okay sorry guys I got home a little bit ago and just finished reading everything I promise I'll give more elaboration later but right now i feel absolutely due to irl reasons so i'll get back to you guys on this.
I have to leave soon. Will post opinions later.LadySuburu wrote:
17. If a player has not posted in 24 hours, I will prod them if requested to do so. That is, it's up to you to ask me to prod a certain player.
DeathxShinigami wrote:
If possible could we get an exact time on when Day 1 actually ends?
@host: When you mean sunday what timezone and actual time do you mean Day 1 will end?
Sorry if I missed it earlier
unexpected RL plans got in the way so won't be able to post as much as i'd like to for tomorrow.
On your post that you just posted, read what time it says it is. For me, I get Posted: Sat Jun 18, 2011 3:10 pm (3 minutes ago) .bmin11 wrote:
By the way, does anyone knows how to check the forum time? I'm still not clear with the dead line orz
Like I said. So, exactally 5 days from the time I posted my post. Since it's set to your timezone, you should know exactally when the deadline is.Quaraezha wrote:
I'm sorry but the forum time is set to whatever GMT Timezone we set it.
For me, it says "Posted: Sun Jun 19, 2011 4:10 am (6 minutes ago)" and I use GMT + 8
Wups; I was probably thinking of that PyP game.NoHItter wrote:
Re: ProddingI have to leave soon. Will post opinions later.LadySuburu wrote:
17. If a player has not posted in 24 hours, I will prod them if requested to do so. That is, it's up to you to ask me to prod a certain player.
Yes; see my analysis below.DeathxShinigami wrote:
@ Ph0x I'm understanding why you see animask as pro town but he's really an emotional player which makes it seem either a style base of playing like me or he's really new.
Any thoughts?
Mashley, what do you think of NoHItter's suspicions of you, exactly? I know you defended yourself already, but what of NoHItter's persistence?NoHItter wrote:
I think right now, I would prefer a lynch among either Mahsley or animask.
[...]
Mashley for that comment a while back that pinged me.
Haha! Kinda funny; I already saw that (see analysis below).bmin11 wrote:
First, I think animask is a townie now (ya I might have gotten influenced by Ph0X but whatever).
I didn't see that, and I agree with you. However, there are other ways a mafia can defend his buddy besides direct defense, including trying to vote for someone else or using extreme distancing to attract reverse attention (which gets really complicated and is hard to pull off ... but whatever).bmin11 wrote:
If he was a mafia, he wouldn't have driven himself this far behind, unless his mafia fellow was being afk.
Really? You look like a pretty decent player.bmin11 wrote:
This is my first game and I'm looking forward to it.
....... which you are doing for animask...? I'll keep it on my note for now. Thanks Ph0XPh0X wrote:
I didn't see that, and I agree with you. However, there are other ways a mafia can defend his buddy besides direct defense, including trying to vote for someone else or using extreme distancing to attract reverse attention (which gets really complicated and is hard to pull off ... but whatever).bmin11 wrote:
If he was a mafia, he wouldn't have driven himself this far behind, unless his mafia fellow was being afk.
awww thanks. I once played a very heavy role based mafia (on online real time) before. Some roles would be able to track the mafia if he targets the victim successfully, some will have one free shot of killing, some will simply not get lynched lol. It was a fast-paced game (only a brief 10min), because mafia would be spotted quite easily >_>...;; but a mafia with only cop/doc/mafia is my first time. Maybe this is why I'm relying to "lets just wait until cop does something". I'm getting the hang of this game now (and yes, no lynch wasn't a good idea I realized orz)Ph0X wrote:
Really? You look like a pretty decent player.
animask wrote:
bmin11 - Pairing up me and iMuffin as mafia. There are 2 mafia members(?)
there should be only two mafias according to this list unless LadySuburu is playing with us (and I am not amused in that case)LadySuburu wrote:
It consists of one of the following combinations of roles:
• 1 Mafia Goon, 1 Mafia Roleblocker, 1 Cop, 1 Doctor, 5 Vanilla Townies.
