bmin11 wrote:
Ph0X wrote:
[...] However, there are other ways a mafia can defend his buddy besides direct defense, including trying to vote for someone else or using extreme distancing to attract reverse attention (which gets really complicated and is hard to pull off ... but whatever).
....... which you are doing for animask...? I'll keep it on my note for now. Thanks Ph0X 
Damn! You've figured me out!
bmin11 wrote:
Another note to Ph0X:
I want to hear more about your suspicion against NoHitter, because to me, it just feels like he's following his gut (quite hasty as well). I just want to hear more from you (or just summarized post) since you are holding the strongest suspicion against NoHitter.
Yeah, I was gonna read him ISO, in addition to rust. Comments are below.
bmin11 wrote:
I'm not sure if animask is acting out this one. He may be trying to act as if "huh? was there two mafias?" and to convince us he's not a mafia (mafia should know there are two mafias if I didn't count the number wrong). I'm not going to judge this yet, since this will also be confirmed if we lynch iMuffin.
Remember: it was just a theory that iMuffin and animask are both mafia.
I wouldn't look much into animask's comment about the mafia count. It's WIFOM at this point.
Mashley wrote:
Such long post guys, how do you do than 
I assume you meant "that"? And, it's called re-reading the thread from day 1's beginning and posting your thoughts as you read. ;P
rust45 wrote:
I actually have a question for Ph0x now though. Why was I put on your "Suspicious" list for on "useless" comment that you have on me. Yet iMuffin is "Not-so-suspicious" even though he's barely been commenting?
Not remembering what you have done ≠ remembering you have done nothing. Also, posting "useless" comments (they weren't really useless; I just didn't gain anything from them) ≠ not posting at all. Separate can of worms.
Anyway, making a vote is still kind of hard for me. I will review my analysis and hopefully make a vote. Until then, here are ISO's of rust and NoHItter.
rust ISOviewtopic.php?f=68&t=55003&p=885536#p885536rust responds to DxS's mention of meta. He then voices his suspicions of animask and DxS.
viewtopic.php?f=68&t=55003&p=886319#p886319rust answers NoHItter's questionnaire. He then says he agrees with me on a minor detail.
viewtopic.php?f=68&t=55003&p=888181#p888181rust points out a flaw in DxS's logic, then says he'll post his opinions of each player later.
viewtopic.php?f=68&t=55003&p=888714#p888714rust posts the aforementioned opinions. As I said in my re-read analysis, I gained nothing from this post (besides opinions of rust).
viewtopic.php?f=68&t=55003&p=890130#p890130rust responds to my analysis, saying he doesn't feel he has been quiet. He then states he will revise his opinion list.
viewtopic.php?f=68&t=55003&p=890144#p890144rust's revised opinion list. Much more useful than before. I don't like his opinion of himself, though; rather fishy.
It strikes me as odd that rust seems to blindly have agreed to everything I (and I guess bmin) have said about animask, including the point of keeping him around. Keeping him around was more of a meta sympathy (because "I" know animask) than a gaming tactic. (A note: so far, I think animask has been helpful to the discussion overall, which is a big plus.)
The comments rust has made make me less annoyed by him, but they don't really bring anything brand new to the table (just slight modifications of existing opinions).
NoHItter ISOviewtopic.php?f=68&t=55003&p=885323#p885323NoHItter posts his questionnaire, shoots an FoS at animask for rolefishing (with elaboration), and shoots a minor FoS at DxS for tunneling then claiming to bluff. Nothing ticked off my radar here.
viewtopic.php?f=68&t=55003&p=886673#p886673NoHItter states the entent of his questionnaire, suggests we all "pseudo-vote", then votes (?) for Mashley based on (IMO) just gut feeling. The latter, of course, I didn't like; awful scummy vote.
viewtopic.php?f=68&t=55003&p=887894#p887894NoHItter asks for a prod of three players (two of which have been 'active enough' and didn't need to be prodded IMO), teaches animask how to play, questions bmin, then complains I am not being serious enough. Pretty much zilch on any radar I have seen (except the "boring" radar), as I explained before.
viewtopic.php?f=68&t=55003&p=888203#p888203NoHItter shots down DxS's argument against Mashley. Just shows that he knows how to play the game.
viewtopic.php?f=68&t=55003&p=888811#p888811NoHItter corrects me on game rules, then says he'll post his thoughts later.
viewtopic.php?f=68&t=55003&p=889668#p889668NoHItter posts his suspicion list. He continues to have a FoS for Mashley, unswayed by counterarguments to his argument by several other players. He also has a FoS on animask, not believing he is a "confused townie" as the current public opinion seems to be. (Funny that he has tunnel vision for Mashley almost, yet complained about DxS having tunnel vision (which I myself did not see) for bmin.)
I find it fishy that NoHItter equates "participating" with "being townish". NoHItter: don't make that mistake. ;P Mafia can be a big part of the discussion as well. (See Echo and SFG of older Mafia games.)
In this post, NoHItter also tells people who are about to be lynched to claim. Not sure what to make of that.