay so about my suspicion on bmin11
(Not that's it's much of a big deal, but these are my 2 cents)
I believe bmin11 is a bit TOO active and trying TOO hard to fit in with townies.
Even though bmin11 has contributed a lot, I say these are just elements of trying to blend in.
(Although considering that this is bmin11's first game, this might probably be normal and bmin11's townie)
0_o, you should have realized that Ph0X and myself both voted for Mashley.Yes, but for different reasons. You said that you thought he was trying too hard to fit in, and Ph0X voted for him because Mashley had the most FoS's out of everyone (although when you actually look at everyone's explaination for their Mashley FoS's most of them are fairly mild. Ph0X himself didn't even state any strong suspicions about him)
Also, the mafia shouldn't know if their roleblock was succesful or not.The first thing I thought when you posted the "any doctors or cops" post is that you were a (noob) doctor looking for a cop to protect (I had a feeling there were others that thought this as well but didn't say anything in order to keep you hidden, though I could be wrong of course). I believe the mafia had the same idea, which is probably why they roleblocked you. If you hadn't have said anything about it the next day then there would still been have some uncertainty, but blatantly saying "there must be a roleblocker" completely tipped your hand as doctor is the only townie that would know there is a roleblocker.
DeathxShinigami wrote:
In response to animask, it was infighting about the past day 1 that you accused me on mostly when a lot of those accusations were cleared up. I am trying to stay relevant in my posts by continuing to say what I believe in but somehow you like to bring up the past with your reckless playing style which really disturbs me. However it isn't wise to just evade that and immediately accusing someone else without dealing with what others bring up against you first. (such as in my case) Gotta like the bigger shift in playing style since you claimed doctor however.
Firstly I'm pretty sure you aren't getting lynched today.animask wrote:
ty~ I think. I'm getting lynched anyways so I might as well contribute like crazy.
(or maybe I just raised my lynch rate...)
Also, how much time do we have left? Approx.?
I know they would also try to distance themselve to avoid alignment, but you suggested "mafia trying to lynch a mafia" not "mafia trying to distance eachother by putting suspicion" and I was a bit humoured by it. Well now I understand what you are trying to say, so there's no problem with this anymore (to me).animask wrote:
bmin11, you accused my idea of the mafia targeting another mafia to be stupid, when you forgot about how it is opposite
of the mafia buddy system. You also refused to believe it could be possible (I didn't claim you as mafia. I just made an example of a possible mafia pairing like that.)
I wasn't upset by your assumption, but how you ignored my respond TWICE and ASKED AGAIN. *ahem* It wouldn't have been a big deal (since most knew you were a doctor anyway), but ignoring me is a different matter. I'm going to remind you again (because I'm worried you might have missed it again), please read my posts.animask wrote:
You shouldn't have gotten too upset by my assumptions unless you were actually guilty
Everyone will vote on their last log in before the lynch. Voting means "I have made my decision and I'm not going to change my vote no matter how you defense". So ya, remember to vote if you can't log in before the lynch. We need eveyones voteanimask wrote:
I agree with the HoS pseudo-vote/unvote idea. Except, will we have to vote at the last minute or something similar?
And how did I not see this until now ;_; Sorry NoHItter for accusing you...NoHItter wrote:
Ahh crap. I forgot that since the votes are permanent, claiming when you are about to get lynched is useless.
Next day I suggest we really go through with a pseudo-voting system before actually voting to give leeway for any changes in suspicions
NoHItter wrote:
Ahh crap. I forgot that since the votes are permanent, claiming when you are about to get lynched is useless.
Next day I suggest we really go through with a pseudo-voting system before actually voting to give leeway for any changes in suspicions
Basically all of what I mentioned about you in my previous post. Stuff you did or said that I found incriminating.NoHItter wrote:
Incidentally rust, what are those "dirt" you mentioned?
When I read this post in context (both when it was posted and through my re-read), it seemed more like you were talking about claiming when one's about to get lynched. The post didn't seem to have to do with your vote at all.NoHItter wrote:
Ahh crap. I forgot that since the votes are permanent, claiming when you are about to get lynched is useless.
Next day I suggest we really go through with a pseudo-voting system before actually voting to give leeway for any changes in suspicions
If I feel less lazy after I get up tomorrow, or if I still feel this lazy but someone has posted the links to D1 and D2 start.rust45 wrote:
Mod: may you please update the OP to show the starts of the days, I remember this being in other games and it's useful for reference.
I knew I was forgetting something...bmin11 wrote:
I still haven't got any posts about suspicion against rust45
and animask, you didn't post anything about rust45 on your last suspicion list (or similar to) for some reason.
If I was mafia, I wouldn't even kill him, as when I'm mafia, I go for those who did participate as much as others, that way I get get someone who was slowing down the game, and possibly an aux role who was trying to go noticed. Ph0x did not meet my conditions for a night 1 kill.
There's more to mafia than winning IMO. As a townie there's not really anything you can do to make it fun (espcially in small games like this), but as a mafia, killing good players will make it less interesting. I dunno though, I haven't actually been mafia in a game so I don't know if doing this is really that great of an idea.animask wrote:
Why take out the bad player if you were mafia? That seems more like what a townie would think.
But if you don't play to win, its not really as fun. I could probably make the game fun on the townie side ( I think I have. ) Also, evenrust45 wrote:
There's more to mafia than winning IMO. As a townie there's not really anything you can do to make it fun (espcially in small games like this), but as a mafia, killing good players will make it less interesting. I dunno though, I haven't actually been mafia in a game so I don't know if doing this is really that great of an idea.animask wrote:
Why take out the bad player if you were mafia? That seems more like what a townie would think.
If you really are town I'm voting NoHItter then...cause he doesn't seem to be anymore willing than you to roleclaim. x:rust45 wrote:
I dunno though, I haven't actually been mafia in a game so I don't know if doing this is really that great of an idea.
Or the Roleblocker~NoHItter wrote:
FWIW, It's useless to roleclaim.
animask claimed Doctor.
Mashley was Cop.
All other possible roles now are either Scum or Vanilla Townies.
And speaking of which, I am a Vanilla Townie.
DxS voted rust45 by the way0_o wrote:
If he turns up town I'm going with DxS + rust for mafia.
Wait until there is a solid and general consensus. If by any chance, any one town submits a vote on a fellow townie, the mafia will just bandwagon to win.And wow, never thought of that. This is really dangerous indeed... we should come up with some opinion list or questionnaire so we can have everyone to post and not waste times like Day 2