• 1 Mafia Goon, 1 Mafia Roleblocker, 7 Vanilla Townies.
• 2 Mafia Goons, 1 Cop, 6 Vanilla Townies.
• 2 Mafia Goons, 1 Doctor, 6 Vanilla Townies.
I honestly don't think I've been too quiet in this game (certainly not as much as other games) but I suppose I can't blame you for being suspicious of me for not giving too many opinions, I would probably do the same thing.Ph0X wrote:
rust
Actually, I don't know. Let me look...
Oh look, I have only one comment about him. And it's pretty much useless. That trips my alarm! FoS! May have to look at him in isolation. Will do that in a follow-up post.
There are two mafia members.bmin11 wrote:
there should be only two mafias according to this list unless LadySuburu is playing with us (and I am not amused in that case)
Damn! You've figured me out!bmin11 wrote:
....... which you are doing for animask...? I'll keep it on my note for now. Thanks Ph0XPh0X wrote:
[...] However, there are other ways a mafia can defend his buddy besides direct defense, including trying to vote for someone else or using extreme distancing to attract reverse attention (which gets really complicated and is hard to pull off ... but whatever).
Yeah, I was gonna read him ISO, in addition to rust. Comments are below.bmin11 wrote:
Another note to Ph0X:
I want to hear more about your suspicion against NoHitter, because to me, it just feels like he's following his gut (quite hasty as well). I just want to hear more from you (or just summarized post) since you are holding the strongest suspicion against NoHitter.
Remember: it was just a theory that iMuffin and animask are both mafia.bmin11 wrote:
I'm not sure if animask is acting out this one. He may be trying to act as if "huh? was there two mafias?" and to convince us he's not a mafia (mafia should know there are two mafias if I didn't count the number wrong). I'm not going to judge this yet, since this will also be confirmed if we lynch iMuffin.
I assume you meant "that"? And, it's called re-reading the thread from day 1's beginning and posting your thoughts as you read. ;PMashley wrote:
Such long post guys, how do you do than
Not remembering what you have done ≠ remembering you have done nothing. Also, posting "useless" comments (they weren't really useless; I just didn't gain anything from them) ≠ not posting at all. Separate can of worms.rust45 wrote:
I actually have a question for Ph0x now though. Why was I put on your "Suspicious" list for on "useless" comment that you have on me. Yet iMuffin is "Not-so-suspicious" even though he's barely been commenting?
This was correct, but animask brings up a good point about Mashley I didn't fully see before now. I'll add him to my FoS list (at the top). If anyone wants, I can elaborate.bmin11 wrote:
Ph0X: NoHitter, rust45
That was why at that moment, I pseudo-voted. Your gut isn't supposed to be a huge basis for a permanent vote. (Basically what I did was like a pressure vote except since we can't change votes...)Ph0x wrote:
NoHItter states the entent of his questionnaire, suggests we all "pseudo-vote", then votes (?) for Mashley based on (IMO) just gut feeling. The latter, of course, I didn't like; awful scummy vote.
Mashley's explanation for his suspicious post, didn't cut it. Doing something suspicious then saying, "Opps. I didn't mean that. It was supposed to be something like this." is not quite a valid excuse. If he EBWOP'd (edit by way of post) and made the correction right after he posted, that would be more acceptable.Ph0x wrote:
NoHItter posts his suspicion list. He continues to have a FoS for Mashley, unswayed by counterarguments to his argument by several other players. He also has a FoS on animask, not believing he is a "confused townie" as the current public opinion seems to be. (Funny that he has tunnel vision for Mashley almost, yet complained about DxS having tunnel vision (which I myself did not see) for bmin.)
[Possible WIFOM ahead] Yes I admit that mafia can be a part of the discussion, but from my experience, mafia tend to be less active to attarct less attention. Maybe I'm wrong with activeness as a town tell though.Ph0x wrote:
I find it fishy that NoHItter equates "participating" with "being townish". NoHItter: don't make that mistake. ;P Mafia can be a big part of the discussion as well. (See Echo and SFG of older Mafia games.)
Isn't that standard operating procedure for the lynchee? Well it is for MafiaScum.Ph0x wrote:
In this post, NoHItter also tells people who are about to be lynched to claim. Not sure what to make of that.
Wow. Now I know why my gut has been telling me about Mashley from the start. You're right. He has been trying to "fit in". No wonder I felt it odd.animask wrote:
Mashely seems to be following majority opinions for some reason. He is trying to fit in too well.
Yeah; we know.NoHItter wrote:
Regarding the "questionnaire":
It's RQS or Random Questioning Stage. Basically it's a way of starting off discussion.
Your "pseudo-vote" looked like an actual vote, because it was bolded. Please make the distinction next time.NoHItter wrote:
That was why at that moment, I pseudo-voted. Your gut isn't supposed to be a huge basis for a permanent vote. (Basically what I did was like a pressure vote except since we can't change votes...)Ph0x wrote:
NoHItter states the entent of his questionnaire, suggests we all "pseudo-vote", then votes (?) for Mashley based on (IMO) just gut feeling. The latter, of course, I didn't like; awful scummy vote.
He wasn't EBWOP'ing; he wasn't trying to cover up what he said at all. You misinterpreted what he said, and he re-explained his intent of the post. Of course, maybe I'm wrong, but I highly doubt that here.NoHItter wrote:
Mashley's explanation for his suspicious post, didn't cut it. Doing something suspicious then saying, "Opps. I didn't mean that. It was supposed to be something like this." is not quite a valid excuse. If he EBWOP'd (edit by way of post) and made the correction right after he posted, that would be more acceptable.Ph0x wrote:
NoHItter posts his suspicion list. He continues to have a FoS for Mashley, unswayed by counterarguments to his argument by several other players. He also has a FoS on animask, not believing he is a "confused townie" as the current public opinion seems to be. (Funny that he has tunnel vision for Mashley almost, yet complained about DxS having tunnel vision (which I myself did not see) for bmin.)
Yeah, but normally you don't need to tell people that. They can claim if they believe it'll help their team win. You're just setting people up for a "you didn't claim; you're clearly scum" argument.NoHItter wrote:
Isn't that standard operating procedure for the lynchee? Well it is for MafiaScum.Ph0x wrote:
In this post, NoHItter also tells people who are about to be lynched to claim. Not sure what to make of that.
Nope. An autolynch occurs on majority. Before then, in the "about to get lynched" stage (usually L-1 or L-2), a lynch can still occur on a different player.NoHItter wrote:
Ahh crap. I forgot that since the votes are permanent, claiming when you are about to get lynched is useless.
Nothing wrong with bmin posting a vote count; I did it in a few games.DeathxShinigami wrote:
Where's our host with updated vote counts?
Why are you the host bmin?
Sucks that you won't be able to be here for the last stretch.bmin11 wrote:
My internet dead line is coming... within 6 minutes ;_;
I hope everything will turn out good *cross finger*. Wish us luck!
Yeah. Is that really that unbelievable? ;Panimask wrote:
Did I actually bring up something smart?
Not sure what you mean. Mashley would be lynched then.DeathxShinigami wrote:
Still any thoughts on a 4/4 split? I know it's so situational but you never know.
Yeah? Unless animask gets five votes, Mashley will be lynched. Read the rules:DeathxShinigami wrote:
I meant with imuffin still MIA and the remaining non voters voting for animask.
Kinda hoped imuffin would've been around more for Day 1 since this was a critical day in general.
It'd create a 4/4 split unless you mean mashley gets lynched based on the times people voted.
Rules wrote:
In the event of a draw, the player who had the most votes before being tied will be lynched.
Well, it's either Mashley or animask at this point. Unless iMuffin pops up in the next few hours, it's gonna be Mashley.rust45 wrote:
I'm not getting that gut feeling that other people are having for Mashley, and I still think animask is a confused townie, so I think I may just hold back my vote for today unless something convinces me to vote for one of them. I could vote for someone else but I figure it'd probably be useless.
Well on the bright side...bmin11 wrote:
Ok, who the hell's the doctor here? Not saving Ph0X?
This is just fantastic.... we lost a cop and the master brain of this game D:
bmin11 (That vote totaling and list of FoS's led me to think Mashley was mafia but I got confused when you went for animask and phox went for mashley intended split voting? so you can lure other players like me?)tbh I didn't saw it coming. I never thought of reversing my list and the outcomes of it ;_;....
Hmm? Mashley claimed cop 4 hours after rust's last post. I don't see any evidence that rust was aware of the cop claim... unless I'm missing something.bmin11 wrote:
And after reading DxS's post and the thread itself, Mashley did claimed cop before rust45 to post. This means, rust45 KNEW Mashley could have been a cop.
bmin11, you assumed I was the Doctor pretty quickly. You're using logic or you have been thinking that all this time.
I just assumed that someone would protect Ph0X (which you stated earlier) since he was the most useful. Anyone else could
have been the Doctor.
You said "HAS to be one" and I thought you were pretty clear with the role blocker thing. I guess you were just assuming ._.;; I was also wating for a counter-claim, but no one yet have done it (maybe it's NoHitter or Q? They are sleeping at the moment so that could be why they couldn't role claim).animask wrote:
Mafia Roleblocker. There has to be one.
*puff* great, I was day dreaming I guess orz..... Face palm for me and I unFoS rust450_o wrote:
Hmm? Mashley claimed cop 4 hours after rust's last post. I don't see any evidence that rust was aware of the cop claim... unless I'm missing something.bmin11 wrote:
And after reading DxS's post and the thread itself, Mashley did claimed cop before rust45 to post. This means, rust45 KNEW Mashley could have been a cop.
EDIT: I THINK rust is in the same timezone I am, so that would mean that Mashley claimed at 5:47 AM, and the game ended 10:18 AM, Sunday morning. I'd say there's a pretty good chance he was asleep throughout that time period.
I'm actually 2 hours behind you, but your point is still true, I was asleep. When I looked through the thread when I woke up I told myself I would've voted on animask given the chance. Although I still think animask is a townie I would've done it for the obvious reasons.0_o wrote:
Hmm? Mashley claimed cop 4 hours after rust's last post. I don't see any evidence that rust was aware of the cop claim... unless I'm missing something.bmin11 wrote:
And after reading DxS's post and the thread itself, Mashley did claimed cop before rust45 to post. This means, rust45 KNEW Mashley could have been a cop.
EDIT: I THINK rust is in the same timezone I am, so that would mean that Mashley claimed at 5:47 AM, and the game ended 10:18 AM, Sunday morning. I'd say there's a pretty good chance he was asleep throughout that time period.
Don't we participate to "find out the mafia"? It would be better for the mafia if no one talks and gets no lynch (or try to bandwagon someone)rust45 wrote:
I think it's a better idea to look at who would kill Ph0x, and why. Looking at his last suspicious list, NoHitter and I are on there. If I was mafia, I wouldn't even kill him, as when I'm mafia, I go for those who did participate as much as others, that way I get get someone who was slowing down the game, and possibly an aux role who was trying to go noticed. Ph0x did not meet my conditions for a night 1 kill.
Actually it's possible that they knew there wasn't a doctor. If there are only 2 goons (ie. no roleblocker) then they would have known that there's only one aux role in the game (who just died).bmin11 wrote:
Ph0X's death is a huge gain for mafia and they took the risk of being blocked by the doctor.
I'll be as active as I can, but I don't want to have the expectation of being a Ph0X replacement here. I'll pick out things as I see them, but don't expect me to do constant post-by-post analyses of the entire game. Not my style~DeathxShinigami wrote:
0_o (I know you're willing to take on ph0x's role of looking at all the data and helping us get a general idea of the situation [...]
/me Looks through the role list0_o wrote:
Actually it's possible that they know there isn't a doctor. If there are only 2 goons (ie. no roleblocker) then they would know that there's only one aux role in the game (who just died).bmin11 wrote:
Ph0X's death is a huge gain for mafia and they took the risk of being blocked by the doctor.
• 2 Mafia Goons, 1 Cop, 6 Vanilla Townies.oh wow, you are right. If there are two goons, only one aux role is give to townies. Thanks
• 2 Mafia Goons, 1 Doctor, 6 Vanilla Townies.
I'm merely posting anything that comes into my head right now. Theories, I guess and on day 1, I couldn't really add and infoes because a lot of times were spent around animask, DxS (you), Mashley, and Ph0X talking eachother.DxS wrote:
Hmm...bmin, is it just me or are you posting a lot just to add in more info? or just really chatty now that ph0x is gone?
You awake to see Ph0X nailed to the wall, with paper from the ballots stuffed in his mouth. They all read "Ph0X".Just realized. Dats sexy.
Because if they DO get informed and they got a positive from it, our doctor is no better then a townie. We can at least have a confirmed townie by asking the doctor to claim it's role if the doctor tried to protect Ph0X and failed (failed will give mafia a positive block result, thus they know who's the doctor).animask wrote:
bmin11, asking if roleblocker gets informed. Suspicious, but seems innocent.
As I answered before, I was assuming you were the doctor since you said...animask wrote:
He's right to assume that I'm not mafia, but as a Doctor, no.
and only the doctor (or the role blocker IF they gets informed) would be sure of this. You sounded pretty sure of it when you said "has to be one". If I'm taking your posts to directly and not seeing your hidden thoughts (ex: "I was only assuming even though I said HAS to"), please make it clear for me ._.;;animask wrote:
Mafia Roleblocker. There has to be one.
How else would I play? So yeah, this is how I play, I guess.DeathxShinigami wrote:
Can you at least tell me straight up if this is how you play? Cause it's really annoying me to animask.
Cool or chill?animask wrote:
How else would I play? So yeah, this is how I play, I guess.DeathxShinigami wrote:
Can you at least tell me straight up if this is how you play? Cause it's really annoying me to animask.
Interesting. Why so? (as always, I want reasoning)animask wrote:
0_o the replacement. I get the feeling DxS could be working with you. (If I'm right I'll give myself 2 points for guessing right.)
DxS could be the normal mafia goon and 0_o could be the roleblocker/mafia.bmin11 wrote:
Interesting. Why so? (as always, I want reasoning)animask wrote:
0_o the replacement. I get the feeling DxS could be working with you. (If I'm right I'll give myself 2 points for guessing right.)
Huh? *confused*animask wrote:
At first I suspected Quy, but if iMuffin was active, he would try to find out the cop/doctor.
He probably wanted to have a safe vote. By having no counter-claims, Mashley would be very likely to be a cop. If there WAS a cop and counter-claimed? Mashley would be confirmed mafia. Even if he wasn't, we could always just lynch the person to counter-claimed (no townie wants to take the risk of counter-claiming). The cop could have chosen to not claim even knowing that guy is a mafia and this is would be the best option at that moment (Mashley had the most vote and rust was sleeping). Sadly, that wasn't the case.animask wrote:
Originally, I also suspected Quy, because of how he voted for me and wanted me to claim. (He wanted someone to counter-claim as Cop in order to protect Mashley who he thought was cop).
I'm not sure how mafia would want to copy someones playing style. Any thoughts on why?animask wrote:
BUT, DxS seems to be focusing on accusations and sus(s). He isn't providing much to his accusations, because he is
trying to copy me in some ways. That might be why he wants to know my play style. He notices that I "beat around the bush when you're not directly quoting actions".
No.bmin11 wrote:
MOD: Does the Role Blocker gets informed if they role blocked successfully?
Thank youLadySuburu wrote:
No.bmin11 wrote:
MOD: Does the Role Blocker gets informed if they role blocked successfully?
animask wrote:
DxS probably thinks that I'm a threat in some way (to both mafia and townie) due to my reckless newbie playing, but he is using that to eliminate any suspicions on him.
I don't think DxS is on to you, animaskDxS wrote:
animask (Pulled a fast one on me now but hey, newbies learn you get the least of my suspicions)